MEKANİK TESİSAT PROJELERİNDE BEST WORST VE NÖTROSOFİK AHP ENTEGRE MODELİYLE HATA TÜRÜ VE ETKİLERİ ANALİZİ

Hata türü ve etkileri analizi (FMEA), sistemlerdeki, tasarımlardaki, ürünlerdeki, projelerdeki veya projelerdeki güvenliği iyileştirmeyi, tanımlamayı, değerlendirmeyi ve en aza indirmeyi hedefleyen bir risk değerlendirme aracıdır. Risk önceliği numarası (RPN), FMEA bazlı risk değerlendirme uygulamaları için temel değerlendirme kriteridir. RPN'in oluşum (O), şiddeti (S) ve tespiti (D) gibi risk faktörlerine dayanarak uygun şekilde hesaplanmalıdır. Bununla birlikte, geleneksel RPN hesaplama yöntemi, risk faktörlerinin ağırlığını göz önünde bulundurmamak gibi birçok nedenden dolayı ağır biçimde eleştirilmiştir. Geleneksel FMEA yönteminin bu dezavantajının üstesinden gelmek için, bu makale, mekanik tesisat projeleri için Best Worst method (BWM) ve Nötrosofik analitik hiyerarşi süreci (NAHP) ile entegre modelini içeren FMEA modelini önermektedir. FMEA parametresi S, O ve D'nin ağırlıkları, BWM yöntemiyle hesaplanır ve bu da, tutarlı bir şekilde ikili karşılaştırma ve güvenilir sonuçlar sağlar. Daha sonra dokuz arıza modu, NAHP metodu ile S, O ve D parametreleri açısından değerlendirilir. Arıza modlarının risk önceliklerini belirlemek için risk öncelik endeksleri hesaplanır. Son olarak, belirlenen arıza modları için önleyici tedbirler önerilmiştir.

FMEA ANALYSIS IN MECHANICAL INSTALLATION PROJECT BASED ON BEST WORST AND NEUTROSOPHIC AHP INTEGRATED MODEL

___

  • Abdel-Basset, M., Mohamed, M., & Sangaiah, A. K. (2018a). Neutrosophic AHP-Delphi Group, decision making model, based on trapezoidal neutrosophic numbers. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 9(5), 1427-1443.
  • Abdel-Basset, M., Mohamed, M., & Smarandache, F. (2018). A hybrid neutrosophic group ANP-TOPSIS framework for supplier selection problems. Symmetry, 10(6), 226.
  • Abdel-Basset, M., Mohamed, M., Zhou, Y., & Hezam, I. (2017). Multi-criteria group decision making based on neutrosophic analytic hierarchy process. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 33(6), 4055-4066.
  • Abdelgawad, M., & Fayek, A. R. (2010). Risk management in the construction industry using combined fuzzy FMEA and fuzzy AHP. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(9), 1028-1036.
  • Ahmadi, H. B., Kusi-Sarpong, S., & Rezaei, J. (2017). Assessing the social sustainability of supply chains using Best Worst Method. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 126, 99-106.
  • Akyuz, E., & Celik, E. (2018). A quantitative risk analysis by using interval type-2 fuzzy FMEA approach: the case of oil spill. Maritime Policy & Management, 45(8), 979-994.
  • Alava, M. V., Figueroa, S. P. D., Alcivar, H. M. B., & Vázquez, M. L. (2018). Single Valued Neutrosophic Numbers and Analytic Hierarchy Process for Project Selection. Neutrosophic Sets & Systems, 21.
  • Alonso, J. A., & Lamata, M. T. (2006). Consistency in the analytic hierarchy process: a new approach. International journal of uncertainty, fuzziness and knowledge-based systems, 14(04), 445-459.
  • Amigun, B., Petrie, D., & Görgens, J. (2011). Economic risk assessment of advanced process technologies for bioethanol production in South Africa: Monte Carlo analysis. Renewable Energy, 36(11), 3178-3186.
  • Carbone, T. A., & Tippett, D. D. (2004). Project risk management using the project risk FMEA. Engineering Management Journal, 16(4), 28-35.
  • Carlsson, B. (2004). Initial risk analysis of potential failure modes. In Performance and Durability Assessment (pp. 147-157).
  • Chang, K. H., Chang, Y. C., & Tsai, I. T. (2013). Enhancing FMEA assessment by integrating grey relational analysis and the decision making trial and evaluation laboratory approach. Engineering Failure Analysis, 31, 211-224.
  • Fattahi, R., & Khalilzadeh, M. (2018). Risk evaluation using a novel hybrid method based on FMEA, extended MULTIMOORA, and AHP methods under fuzzy environment. Safety Science, 102, 290-300.
  • Fink, O., Zio, E., Weidmann, U. (2014). Predicting component reliability and level of degradation with complex-valued neural networks. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 121(1), pp. 198-206.
  • Gamal, A., Ismail, M., & Smarandache, F. A Scientific Decision Framework for Supplier Selection under Neutrosophic Moora Environment. Peer Reviewers, 33.
  • Gul, M. (2018). Application of Pythagorean fuzzy AHP and VIKOR methods in occupational health and safety risk assessment: The case of a gun and rifle barrel external surface oxidation and coloring unit. International journal of occupational safety and ergonomics, (just-accepted), 1-26.
  • Gul, M., & Guneri, A. F. (2016). A fuzzy multi criteria risk assessment based on decision matrix technique: a case study for aluminum industry. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 40, 89-100.
  • Gul, M., Ak, M. F., & Guneri, A. F. (2017). Occupational health and safety risk assessment in hospitals: A case study using two-stage fuzzy multi-criteria approach. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, 23(2), 187-202.
  • Guo, S., & Zhao, H. (2017). Fuzzy best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method and its applications. Knowledge-Based Systems, 121, 23-31.
  • Hui M., E. C., Fai Lau, O. M., & Lo, K. K. (2009). A fuzzy decision‐making approach for portfolio management with direct real estate investment. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 13(2), 191-204.
  • Jannadi, O. A., & Almishari, S. (2003). Risk assessment in construction. Journal of construction engineering and management, 129(5), 492-500.
  • Jiang, W., Xie, C., Zhuang, M., & Tang, Y. (2017). Failure mode and effects analysis based on a novel fuzzy evidential method. Applied Soft Computing, 57, 672-683.
  • Johnston, G. (2000). Reliability for technology, engineering, and management, by paul kales. Technimetrics . 42(2), pp. 207-207.
  • Kadoić, N., Ređep, N. B., & Divjak, B. (2017, January). Decision Making with the Analytic Network Process. In The 14th International Symposium on Operational Research in Slovenia.
  • Leu, S. S., & Chang, C. M. (2013). Bayesian-network-based safety risk assessment for steel construction projects. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 54, 122-133.
  • Linder, E., Patil, G. P., & Vaughan, D. S. (1987). Application of event tree risk analysis to fisheries management. Ecological Modelling, 36(1-2), 15-28.
  • Lindhe, A., Rosén, L., Norberg, T., & Bergstedt, O. (2009). Fault tree analysis for integrated and probabilistic risk analysis of drinking water systems. Water research, 43(6), 1641-1653.
  • Liu, H. C., Fan, X. J., Li, P., & Chen, Y. Z. (2014). Evaluating the risk of failure modes with extended MULTIMOORA method under fuzzy environment. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 34, 168-177.
  • Liu, H. C., You, J. X., You, X. Y., & Shan, M. M. (2015). A novel approach for failure mode and effects analysis using combination weighting and fuzzy VIKOR method. Applied Soft Computing, 28, 579-588.
  • Mentes, A., & Helvacioglu, I. H. (2011). An application of fuzzy fault tree analysis for spread mooring systems. Ocean Engineering, 38(2-3), 285-294.
  • Miao, X., Yu, B., Xi, B., & Tang, Y. H. (2010). Modeling of bilevel games and incentives for sustainable critical infrastructure system. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 16(3), 365-379.
  • Misra, K. B., & Weber, G. G. (1990). Use of fuzzy set theory for level-I studies in probabilistic risk assessment. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 37(2), 139-160.
  • Mohammadi, A., & Tavakolan, M. (2013, June). Construction project risk assessment using combined fuzzy and FMEA. In IFSA World Congress and NAFIPS Annual Meeting (IFSA/NAFIPS), 2013 Joint (pp. 232-237). IEEE.
  • Mou, Q., Xu, Z., & Liao, H. (2016). An intuitionistic fuzzy multiplicative best-worst method for multi-criteria group decision making. Information Sciences, 374, 224-239.
  • Nawaz, F., Asadabadi, M. R., Janjua, N. K., Hussain, O. K., Chang, E., & Saberi, M. (2018). An MCDM method for cloud service selection using a Markov chain and the best-worst method. Knowledge-Based Systems, 159, 120-131.
  • Ouédraogo, A., Groso, A., & Meyer, T. (2011). Risk analysis in research environment–part II: weighting lab criticity index using the analytic hierarchy process. Safety science, 49(6), 785-793.
  • Peeters, J. F. W., Basten, R. J., & Tinga, T. (2018). Improving failure analysis efficiency by combining FTA and FMEA in a recursive manner. Reliability engineering & system safety, 172, 36-44.
  • Pinto, A. (2014). QRAM a qualitative occupational safety risk assessment model for the construction industry that incorporate uncertainties by the use of fuzzy sets. Safety Science, 63, 57-76.
  • Pramanik, S., Dalapati, S., & Roy, T. K. (2018). Neutrosophic multi-attribute group decision making strategy for logistics center location selection. Neutrosophic Operational Research, 3, 13-32.
  • Razaque, A., Bach, C., & Alotaibi, A. (2012). Fostering project scheduling and controlling risk management. arXiv preprint arXiv:1210.2021.
  • Rezaei, J. (2015). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega, 53, 49-57.
  • Rezaei, J. (2016). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method: Some properties and a linear model. Omega, 64, 126-130.
  • Rezaei, J., Nispeling, T., Sarkis, J., & Tavasszy, L. (2016). A supplier selection life cycle approach integrating traditional and environmental criteria using the best worst method. Journal of Cleaner Production, 135, 577-588.
  • Rezaei, J., Wang, J., & Tavasszy, L. (2015). Linking supplier development to supplier segmentation using Best Worst Method. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(23), 9152-9164.
  • Saaty, T. L. (1990). How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process. European Journal Operations Research, 48(1), 9-26.
  • Salimi, N., & Rezaei, J. (2016). Measuring efficiency of university-industry Ph. D. projects using best worst method. Scientometrics, 109(3), 1911-1938.
  • Schuhmacher, M., Meneses, M., Xifró, A., & Domingo, J. L. (2001). The use of Monte-Carlo simulation techniques for risk assessment: study of a municipal waste incinerator. Chemosphere, 43(4-7), 787-799.
  • Shojaei, P., Haeri, S. A. S., & Mohammadi, S. (2018). Airports evaluation and ranking model using Taguchi loss function, best-worst method and VIKOR technique. Journal of Air Transport Management, 68, 4-13.
  • Singh M, & Sarkar D. (2017), Project Risk Analysis for Elevated Metro Rail Projects using Fuzzy Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA), International Journal of Engineering Technology Science and Research,4,(11).
  • Smarandache, F., & Vlăduțescu, Ş. (2013). Communication vs. Information, an Axiomatic Neutrosophic Solution. Infinite Study.
  • Song, W., Ming, X., Wu, Z., & Zhu, B. (2014). A rough TOPSIS approach for failure mode and effects analysis in uncertain environments. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 30(4), 473-486.
  • Stamatis, D. H. (2003). Failure mode and effect analysis: FMEA from theory to execution. ASQ Quality Press.
  • Su, X., Deng, Y., Mahadevan, S., & Bao, Q. (2012). An improved method for risk evaluation in failure modes and effects analysis of aircraft engine rotor blades. Engineering Failure Analysis, 26, 164-174.
  • Thomas A. Carbone & Donald D. Tippett (2004) Project Risk Management Using the Project Risk FMEA, Engineering Management Journal, 16:4, 28-35.
  • Turskis, Z., Zavadskas, E. K., & Peldschus, F. (2009). Multi-criteria optimization system for decision making in construction design and management. Engineering economics, 61(1).
  • Ustinovichius, L., Barvidas, A., Vishnevskaja, A., & Ashikhmin, I. V. (2009). Multicriteria verbal analysis for the decision of construction problems. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 15(2), 326-340.
  • Vahdani, B., Salimi, M., & Charkhchian, M. (2015). A new FMEA method by integrating fuzzy belief structure and TOPSIS to improve risk evaluation process. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 77(1-4), 357-368.
  • Vílchez, J. A., Espejo, V., & Casal, J. (2011). Generic event trees and probabilities for the release of different types of hazardous materials. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 24(3), 281-287.
  • Wang, Y. M., Chin, K. S., Poon, G. K. K., & Yang, J. B. (2009). Risk evaluation in failure mode and effects analysis using fuzzy weighted geometric mean. Expert systems with applications, 36(2), 1195-1207.
  • Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., & Tamošaitiene, J. (2010). Risk assessment of construction projects. Journal of civil engineering and management, 16(1), 33-46.
  • Zeng, S. X., Tam, C. M., & Tam, V. W. (2015). Integrating safety, environmental and quality risks for project management using a FMEA method. Engineering Economics, 66(1).
  • Zeng, Sai X, Tam, Chun M., Vivian W. Y. Tam, (2010), Integrating Safety, Environmental and Quality Risks for Project Management Using a FMEA Method,Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics, 21, (1).
  • Zhang, Z., & Chu, X. (2011). Risk prioritization in failure mode and effects analysis under uncertainty. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(1), 206-214.
  • Zhao, H., You, J. X., & Liu, H. C. (2017). Failure mode and effect analysis using MULTIMOORA method with continuous weighted entropy under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Soft Computing, 21(18), 5355-5367.
  • Zhi-Qiang, Hou; YA-MEI, Zeng. Research on risk assessment technology of the major hazard in harbor engineering. Procedia engineering, 2016, 137: 843-848.
  • Zhou, Q., & Thai, V. V. (2016). Fuzzy and grey theories in failure mode and effect analysis for tanker equipment failure prediction. Safety science, 83, 74-79.
Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1304-0278
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2002
  • Yayıncı: Cahit AYDEMİR
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

EĞİTİM PROGRAMI OKURYAZARLIĞI KAVRAMININ KAVRAMSAL YÖNDEN ANALİZİ: BİR ÖLÇEK GELİŞTİRME ÇALIŞMASI

Salih AKYILDIZ

GÜZEL SANATLAR FAKÜLTESİ ÖZEL YETENEK GİRİŞ SINAV PUANI VE HESAPLAMADA KULLANILAN PUANLARIN ÖZEL YETENEK SINAV BAŞARISI İLE AKADEMİK BAŞARIYA ETKİSİ (Erciyes Üniversitesi Güzel Sanatlar Fakültesi Örneği)

Levent ÇORUH

TRAVMA SONRASI STRES ile TRAVMA SONRASI BÜYÜME ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİDE SOSYAL DESTEĞİN ve MANEVİYATIN ARACI ROLÜ

Neslihan ARICI ÖZCAN, Reyhan ARSLAN

BAZI İNSANLAR MATEMATİKSEL YETENEKLE Mİ DOĞMAKTADIR? MATEMATİK ÖĞRETMENLERİNİN VE MATEMATİK ÖĞRETMENİ ADAYLARININ MATEMATİKSEL YETENEK HAKKINDAKİ İNANÇLARI

Mehmet AYDIN

OTİZM SPEKTRUM BOZUKLUĞU OLAN ÇOCUKLARIN KAYNAŞTIRILMASI VE BÜTÜNLEŞTİRİLMESİNDE ÖĞRETMENLERLE İLGİLİ DEĞİŞKENLERİN İNCELENMESİ

Yakup BURAK, Emine AHMETOĞLU

ŞANLIURFA İLİ KÖYLERİNDE YAŞLILARIN DEMOGRAFİK VE SOSYO-EKONOMİK DURUMLARI İLE YOKSULLUK VE YAŞLILIK ALGILARI

Müge KANTAR DAVRAN, Mehmet Reşit SEVİNÇ, Mehmet CANÇELİK

OKUL MÜDÜRÜ GERİ BİLDİRİM ÖLÇEĞİ GEÇERLİK VE GÜVENİRLİK ÇALIŞMASI

Suphi BALCI, Habib ÖZKAN

BİYOLOJİ ÖĞRETMENLERİNİN BİREYSEL YENİLİKÇİLİK DÜZEYLERİNİN İNCELENMESİ (DİYARBAKIR İLİ ÖRNEĞİ)

İbrahim Ümit YAPICI, Seval KAYA

ORTAOKUL ÖĞRENCİLERİNDE ZORBALIĞI VE SALDIRGANLIĞI AÇIKLAMADA BAŞA ÇIKMA STRATEJİLERİNİN ROLÜ

Ahmet Bedel, Gökhan GÜLER

İŞLETMELERDE DAĞITIMSAL ADALET: SERAMİK SEKTÖRÜNDE BİR UYGULAMA

İbrahim YILDIRIM, Hasan ERASLAN