Onur GÖKÇEN, Ayça KARAKUŞ, Emine Esin BENLİ, Mehmet ALEGÖZ

BİR BELEDİYEDE STRATEJİK PLANLAMANIN ÖNCELİKLENDİRİLMESİ

Belediyeler, mevcut kaynaklarını en etkin biçimde kullanmak, amaç ve hedeflerini daha sistematik bir biçimde ifade etmek ve yerel halkın ihtiyaçlarına en iyi şekilde cevap verebilmek amacıyla düzenli olarak stratejik planlar yaparlar. Bu çalışma, bir belediyenin hazırlamış olduğu stratejik planda yer alan hedeflere odaklanmakta ve bu hedeflerin önceliklendirilmesini amaçlamaktadır. Bu amaçla, iki aşamalı bir çözüm yaklaşımı öne sürülmüştür. İlk aşamada, bir yamuksal tip-2 bulanık AHP yaklaşımı kullanılarak hedeflerin ağırlıkları belirlenmiştir. İkinci aşamada ise, sınırlı bir bütçe altında belediyenin hangi hedefleri seçmesi gerektiğini belirleyen bir kesin çözüm yaklaşımı (matematiksel model) öne sürülmüştür. Öne sürülen modeller ve sayısal sonuçlar birçok çıkarımı beraberinde getirmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Stratejik Planlama, Önceliklendirme, Yamuksal Tip-2 Bulanık AHP, Matematiksel Model, 0-1 Tamsayılı Programlama

Municipalities make regular strategic plans in order to use their resources effectively, indicate their objectives and goals in a more systematic manner and respond to the needs of the people living in that municipality. This study focuses on the goals proposed in the strategic plan of a municipality and aims to prioritize these goals. To this end, a two-phase solution approach is proposed. In the first phase, a trapezoidal type-2 fuzzy AHP algorithm is used to determine the weights of the goals, whereas in the second phase, an exact solution approach (mathematical model) is proposed to determine which goals should be selected by the municipality under a limited budget. Proposed models and computational results bring various managerial insights.

Keywords:

Strategic Planning, Prioritizing, Trapezoidal Type-2 Fuzzy AHP, Mathematical Model, 0-1 Integer Programming,

PDF

___

[1] Afolayan, A. H., Ojokoh, B. A., & Adetunmbi, A. O. (2020). Performance analysis of fuzzy analytic hierarchy process multi-criteria decision support models for contractor selection. Scientific African, 9, e00471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2020.e00471
[2] Ali, S. A., Parvin, F., Al-Ansari, N., Pham, Q. B., Ahmad, A., Raj, M. S., & Anh, D. T., Ba, L. H., & Thai, V. N. (2021). Sanitary landfill site selection by integrating AHP and FTOPSIS with GIS: a case study of Memari Municipality, India. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(6), 7528-7550. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11004-7
[3] Babashamsi, P., Golzadfar, A., Yusoff, N. I. M., Ceylan, H., & Nor, N. G. M. (2016). Integrated fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and VIKOR method in the prioritization of pavement maintenance activities. International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology, 9(2), 112-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijprt.2016.03.002
[4] Baysal, M. E., Kaya, İ., Kahraman, C., Sarucan, A., & Engin, O. (2015). A two phased fuzzy methodology for selection among municipal projects. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 21(3), 405-422. https://doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2014.909902
[5] Bousdekis, A., & Kardaras, D. (2020). Digital Transformation of Local Government: A Case Study from Greece. In 2020 IEEE 22nd Conference on Business Informatics (CBI) (Vol. 2, pp. 131-140). IEEE.
[6] Buckley, J. J. (1985). Fuzzy hierarchical analysis. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 17(3), 233-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(85)90090-9
[7] Calabrese, A., Costa, R., Levialdi, N., & Menichini, T. (2019). Integrating sustainability into strategic decision-making: A fuzzy AHP method for the selection of relevant sustainability issues. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 139, 155-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.11.005
[8] Canbay, Ş. K. (2008). Kamuda Stratejik Planlama ve Stratejik Yönetim. Kocaeli Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Kocaeli. Yayınlanmış Yüksek Lisans Tezi.
[9] Chen, S. M., & Lee, L. W. (2010). Fuzzy multiple attributes group decision-making based on the interval type-2 TOPSIS method. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(4), 2790-2798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.09.012
[10] Çelik, E., Gumus, A. T., & Alegoz, M. (2014). A trapezoidal type-2 fuzzy MCDM method to identify and evaluate critical success factors for humanitarian relief logistics management. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 27(6), 2847-2855. https://doi.org/10.3233/IFS-141246
[11] Dereli, T., & Altun, K. (2013). Technology evaluation through the use of interval type-2 fuzzy sets and systems. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 65(4), 624-633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2013.05.012
[12] Falak, J., Kunjan, M., Nagaraju, D., & Narayanan, S. (2020). Evaluation of continuous improvement techniques using hybrid MCDM technique under fuzzy environment. Materials Today: Proceedings, 22, 1295-1305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.01.422
[13] Fernández, M. A., Bendodo, E., Sánchez, J. R., & Cabrera, F. E. (2019). A group decision process based on expert analysis and criteria coalition to measure municipalities’ financial distress. Soft Computing, 23(10), 3327-3345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-017-2991-y
[14] Hamurcu, M., & Eren, T. (2017). Sürdürülebilir Kent İçi Ulaşım İçin Bulanık AHP Tabanlı VIKOR Yöntemi ile Proje Seçimi. International Conference on Advanced Engineering Technologies (ICADET’17), Bayburt, Türkiye.
[15] Khan, A. A., Shameem, M., Kumar, R. R., Hussain, S., & Yan, X. (2019). Fuzzy AHP based prioritization and taxonomy of software process improvement success factors in global software development. Applied Soft Computing, 83, 105648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2019.105648
[16] Kılıç, H. S., & Çevikcan, E. (2012). A hybrid weighting methodology for performance assessment in Turkish municipalities. In International Conference on Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-Based Systems (pp. 354-363). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31724-8_37
[17] Ruiz-Padillo, A., Torija, A. J., Ramos-Ridao, A. F., & Ruiz, D. P. (2016). Application of the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process in multi-criteria decision in noise action plans: Prioritizing road stretches. Environmental Modelling & Software, 81, 45-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.03.009
[18] Saaty, T.L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process, New York: McGraw-Hill.
[19] Talbi, E. G. (2009). Metaheuristics: From Design to Implementation. John Wiley & Sons.
[20] Tepebaşı Belediyesi. (2019). Tepebaşı Belediyesi 2020-2024 Stratejik Planı. Eskişehir. http://www.tepebasi.bel.tr/stratejikplan/Stratejik%20Plan%202020-2024.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 05.05.2021)
[21] Yalçınkaya, Ö., & Deniz, F. (2019). Meslek Odalarında Stratejik Planlama Çalışmaları: TMMOB Makina Mühendisleri Odası İzmir Şube Örneği. Endüstri Mühendisliği, 30(3), 220-238.