___

Aksu-Koç, A. & Ketrez, F. N. (2003). Early syntactic combinations: Emergence of argument structures in Turkish. Paper presented at SRCD 2003 Biennial Meeting, Tampa, Florida. April 24-27, 2003.

Aksu-Koç, A. & Slobin, D. 1. (1985). The acquisition of Turkish. In D. I, Slobin (ed), Cross-linguistic Study of Language Acquisition. Vol:l. New Jersey: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.

Bloom, L., Hood, L. & Lightbown, P. (1974). Imitation in language development: If, when, and why. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 380-420.

Crain, S. & Thorntorn, R. (1999). Investigations in Universal Grammar: A Guide to Experiments on the Acquisition of Syntax and Semantics. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Diesing, M. (1996). Indefinites. Linguistic Inquiry Monograph, 20. Cambridge: The MIT Press. Ekmekçi, O. (1986). Significance of word order in the acquisition of Turkish. In D. Slobin and K. Zimmer (eds.), Studies in Turkish Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Enç, M. (1991). The Semantics of Specificity. Linguistic Inquiry, 22. 1-25.

Gerken, L. & Shady, M. E. (1996). The picture selection task, In D. McDaniel, C. McK.ee and H. S. Cairns (eds.), Methods for Assessing Children's Syntax, 125-145.Cambridge, Mass. MIT Press.

Kramer, I. (2000). Interpreting Indefinites: An experimental Study of Children's language Comprehension. MPI Series in Psycholinguistics.

Kelepir, M. (2001). Topics in Turkish syntax: Clausal structure and scope. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT. . (2003). Intervention effects in the interpretation of Turkish and Japanese indefinites. Paper presented at the Workshop on Altaic in Formal Linguistics. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.

Kennelly, S. D. (1994). Caseless Existential DPs in Turkish. Paris 8 Working Papers in Linguistics.

Ketrez, F. N. (1999). Early verbs and the acquisition of Turkish argument structure. MA Thesis, Boğaziçi University, Istanbul. __. (2000). Eylem öğe yapılarının ediniminde eden-özne ilişkisi. A. S. Özsoy and E.E. Taylan. (eds.), XIII. Ulusal Dilbilimi Kurultay Bildirileri, 189-199. istanbul:Boğaziçi University Press. . (2003). Children's accusative-marked indefinites. Paper presented at the Workshop on Altaic in Formal Linguistics. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA. . (2004). Children's comprehension of indefinite objects: A study on case and scope. Qualifying Paper, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.

Küntay, A. C. (2002). Development of the Expression of Indefiniteness: Presenting New Referents in Turkish Picture-series Stories. Discourse Processes, 33, 77-101.

Lust, B., Flynn, S. & Foley, C. (1996). What children know about what they say. Elicited Imitation as a research method for assessing children's syntax. In D. McDaniel,C. McKee and H. S. Cairns (eds.), Methods for Assessing Children's Syntax.Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Pesetsky, D. (1987). Wh-in-situ: Movement and unselective binding. In E. Reuland and A. ter Meulen (eds.). The Representation of (In)definiteness, 98-129. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Schaeffer, J. (1997). Direct object scrambling in Dutch and Italian child language.

• (2000). The acquisition of direct object scrambling and clitic placement syntax and pragmatics. Language Acquisition and Language Disorders. Vol: 22. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Slobin, D. I. & Bever, T. (1982). Children use canonical sentence schemas: A cross-linguistic study of word order and inflections. Cognition,12(3),229-265.

Zidani-Eroğlu, L. (1997). Indefinite NPs in Turkish. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Wisconsin-Madison.