Producers’ Behaviours and Their Information Source in Pesticide Use

Producer’s behaviour is critical factor for human health and safe environment. This study aims to investigate the effects of tomato producers ’behaviours in pesticide use and the source of information they use as the basis for this use. Simple random sampling method was used to estimate the sample size and 121 producers were interviewed in Aksu Township (Antalya-Turkey) to collect data for analyses. Analyses show producers’ pesticide use to be correlated to their socio-economic background such as level of education and general knowledge. Age and education level affect the number of pesticide applications. We found that not using protective equipment, pesticide containers being left randomly in the environment, and some containers being used for other purposes. As well, producers expressed thoughts that these behaviors did not result in any contamination and did not affect human health. This study determines the behaviours of the producers that negatively affect human and environmental health. So, it will provide data for the policy- decision makers and extension programs (training activities) to change farmers’ harmful behaviours.

___

  • Antalya Directorate of Provincial Food Agriculture and Livestock (2015). Farmer registration system data.
  • Avcı MB (2007). Evaluation of herbicide using on wheat, barley, maize and rice farming in the Thrace region for sustainable agriculture. Trakya University, Institute of Science and Technology, Published master thesis.
  • Bulut H ve Tamer A (1996). Pestisit kullanımının azaltılması ile ilgili politika ve stratejiler. II. Ulusal Zirai Mücadele Ilaçları Sempozyumu, TC Tarım ve Köyisleri Bakanlığı Tarımsal Arastırmalar Genel Müdürlüğü Koruma ve Kontrol Genel Müdürlüğü, Ankara, 18-42.
  • Central Bank of Turkey (2017). http://www.tcmb.gov.tr/kurlar/201512/21122015.xml (Access date: 09.02.2018).
  • Chena R Huanga J and Qiaoc F (2013). Farmers' knowledge on pest management and pesticide use in Bt cotton production in china, China Economic Review, 27: 15–24.
  • De A Bose R Kumar A and Mozumdar S (2013). Chapter; Worldwide Pesticide Use, Book title “Targeted Delivery of Pesticides Using Biodegradable Polymeric Nanoparticles”. 5-6, Print ISBN: 978-81-322-1688-9.
  • Delcoura I Spanoghea P and Uyttendaeleb M (2015). Literature review: Impact of climate change on pesticide use, Food Research International, 68: 7–15.
  • Demircan V ve Aktas AR (2004). Isparta İli Kiraz Üretiminde Tarımsal ilaç Kullanım Düzeyi ve Üretici Eğilimlerinin Belirlenmesi. Tarım Ekonomisi Derneği Dergisi, 9: 51-65.
  • Ecobichon DJ (2001). Pesticide use in developing countries, Toxicology, 160(1–3): 27–33.
  • Engindeniz S and Cosar GO (2013). An economic comparison of pesticide applications for processing and table tomatoes: A case study for Turkey. Journal of Plant Protection Research, 53(3): 230-237.
  • Engindeniz S Yilmaz I Durmusoglu E Yagmur B Eltez RZ Demirtas B Engindeniz D Tatarhan AH (2010). Comparative input analysis of greenhouse vegetables, Ekoloji, 19(74): 122-130.
  • FAO (2015). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. http://www.fao.org (Data Access: 21.03.2015).
  • FAOSTAT (2020). http://faostat.fao.org/beta/en/#data/QC (Access Date: 05.05.2020).
  • Hou L Andreotti G Baccarelli AA Savage S Hoppin JA Sandler DP Barker J Zhu ZZ Hoxha M Dioni L Zhang X Koutros S Freeman LEB and Alavanja MC (2013). Lifetime pesticide use and telomere shortening among male pesticide applicators in the agricultural health study. Environmental Health Perspectives, Research Triangle Park 121(8): 919.
  • Karaturhan B Boyacı M and Yaşarakıncı N (2005). Extension problems of integrated pest management in Ege Region: Case of greenhouse vegetable, Ege University Faculty of Agriculture Journal, 42(2): 155-166, ISSN: 1018-8851.
  • Karlsson S (2004). Institutionalized knowledge challenges in pesticide governance: The end of knowledge and beginning of values in governing globalized environmental issues. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 4: 195–213.
  • Kariathi V Kassim N and Kimanya M (2016). Pesticide exposure from fresh tomatoes and its relationship with pesticide application practices in Meru district. Food and Agriculture, 2: 1196808.
  • Khana M Mahmooda HZ and Damalasb CA (2015). Pesticide use and risk perceptions among farmers in the cotton belt of Punjab, Pakistan. Crop Protection, 67: 184–190.
  • Koutros S Freeman LBE Lubin JH Heltshe SL Andreotti G Barry KH DellaValle CT Hoppin JA Sandler DP Lynch C F Blair A and Alavanja MCR (2013). Risk of total and aggressive prostate cancer and pesticide use in the agricultural health study, American Journal Epidemiol, 177(1): 59-74.
  • Lebov JF Engel LS Richardson D Hogan SL Hoppin JA and Sandler DP (2015). Pesticide use and risk of end-stage renal disease among licensed pesticide applicators in the agricultural health study, Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 73: 3-12.
  • Lechenet M Dessaint F Py G Makowski D and Munier-Jolain N (2017). Reducing pesticide use while preserving crop productivity and profitability on arable farm. Nature Plants, 3, 17008 doi:10.1038/nplants.2017.8.
  • Mengistie BT Mol APJ and Oosterveer P (2017). Pesticide use practices among smallholder vegetable farmers in Ethiopian Central Rift Valley, Environment, Development and Sustainability. 19(1): 301–324.
  • Ozkan B Akçaoz HV Karaman S ve Tascioglu Y (2002). Antalya İlinde Serada Sebze Üretiminde Pestisit Kullanımının Ekonomik Açıdan Değerlendirilmesi. Bahçe Dergisi, 31:9-16.
  • Peker AE (2012). The Analysis of pesticide use in tomato production in Konya province in terms of environmental sensitivity perspective, Igdır Univ. J. Inst. Sci. and Tech. 2(1): 47-54.
  • Pimentel D Acquay H Biltonen M Rice P Silva M Nelson J Lipner V Giordano S Horowitz A and D'Amore M (1992). Environmental and economic costs of pesticide use. BioScience, 42(10): 750-760.
  • Ríos-González A Jansen K and Sánchez-Pérez HJ (2013). Pesticide risk perceptions and the differences between farmers and extensionists: Towards a knowledge-in-context model. Environmental Research, 124: 43–53.
  • Skevasa T Stefanoub SE and Lansinkc AO (2014). Pesticide use, environmental spillovers and efficiency: A DEA risk-adjusted efficiency approach applied to Dutch arable farming. European Journal of Operational Research, 237(2): 658–664.
  • Sumbuloglu V ve Sumbuloglu K (2005). Klinik ve Saha Arastırmalarında Örnekleme Yöntemleri ve Örneklem Büyüklüğü, Book, İstanbul.
  • Starling AP Umbach DM Kamel F Long S Sandler DP and Hoppin JA (2014). Pesticide use and incident diabetes among wives of farmers in the agricultural health study. Occup Environ Med, Doi: 10.1136/oemed-2013-101659.
  • TRADE MAP (2019). https://www.trademap.org/Index.aspx, (Access Date: 25.07.2019).
  • TUIK (2019). www.tuik.gov.tr (Access Date: 25.07.2019).
  • Uskun E (2015). Knowledge and behaviour of agricultural workers about the plant protection products, Turkish Bulletin of Hygiene and Experimental Biology/Türk Hijyen ve Deneysel Biyoloji, 72(3): 41-254.