___

• Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A Taxonomy For Learning, Teaching, And Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. NY:Longman.
• Blumen Pard, S. (2002) Effects of a Teacher Training Workshop on Creativity, Cognition,and School Achievement in Gifted and Non-gifted Second-grade Students in Lima, Peru, High Ability Studies, 13:1, 47-58.
• Chan, D. W. (2001). Characteristics and Competencies of Teachers of Gifted Learners: The Hong Kong perspective. Roeper Review, 23 (4), 197-202.
• Clark, B. (2002). Growing up Gifted: Developing the Potential of Children at Home and at School (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
• Colangelo, N. & Davis, G. A. (2003). Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.
• Colangelo, N., & Davis, G. A. (2003). Introduction and overview. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed.) (pp. 3-10). Boston: Pearson Education.
• Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Fiedler, E.D., Lange, R.E. & Winebrenner, S. (2002). Insearch of reality: Unraveling the myths about tracking, ability grouping, and the gifted. Roeper Review, 24(3), 108-111.
• Fraser-Seeto, K. T., Howard, S. J., & Woodcock, S. (2015). An Investigation of Teachers' Awareness and Willingness to Engage with a Self-Directed Professional Development Package on Gifted and Talented Education. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 40(1), 1-14.
• Gagne, F. (2010). Motivation within the DMGT 2.0 framework. High Ability Studies, 1(2), 81- 99.
• Geake, J. G. & Gross, M.U.M. (2008). Teachers' Negative Affect Toward Academically Gifted Students, Gifted Child Quarterly 52 (3), 217-231.
• George, D. (2003). Gifted education: Identification and provision (2nd ed.). London: David Fulton Publishers.
• Gross, M. U. M. (2005). Exceptionally Gifted Children. London and New York: Routledge Falmer.
• Harris, D. N. & Sass, T. R. (2011). Teacher tarining, teacher quality and student achievement. Journal of Public Economics. 95, 798-812.
• Horn, C. (2002). "Raising expectations of children from poverty". Gifted Education Press Quarterly, 16(4), 2-5.
• Jacob, B. & Lefgren, L. (2004). The impact of teacher training on student achievement: quasiexperimental evidence from school reform efforts in Chicago. Journal of Human Resources, 39 (1), 50-79.
• Kaplan, S. (2005). Layering differentiated curricula fort he gifted and talented. In F. Karnes & S. Bean (Eds.), Methods and materials for teaching the gifted (107-132). TX:Prufrock Press.
• Kogan, N. (1995). Motivational and personality patterns in performing artists. Paper presented at the Esther Katz Rosen Symposium on the Psychological Development of Gifted Children, Lawrence, KS.
• Laine, S., Kuusisto, E. & Tirri, K. (2016). Finnish teachers' conceptions of giftedness. Journal fort he Education of the Gifted, 39 (2) 151-167.
• Lassig, C. J. (2003) Gifted and talented education reforms: Effects on teachers' attitudes. In Bartlett, B. and Bryer, F. and Roebuck, D., Eds. Proceedings 1st Annual International Conference on Cognition, Language, and Special Education Research: Reimagining Practice: Researching Change 2, pages pp. 141-152, Surfers Paradise, Australia.
• McCoach, D. B. (2007). What predicts teachers' attitudes toward the gifted?. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51(3), 246-255. McDaniel, T.R. (2002). Mainstreaming the gifted: Historical perspectives on excellence and equity. Roeper Review, 24, 112-115.
• Mills, C. J. (2003). Characteristics of Effective Teachers of Gifted Students: Teacher Background and Personality Styles of Students. G i f t e d C h i l d Q u a r t e r l y, 47 (4), 272-281.
• Mishal, A. & Patkin, D. (2016) Contribution of mathematics in-service training course to the professional development of elementary school teachers in Israel, Teacher Development, 20:2, 253-274.
• MEB. (2007). Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı Bilim ve Sanat Merkezleri Yönergesi, 10.03.2015 tarihinde "http://orgm.meb.gov.tr/" adresinden alınmıştır.
• MEB. (2010). Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı İç Denetim Birimi Başkanlığı Bilim ve Sanat Merkezleri Süreci (Üstün Yetenekli Bireylerin Eğitimi) İç Denetim Raporu, http://icden.meb.gov.tr/digeryaziler/ Bilim Sanat Merkezleri Ic Denetim Ra.pdf, Web adresinden 10.03.2015 tarihinde alınmıştır.
• Milne, H. & Reis, S. (2000). Using video therapy to address the social and emotional needs og gifted children. Gifted Child Today, 23 (1), 24-29.
• Moon, S. (Ed). (2004). GCQ seminal articles. Socio-emotional issues, underachievement, counseling of gifted and talented students. Thousands Oaks,CA: Corwin Press. Muijs, D. (2004). Doing Quantitative Research in Education with SPSS. Sage Publications, London.
• O'Sullivan, M. 2004. "The Reconceptualisation of Learner-centred Approaches: A Namibian Case Study." International Journal of Educational Development 24 (6): 585- 602.
• Özen, R. & Nartgün, Ş.S. (2005). Perceptions of primary schools teachers in relation to the effects of inservice training programs. Paper presented at the International Conference on the subject of Lifelong Learning in the Balkans: A Historical Context and Current Trends" held in 1st-3rd, July, 2005, Belgrade.
• Özer, B. (2004). Öğretmenlerin hizmetiçi eğitimi: Katılma durumları, beklentileri ve engelleri. XIII. Ulusal Eğitim Bilimleri Kurultayı, 06-09 Temmuz, Malatya, Bildiri Özeti Kitapçığı, PegemA, 68-69.
• Parmaksız, R. & Sıcak, A. (2015). Uzaktan hizmetiçi eğitime ilişkin öğretmen görüşleri. Uşak Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 8 (4), 187-212.
• Peterson, J. S. (2003). An argument for proactive attention to affective concerns of gifted adolescents. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 14, 62-71.
• Renzulli, J. S. (2004). Introduction to identification of students for gifted and talented programs. In J. S. Renzulli (Ed.), Identification of students for gifted and talented programs (pp. xxiiixxxiv). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
• Renzulli, J. S. (2012). Reexamining the role of gifted education and talent development for the 21st century: A four- part theoretical approach. Gifted Child Quarterly, 56, 150-159.
• Renzulli, J.S.&Gaesser, A. H. (2015). A Multi Criteria System For the Identification of High Achieving and Creative/ProductiveGiftedness http://gifted.uconn.edu/schoolwideenrichmentmodel/high_achieving_creative-productive_giftedness/adresinden 10.03.2016 tarihinde alındı.
• Rogers, K. B. (2007). Lessons learned about educating the gifted and talented: A synthesis of research on educational practice. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51(4), 382-396.
• Sharma, U. & Sokal, L. (2015). The impact of teacher education course on preservice teacers' beliefs about inclusion: and international comparison. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs. 15 (4), 276-284.
• Tebliğler Dergisi. (2001). Bilim Sanat Merkezleri Yönergesi, Sayı: 2530, Cilt: 64. Tomlinson, C.A., & Allan, S.D. (2000). Leadership for differentiating schools and classrooms. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
• VanTassel-Baska, J., Avery, L.D., Little, C., &Hughes, C. (2000). An evaluation of the implementation of curriculum innovation: The impact of the William and Mary units on schools. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 23, 244-272.
• VanTassel-Baska, J., & Stambaugh, T. (2006). Comprehensive curriculum for gifted learners (3rd. ed.), Boston, Allyn&Bacon.
• Van Tassel-Baska, J. & Johnsen, S. K. (2007). Teacher education standards fort he field of gifted education. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51 (2), 182-205.
• Vialle, W., & Quigley, S. (2002). Does the teacher of the gifted need to be gifted?. Gifted and Talented International, 17(2), 85-90.
• Wayne, A. J. & Youngs, P. (2003). Teacher characteristic s and student achievement gains. Review of Educational Research, 73 (1), 89-122.