Fuat AKERCAN, Teksin ÇIRPAN, Solmaz Pınar YILDIZ, Serdar ÖZŞENER, Nedim KARADADAŞ, Mustafa ULUKUŞ

Benign adneksiyel kitlelerde tanı ve tedavi yaklaşımları

Adneksiyel kitlelere jinekoloji pratiğinde oldukça sık rastlanılmaktadır. Takip ve tedavilerinin uygun biçimde yapılabilmesi için başta benign/malign ayrımı olmak üzere kitlelerin karakteristikleri ve yönetiminin çok iyi bilinmesi zorunludur. Bu retrospektif çalışmada Ege Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi (EÜTF) Kadın Hastalıkları ve Doğum Kliniği'nde 2002/2003 yıllarında opere edilen ve histopatolojik incelemede benign karakterde olduğu saptanmış adneksiyel kitle tanılı toplam 80 hastanın anamnez, fizik muayene, transvajinal ultrason (TV USG), küretaj ve CA 125 sonuçlarının değerlendirilmesi amaçlanmıştır. Benign karakterli adneksiyel kitlelerde özenli bir öykü alımı, fizik muayene, laboratuvar tetkikleri ve TV USG bir arada kullanıldığında oldukça yüksek güvenilirliğe sahip olduğu sonucuna varılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Geriyedönük çalışma, Adneksa hastalıkları, Ultrasonografi, CA-125 antijen

Approaches to the diagnosis and treatment of benign adnexial masses

Adnexial masses are commonly seen in gynecology practice. The management should be made according to the differentiation of the characteristics of the masses. Totally 80 cases that the operation were performed at Ege University Faculty of Medicine Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology investigated in years 2002/2003 with benign histology in this retrospective study. The aim of the study was the evaluation of the history, physical examination, transvaginal ultrasound, curettage and CA 125 levels of the patients.

Keywords:

Retrospective Studies, Adnexal Diseases, Ultrasonography, CA-125 Antigen,

PDF

___

1. Morgan A. Adnexial mass evaluation in the emergency department. Emerg Med Clin North Am 2001;19(3):799-816
2. Guerriero S, Ajossa S, Garau N, Piras B, Paoletti AM, Melis GB. Ultrasonography and color Doppler-based triage for adnexal masses to provide the most appropriate surgical approach. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Feb;192(2):401-6.
3. Timmerman D, Verrelst H, Collins WP, Bourne TH, Vergote I. Re: Mol et al. Distinguishing the benign and malignant adnexial mass: an external validation of prognostic models. Gynecol Oncol 2001;83(1):166-8
4. Davies AP, Jacobs I, Woolas R, Fish A, Oram D. The adnexial mass: benign or malignant? Evaluation of a risk of malignancy index. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1993;100(10):927-31
5. Drake J. Diagnosis and management of the adnexial mass. Am Fam Physician 1998;15;57(10):2471-6, 2479-80
6. Bayer AI, Wiskind AK. Adnexial torsion: can the adnexa be saved? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994;171(6):1506-10
7. Close RJ, Sachs CJ, Dyne PL. Reliability of bimanual pelvic examinations performed in emergency departments. West J Med 2001;175(4):240-4
8. Guerriero S, Mais V, Ajossa S, Paoletti AM, Angiolucci M, Melis GB. Transvaginal ultrasonography combined with CA-125 plasma levels in the diagnosis of endometrioma. Fertil Steril 1996;65(2):293-8
9. Guerriero S, Ajossa S, Paoletti AM, Mais V, Angiolucci M, Melis GB. Tumor markers and transvaginal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of endometrioma. Obstet Gynecol 1996;88(3):403-7
10. Schmitz-Stolbrink A. Gynecologic origin of acute abdomen in childhood Radiologe 1997;37(6):459-63
11. Sohaib SA, Mills TD, Sahdev A, Webb JA, Vantrappen PO, Jacobs IJ, Reznek RH. The role of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound in patients with adnexal masses. Clin Radiol. 2005 Mar;60(3):340-8.
12. Pejovic T, Nezhat F. Laparoscopic management of adnexial masses, the opportunities and the risks. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2001;943:255-68www_celebiyiz_biz_yayinlanmayanreklamlar.wmv
13. Chapron C, Dubuisson JB, Capella-Allouc S. Salpingo-oophorectomy for adnexial masses. Place and results for operative laparoscopy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1997;73(1):43-8
14. Buquet RA, Amato AR, Huang GB, Singla J, Ortiz J, Ortiz OC. Is preoperative selection of patients with cystic adnexial masses essential for laparoscopic treatment? J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1999;6(4):477-81
15. Ou CS, Liu YH, Zabriskie V, Rowbotham R. Alternate methods for laparoscopic management of adnexial masses greater than 10 cm in diameter. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2001;11(3):125-32
16. Dietrich M, Osmers RG, Grobe G, Zech G, Suren A, Krauss T, Sander H, Fischer G, Kuhn W. Limitations of the evaluation of adnexial masses by its macroscopic aspects, cytology and biopsy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1999;82(1):57-62
17. Curtin JP. Management of the adnexial mass. Gynecol Oncol 1994;55:42-6
18. Argenta PA, Nezhat F. Approaching the adnexial mass in the new millennium. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2000;7(4):455-71