Psychometric Properties of the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems- Circumplex Scales Short Form: a Reliability and Validity Study

Kişilerarası Problemler Envanteri Döngüsel Ölçekleri kısa formu psikometrik özellikleri: Bir güvenirlik ve geçerlik çalışması. Amaç: Bu çalışmada bireylerin kişilerarası güçlüklerini ölçen Türkçe bir envanterin bulunmaması göz önüne alınarak Kişilerarası Problemler Envanteri Döngüsel Ölçekleri kısa formunun (IIP-C) Türk kültürüne uyarlanması amaçlanmış ve ölçeğin psikometrik özellikleri çalışılmıştır. Yöntem: Araştırmaya, genel toplumdan yaşları 18 ile 68 arasında değişmekte 441'i erkek, 887'si kadın, toplam 1298 kişi katılmıştır. IIP-C Türkçe formunun güvenirlik ve geçerlik çalışması kapsamında, iç tutarlığı, test-tekrartest güvenilirliği, iki-yarım-test güvenirliği ile eşzamanlı ve kriter geçerliği incelenmiştir. Geçerlik çalışması kapsamında, Pozitif ve Negatif Duygu Ölçeği, Kısa Semptom Envanteri, Çok Boyutlu Algılanan Sosyal Destek Ölçeği ve Temel Kişilik Özellikleri Envanteri ile ilişkiler incelenmiştir.Bulgular: Elde edilen sonuçlara göre, genel kişilerarası güçlük düzeyi ve çeşitli kişilerarası problemlerden kaynaklanan stresi değerlendiren Kişilerarası Problemler Envanteri'nin iyi düzeyde iç tutarlılık, test-tekrar-test ve iki-yarım-test güvenilirlik katsayılarına sahip olduğu bulunmuş, benzer şekilde eş zamanlı ve kriter geçerliği ve orijinali ile uyumlu iki faktörlü yapısı da desteklenmiştir. Sonuç: IIP-C kabul edilir psikometrik özelliklere sahip olup, Türkiye'de yürütülen araştırma ve klinik uygulamalarda kullanılabilir niteliktedir.

Kişilerarası Problemler Envanteri Döngüsel Ölçekleri kısa formu psikometrik özellikleri: Bir güvenirlik ve geçerlik çalışması

Psychometric properties of the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems Circumplex Scales short form: a reliability and validity study. Objective: Considering the lack of an instrument in Turkish to measure individuals' interpersonal difficulties, our aim was to adapt a short version of the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems Circumplex Scales (IIP-C) for Turkish culture, and we studied the psychometric properties of the scale.Method: Our study included 1298 adult participants from the normal population (411 females and 887 males) between the ages of 18 and 68. In order to establish reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the IIP-C, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, split-half reliability coefficients, and concurrent and criterion validity studies were conducted. The validity study analyzed correlations with the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule, the Brief Symptom Inventory, the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support and the Basic Personality Traits Inventory. Results: The results of the study indicated good internal consistency, test-retest and split-half reliability coefficients of the IIP-C, assessing overall level of interpersonal difficulty and distress due to various interpersonal problems. Moreover, findings supported concurrent and criterion validity of the inventory, in addition to the two-factor structures consistent with the original inventory.Conclusion: The psychometric properties of IIP-C seem to be acceptable; therefore, the instrument can be utilized for research and clinical purposes in Turkey.

Kaynakça

Sullivan HS. The Interpersonal Theory of Psychiatry. First ed. New York: Norton, 1953; 110-111.

Horowitz LM, Alden LE, Wiggins JS, Pincus AL. Inventory of Interpersonal Problems Manual. Texas: The Psychological Corporation, 2003.

Leary TF. Interpersonal Diagnosis of Personality: a Functional Theory and Methodology for Personality Evaluation. First ed. New York: Ronald Press, 1957.

Locke KD. Interpersonal Circumplex Measures. In Strack S (Ed.) Differentiating Normal and Abnormal Personality. Second ed. New York: Springer, 2006; 383-400.

Sahin NH, Durak A, Yasak Y. Interpersonal Relationship Scale: Psychometric Characteristics. 8th National Congress of Psychology, Izmir, Sept. 21-23, 1994. (Turkish)

Sahin NH, Ceri O, Duzgun G, Ergun, H, Karsli E, Koc V, Orflu P, Uzun C. Interpersonal Style Inventory. Ankara: Unpublished study, 2007. (Turkish)

Imamoglu SE, Aydin B. Development of the Scale of Dimensions of Interpersonal Relationships. Studies in Psychology 2009; 29:76-90.

Cam S, Tumkaya S. Developing the Interpersonal Problem Solving Inventory (IPSI): validity and reliability study. Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Journal 2007; 3:95-108. (Turkish)

Boyacioglu G, Savasir I. Standardization, validity and reliability study of the Interpersonal Schema Questionnaire (ISQ) for Turkish university students. Turkish Journal of Psychology 1995; 10:40-58. (Turkish)

Oztan N. Kisilerarası Iliski Tarzi Olcegi Gecerlik ve Guvenirligi. Topsever Y, Goregetili M (Ed.). Ulusal Psikoloji Kongresi Bilimsel Calismalari. Ankara: Turk Psikologlar Dernegi Yayinlari, 1994, 37-44. (Turkish)

Sahin EE, Gizir CA. Interpersonal Competence Questionnaire- Short Form: validity and reliability studies. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education 2013; 9:144-158. (Turkish)

Ulusoy Y, Durmus E. Investigation of interpersonal dependency tendency in terms of five-factor personality traits. Inonu University Journal of the Faculty of Education 2011; 12:1-21. (Turkish)

Alden LE, Wiggins JS, Pincus AL. Construction of circumplex scales for the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems. J Pers Assess 1990; 55:521-536. [CrossRef]

Horowitz LM, Rosenberg SE, Baer BA, Ureno G, Villasenor, VS. Inventory of Interpersonal Problems: psychometric properties and clinical applications. J Consult Clin Psychol 1988; 56:885- 892. [CrossRef]

Hughes J, Barkham M. Scoping the inventory of interpersonal problems, its derivatives and short forms: 1988-2004. Clin Psychol Psychother 2005; 12:475-496. [CrossRef]

Inventory of Interpersonal Problems. http://www.mindgarden. com/products/iip.htm. Accessed December 10, 2014.

Bartholomew K, Horowitz LM. Attachment styles among young adults: a test of a four-category model. J Pers Soc Psychol 1991; 61:226-244. [CrossRef]

Horowitz LM, Rosenberg SE, Bartholomew K. Interpersonal problems, attachment styles, and outcome in brief dynamic psychotherapy. J Consult Clin Psychol 1993; 61:549-560. [CrossRef]

Gurtman MB. The Circumplex as a Tool for Studying Normal and Abnormal Personality: a Methodological Primer. In Strack S, Lorr M (editors). Differentiating Normal and Abnormal Personality. First ed. New York: Springer, 1994, 243-263.

Gurtman MB. Personality structure and interpersonal problems: a theoretically-guided item analysis of the inventory of interpersonal problems. Assessment 1995; 2:343-361. [CrossRef]

Gurtman MB. Exploring personality with interpersonal circumplex. Soc Personal Psychol Compass 2009; 3:601-619. [CrossRef]

Monsen JT, Hagtvet KA, Havik OE, Eilertsen DE. Circumplex structure and personality disorder correlates of the interpersonal problems model (IIP-C): construct validity and clinical implications. Psychol Assess 2006; 18:165-173. [CrossRef]

Pincus AL, Wiggins JS. Interpersonal problems and conceptions of personality disorders. J Pers Disord 1990; 4:342-352. [CrossRef]

Eldredge KL, Locke KD, Horowitz LM. Patterns in interpersonal problems associated with binge eating disorder. Int J Eat Disord 1998; 23:383-389. [CrossRef]

Eng W, Heimberg RG. Interpersonal correlates of generalized anxiety disorder: Self versus other perception. J Anxiety Disord 2006; 20:380-387. [CrossRef]

Kachin KE, Newman MG, Pincus AL. An interpersonal problem approach to the division of social phobia subtypes. Behavior Therapy 2001; 32:479-501. [CrossRef]

McEvoy PM, Burgess MM, Page AC, Nathan P, Fursland A. Interpersonal problems across anxiety, depression, and eating disorders: a transdiagnostic examination. Br J Clin Psychol 2013; 52:129-147. [CrossRef]

Spitzer C, Siebel-Jurges U, Barnow S, Grabe H, Freyberger HJ. Alexithymia and interpersonal problems. Psychother Psychosom 2005, 74:240-246. [CrossRef]

Dinger U, Zilcha-Mano S, McCarthy KS, Barett MS, Barber JP. Interpersonal problems as predictors of alliance, symptomatic improvement and premature termination in treatment of depression. J Affect Disord 2013; 151:800-803. [CrossRef]

Gurtman MB. Interpersonal problems and the psychotherapy context: the construct validity of the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems. Psychol Assess 1996; 8:241-255. [CrossRef]

McEvoy PM, Burgess MM, Nathan P. The relationship between interpersonal problems, negative cognitions, and outcomes from cognitive behavioral group therapy for depression. J Affect Disord 2013; 150:266-275. [CrossRef]

McEvoy PM, Burgess MM, Nathan P. The relationship between interpersonal problems, therapeutic alliance, and outcomes following group and individual cognitive behavior therapy. J Affect Disord 2014; 157:25-32. [CrossRef]

Quilty LC, Mainland BJ, Mcbride C, Bagby RM. Interpersonal problems and impacts: further evidence for the role of interpersonal functioning in treatment outcome in major depressive disorder. J Affect Disord 2013; 150:393-400. [CrossRef]

Gencoz T, Oncul O. Examination of personality characteristics in a Turkish sample: development of the Basic Personality Traits Inventory. J Gen Psychol 2012; 139:194-216. [CrossRef]

McCrae RR, Costa PT. Personality in Adulthood: a Five Factor Theory Perspective. Second ed. New York, NY: The Guilford Press, 2003; 34-37. [CrossRef]

Derogatis LR. BSI Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI), Administration, Scoring, and Procedures Manual- II. New York: Clinical Psychometric Research Inc, 1992.

Sahin NH, Durak A. Brief symptom inventory-BSI: Adaptation for Turkish Youths. Turkish Journal of Psychology 1994; 9:44- 56. (Turkish)

Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol 1988; 54:1063-1070. [CrossRef]

Gencoz T. Positive and negative affect schedule: a study of validity and reliability. Turkish Journal of Psychology 2000; 15:19-26. (Turkish)

Zimet GD, Dahlem NW, Zimet SG, Farley GK. The multidimensional scale of perceived social support. J Pers Assess 1988; 52:30-41. [CrossRef]

Eker D, Arkar H, Yaldiz H. Factorial structure, validity, and reliability of revised form of the multidimensional scale of perceived social support. Turk Psikiyatri Derg 2001; 12:17-25. (Turkish)

Nysæter TE, Langvik E, Berthelsen M, Nordvik H. Interpersonal problems and personality traits: the relation between IIP-64C and NEO-FFI. Nordic Psychology 2009; 61:82-93. [CrossRef]

Soldz S, Budman S, Demby A, Merry J. Representation of personality disorders in circumplex and five-factor space: explorations with a clinical sample. Psychol Assess 1993; 5:41- 52. [CrossRef]

Trapnell PD, Wiggins JS. Extension of the interpersonal adjective scales to include the big five dimensions of personality. J Pers Soc Psychol 1990; 59:781-790. [CrossRef]

McCrae RR, Costa PT. The structure of interpersonal traits: wiggins's circumplex and the five-factor model. J Pers Soc Psychol 1989; 56:586-595. [CrossRef]

Schmitz N, Hartkamp N, Kiuse J. The symptom check-list (SCL- 90-R): a German validation study. Qual Life Res 2000; 9:185- 193. [CrossRef]

Gude T, Moum T, Kaldestad E, Friis S. Inventory of interpersonal problems: a three-dimensional balanced and scalable 48-item version. J Pers Assess 2000; 74:296-310. [CrossRef]

Tracey TJG, Rounds J, Gurtman M. Examination of the general factor with the interpersonal circumplex structure: application to the inventory of interpersonal problems. Multivariate Behav Res 1996; 31:441-466. [CrossRef]

Vittengl JR, Clark LA, Jarrett RB. Interpersonal problems, personality pathology, and social adjustment after cognitive therapy for depression. Psychol Assess 2003; 15:29-40. [CrossRef]

Barkham M, Hardy GE, Startup M. The IIP-C: a short version of the inventory of interpersonal problems. Br J Clin Psychol 1996; 35:21-35. [CrossRef]

Kaynak Göster

  • ISSN: 1018-8681
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 1984

5.4b 3.3b

Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Relation of the Nine Types of Temperament Model with Personality Disorders

Enver Demirel YILMAZ, Ali Görkem GENÇER, Özge ÜNAL, Mehmet PALANCI, Mehmet KANDEMİR, Ziya SELÇUK, ÖMER AYDEMİR

Treatment Augmentation Effects of EMDR Intervention after Traumatic Experiences in Patients with Major Depression: a Case Series

Murat SEMİZ, Serdar ATİK, Murat ERDEM

Manifestation of Hashimoto's encephalopathy with Psychotic Signs: a Case Presentation

Ayşin KISABAY, Kuzeymen BALIKÇI, Serpil SARI, Deniz SELÇUKİ

Tardive Dyskinesia in Mentally Retarded Patients under Long-Term Antipsychotic Treatment

Aylin CAN, Ahmet NALBANT, Huseyin Sehit BURHAN, Alparslan CANSİZ, Kaasım Fatih YAVUZ, Mehtap Arslan DELİCE, Erhan KURT

Development of a Problematic Mobile Phone Use Scale for University Students: Validity and Reliability Study

MUSTAFA PAMUK, ABDULLAH ATLİ

Tactile Hallucination and Delusion Following Acute Stroke: a Case Report

Erhan AKINCI, Fatih ÖNCÜ, Barış TOPÇULAR

Psychometric Properties of the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems- Circumplex Scales Short Form: a Reliability and Validity Study

MİRAY AKYUNUS, TÜLİN GENÇÖZ

Reproductive and Sexual Functions in Bipolar Patients: Data from a Specialized Mood Disorder Clinic

EBRU ALDEMİR, Fisun AKDENİZ, Serhan IŞIKLI, Nesli Keskinoz BİLEN, Simavi VAHİP

Evaluation of Depression and Social Anxiety Symptoms in Obese Children

ESRA AKYÜZ ÖZKAN, Ali İrfan GÜL, Zeynep Tuba OZDEMİR, Hasim HUSREVSAHİ, Zehra YILDIRIM, Esra DOMUR, Ummugulsum Aliye GECİT

Alleviation of Alopecia after Switching from Escitalopram to Duloxetine: a Case Report

Sibel KOÇBIYIK, SEDAT BATMAZ, Levent TURHAN, Ozgur Ahmet YUNCU, Ali ÇAYKÖYLÜ