Canan ÇETİN

15961

Orta Asya Göç Akımı'na Yerçekimi Kanunu Yaklaşımı

Afghanistan, Tacikistan, Azerbaycan, Özbekistan ve Pakistan)Türkiye ve Rusya’yı koridor ülke olarak kullanılarak Avrupa’ya giden uluslararası göç stoğunu istatistiksel olarak Newton’un Yerçekimi Kanunu modelini uluslararası göçe uygulamayı hedeflemektedir. Çalışma,uluslararası göçü 1990 ve 2013 yılları arasındaki onar yıllık periodlar şeklinde incelemektedir. Bu çalışmanın temel amacı tarihi olayları açıklamak ya da Orta Asya devletleriyle Türkiye ve Rusyanın ikili ilişkilerini incelemek değildir. Çalışmanın amacı, Yer Çekimi Kanunun önerdiği değişkenlere ek olarak eklenmiş kukla değişkenlerle Orta Asya’dan Avrupa’ya giden göçe yön veren parametreleri açıklamaktır. Çalışmanın sonuçları, varılan ülkenin nüfusu ve toprak genişliği, ülkeler arasındaki uzaklık, Gayrisafi Milli hasılalar arasındaki farklılık, ve tarihsel ve kültürel olarak Sovyetler Birliğine olan bağlılığın uluslararası göç stoğuna Türkiye ve Rusya’nın seçiliminde yön verdiği ve etkilediğini ortaya çıkarmaktadır. Çalışma yerçekimi kanunu uluslarası göç üzerinden bu bölgeye ilk kez uygulaması bakımından özgündür.
Anahtar Kelimeler:

Yerçekimi Kanunu, Orta Asya, Türkiye, Rusya, Koridor Ülke, Göç

Gravity Approach Applied to Central Asian Migration Flow

This essay attempts to discuss empirical results on determinants of international migration stock from the perspective of destination countries, Turkey and Russia, and applies the gravity model of migration to statistically test the migration stock from Central Asia (Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Turkmenistan, Afghanistan Tajikistan, Azerbaijan, Uzbekistan and Pakistan) for ten years periods between 1990 and 2013. This paper does not aim to describe historical events or bilateral relations between the Central Asian States with Turkey and Russia. The findings of the study unveil that area and population of the destination country, the distance between countries, difference in GDP, historical and cultural ties with the Soviet Union influence migration stock in Turkey and Russia.
Keywords:

Gravity Approach, Central Asia, Turkey, Russia, Corridor Country, Migration,

PDF

___

  • BIBLIOGRAPHY
  • AGRESTI, A. and Finlay, B. (2009). Statistical methods for the social sci¬ences. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson Prentice Hall.
  • AKINER, S. and Ehteshami, A. (1995). From the Gulf to Central Asia: Players in the New Great Game.International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-), 71(4), p.832.
  • ARAS, O. and Suleymanov, E. (n.d.). Azerbaycan’ın Bağımsızlığının 20 Yılında: Azerbaycan-Türkiye Ekonomik İlişkileri Ve Perspektifi (Econom¬ic Relations and Perspective between Azerbaijan and Turkey: In 20 Years of Azerbaijan’s Independence). SSRN Electronic Journal.(2012)
  • BAGASAO, I. (2004). Migration and development: the Philippine experi¬ence. Small Enterprise Development, 15(1), pp.62-67.
  • BRUN, J. (2005). Has Distance Died? Evidence from a Panel Gravity Model. The World Bank Economic Review, 19(1), pp.99-120.
  • BRYMAN,Alan. 2012. Social Research Methods. Oxford: Oxford Univer¬sity Press
  • BURGER, M., van Oort, F. and Linders, G. (2009). On the Specification of the Gravity Model of Trade: Zeros, Excess Zeros and Zero-inflated Estima¬tion. Spatial Economic Analysis, 4(2), pp.167-190.
  • BUTLER, A. (2008). Distance Still Matters: Evidence from Municipal Bond Underwriting. Rev. Financ. Stud., 21(2), pp.763-784.
  • COPELAND, D. (1996). Economic Interdependence and War: A Theory of Trade Expectations. International Security, 20(4), p.5.
  • EMERSON, M. and Noutcheva, G. (2004). Europeanisation as a gravity model of democratisation. Brussels: Centre for European Policy Studies.
  • HIRO, D. (2011). Inside Central Asia: A Political and Cultural History of Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyz stan, Tajikistan, Turkey, and Iran. Abrams.
  • HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH, (2015). World Report 2015: Kazakhstan. [on¬line] Available at: https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2015/country-chap¬ters/kazakhstan [Accessed 7 Jan. 2016].
  • HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH, (2015). World Report 2015: Kyrgyzstan. [on¬line] Available at: https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2015/country-chap¬ters/kyrgyzstan [Accessed 7 Jan. 2016].
  • HUNTINGTON, S. (1996). The clash of civilizations and the remaking of world order. New York: Simon & Schuster.
  • JUSS, S. (2007). International migration and global justice. Aldershot: Ashgate.
  • KAPLAN, R. (2000). The coming anarchy. New York: Random House.
  • KAREMERA, D., Oguledo, V. and Davis, B. (2000). A gravity model analysis of international migration to North America. Applied Economics, 32(13), pp.1745-1755.
  • KHADAROO, J. and Seetanah, B. (2008). The role of transport infra¬structure in international tourism development: A gravity model approach. Tourism Management, 29(5), pp.831-840.
  • KING, R. (2011). Geography and Migration Studies: Retrospect and Pros¬pect. Population, Space and Place, 18(2), pp.134-153.
  • KOSER, K. (2007). International migration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • KRUGMAN, P. (2009). The Increasing Returns Revolution in Trade and Geography. American Economic Review, 99(3), pp.561-571.
  • KYMLICKA, W. (1995). The Rights of minority cultures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • LARUELLE, M. (2008). Russia’s Central Asia Policy and the Role of Rus¬sian Nationalism. Silk Road Studies Program.
  • LEWER, J. and Van den Berg, H. (2008). A gravity model of immigration. Economics Letters, 99(1), pp.164-167.
  • MACKINNON, D., Lockwood, C., Hoffman, J., West, S. and Sheets, V. (2002). A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 7(1), pp.83-104.
  • MAZUR, R. (2004). Realization or Deprivation of the Right to Develop¬ment Under Globalization? Debt, Structural Adjustment, and Poverty Re¬duction Programs. GeoJournal, 60(1), pp.61-71.
  • MCCANN, P. (2005). Transport costs and new economic geography. Jour¬nal of Economic Geography, 5(3), pp.305-318.
  • MELITZ, J. (2007). North, South and distance in the gravity model. Euro¬pean Economic Review, 51(4), pp.971-991.
  • MOORADIAN, M. (1998). The OSCE: Neutral and impartial in the Kara¬bakh conflict?. Helsinki Monitor, 9(2), pp.5-17.
  • OGULEDO, V. and Macphee, C. (1994). Gravity models: a reformulation and an application to discriminatory trade arrangements. Applied Econom¬ics, 26(2), pp.107-120.
  • OMELICHEVA, M. (2013). Russian foreign policy: A quest for great pow¬er status in a multipolar world. Foreign Policy in Comparative Perspective: Domestic and International Influence on State Behavior. London: SAGE, 94-117.
  • ORTEGA, F. and Peri, G. (2013). The effect of income and immigration policies on international migration. Migration Studies, 1(1), pp.47-74.
  • PÂNZARU, C. (2013). The Determinants of International Migration. A Panel Data Analysis. Journal of Politics and Law, 6(1).
  • PEOPLEMOV.in, (2016). peoplemovin - A visualization of migration flows. [online] Available at: http://peoplemov.in/#t_RU [Accessed 9 Jan. 2016].
  • PETROVICH-BELKIN, O. K., Eremin, A. A., & Bokeriya, S. A. (2019). THE DECLINE OF RUSSIA’S INFLUENCE IN THE POST-SOVI¬ET REGION AND THE REASONS BEHIND IT. Сравнительная политика, 10(3).
  • PRESTON, S. (2007). The changing relation between mortality and level of economic development. International Journal of Epidemiology, 36(3), pp.484-490.
  • PUAR, J. (2002). Monster, Terrorist, Fag: The War on Terrorism and the Production of Docile Patriots.Social Text, 20(3 72), pp.117-148.
  • REISMAN, W. (1990). Sovereignty and Human Rights in Contemporary International Law. The American Journal of International Law, 84(4), p.866.
  • REITZ, J., Hatton, T. and Williamson, J. (1999). The Age of Mass Migra¬tion: Causes and Economic Impact. International Migration Review, 33(3), p.766.
  • SWANSTON, A., Swanston, M., & Mapping, R. L. (2007). Mapping His¬tory Battles and Campaigns. Cartographica.
  • TAYLOR, J. (1987). Undocumented Mexico-U.S. Migration and the Re¬turns to Households in Rural Mexico. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 69(3), p.626.
  • TONRY, M. (1997). Ethnicity, Crime, and Immigration. Crime and Justice, 21, pp.1-29.
  • UBAIDULLOEV, Z. (2015). The Russian-Soviet legacies in reshaping the national territories in Central Asia: A catastrophic case of Tajikistan. Journal of Eurasian Studies, 6(1), 79-87.
  • UN, (2011). Statistics on International Migration A Practical Guide for Countries of Eastern EUROPE AND CENTRAL ASIA. [online] Available at: http://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/stats/publications/Internation-al_Migration_Practical_Guide_ENG.pdf [Accessed 29 Dec. 2015].
  • UNSTATS.un.org, (2015). United Nations Statistics Division - Demo¬graphic and Social Statistics. [online] Available at: http://unstats.un.org/ unsd/Demographic/sconcerns/migration/default.htm [Accessed 29 Dec. 2015].
  • VASTA, E. (2007). From ethnic minorities to ethnic majority policy: Mul¬ticulturalism and the shift to assimilationism in the Netherlands. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 30(5), pp.713-740.
  • WHEELER, T. (2013). Turkey’s role and interests in Central Asia. Safer¬world Briefing, 3.
Göç Araştırmaları Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 2149-5548
  • Başlangıç: 2015
  • Yayıncı: Göç İdaresi Genel Müdürlüğü
Arşiv
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Suriyeli Sığınmacıların Türk Emek Piyasasına Katılım Süreçlerinin Toplumsal Boyutları

Şeyda KOCA

Uluslaraşırı Köprüler Olarak Memleket Dernekleri: Avusturya'daki Türk Kültürel Birliğinin Vaka Analizi

Ozan YILMAZ

Orta Asya Göç Akımı'na Yerçekimi Kanunu Yaklaşımı

Canan ÇETİN

Türkiye’de Oluşturulan Yeni Uyum Politikası

Ömer TAŞÇI, Abdullah KARA

Suriye Krizi Hakkında Suriyelilerin Düşünceleri: Aktörler, Sorumlular ve Çözüm Yolları

Hakan SAMUR, Murat CİHANGİR