Nonkomunikan rudimenter uterin hornda ektopik gebelik

Konjenital uterin anomalilerin fertil kadınlardaki insidansı 1/200-600'dür. Rudimenter hornlu unikornuat uterus, kadın genital sisteminin en nadir müllerian anomalisidir ve insidansı 1/100.000'dir. Müllerian anomalilerin obstetrik komplikasyonları ektopik gebelik, habitüel abortus, prematürite ve malpresentasyondur. Nonkomünike tip rudimenter hornda gelişen gebelikler, spermin ya da fertilize ovumun karşı taraftan transperitoneal migrasyonu ile gerçekleşir; gebelik sonuçları kötüdür. En korkulan komplikasyonu rudimenter horn gebelik rüptürüdür.Tedavi seçenekleri rudimenter hornun çıkarılmasını veya metotreksat uygulamasını içerir. Bu vaka sunumunda, rudimenter uterin hornda, rüptüre olmamış ve eksizyon ile tedavi edilmiş ektopik gebelik olgusunu tartıştık.

Ectopic pregnancy in noncommunicating rudimentary uterine horn

The incidence of congenital uterine anomalies among fertile women is reported as 1/200 to 1/600. An unicornuate uterus with a rudimentary horn is the rarest mullerian anomaly and its incidence is 1/100.000. The obstetric complications of mullerian anomalies are ectopic pregnancy, habitual abortion, prematurity and malpresentation. Conception in a noncommunicating rudimentary horn arises from transperitoneal migration of either spermatozoa or the fertilized ovum from the contralateral site. Pregnancy outcome is poor and the most dreaded complication is rupture of the rudimentary horn pregnancy. Treatment options include excision of the rudimentary horn or methotrexate. We present a case of ectopic pregnancy in a noncommunicating rudimentary uterine horn that was unruptured and succesfully treated with excision.

___

  • 1) Ansbacher R. Uterin anomalies and future pregnancies. Clin Perinatol. 1983;10:295-304
  • 2) Pentti K. Heinonen M.D.Unicornuate uterus and rudimentary horn. FertilSteril 1997;68:224-30.
  • 3) Wang SJ, Oli M, Jinang L, Wang JL, Wei LH. Clinical analysis of 225 women with congenital uterine malformation. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2008 Jul;43(7):493-6.
  • 4) The American Fertility Society. The American Fertility Society classifications of adnexal adhesions, distal tubal occlusion, secondary to tubal ligation, tubal pregnancies, Mullerian anomalies and intrauterine adhesions. Fertil Steril 1988;49:944-55.
  • 5) Speroff L, Glass RH, Kase NG. Clinical Gynecologic Endocrinology and Infertility. Sixth Edition. 1999 pp 123-158.
  • 6) Handa Y, Hoshi N, Yomada h, Wada S, Kudo M, Tsuda K, et al. Tubal Pregnancy in a unicornuate uterus with rudimentory horn: a case report Fertil steril 1999; 72(2): 354-356.
  • 7) Nahum GG. Rudimentary uterine horn pregnancy. The 20th Century worldwide experience of 588 cases. J Reprod Med. 2002; 47(2):151-63
  • 8) Güneş H, Yermez E, Özgenç Y, Uran B. Rupture of a Rudimentary Horn Pregnancy.T Klin J Gynecol Obst 1996; 6: 279-281
  • 9) Cornis M, Wattiez A, Pouly JL. Laparoscopic management of unicorniate uterus with rudimentary horn and unilateral extensive endometriosis: case report. Hum Reprod 1990; 5: 819-820.
  • 10) Dicker D, Nitke S, Shoenfeld A, Fish B, Meizner I, Ben-Rafael Z. Laparoscopic management of rudimentary horn pregnancy. Hum Reprod. 1998;13:2643–2644