WILLIAM BLAKE’S “LONDON”: RESISTANCE TO POWER AND AUTHORITY

Bu çalışmada amaç William Blake 'in "London adlı şiirini Yeni Tarihselcilik bağlamında okumaktır. Metne böyle bir yaklaşım şiiri tarihselleştirmek, başka bir deyişle, şiiri tarihi gelişimin bir ürünü olarak ve böylece şiiri, içinde yazıldığı dönemde yaşayan yoksul ve çaresiz halkın sosyal durumunu yansıtan bir metin olarak yorumlamamızı sağlayacaktır. Bundan dolayı çalışmada bağlamlama önemli bir yer teşkil etmektedir. Bu amaçla çalışmada şiir sosyal ve tarihsel bağlam içine konmakta ve Blake 'in şiire koyduğu imgelerin anlamları tartışılmakta ve böylece şiirin yazıldığı tarihsel dönemde yaygın olan politikalar ile bunların şiirdeki yansımaları çalışılmaktadır. Bu çalışmada vurgu Blake 'in dönemde hâkim olan sosyal düzeni sorgulaması ve eleştirmesi üzerinedir. Şiirde Blake 'in ruhsal ve insani değerleri göz ardı eden ve insanı özgürleştirmekten ziyade köleleştiren bilimsel ve teknolojik düşünme yöntemlerinin olası tehlikelerini görerek, Aydınlanma Çağı 'nın bilimsel düşünüş tarzına, başka bir deyişle modern akılcılığa da karşı olduğu gözlenmiştir. Şiirde Blake 'in temelde üç önemli kuruma karşı olduğu gözlenmiştir. Bunlar hükümet, monarşi ve Kilisedir. Blake bu kurumlara yönelik eleştirisini dönemden seçtiği üç figürü genelleştirerek yapmaktadır. Bunlar 'baca süpürücüsü ', 'asker' ve 'fahişe'dir. Blake şiirinde, Londra 'yı çarpık bir sosyal sistem içinde güç ve otoritenin baskısına boyun eğmeye maruz kalan Londra halkının olduğu bir şehir olarak resmetmektedir. Çalışmada ayrıca Blake 'in "London" adlı şiirinde kendini bu kişilerden (dolayısıyla onların temsil ettiği gruplardan) ayrı tutarak onları nesnelleştirmediği ve ötekileştirmediği, aksine yönetim, kraliyet ve Kilise tarafından fakirleştirilenlerin ve ötekileştirilen dışlanan ve sömürülenlerin sesi olduğu sonucuna varılmıştır. Böylece bu çalışma sonuç olarak, Blake 'in "London" adlı şiirinin politik ve sosyal bir protesto olduğunu ve yazıldığı dönemin egemen güçlerine karşı duran bir metin olduğunu göstermektedir.

William Blake ’in “London ”Adlı Şiiri: Güç Ve Otoriteye Karşı Bir Direnç

In this study the aim is to read William Blake’s ”London in new historicist perspective. The New Historicist approach to text would enable us to historicize the poem, in other words, to interpret it as product of historical development and thus as text mirroring the social conditions of the miserable and the wretched living in the time in which the poem was written. this end, in the study, the poem has been put in its social and historical contexts and the meanings of the images which Blake put in the poem have been discussed, and thus the politics prevailing in the period in which the poem was written and their reflections in the poem have been studied. Therefore contextualization is taking great part in the study. The emphasis in the essay is on Blake’s criticism of the prevalent social order. It has also been observed that Blake seeing the potential dangers in the overreliance of scientific and technological methods of thought methods neglecting spiritual and humanistic values and enslaving rather than liberating man opposes scientific way of thinking of the ‘Age of Enlightenment ’, that is, Enlightenment rationality. In the poem Blake basically protests against three major institutions: the government, the monarchy and the Church. He makes his criticism of these institutions through generalization of three main figures in the period. These are ‘the chimney sweeper’, ‘soldier’ and 'harlot’. Thus Blake depicts London, in the poem, as city in which Londoners are exposed to the subjugation of the authority and power in, what he saw as, corrupted social system. In the study, it has been concluded that Blake in "London does not objectify these figures (and the groups they represent) and does not make them the ‘Other’ because he does not detach himselffrom them; on the contrary, he becomes the voice of the marginalized and the exploited who are impoverished and made the ’Other’ by the administration, monarchy and the Church. The study also concludes that Blake ’s "London is poem ofpolitical and social protest and text which resists the hegemonic forces of the time in which it was written.

___

  • ABRAMS, M. H. Et. al., eds. “The Victorian Age: 1832-1901”. The Norton Anthology of English Literature. Vol. II. New York: W. W. Norton and Company, Inc. 915—938. 1986.
  • ACKROYD, Peter. London: The Biography. USA: Anchor Books, 2003.
  • BARNHART, Clarence L., Robert K. Bamhart. The World Book Dictionary. Vol. /A—K. Chicago: World Book Inc., 1990.
  • BASCH, Françoise. Relative Creatures. Trans. Anthony Rudolf. Great Britain: Mackay Limited. 1974.
  • BARTLEY, Paula. Prostitution: Prevention and Reform in England. London: Routledge. 2000.
  • BEATY, Jerome, J. Paul Hunter. The Norton Introduction to Literature. Vol. I. New York: W. W. Norton and Company, 1998.
  • BENTLEY Jnr, G. E., ed. The Critical Heritage: William Blake. London: Routledge, 1975.
  • BLAKE, William. “London”. The Norton Anthology of English Literature. Ed. M. H. Abrams et. al., New York: W. W. Norton Company. 42—43, 1986.
  • BLOOM, Harold. “Biography of William Blake”. Bloom ’s Major Poets: William Blake. Ed. and Intr. Harold Bloom. New York: Infobase Publishing. 12-16, 2003(a).
  • “Critical Analysis of “London”. Bloom’s Major Poets: William Blake. Ed. and Intr. Harold Bloom. New York: Infobase Publishing. 41-43, 2003(b).
  • “Introduction”. English Romantic Poetry. Ed. Harold Bloom. USA: lnfobase. l—23, 2004.
  • BURGESS, Anthony. English Literature: Survey for Students. England: Longman, 1983.
  • CARTER, Ronald, John McRae. The Routledge History of Literature in English: Britain and Ireland. Intr. Malcolm Bradbury. London: Routledge, 1998.
  • CREHAN, Stewart. “The Social System of London”. Bloom ’s Major Poets: William Blake. Ed. and Intr. Harold Bloom. New York: lnfobase. 54—57. 2003.
  • EAVES, Morris. ed. “Introduction: The Paradise the Hard Way”. The Cambridge Companion to William Blake. United Kingdom: Cambridge UP. 1—16, 2004.
  • ERDMAN, David V. “People in Blake’s London”. Bloom’s Major Poets: William Blake. Ed. and Intr. Harold Bloom. New York: Infobase. 44—47. 2003.
  • -------------- Blake: Prophet Against Empire. USA: Princeton University Press. 1954.
  • GLEN, Heather. “Blake’s London: The Language of Experience”. New Historicism and Cultural Materialism: Reader. Ed. Kieman Ryan. London: Arnold. 146- 157, 1996.
  • GRAY, Drew D. Crime, Prosecution and Social Relations.UK: Palgrave&Macmillan. 2009.
  • HITCHCOCK, Tim. Down and Out in Eighteenth-Century London. Great Britain: Cambridge UP. 2004.
  • “All besides the Rail, rang’d Beggars lie”: Trivia and the Public Poverty of Early Eighteenth-Century London”. Walking the Streets of Eighteenth-Century London. Ed. Clare Brant and Susan E. Whyman. Oxford: UP. 74—89. 2007.
  • MAYHEW, Henry. London Labour and the London Poor. Vol. H. NY: Cosimo, Inc. 2009.
  • MAKDISI, Saree. William Blake and the Impossible History ofthe 790s. Chicago: UP of Chicago, 2003.
  • MCDOWALL, David. An Illustrated History ofBritain. England: Longman, 2006. MCGANN, Jerome J. “Phases of English Romanticism”. English Romantic Poetry. Ed. and intr. by Harold Bloom. USA: lnfobase. 117—127. 2004
  • MEE, Jon. “Blake’s Politics in History”. The Cambridge Companion to William Blake. Ed. Morris Eaves. United Kingdom: Cambridge UP. 133-149, 2004. MONTROSE, Louis A. “Professing the Renaissance: The Poetics and Politics of Culture,”. The New Historicism. Ed. H. Aram Veeser. New York: Routledge. 15-36, 1989.
  • OLSEN, Kirstin. Daily Life in the I8th-Century England. London: Greenwood Press. 1999.
  • OUSBY, Ian. Cambridge Paperback Guide to Literature in English. Great Britain:Cambridge UP. 1996.
  • PORTER, David. Considerations on the Present State of Chimney Sweepers .' With Some Observations on the Act of Parliament, Intended for Their Regulations and Relief, with Proposals for Their Further Relief. Great Britain, 1792.
  • PORTER, Roy. London: Social History. London: Hamish Hamilton, 1994.
  • QUlNNEY, Laura. William Blake on Self and Soul. USA and England: Harvard UP. 2009.
  • RIX, Robert W. “Blake’s Auguries of Innocence, The French Revolution, and London”. Explicator. Vol. 64, Issue 1. 27-29. Heldref Publications, 2005.
  • SAYERS, Janet and Nanette MONIN. “Blake’s ‘London’: Diabolical Reading and Poetic Place in Organisational Theorising”. Culture and Organization. Vol 18, No. 1. 1-13. 2012
  • STRANGE, K. H. (1982). Climbing Boys: Study of Sweeps’ Apprentices I772- 1875. London: Allison and Busby.
  • THORNE, Sara. Mastering Poetry. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006.
  • THOMPSON, E. P. “The Ways in Which Words Change London”. Bloom ’s Major Poets: William Blake. Ed. and Intr. Harold Bloom. New York: Infobase. 49-51. 2003.
  • WARD, Aileen. “William Blake and His Circle”. The Cambridge Companion to William Blake. Ed. Morris Eaves. United Kingdom: Cambridge UP. 19-36. 2004.
  • WILLIAMS, R. Vaughan. Ed. Ten Blake Songs. Great Britain: Oxford UP, 1958. WOLFSON, Susan J. “Blake’s Language in Poetic Form”. Cambridge Companion to William Blake. Ed. Morris Eaves United Kingdom: Cambridge UP. 63—84. 2004.
  • YEATS, W. B. ed. William Blake: Collected Poems. Intr. Tom Paulin. London: Routledge, 2002
  • ZAHN, Changjuan. “William Blake and His Poem “London”. Theory and Practice in Language Studies. Vol. 3, No. 9, pp. 1610-1614. 2013.