___

• Anduiza, E., Cristancho, C. ve Sabucedo, J. (2011). The political protest of the outraged in Spain: what’s new?. Unpublished manuscript, used with permission.
• Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid Modernity, Polity, Cambridge.
• Beck, U. ve Beck-Gernsheim, E. (2002). Individualization: Institutionalized Individua- lism and its Social and Political Consequences, SAGE, London.
• Benford, R. D. ve Snow, D. A. (2000). Framing processes and social movements: an overview and an assessment, Annual Review of Sociology, vol. 26, ss. 611–639.
• Benkler, Y. (2006). The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Mar- kets and Freedom, Yale University Press, New Haven.
• Bennett,W. L. (1998). The uncivic culture: communication, identity, and the rise of lifest- yle politics, Ithiel de Sola Pool Lecture, American Political Science Association, published içinde P.S.: Political Science and Politics, vol. 31 (December), ss. 41–61.
• Bennett,W. L. (2003). Communicating global activism: strengths and vulnerabilities of networked politics, Information, Communication & Society, vol. 6, no. 2, ss. 143–168.
• Bennett, W. L. (2005). Social movements beyond borders: organization, communication, and political capacity in two eras of transnational activism, içinde (Der.) D. della Porta ve S. Tarrow, Transnational Protest and Global Activism, ss.203-226, Row- man & Littlefield, Boulder, CO.
• Bennett,W. L. ve Segerberg, A. (2011). Digitalmedia and the personalization of collec- tive action: social technology and the organization of protests against the global economic crisis, Information, Communication & Society, vol. 14, ss. 770–799.
• Bennett, W. L. ve Segerberg, A. (Yayınlanacak) The Logic of Connective Action: Digi- tal Media and the Personalization of Contentious Politics, Cambridge University Press, New York.
• Bennett,W. L., Lang, S. ve Segerberg, A. (2011). Digital media and the organization of transnational advocacy: legitimacy and public engagement in national and EU issue networks, paper presented at International Studies Association Conference, Montreal, Canada, 16–19 March 2011.
• Bimber, B. ve Davis, R. (2003). Campaigning Online: The Internet in U.S. Elections, Oxford University Press, New York.
• Bimber, B., Flanagin, A. ve Stohl, C. (2005). Reconceptualizing collective action in the contemporary media environment, Communication Theory, vol. 15, ss. 389–413.
• Bimber, B., Stohl, C. ve Flanagin, A. (2009). Technological change and the shifting na- ture of political organization, içinde (Der.) A. Chadwick ve P. Howard, Routledge Handbook of Internet Politics, ss.72-85, Routledge, London.
• Bimber, B., Flanagin, A. ve Stohl, C. (2012). Collective Action in Organizations: Inte- raction and Engagement and Engagement in an Era of Technological Change, Cambridge University Press, New York.
• Calderaro, A. (2011). New political struggles in the network society: the case of free and open source software (FOSS) Movement, paper presented at ECPR General Conference, Reykjavik, 25–27 August 2011.
• Castells, M. (2000). The Network Society, 2.Baskı, Blackwell, Oxford.
• Chadwick, A. (2007). Digital network repertoires and organizational hybridity, Political Communication, vol. 24, no. 3, ss. 283–301.
• Chadwick, A. (2011). The hybrid media system, paper presented at ECPR General Con- ference, Reykjavik, Iceland, 25–27 August 2011.
• Chesters, G. ve Welsh, I. (2006). Complexity and Social Movements: Multitudes at the End of Chaos, Routledge, London.
• Daily Show (2009). Tea partiers advise G20 protesters, Daily Show, 1 October, [On- line] Available at: http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/thu-october-1-2009/tea- partiers-advise-g20-protesters (6 October 2010).
• Dawkins, R. (1989). The Selfish Gene, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
• Diani, M. (2011). The Cement of Civil Society: Civic Networks in Local Settings, Barce- lona, unpublished manuscript.
• Earl, J. ve Kimport, K. (2011). Digitally Enabled Social Change: Online and Offline Activism in the Age of the Internet, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
• Foot, K. ve Schneider, S. (2006). Web Campaigning, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
• Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and Self Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age, Stanford University Press, Stanford.
• Gitlin, T. (1980). The Whole World Is Watching: Mass Media in the Making & Unmaking of the New Left, University of California Press, Berkeley.
• Gladwell, M. (2010). Small change: why the revolution will not be tweeted, The New Yorker, 4 October.
• Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties, American Journal of Sociology, vol. 78, ss. 1360 1380.
• Howard, P. ve Hussain, M. (2011). The role of digital media, Journal of Democracy, vol. 22, no. 3, ss. 35–48.
• Hunt, S., Benford, R. D. ve Snow, D. A. (1994). Identity fields: framing processes and the social construction of movement identities, içinde (Der.) E. Laran˜a, H. John- ston & J. R. Gusfield, New Social Movements: From Ideology to Identity, ss.185- 208, Temple University Press, Philadelphia.
• Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and Post-Modernization: Cultural, Economic and Political Change in 43 Societies, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
• Juris, J. (2008). Networking Futures: The Movements against Corporate Globalization, Duke University Press, Durham, NC.
• Keck, M. ve Sikkink, K. (1998). Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in Inter- national Politics, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.
• Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
• Livingston, S. ve Asmolov, G. (2010). Networks and the future of foreign affairs repor- ting, Journalism Studies, vol. 11, no. 5, ss. 745–760.
• Lupia, A. ve Sin, G. (2003). Which public goods are endangered? How evolving com- munication technologies affect “The Logic of Collective Action”, Public Choice, vol. 117, ss. 315–331.
• McAdam, D. (1986). Recruitment to high-risk activism: The case of freedom summer, American Journal of Sociology, vol. 92, ss. 64–90.
• McAdam, D., McCarthy, J. D. ve Zald, M. N. (Der.) (1996). Introduction: opportunities, mobilizing structures, and framing processes – toward a synthetic, comparati- ve perspective on social movements, içinde Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Fra- mings, Cambridge University Press, New York.
• McAdam, D., Tarrow, S. ve Tilly, C. (2001). Dynamics of Contention, Cambridge Uni- versity Press, New York.
• McCarthy, J. D. ve Zald, M. N. (1973). The Trend of Social Movements in America: Professionalization and Resource Mobilization, General Learning Press, Morris- town, NJ.
• McCarthy, J. D. ve Zald, M. N. (1977). Resource mobilization and social movements: a partial theory’, American Journal of Sociology, vol. 82, no. 6, ss. 1212–1241.
• McDonald, K. (2002). From solidarity to fluidarity: social movements beyond “collec- tive identity” – the case of globalization conflicts, Social Movement Studies, vol. 1, no. 2, ss. 109–128.
• Melucci, A. (1996). Challenging Codes: Collective Action in the Information Age, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
• Micheletti, M. (2003). Political Virtue and Shopping, Palgrave, New York.
• Morozov, E. (2011). The Net Delusion: How Not to Liberate the World, Allen Lane, London.
• Olson, M. (1965). The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Gro- ups, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
• Polletta, F. (2002). Freedom Is an Endless meeting. Democracy in American Social Mo- vements, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
• della Porta, D. (2005). Multiple belongings, flexible identities and the construction of “another politics”: between the European social forum and the local social fora, içinde (Der.) D. della Porta ve S. Tarrow, Transnational Protest and Global Acti- vism, ss.175-202, Rowman & Littlefield, Boulder, CO.
• della Porta, D. ve Diani, M. (2006). Social Movements: An Introduction , 2.baskı, Black- well, Malden, MA.
• Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community, Simon & Schuster, New York.
• Put People First (2009). [Online] Available at: http://www.putpeoplefirst.org.uk/ (6 July 2011).
• Rheingold, H. (2002). Smart Mobs: The Next Social Revolution, Perseus Pub., Camb- ridge, MA.
• Robinson, A. ve Tormey, S. (2005). Horizontals, Verticals and the Conflicting Logics of Transformative Politics, içinde (Der.) C. el-Ojeili ve P. Hayden, Confronting Globalization, ss. 208-226, Palgrave, London.
• Routledge, P. ve Cumbers, A. (2009). Global Justice Networks: Geographies of Trans- national Solidarity, Manchester University Press, Manchester, UK.
• rtve (2011), Mas de seis millones de Espanoles han participado en el movimiento 15M, 6 August, [Online] Available at: http://www.rtve.es/noticias/20110806/mas-seis- millones-espanoles-han-participado-movimiento-15m/452598.shtml (18 Sep- tember 2011).
• Segerberg, A. ve Bennett, W. L. (2011). Social media and the organization of collective action: using Twitter to explore the ecologies of two climate change protests, The Communication Review, vol. 14, no. 3, ss. 197–215.
• Shiftman, L. (2013). Memes In Digital Culture, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
• Snow, D. A. ve Benford, R. D. (1988). Ideology, frame resonance, and participant mobi- lization, International Social Movement Research, vol. 1, ss. 197–217.
• Snow, D. A., Rochford, B.Jr.,Worden, S. K. ve Benford, R. D. (1986). Frame alignment processes, micromobilization, and movement participation, American Sociologi- cal Review, vol. 51, ss. 464–481.
• Tarrow, S. (2011). Power in Movement: Social Movements in Contentious Politics , 3.baskı. Cambridge University Press, New York.
• Tilly, C. (2004). Social Movements, 1768–2004, Paradigm, Boulder, CO.
• Tilly, C. (2006). WUNC, içinde (Der.) J. T. Schnapp ve M. Tiews, Crowds, ss.289-306, Stanford University Press, Stanford.
• Vinocur, N. ve Barkin, N. (2009). G20 marches begin week of protests in Europe, Reu- ters. 28 March, [Online] Available at: http://www.reuters.com/article/2009/03/28/ us-g20-britain-march idUSTRE52R0TP20090328 (9 July 2011).
• Weller, B. (2010). G20 protests in Seoul, Demotix, [Online] Available at: http://www. demotix.com/photo/504262/g20-protests-seoul (9 July 2011).