Koenzim Q10'un ratlarda sıçanlarda sisplatininneden olduğu ototoksisiteye etkisi

Amaç: Sıçanlarda düflük ve yüksek dozlarda koenzim Q10'un sistemikuygulamasının sisplatinin neden olduğu ototoksisite üzerine etkinliğinibelirlemek. Yöntem:Çalıflmamız 40 Sprague-Dawley sıçanla gerçeklefltirildi. Sıçanlar randomize flekilde befl gruba ayrıldı: Cis, Cis+Q1030, Cis+Q1010,Q10, kontrol. Cis (n=8) grubuna tek bir 14 mg/kg dozda intraperitoneal (i.p.) yolla sisplatin enjekte edildi. Cis+Q1030(n=8) grubuna tek bir14 mg/kg dozda i.p. sisplatin ve 3 gün boyunca günde 30 mg/kg dozdakoenzim Q10 i.p. enjekte edildi. Cis+Q1010(n=8) grubuna tek bir 14mg/kg dozda i.p. sisplatin ve 3 gün boyunca günde 10 mg/kg dozda koenzim Q10 i.p. enjekte edildi. Q10 (n=8) grubuna 3 gün boyunca günde 10 mg/kg dozda koenzim Q10 i.p. enjekte edildi. Kontrol grubuna(Grup C) (n=8) 3 gün boyunca günde 1 mL dozda i.p. salin enjekte edildi. Tedavi öncesi ve sonrası iflitme düzeyleri distorsiyon ürünü otoakustik emisyonlarla (DPOAE) değerlendirildi. Bulgular:Bafllangıca göre çalıflma sonunda 4004, 4358, 4761 ve 5188Hz'deki ölçüm sonuçlarında istatistiksel açıdan anlamlı herhangi birdeğifliklik yoktu (p>0.05). Diğer taraftan 5652, 6165, 7336 ve 7996Hz'deki ölçümlerde anlamlı bir farklılık vardı (sırasıyla p=0.002,p=0.037, p=0.001 ve p=0.001). Ayrıca 5652 Hz'deki değiflimin hızı Cisgrubunun Cis+Q1010, kontrol ve Q10 gruplarından farklı olduğunuortaya koydu (p

The effect of coenzyme Q10 on cisplatin-induced ototoxicity in rats

Objective:To determine the efficacy of systemic administration ofcoenzyme Q10 at low and high doses on cisplatin-induced ototoxicityin rats. Methods:Our study was performed with 40 Sprague-Dawley rats.They were divided randomly into five groups: Cis, Cis+Q1030,Cis+Q1010, Q10, and control. Cis (n=8) group was administered cisplatin[a single intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection of 14 mg/kg], Cis+Q1030(n=8)group was administered cisplatin (a single i.p. injection of 14 mg/kg) andcoenzyme Q10 (30 mg/kg/day, i.p.) for 3 days, Cis+Q1010(n=8) groupwas given cisplatin (a single dose of 14 mg/kg/day, i.p.) and coenzymeQ10 (10 mg/kg/day, i.p.) for 3 days, Q10 (n=8) group was administeredcoenzyme Q10 (10 mg/kg/day, i.p.) for 3 days and Group C (n=8) (control group) was administered saline solution (1 mL/day, i.p.) once dailyfor 3 days. Pretreatment and posttreatment hearing levels were evaluated with distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs). Results: There was no statistically significant difference in the resultsof measurements of 4004, 4358, 4761 and 5188 Hz at end of the studyin comparison to baseline (p>0.05). On the other hand, there was a significant difference at the measurements of 5652, 6165, 7336 and 7996Hz (p=0.002, p=0.037, p=0.001, p=0.001, respectively). The rate ofchange at 5652 Hz revealed that Cis group was different fromCis+Q1010, control and Q10 groups (p<0.01); measurements at 6165Hz revealed that change at Cis group was significantly different fromcontrol and Q10 groups (p<0.01, p<0.05). Final measurements ofdecrease in Cis group at 7336 and 7996 Hz were significantly differentfrom baseline (p<0.05; p<0.01). Conclusion:The high-dose coenzyme Q10 showed a protective effecton hearing in cisplatin-induced ototoxicity while low-dose coenzymeQ10 protected hearing at low frequencies but did not show protectiveeffect at high frequencies.

___

  • 1. Walker EM Jr, Fazekas-May MA, Bowen WR. Nephrotoxic and ototoxic agents. Clin Lab Med 1990;10:323-54.
  • 2. Ravi R, Somani SM, Rybak LP. Mechanism of cisplatin ototoxicity: antioxidant system. Pharmacol Toxicol 1995;76:386-94.
  • 3. Daldal A, Odabasi O, Serbetcioglu B. The protective effect of intratympanic dexamethasone on cisplatin-induced ototoxicity in guinea pigs. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007;137:747-52.
  • 4. Rybak LP, Whitworth CA, Mukherjea D, Ramkuvar L. Mechanisms of cisplatin-induced ototoxicity and prevention. Hear Res 2007;226:157-67.
  • 5. Van den Berg JH, Beijnen JH, Balm AJ, Schellens JH. Future opportunities in preventing cisplatin induced ototoxicity. Cancer Treat Rev 2006;32:390-7.
  • 6. Fetoni AR, Sergi B, Ferraresi A, Paludetti G, Troiani D. Protective effects of alpha-tocopherol and tiopronin against cisplatin-induced ototoxicity. Acta Otolaryngol 2004;124:421-6.
  • 7. Ise T, Shimizu T, Lee EL, Inoue H, Kohno K, Okada Y. Roles of volume-sensitive Cl-channel in cisplatin-induced apoptosis in human epidermoid cancer cells. J Membr Biol 2005;205:139-45.
  • 8. Van Ruijven MW, de Groot JC, Klis SF, Smoorenbug GF. The cochlear targets of cisplatin: an electrophysiological and morphological time-sequence study. Hear Res 2005;205:241-8.
  • 9. Sergi B, Fetoni AR, Paludetti G, et al. Protective properties of idebenone in noise-induced hearing loss in the guinea pig. Neuroreport 2006;17:857-61.
  • 10. Papucci L, Schiavone N, Witort E, et al. Coenzyme Q10 prevents apoptosis by inhibiting mitochondrial depolarization independently of its free radical scavenging property. J Biol Chem 2003;278: 28220-8.
  • 11. Hinojosa R, Riggs LC, Strauss M, Matz GJ. Temporal bone histopathology of cisplatin ototoxicity. Am J Otol 1995;16:731-40.
  • 12. Hyppolito MA, de Oliveira JA, Rossato M. Cisplatin ototoxicity and otoprotection with sodium salicylate. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2006;263:798-803.
  • 13. Church MW, Blakley BW, Burgio DL, Gupta AK. WR-2721 (Amifostine) ameliorates cisplatin-induced hearing loss but causes neurotoxicity in hamsters: dose-dependent effects. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2004;5:227-37.
  • 14. Korver KD, Rybak LP, Whitworth C, Campbell KM. Round window application of D-methionine provides complete cisplatin otoprotection. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002;126:683-9.
  • 15. Kalkanis JG, Whitworth C, Rybak LP. Vitamin E reduces cisplatin ototoxicity. Laryngoscope 2004;114:538-42.
  • 16. Berkiten G, Salturk Z, Topalo¤lu I, U¤rafl H. Protective effect of pentoxifylline on amikacin-induced ototoxicity in rats. Am J Otolaryngol 2012;33:689-92.
  • 17. Chen X, Frisina RD, Bowers WJ, Frisina DR, Federoff HJ. HSV amplicon-mediated neurotrophin-3 expression protects murine spiral ganglion neurons from cisplatin-induced damage. Mol Ther 2001;3:958-63.
  • 18. So HS, Park C, Kim HJ, et al. Protective effect of T-type calcium channel blocker flunarizine on cisplatin-induced death of auditory cells. Hear Res 2005;204:127-39.
  • 19. Lopez-Gonzalez MA, Guerrero JM, Rojas F, Delgado F. Ototoxicity caused by cisplatin is ameliorated by melatonin and other antioxidants. J Pineal Res 2000;28:73-80.
  • 20. Rybak LP, Husain K, Morris C, Whitworth C, Somani S. Effect of protective agents against cisplatin ototoxicity. Am J Otol 2000; 21:513-20.
  • 21. Ahn JH, Yoo MH, Lee HJ, Chung JW, Yoon TH. Coenzyme Q10 in combination with steroid therapy for treatment of sudden sensorineural hearing loss: a controlled prospective study. Clin Otolaryngol 2010;35:486-9.
  • 22. Hirose Y, Sugahara K, Mikuriya T, Hashimoto M, Shimogori H, Yamashita H. Effect of water-soluble coenzyme Q10 on noiseinduced hearing loss in guinea pigs. Acta Otolaryngol 2008;128:1071-6.
  • 23. Guastini L, Mora R, Dellepiane M, Santamauro V, Giorgio M, Salami A. Water-soluble coenzyme Q10 formulation in presbycusis: long-term effects. Acta Otolaryngol 2011;131:512-7.
  • 24. Fetoni AR, Eramo SL, Rolesi R, Troiani D, Paludetti G. Antioxidant treatment with coenzyme Q-ter in prevention of gentamycin ototoxicity in an animal model. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 2012;32:103-10.
  • 25. Sockalingam R, Freeman S, Cherny TL, Sohmer T. Effect of high-dose cisplatin on auditory brainstem responses and otoacoustic emissions in laboratory animals. Am J Otol 2000;21:521-7.
  • 26. Fetoni AR, Garzaro M, Ralli M, et al. The monitoring role of otoacoustic emissions and oxidative stress markers in the protective effects of antioxidant administration in noise-exposed subjects: a pilot study. Med Sci Monit 2009;15:PR1-8.
ENT Updates-Cover
  • ISSN: 2149-7109
  • Başlangıç: 2015
  • Yayıncı: Prof.Dr.Murat Demir
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Tonsillotomi hasta seçiminde nötrofil-lenfositoranı, trombosit-lenfosit oranı ve MPV inflamasyonbelirteci olarak kullanılabilir mi?

Yeşim BAŞAL, İMRAN KURT ÖMÜRLÜ, Pınar UYSAL, AYLİN ERYILMAZ, HATİCE SEMA BAŞAK

Tek bir ajan olarak setuksimab oral kavitekanser hücrelerinde doza bağımlı etkiye sahiptir: Bir in vitro çalışma

GÖRKEM ESKİİZMİR, GİZEM ÇALIBAŞI KOÇAL, TUĞBA UYSAL KILIÇ, Hülya ELLİDOKUZ, Yasemin BASKIN

Ortalama trombosit hacmi ani işitme kaybı içinprediktif bir değer midir?

Hasan Emre KOÇAK, Harun ACIPAYAM, Mehmet KESKİN, Arzu Karaman KOÇ, Ayşe Pelin YİĞİDER, Fatma Tülin KAYHAN

Submandibüler bezde siyalolityaz ve aktinomikozun seyrek görülen birlikteliği

Oğuzhan DİKİCİ, Nuray Bayar MULUK

Topikal dekspantenol uygulaması akut kulakzarı perforasyonlarının iyileşmesini hızlandırmaktadır:Deneysel bir çalışma

Sinem DEMİRDELEN, Mehmet İMAMOĞLU, Selçuk ARSLAN, İsmail SAYGIN

Endotelyal nitrik oksit sentaz (eNOS) ve miyeloperoksidaz (MPO) genlerin mikrotiyadaki rolü

Berker BÜYÜKGÜRAL, SACİDE PEHLİVAN, AYŞE FEYDA NURSAL, MEHMET BEKERECİOĞLU

Koenzim Q10'un ratlarda sıçanlarda sisplatininneden olduğu ototoksisiteye etkisi

Güler BERKİTEN, Tolgar Lütfi KUMRAL, Ziya SALTÜRK, Belgin TUTAR, Ayşe Enise GÖKER, Gürcan SÜNNETÇİ, YAVUZ UYAR, Hilmi UĞRAŞ

Akut parotit hastalarında parotis muayenesi vemasajın serum amilaz düzeylerine etkisi

MUHAMMED FATİH EVCİMİK, BURAK ÖMÜR ÇAKIR, Ahmet Adnan CIRIK, Raflit CEVİZCİ, Erkan SOYLU, Celal GÜNAY

Psoriasis hastalarında iflitmenin hastalığın fliddetine göre değerlendirilmesi

Aslı HAPA, Nilda SÜSLÜ, Ayşen KARADUMAN, BİLGEHAN BUDAK, Sibel Ersoy EVANS, Levent SENNAROĞLU

How much are the incidental abnormalities on brain MRI clinically significant in otolaryngology practice?

Çiğdem Kalaycık ERTUGAY, Ayça Özbal KOÇ, Halime ÇEVİK2, Selim Sermed ERBEK