TEDARİK ZİNCİRİ YÖNETİMİNDE LOJİSTİK KÜMELERİN ÖNEMİ: BOLU İLİ İÇİN UYGULAMA
Bu çalışma ile birlikte Bolu ilinde faaliyet gösteren firmaların lojistik süreçlerindeki temel ihtiyaçlarının belirlenmesi ve yapılan iyileştirme çalışmalarının lojistik kümelenme faaliyetleri için önemi araştırılmıştır. Lojistik sektöründeki farklı oyuncularının bilgi paylaşımı, eğitim ve öğrenme kabiliyetlerini kullanarak kaynak ve kapasite paylaşımı ve katma değerli hizmetlerin artırılması üzerine algılarının anket çalışmaları ile elde edilen veriler doğrultusunda detaylı incelemesi yapılmıştır. Lojistik sektörüne yoğun etkisi olan farklı değişkenler kullanılarak çeşitli aşamalarda ölçme değişmezliği testleri yardımıyla verilerin analizinin yapılması ve bölge genelinde kümelenme faaliyetlerinin üçlü sarmal yapının paydaşları için faydaları ortaya konulmuştur. Araştırma sonucunda şirketlerin sektör içerisindeki kapasite artışları veya firmaların çalışma yaşlarındaki artış çıktı değişkenleri üzerinde olumlu etkileri olduğu gözlenmiştir
THE IMPORTANCE OF LOGISTICS CLUSTERING FOR SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT: A CASE STUDY OF BOLU
This study investigates the importance of clustering activities in order to increase the quality and effectiveness of logistics industry, also shows the determination of basic needs and assessment of logistics processes for different stakeholders operating in Bolu. The effects of different stakeholders in logistics sector over capacity and resource sharing and increasing the value-added services by using the knowledge sharing, education and learning abilities are performed with the detailed analysis. The roadmap for the development of logistics sector and regional development is prepared by analyzing the data with equivalent measurement tests at various stages using different important variables and by sharing the importance of clustering activities for member of triple helix structures. As a consequence, the positive impact of capacity and maturity level increases of companies over the variables of the models is observed
___
- [1]. TIS – 2023 Türkiye İhracat Stratejisi
ve Eylemi. 2012.
http://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskil
er/2012/06/20120613-31-1.pdf
Erişim Tarihi (11.02.2017).
- [2]. Beamon, B. M., Designing the green
supply chain. 1999. Logistics
information management, 12 (4), 332-
342.
- [3]. Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J., Lai, K. H. 2008.
Confirmation of a measurement
model for green supply chain
management practices
implementation. International journal
of production economics, 111(2), 261-
273.
- [4]. Carter, C. R., Kale, R., Grimm, C. M.
2000. Environmental purchasing and
firm performance: an empirical
investigation. Transportation
Research Part E: Logistics and
Transportation Review, 36(3), 219-
228.
- [5]. Masoumik, S. M., Abdul-Rashid, S. H.,
Olugu, E. U., Raja Ghazilla, R. A. 2014.
Sustainable supply chain design: A
configurational approach. The
Scientific World Journal.
- [6]. Pishvaee, M. S., Torabi, S. A., Razmi, J.
2012. Credibility-based fuzzy
mathematical programming model
for green logistics design under
uncertainty. Computers & Industrial
Engineering, 62(2), 624-632.
- [7]. Marshall, A. 1898. Principles of
economics. Vol. 1.
- [8]. Porter, M. E. 1998. Cluster and the
new economics of competition.
- [9]. Liu, C. L., Lyons, A. C. 2011. An
analysis of third-party logistics
performance and service
provision. Transportation Research
Part E: Logistics and Transportation
Review, 47(4), 547-570.
- [10]. Awasthi, A., Chauhan, S. S. 2012. A
hybrid approach integrating Affinity
Diagram, AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS for
sustainable city logistics planning.
Applied Mathematical
Modelling, 36(2), 573-584.
- [11]. Aktas, E., Agaran, B., Ulengin, F.,
Onsel, S. 2011. The use of outsourcing
logistics activities: The case of
turkey. Transportation Research Part
C: Emerging Technologies, 19(5), 833-
852.
- [12]. Jane, C. C. 2011. Performance
evaluation of logistics systems under
cost and reliability
considerations. Transportation
Research Part E: Logistics and
Transportation Review, 47(2), 130-
137.
- [13]. Ramanathan, R. 2010. The
moderating roles of risk and
efficiency on the relationship between
logistics performance and customer
loyalty in e-commerce. Transportation
Research Part E: Logistics and
Transportation Review, 46(6), 950-
962.
- [14]. Ishfaq, R., Sox, C. R. 2010.
Intermodal logistics: The interplay of
financial, operational and service
issues. Transportation Research Part
E: Logistics and Transportation
Review, 46(6), 926-949.
- [15]. Rivera, L., Sheffi, Y., Knoppen, D.
2016. Logistics clusters: the impact of
further agglomeration, training and
firm size on collaboration and value
added services. International Journal
of Production Economics.
- [16]. Van Den Heuvel, F., Langen, P., Van
Donselaar, K. Fransoo, J. 2012.
Proximity matters: synergies through
co-location of logistics
establishments. Beta Working Paper
Series, 380.
- [17]. Schuldt, A., Werner, S. 2007.
Distributed clustering of autonomous shipping containers by concept,
location, and time. Multiagent System
Technologies. Springer, Berlin,
Heidelberg, pp. 121–132.
- [18]. Jing, N., Cai, W. 2010. Analysis on
the spatial distribution of logistics
industry in the developed East Coast
Area in China. Ann. Reg. Sci. 45 (2),
331–350.
- [19]. Lam, H.Y., Choy, K.L., Ho, G.T.,
Cheng, S., Lee, C. 2015. A knowledgebased
logistics operations planning
system for mitigating risk in
warehouse order fulfillment. Int. J.
Prod. Econ. 170, 763–779.
- [20]. Czuchry, A., Yasin, M.,
Khuzhakhmetov, D. 2009. Enhancing
organizational effectiveness through
the implementation of supplier parks:
the case of the automotive industry. J.
Int. Bus. Res. 8 (1), 45–61.
- [21]. Sako, M. 2003. Governing Supplier
Parks: Implications for Firm
Boundaries and Clusters. University
of Oxford.
- [22]. Musso, F. 2013. Is industrial
districts logistics suitable for
industrial parks? Acta Univ. Danub. 9
(4).
- [23]. Resat, H. G., Turkay, M. 2015.
Design and operation of intermodal
transportation network in the
Marmara region of
Turkey. Transportation Research Part
E: Logistics and Transportation
Review, 83, 16-33.
- [24]. Pateman, H., Cahoon, S., Chen, S.,
The role and value of collaboration in
the logistics industry: an empirical
study in Australia. Asian J. Shipp.
Logist. 32 (1), 33–40, 2016.
- [25]. Sheffi, Y. 2012. Logistics Clusters:
Delivering Value and Driving Growth.
MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
- [26]. Kam, B.H., Tsahuridu, E.E., Ding, M.J.
2010. Does Human Resource
Management Contribute to the
Development of Logistics and Supply
Chain Capabilities? An Empirical
Study of Logistics Service Providers in
China, Research and Practice in
Human Resource Management, vol.
18, 2, pp. 15–34.
- [27]. Lannone, F. 2012. The private and
social cost efficiency of port
hinterland container distribution
through a regional logistics system.
Transp. Res. Part A 46, 1424–1448.
- [28]. Reichhart, A., Holweg, M. 2008. Colocated
supplier clusters: forms,
functions and theoretical
perspectives. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag.
28 (1), 53–78.
- [29]. Grando, A., Belvedere, V. 2006.
District's manufacturing
performances: a comparison among
large, small-to-medium-sized and
district enterprises. Int. J. Prod. Econ.
104 (1), 85–99.
- [30]. Soinio, J., Tanskanen, K., Finne, M.
2012. How logistics-service providers
can develop value-added services for
SMEs: a dyadic perspective. The
International Journal of Logistics
Management, 23(1), 31-49.
- [31]. BTS-Bolu Ticaret ve Sanayi Odası,
2015.
http://www.bolutso.org.tr/hizmetler
/tir-karnesi/ (Erişim tarihi
16.07.2016).
- [32].KGM-Karayolları Genel Müdürlüğü,
2016.
http://www.kgm.gov.tr/SiteCollectio
nDocuments/KGMdocuments/Istatist
ikler/TrafikveUlasimBilgileri/15Trafi
kUlas%C4%B1mBilgileri.pdf. (Erişim
tarihi 16.07.2016).
- [33].MARKA-Doğu Marmara Kalkınma
Ajansı, 2016.
http://www.marka.org.tr/uploads//F
iles/MarkaBolgePlani/DoguMarmara
BolgePlani.pdf. (Erişim tarihi
16.07.2016).
- [34].BTS-Bolu Ticaret ve Sanayi Odası,
2015b.
http://www.bolutso.org.tr/dosyalar/
2015_001_DisTicaretSektorAnalizRap
oru_20150112_01.pdf. (Erişim tarihi
16.07.2016).
- [35]. SPSS, I. 2011. IBM SPSS statistics for
Windows, version 20.0. New York:
IBM Corp.
- [36]. Resat, H. G. 2015. Bolu ili geçici
depolama tesisi fizibilite ve analiz
raporu. Bolu Ticaret ve Sanayi Odası,
Bolu.
- [37]. Cronbach, L. J. 1951. Coefficient
alpha and the internal structure of
tests.psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334.
- [38]. Brown, R. F., Schutte, N. S. 2006.
Direct and indirect relationships
between emotional intelligence and
subjective fatigue in university
students.Journal of Psychosomatic
Research, 60(6), 585-593.
- [39]. Cheung, G. W., Rensvold, R. B. 2002.
Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for
testing measurement
invariance. Structural equation
modeling,9(2), 233-255.
- [40]. Millsap, R. E., Olivera-Aguilar, M.
2012. Investigating measurement
invariance using confirmatory factor
analysis. Handbook of structural
equation modeling, 380-392.
- [41]. Byrne, B. M., Shavelson, R. J.,
Muthén, B. 1989. Testing for the
equivalence of factor covariance and
mean structures: The issue of partial
measurement
invariance. Psychological
bulletin, 105(3), 456.
- [42]. Steenkamp, J. B. E., Baumgartner, H.
1998. Assessing measurement
invariance in cross-national
consumer research. Journal of
consumer research, 25(1), 78-90.
- [43]. LIKERT, R., ROSLOW, S., MURPHY,
G. 1934. “A Simple and Reliable
Method of Scoring the Thurstone
Attitude Scales”. The Journal of Social
Psychology, USA.
- [44]. Rigdon, E. E. 1996. CFI versus
RMSEA: A comparison of two fit indexes
for structural equation
modeling. Structural Equation Modeling:
A Multidisciplinary Journal, pg. 369-379.