Distomolar Dişlerin Görülme Sıklığı: Geriye Dönük (Retrospektif) İnceleme

AMAÇ: Bu çalışmanın amacı erişkinlerde distomolar dişlerin yaygınlığını değerlendirmektir. YÖNTEM: 25-45 yaş arasındaki hastaların panoramik radyografları, yaş, cinsiyet, distomolar dişlerin varlığı, sayıları, şekilleri, yerleri, tek ya da çift taraflı oluşu ve tedavi şekli açısından geriye dönük olarak incelenmiştir. BULGULAR: 5234 hastaya ait panoramik görüntü içinde 18 hastada 21 distomolar diş tespit edilmiş ve distomolar sıklığı % 0,34 olarak bulunmuştur. Distomolar dişlerin çoğunluğu gömülü (%76,19) ve mikrodont (% 95,24) olarak sıklıkla erkeklerde (% 61,11) ve üst çenede (% 76,19) gözlenmiştir.. SONUÇ: Distomolar dişler nadir olmakla birlikte genellikle gömülü olarak izlenirler. Komşu dişlerde sürme anomalileri, kist oluşumu gibi komplikasyonlara yol açabildiklerinden, panoramik radyografilerin detaylı olarak ve dikkatle incelenmesi son derece önemlidir.

Retrospective Analysis Of Distomolar Frequency

INTRODUCTION: Evaluation of the frequency of distomolar teeth in the adult population. METHODS: 25-45 years old patients' panoramic images were assessed retrospectively. Demographic data (age, gender), the presence of distomolar teeth, their number, shape, location, laterality and treatment modality were noted. RESULTS: Among 5234 patients' panoramic images 21 distomolar teeth were detected in 18 patients. The frequency of distomolars were found to be 0,34%. Majority of distomolar teeth were impacted (76,19%), microdont (95,24%), and found in the maxillas (76,19%) of men (61,11%). CONCLUSION: Distomolars are generally impacted and are rarely seen. A detailed and careful investigation of panoramic radiographs is imperative to prevent or minimize associated complications such as eruption anomalies or the formation of odontogenic cysts.

PDF

___

1. Leco Berrocal MI, Martin Morales JF, Martinez Gonzalez JM. An observational study of the frequency of supernumerary teeth in a population of 2000 patients. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2007;12:134- 138.
2. Rao PV, Chidzonga MM. Supernumerary teeth: literature review. Cent Afr J Med 2001;47:22-26.
3. Batra P, Duggal R, Parkash H. Non syndromic multiple supernumerary teeth transmitted as an autosomal dominant trait. J Oral Pathol Med 2005;34:621-625.
4. Fazliah SN. Supernumerary tooth: report of a case. Arch Orofac Sci 2007;2:54-58. 5. Liu JF. Characteristics of premaxillary supernumerary teeth: a survey of 112 cases. ASDC J Dent Child 1995;62:262-265.
6. Sugimura M, Tsuji Y, Yamaguchi K, Yoshida Y, Tanioka H. Mandibular distomolars. A review of the Japanese literature and a report of three additional cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1975;40:341- 345.
7. Patchett CL, Crawford PJ, Cameron AC, Stephens CD. The management of supernumerary teeth in childhood- a retrospective study of practice in Bristol Dental Hospital, England and Westmead Dental Hospital, Sydney, Australia. Int J Pediatric Dent 2001;11:259-265.
8. Peker I, Kaya E, Darendeliler-Yaman S. Clinical and radiographical evaluation of non-syndromic hypodontia and hyperdontia in permanent dentition. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2009;14:393-397.
9. Fernandez Montenegro P, Valmaseda Castellon E, Berini Aytes L, Gay Escoda C. Retrospective study of 145 supernumerary teeth. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2006;11:339-344.
10. Neville B, Damm D. Allen C. Bouquot J: Oral Maxillofacial Pathology. 2. ed, Saunders, Philadelphia, 2002, s.71.
11. Gündüz K, Çelenk P. Distomolarlar üzerine retrospektif bir çalışma. Türkiye Klinikleri J Dental Sci 2006;12:83-86.
12. Yusof WZ: Non-syndrome multiple supernumerary teeth: Literature review. J Can Dent Assoc 1990;56:147-149.
13. Kökten G, Balcıoğlu H, Büyükertan M. Supernumerary fourth and fifth molars: a report of two cases. J Contemp Dent Pract 2003;15:67-76.
14. Hattab FN, Yassin OM, Rawashdeh MA. Supernumerary teeth: report of three cases and review of the literature. ASDC J Dent Child 1994;61:382-393.
15. Agrawal JM, Agrawal MS, Nanjannawar LG, Adaki RV. Non- syndromic multiple supernumerary teeth: a rare entity. BMJ Case Rep, 2013,doi: 10.1136/bcr2012-007796.
16. Clementini M, Ottria L, Pandolfi C, Agrestini C, Barlattani A. Four impacted fourth molars in a young patient: a case report. Oral Implantol (Rome) 2013;5:100-103.
17. Hopcraft M. Multiple supernumerary teeth. Case report. Aust Dent J 1998;43:17-19.
18. Reddy GS, Reddy GV, Krishna IV, Regonda SK. Non syndromic bilateral multiple impacted supernumerary mandibular third molars: a rare and unusual case report.Case Rep Dent, 2013, doi: 10.1155/2013/857147.
19. Grimanis GA, Kyriakides AT, Spyropoulos ND. A survey on supernumerary molars. Quintessence Int.1991;22:989-995.
20. Özden B, Baş B, Gündüz K, Şanal KO. Bilateral mandibular distomolar dişler. Vaka raporu. Süleyman Demirel Üni Diş Hek Fak Derg 2010;2:143-146.
21. Shahzad KM, Roth LE. Prevalence and management of fourth molars: a retrospective study and literature review. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012;70:272-275.
22. Kaya E, Güngör K, Demirel O, Özütürk Ö. Prevalence and characteristics of non-syndromic distomolars: a retrospective study. J Investig Clin Dent 2015;6:282-286.
23. Arslan A, Altundal H, Ozel E. The frequency of distomolar teeth in a population of urban Turkish adults: a retrospective study. Oral Radiol 2009;25:118-122.
24. Kurt H, Suer BT, Senel B, Avsever H. A retrospective observational study of the frequency of distomolar teeth in a population of 14.250 patients. Cumhuriyet Dent J 2015;18:335-342.
25. Mitsea A, Vardas E, Papachatzopoulou A, Kalfountzos G, Leventis M, Tsiklakis K. The frequency of non-syndromic distomolar teeth in a Greek population sample? J Clin Exp Dent. 2015;7:e589-594.