Yolsuzluğun ölçülmesi sorunu ve opasitesi endeksi

Negatif dışsallıklar yayan kamusal bir kötülük olarak nitelendirilen yolsuzluk kamu ekonomisinin inceleme alanına girmektedir. Yolsuzluğun bir ülkedeki ge- lişimini inceleyip diğer ülkelerle karşılaştırma yapabilmek için yolsuzluğun ölçülmesi gereklidir. Bu durum yolsuzluğun sebep ve sonuçlarının tespiti bakımından da önemlidir. Fakat çeşitli nedenlerden dolayı yolsuzluğu ölçmek kolay değildir. Bu bakımdan çeşitli ulusal/uluslar arası kuruluş ve dernekler tarafından yolsuz- luk endeksleri geliştirilmiştir. Bu çalışmada da bu endekslerden biri olan “Opasi- te Endeksi” incelenmiştir. Pricewaterhouse Coopers’in organizasyonu ile gerçek- leştirilen opasite endeksi saydam olmama durumunda işletme ve yatırım maliyet- lerini ölçmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Opasite endeksi ile bu endeksin diğer gösterge- lerle (kişi başına GSYİH, sermayeye erişebilirlik, doğrudan yabancı yatırım vs.) ilişkilerini ifade etmek amacıyla yapılan analizler göstermektedir ki saydam olma- ma durumu, yatırımcıların ve bir ülkede iş yapmak isteyenlerin kararlarını olum- suz yönde etkilemektedir. Artan opasite seviyesi yatırımcılar için iş yapmanın maliyetini arttırtmaktadır.

The problem of measuring the corruption and opacity index

Corruption which spreads negative externalities and is labeled as public bad is investigated in the area of public economics. To investigate the development of corruption in a country and to compare it with the other countries, measuring of corruption is necessary. But, it isn’t easy to measure corruption because of the different reasons. In this regard, corruption indexes are developed by different national/international institutions and organizations. Opasite Index which is one of these indexes is investigated in this paper. Opasite Index generated by the or- ganization of Pricewaterhouse Coopers aims to measure the costs of manage- ment and investment in the situation of opaqueness. The opacity index and the analyses which explain its relations with the other indicators (per capital income, capital access, direct foreign capital investment etc.) show that the situation of opaqueness affects negatively to the decisions of foreign investors and entrep- reneurs. Increasing opacity index also increase the cost of transact business for investors.

___

  • ACKERMAN, Susan-Rose; (1999), Corruption and Government: Causes, Consequences and Reform, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, USA.
  • AHUN, Christian; (2001), "Corruption: Political Determinants and Macroeconomic Effects", Vanderbiit University Working Paper, No:01-W26.
  • AHMAD, Naved; (2001), "Corruption Perception Indices: A Comparative Analysis", The Pakistan Development Review Vol:40, No:4 Part II (Winter) pp. 813-830.
  • ANDREI, Tudorel, Ani MATEI, Andreea liuzia İACOB; (2011), "The Measurement Of Corruption And The Identification Of Its Propagation Factors", Revista Economica (Economic Review), Vol. 3, No. 50, pp. 19-27.
  • BAYAR, Güzin; (2007), "Türkiye'de Yolsuzluğun Nedenleri Ekonometrik Bir İnceleme", Türkiye Ekonomi Kurumu Tartışma Metni, Sayı: 2007/3, ss. 1-22.
  • BENNIS, Warren, Daniel GOLEMAN, James O'TOOLE and Patricia Ward BIEDERMAN; (2008), Transparency: How Leaders Create a Culture of Candor, J-B Warren Bennis Series.
  • BERG, Erlehd; (2001), "How Should Corruption be Measured?", MSc Economics Extended Essay, London School of Economics and Political Science, (May), http://members.lycos. co. uk/eberg/, 23.12.2009.
  • BERKMAN, Ümit; (1983), Azgelişmiş Ülkelerde Kamu Yönetiminde Yolsuzluk ve Rüşvet, Ankara: TODAİE Yayınları, No: 203.
  • ÇELEN, Mustafa; (2007), Yolsuzluk Ekonomisi: Kamusal Bir Kötü Olarak Yolsuzluğun Anatomisi, İSMMMO, Yayın No: 77, İstanbul.
  • DANON, Marko; (2010), "Contemporary Eponomic Research of Corruption", Proceedings of FIKUSZ 10 Symposium for Young Researchers, Budapest, Hungary, pp. 27-42, http://kgk. uni-obuda.hu/fikusz, 28.03.2011.
  • DELAVALLADE, Clara; (2006), "Corruption and Distribution of Public Spending in Developing Countries", Journal of Economics and Finance, Vol: 30, No: 2, (Summer), pp: 222-239.
  • HOOPER, Vince, Suk-Joong KIM; (2007), "The Determinants of Capital Inflows: Does Opacity of Recipient Country Explain the Flows?", Economic Systems, No: 31, pp. 35-48.
  • JAIN, Arvind K; (2001), "Corruption: A Review", Journal of Economic Surveys, Vol: 15, No: 1, pp. 71-121.
  • JOHNSTON, Michael (2008), "Measuring Corruption on the Ground", Committee on Concepts and Methods Working Paper Series, No: 20 (September), http://www.concepts-methods.org/ Files/WorkingPaper/PC%2020%20Johnston.pdf, 28.03.2011.
  • GOLDEN, Miriam A. and Lucio PICCI; (2005), "Proposal for A New Measure of Corruption, Illustrated with Italian Data", Economic & Politics, Vol. 17, No. 1, March, pp. 37- 75.
  • GUPTA Sanjeev, Hamid DAVOODI and Erwin TİONGSON; (2000), "Corruption and the Provision of Health Care and Education Services", IMF Working Paper, WP/00/116, (June).
  • KLAVEREN, Jacob Van (1956), "The Concept of Corruption", Political Corruption: A Handbook, Arnold HEIDENHEIMER, Michael JOHNSTON and Victor T. LEVINE (eds.), New Brunswick, Transaction Publishers, pp. 25-29.
  • KLITGAARD, Robert; (1991), Controlling Corruption, Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • KOHAN, Daisy; (2003), "Public Policy For Achieving Transparency and Good Experience: The Experience For Chile", Global Forum on International Investment: Encouraging Modern Governance and Transparency for Investment, 17-18 November 2008, Johannesburg, South Africa.
  • KURTZMAN, Joel and Glenn YAGO; (2001), The Opacity Index 2001, Pricewaterhouse Coopers, January.
  • KURTZMAN, Joel, Glenn YAGO and- Triphon PHUMIWASA-NA; (2004), The Opacity Index 2004: The Global Costs of Opacity, Milken Institute Sloan Management Review, October.
  • KURTZMAN, Joel and Glenn YAGO; (2008), 2007-2008 Opacity Index: Measuring Global Business Risks, Milken Institute, April.
  • KURTZMAN, Joel and Glenn YAGO; (2009), 2009 Opacity Index: Measuring Global Risks, Milken Institute, April.
  • LIPSEY, Roger; (2001), PwC's Opacity Index: A Powerful New Tool for Global Investors, Journal of Corporate Accounting and Finance, No. 12, pp. 35-44.
  • MOCAN, Naci; (2004), "What Determines Corruption? International Evidence From Micro Data", NBER Working Paper Series, No. 10460, April.
  • SERRA, Danila; (2004), "Empirical Determinants of Corruption: A Sensitivity Analysis", GPRGWPS Working Paper, No. 12.
  • TANZI, Vito; (1998), "Corruption Around The World: Causes, Consequences, Scope and Cures", IMF Working Papers, No: 98/63, May..
  • THE LIMA DECLARATION AGAINST CORRUPTION (1997), 8th International Anti-Corruption Conference (IACC), Lima, Peru, 7-11 September 1997, http://www.transparency.ca/Re-ports/Readings/SR-B 16-e-limadecl.pdf, 28.03.2011.
  • THE WORLD BANK; (1997), World Development Report, The World Bank, Washington D.C.,
  • WARNER, Andrew M.; (2001), "The European Competitiveness And Transition Report, 2001-2002: Ratings Of Accession Progress, Competitiveness, and Economic Restructuring of European and Transition Economies", World Economic Forum Series Key Reports, Oxford University Press, US.
  • WEI, Shang-Jin; (1999), "Corruption in Economic Development: Beneficial Grease, Minor Annoyance, or Major Obstacle?", World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, No. 2048 (February) http://www. worldbank. org/wbi/governance/pdf/wei. pdf, 27.03.2011.