___

• Alcock, L., & Inglis, M. (2008). Doctoral students’ use of examples in evaluating and proving conjectures. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 69(2), 111-129.
• Almeida, D. (2000). A Survey of Mathematics Undergraduates’ Interaction With Proof:Some Implications for Mathematics Education. Int. J. Math. Educ. Sci. Technol. 31(6), pp. 896-890.
• Bell, A. W. (1976). A study of pupils' proof-explanations in mathematical situations. Educational studies in mathematics, 7(1-2), 23-40.
• Bieda, K. N. (2010). Enacting proof-related tasks in middle school mathematics: Challenges and opportunities. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41(4), 351-382.
• Bills, E. & Tall, D. (1998). Operable definitions in advanced mathematics: The case of least upper bound. In A. Olivier and K. Newstead (Eds.), Proceedings of the 22nd Conference for the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 2, 104-111.
• Blanton, M. L., & Stylianou, D. A. (2003). The nature of scaffolding in undergraduate students' transition to mathematical proof. In N. A. Pateman, B. J. Dougherty & J. T. Zilliox (Eds.), Proceedings of the 27th conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education held jointly with the 25th annual conference of PME-NA, Vol. 2 (pp. 113-120). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai'i.
• Bleiler, S. K., Thompson, D. R., & Krajčevski, M. (2014). Providing written feedback on students’ mathematical arguments: proof validations of prospective secondary mathematics teachers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 17(2), 105-127.
• Cilli-Turner, E. (2017). Impacts of inquiry pedagogy on undergraduate students conceptions of the function of proof. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 48, 14-21.
• Coe, R., & Ruthven, K. (1994). Proof practices and constructs of advanced mathematics students. British Educational Research Journal, 20(1), 41-53.
• Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research, 3e. London: Sage.
• De Villiers, M. D. (1990). The role and function of proof in mathematics. Pythagoras, 24, 17-24.
• De Villiers, M. (1999). The role and function of proof with Sketchpad. Rethinking proof with Sketchpad, 3-10.
• Demiray, E., & Bostan, M. I. (2017). An investigation of pre-service middle school mathematics teachers’ ability to conduct valid proofs, methods used, and reasons for invalid arguments. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(1), 109-130.
• Dimmel, J. K., & Herbst, P. G. (2018). What Details Do Teachers Expect From Student Proofs? A Study of Proof Checking in Geometry. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 49(3), 261-291.
• Fukawa-Connelly, T. P. (2012). A case study of one instructor’s lecture-based teaching of proof in abstract algebra: making sense of her pedagogical moves. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 81(3), 325-345.
• Fukawa-Connelly, T. (2014). Using Toulmin analysis to analyse an instructor's proof presentation in abstract algebra. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 45(1), 75-88.
• Glaser, B. & Strauss, A.L. (1967) Discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research, Chicago: Aidine.
• Hanna, G. (1990). Some pedagogical aspects of proof. Interchange, 21(1), 6-13.
• Hanna, G. (1995). Challenges to the importance of proof. For the Learning of mathematics, 15(3), 42-49.
• Hanna, G., (2000). Proof, Explanation and Exploration: An Overview, Educational Studies in Mathematics. 44, 5–23.
• Hanna, G., & Barbeau, E. (2010). Proofs as bearers of mathematical knowledge. In Explanation and proof in mathematics (pp. 85-100). Springer, Boston, MA.
• Hanna, G., & Jahnke, H. N. (1996). Proof and proving. In International handbook of mathematics education (pp. 877-908). Springer, Dordrecht.
• Harel, G., & Sowder, L. (2007). Toward comprehensive perspectives on the learning and teaching of proof. Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning, 2, 805-842.
• Hemmi, K. (2010). Three styles characterising mathematicians' pedagogical perspectives on proof. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 271-291.
• Herbst, P. G. (2002). Establishing a custom of proving in American school geometry: Evolution of the two-column proof in the early twentieth century. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 49(3), 283-312.
• Herbst, P., & Brach, C. (2006). Proving and doing proofs in high school geometry classes: What is it that is going on for students?. Cognition and Instruction, 24(1), 73-122.
• Hersh, R. (1993). Proving is convincing and explaining. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 24(4), 389-399.
• Knuth, E. J. (2002). Secondary school mathematics teachers' conceptions of proof. Journal for research in mathematics education, 379-405.
• Ko, Y. Y. (2010). Mathematics teachers’ conceptions of proof: Implications for educational research. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(6), 1109-1129.
• Ko, Y. Y., & Knuth, E. J. (2013). Validating proofs and counterexamples across content domains: Practices of importance for mathematics majors. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 32(1), 20-35.
• Lai, Y., & Weber, K. (2014). Factors mathematicians profess to consider when presenting pedagogical proofs. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 85(1), 93-108.
• Levenson, E. (2013). Exploring one student’s explanations at different ages: the case of Sharon. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 83(2), 181-203.
• Lew, K., Fukawa-Connelly, T. P., Mejia-Ramos, J. P., & Weber, K. (2016). Lectures in advanced mathematics: Why students might not understand what the mathematics professor is trying to convey. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 47(2), 162-198.
• Lynch, A. G., & Lockwood, E. (2017). A comparison between mathematicians’ and students’ use of examples for conjecturing and proving. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior. Erişim adresi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2017.07.004
• Martin, W. G., & Harel, G. (1989). Proof frames of preservice elementary teachers. Journal for research in mathematics education, 41-51.
• McCrory, R., & Stylianides, A. J. (2014). Reasoning-and-proving in mathematics textbooks for prospective elementary teachers. International Journal of Educational Research, 64, 119-131.
• Miller, D., Infante, N., & Weber, K. (2018). How mathematicians assign points to student proofs. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 49, 24-34.
• Mills, M. (2014). A framework for example usage in proof presentations. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 33, 106-118.
• Nardi, E., & Knuth, E. (2017). Changing classroom culture, curricula, and instruction for proof and proving: How amenable to scaling up, practicable for curricular integration, and capable of producing long-lasting effects are current interventions? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 96(2), 267–274.
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
• Patton, M. Q. (2014). Nitel araştırma ve değerlendirme yöntemleri. (Çev. M. Bütün, S. B. Demir). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
• Pinto, A., & Karsenty, R. (2017). From course design to presentations of proofs: How mathematics professors attend to student independent proof reading. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 49, 129-144.
• Sears, R., & Chávez, Ó. (2014). Opportunities to engage with proof: the nature of proof tasks in two geometry textbooks and its influence on enacted lessons. ZDM, 46(5), 767-780.
• Selden, A., & Selden, J. (2003). Validations of proofs considered as texts: Can undergraduates tell whether an argument proves a theorem? Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34(1), 4–36.
• Speer, N. M., Smith III, J. P., & Horvath, A. (2010). Collegiate mathematics teaching: An unexamined practice. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 29(2), 99-114.
• Stein, M. K., Grover, B. W., & Henningsen, M. (1996). Building student capacity for mathematical thinking and reasoning: An analysis of mathematical tasks used in reform classrooms. American educational research journal, 33(2), 455-488.
• Stylianides, A. J. (2007). Proof and proving in school mathematics. Journal for research in Mathematics Education, 289-321.
• Stylianides, A. J., & Stylianides, G. J. (2009). Proof constructions and evaluations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 72(2), 237-253.
• Stylianides, G. J., Stylianides, A. J., & Shilling-Traina, L. N. (2013). Prospective teachers’ challenges in teaching reasoning-and-proving. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(6), 1463-1490.
• Stylianou, D. A., Blanton, M. L., & Knuth, E. J. (2009). Teaching and learning proof across the grades: A K-16 perspective. New York: Routledge.
• Stylianou, D. A., Blanton, M. L., & Rotou, O. (2015). Undergraduate students’ understanding of proof: Relationships between proof conceptions, beliefs, and classroom experiences with learning proof. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 1(1), 91-134.
• Teppo, A. R. (2015). Grounded theory methods. In Approaches to qualitative research in mathematics education (pp. 3-21). Springer, Dordrecht.
• Weber, K. (2002). Beyond proving and explaining: Proofs that justify the use of definitions and axiomatic structures and proofs that illustrate technique. For the learning of Mathematics, 22(3), 14-17.
• Weber, K. (2004). Traditional instruction in advanced mathematics courses: A case study of one professor’s lectures and proofs in an introductory real analysis course. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 23(2), 115-133.
• Weber, K. (2010). Mathematics’ majors perceptions of conviction, validity, and proof. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 12, 306–336.
• Weber, K. (2012). Mathematicians’ perspectives on their pedagogical practice with respect to proof. Int J Math Educ Sci Technol. 43(4), 463–482.
• Weinberg, A., Fukawa-Connelly, T., & Wiesner, E. (2015). Characterizing instructor gestures in a lecture in a proof-based mathematics class. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 90(3), 233-258.
• Yopp, D. A. (2011). How some research mathematicians and statisticians use proof in undergraduate mathematics. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 115-130.
• Zaslavsky, O., Nickerson, S. D., Stylianides, A. J., Kidron, I., & Winicki-Landman, G. (2011). The need for proof and proving: Mathematical and pedagogical perspectives. In Proof and proving in mathematics education (pp. 215-229). Springer, Dordrecht.
• Zazkis, D., Weber, K., & Mejía-Ramos, J. P. (2016). Bridging the gap between graphical arguments and verbal-symbolic proofs in a real analysis context. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 93(2), 155-173.
• Zhen, B., Weber, K., & Mejia-Ramos, J. P. (2016). Mathematics majors’ perceptions of the admissibility of graphical inferences in proofs. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 2(1), 1-29.