ROMA HUKUKUNDA TİCARET SINIRLANDIRMALARI KONUSUNA GENEL BİR BAKIŞ
Roma hukuku kaynakları, ticaretin sınırlandırılması meselesi ile, esas ola-
A GENERAL OUTLOOK ON THE ISSUE OF TRADE RESTRICTIONS IN ROMAN LAW
The legal sources of Roman law, mainly face trade restrictions in thecontext of the relationship between patron and freedman (libertus). It is nocoincidence that, the issue arose in that particular context. Before slaves wereset free, they would often acquire special knowledge and skills from working inthe masters’ businesses. If a slave was set free to administer, the estate of hisformer master as procurator (a representative in terms of a general power ofattorney), his livelihood was secured. In other cases, he had to establish his ownoccupation to survive after his manumission. His obvious choice would havebeen the occupation he had learned under his former master and present patron.For example, the freedman of a medical doctor could become a doctor himselfand the freedman of a slave-dealer did not begin agitate for the abolition ofslavery, but became a slave-dealer himself.
___
- Aubert, Jean-Jacques: “Commerce”, in The Cambridge Companion to
Roman Law, (ed. Johnston, David), Cambridge University Press, 2015,
pp. 213-246.
- Baum, Georg: Das Vertragliche Wettbewerbsverbot, Guttentagsche, Berlin
1914.
- Berger, Adolf: Encylopedic Dictionary of Roman Law, Philadelphia 1953.
- Beseler, Gerhard: “Romanistische Studien”, in Zeitschrift der Savigny-
Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte: Romanistische Abteilung, Vol. 50, Issue
1, Aug. 1930, pp. 18-77.
- Buckland, William Warwick: The Roman Law of Slavery: The Condition of
Slave in Private Law from Augustus to Justinian, Cambridge University
Press, 1970.
- Camacho López, María Elisa: “El contrato de agencia comercial. Análisis
dentro del contexto del derecho romano”, Revista de Derecho Privado,
Vol. 16, Jun. 2009, pp. 49-92.
- Coffee, Neil: Gift and Gain-How Money Transformed Ancient Rome,
Oxford University Press, 2017.
- De Ligt, Luuk: “Roman Law, Markets and Market Prices”, in The Oxford
Handbook of Roman Law and Society, (ed. Du Plessis, Paul J/Ando,
Clifford/Tuori, Kaius), Oxford University Press, 2016, pp. 660-671.
- Del Granado, Juan Javier: “The Genius of Roman Law from a Law and
Economics Perspective”, 13 San Diego Int’l L.J. Vol. 301, 2011, pp.
301-350.
- Emmett, Arthur R.: “Roman Law, “Private Property and teh Public Domain:
Lessons of Copyright Policy”, in Copyright Perspectives, Past, Present
and Prospect, (ed. Fitzgerald, Brian/Gilchrist, John), Springer,
Switzerland 2015, pp. 17-27.
- Fabre, Georges: Libertus, patrons et affranchis à Rome, Roma, École
Française de Rome, 1981.
- Frank, Tenney (editor): An economic survey of ancient Rome, The Johns
Hopkins Press, Baltimore 1933-1940.
- Garnsey, Peter: Non-slave labour in The Roman World’in Cities, Peasants
and Food in Classical Antiquity, Essays in Social and Economic
History, Cambridge University Press, 1998.
- Guggisberg, Paul: Die Konkurrenzklause, (Abhandlungen zum
scweizerischen Recht), Bern 1907.
- Karadeniz, Özcan: Iustinianus Zamanına Kadar Roma’da İş İlişkileri,
Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Yayınları, No. 396, Sevinç
Matbaası, Ankara 1976.
- Koops, Egbert: “Price Setting and Other Attempts to Control The
Economy”, in The Oxford Handbook of Roman Law and Society, (ed.
Du Plessis, Paul J/Ando, Clifford/Tuori, Kaius), Oxford University
Press, 2016, pp. 609-621.
- Lavaggi, Giuseppe: “Nuovi studi sui liberti”, in Studi in Onore di Pietro de
Francisci, vol. II, Milán, Giuffrè, 1956, pp. 76-110.
- Morley, Neville: Trade in Classical Antiquity, Cambridge University Press,
2007.
- Schiller, A. Arthur: “Restraint of Trade in Classical Roman Law”, (Restraint
of Trade), in Mnemosyna Pappulias, Athen 1934.
- Schiller, A. Arthur: “The Business relations of Patron and Freedman in
Classical Roman Law”, (Patron and Freedman) in Legal Essays in
Tribute to Orrin Kip McMurray, University of California Press,
Berkeley 1935, pp. 598-605.
- Schiller, Arthur A.: “Trade Secrets and the Roman Law; the Actio Servi
Corrupti”, (Trade), in American Experience in Roman Law, Göttingen
1971, pp.1-10.
- Sirks, Adriaan Johan Boudewijn: “La laesio enormis en droit romain et
byzantin”, Tijdschrift voor Rechtgeschiedenis, Vol. 53, pp. 291-307.
- Türkoğlu Özdemir, Gökçe: “Roma Haksız Rekabet Hukukuna İlişkin
Olarak Actio Servi Corrupti”, AÜHFD, 2005, Vol.54, Issue 4, pp. 213-
233.
- Van den Bergh, Rena: “Patrons, Freedman and Convenants in Restraint of
Trade”, 72 THRHR, Vol.74, 2009, pp. 74-91.
- Wacke, Andreas: “Freedom of Contract and Restraint of Trade Clauses in
Roman and Modern Law”, Law and History Review, Vol.11, No:1,
Spring 1993, pp. 1-19.
- Waldstein, Wolfgang: Operae libertorum: Untersuchungen zur Dienstpflicht
freigelassener Sklaven, Franz Steiner, Stuttgart 1986.
- Waltzing, Jean Pierre: Etude historique sur les corporations professionelles
chez les romains, 4 vols. (1895-1900, repr. Hildesheim, 1970), Vol.1,
pp.181-190.
- Watson, Alan: “The Devolopment of Praetor’s Edict”, (Praetor), The
Journal of Roman Studies, Vol. 60, 1970, pp. 105-119.
- Watson, Alan: Roman Slave Law, (Slave), Johns Hopkins University Press,
Baltimore 1937.
- Watson, Alan: The Law of Persons in the Later Roman Republic, (Law of
Persons), Claredon Press, 1967.
- Zimmermann, Reinhard: The Law of Obligations, Roman Foundations of
the Civilian Tradition, Oxford University Press, 1996.
- http://www.thaliatook.com/OGOD/annona.php, (acsess date: 06.12.2018).