___

• Alias, N., & Hussin, S. (2004). E-learning in a writing course at Tenaga National University. TEFL Web Journal, 1 (3). (2010, August 15). Retrieved from http://www.teflweb-j.org/v1n3/Alias_Hussin.htm
• Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.
• Beach, R. (1989). Showing students how to assess: Demonstrating techniques for response in the writing conference. In C. M. Anson (Ed.), Writing and Response, (27-148). Urbana, IL: NCTE.
• Buckingham, L. (2008) Development of English academic writing competence by Turkish scholars. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, v.3, 1-18
• Chen M. C. and Lin. H.J.(2009) Self-eficacy, foreign language anxiety as predictors of academic performance among professional program students in general English proficiency writing test, Perceptual and Motor Skills. 109(2), 420-430.
• Gray, R., & Stockwell, G. (1998). Using computer mediated communication for language and culture acquisition. On-Call, 12(3), 2-9.
• Greenfield, R. (2003). Collaborative e-mail exchange for teaching secondary ESL: A case study in Hong Kong. Language Learning & Technology, 7(1), 46-70.
• Gupta, D. and Getachew Seyoum Woldemariam, G.S. (2011) The influence of motivation and attitude on writing strategy use of undergraduate EFL students: Quantitative and qualitative perspectives. Asian EFL Journal. 12(2), 34-89.
• Hamzaoui-Elachachi, H. (2010). Development of a writing curriculum for academic purposes at tertiary level: The case of Algerian EFL university students. ESP world. 1(27), 1-9.
• Kaufman, L.M.(1998). E-mail keypals in zone of proximal development. Puerto Rico: University of Puerto Rico. ( ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 423694)
• Kelm, O.R. (1992). The use of synchronous computer networks in second language instruction: A preliminary report. Foreign Language Annals, 25, 441-454.
• Kern, R. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Using e-mail exchanges to explore personal histories in two cultures. In M. Warschauer (Ed.), Tele collaboration in foreign language learning (105-119). Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.
• Kim, K. J., & Bonk, C. J. (2002). Cross-cultural comparisions of online collaboration among pre-service teachers in Finland, Koreai and the United States. Journal of
• Computer-Mediated Communication, 8(1). King, L. & Orton, C. (1999). A study of motivation in key-palling in GEGEP ESL classroom. The Internet TESL Journal. (2010, July 15). Retrieved from http.//iteslj.org/Articles/Liao-Emailing.html.
• Klassen, R. (2002). Writing in early adolescence: A review of the role of self-efficacy beliefs. Educational Psychology Review, 14, 173-203.
• Larsen- Freeman, D. & Long, M. (1991) An Introduction to Second Language Acquisition. London: Longman.
• Latif, M.A. (2007). The factors accounting fort he Egyptian EFL university students’ negative writing affect. Asian EFL journal. 12(2) .34-89
• Leh, A. (1997). Electronic mail in foreign language learning: Communication and culture. (2003, May 7). Retrieved from http://orders.edrs.com/members/sp.cfm
• Li,Y.& Wang, C. ( 2010) An empirical study of reading self-efficacy and the use of reading strategies in the Chinese EFL context. Asian EFL Journal 12(3) 144-162
• Locke, E. A. & Latham, G. P. (1990). A theory of goal setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
• McCarthy, P., Meier, S. & Rinderer, R. (1985). Self-efficacy and writing. College Composition and Communication, 36, 465-471.
• Pajares, F., Miller, M. D., & Johnson, M. J. (1994). Confidence and competence in writing: The role of writing self-efficacy, outcome expectancy, and apprehension. Research in the Teaching of English, 28, 313-331.
• Pajares, F., & Valiante, G. (1997). The predictive and mediational role of the writing self-efficacy beliefs of elementary students. Journal of Educational Research, 90, 353-3
• Pajares, F., Miller, M. D., & Johnson, M. J. (1999). Gender differences in writing selfbeliefs of elementary school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 50Pajares, F. (2003). Self-efficacy beliefs, motivation, and achievement in writing: A review of the literature. Reading& writing Quarterly, 19 (2), 139-158.
• Rahimpour, M and Nariman-Jahan, R. (2010) The Influence of Self-Efficacy and Proficiency on EFL Learners’ Writing. International journal of instructional technology and distance learning. 7(9), 19-32
• Sanaoui, R.& Lapkin S. (1992). A case study of an FSL senior secondary course integrating computer networking. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 48(3), 525-548.
• Simin, S. & Tavangar, M.(2009) Metadiscourse knowledge and use in Iranian EFL Writing. The Asian EFL Journal Quarterly, 1(1), 230-255.
• Stockwell, G. (2003). Effects of conversation threads on sustainability of e-mail interactions between native speakers and non-native speakers and nonnative speakers. ReCALL Journal, 15(1), 120-145.
• Tella, S. (1991). 'Introducing international communications NetWorks and electronic mail into foreign language classrooms: a case study in Finnish secondary schools'. University of Helsinki, Department of Teacher Education, Research Report 95.
• Vilmi, R. (2003). Global communication through e-mail: An ongoing experiment at Helsinki University of Technology. (2003, April 29). Retrieved from www.ruthvilmi.net/hut/autumn93/global.html
• Warschauer, M. (1995). E-mail for English Teaching. Alexandria, VA: TESOL Publications.
• Warschauer, M. (1996a). Comparing face-to-face and electronic discussion in the second language classroom. CALICO Journal, 13(2/3), 7-26.
• Warschauer, M. (1996b). Motivational aspect of computers for writing and communication. In Warschauer, M. (Ed.), Telecollaboration in foreign language learning (.29-46). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.
• Wu, W. and Wu, P.N.(2008) Creating and Authentic EFL Learning Environment to Enhance Student Motivation to Study English. Asian EFL Journal. 10(4), 2112
• Zimmerman, B. J. & Bandura, A. (1994). Impact of self-regulatory influences on writing course attainment. American Educational Research Journal. 31, 8458 APPENDIX 1 Self-Efficacy in Writing Inventory Read each numbered statement and use the scale below to indicate how you assess your ability in writing in English. The purpose is to get your personal view and there are no right or wrong answers so do not spend too much time on any one statement and just select the answer that best applies to you. Thank you for your cooperation. Dilek Yavuz Erkan 1 = I cannot do it at all 2 = I can’t do it well 3 = I can do it 4 = I can do it very well 1 2 3 4
• I can use the grammar rules that I learned in class easily and correctly. I can match style with topic easily. E.g. If I am asked to write an essay, I can use the appropriate conventions to write a good essay. When asked to write a story, I can write according to the conventions of story writing. I can express and support my opinion easily. I can choose and defend a point of view. I can write very-well-organized compositions. I find it easy to start writing on a given topic. I can write grammatically correct sentences in my compositions. I can use a style that is appropriate to the task. When given a topic to write about, I can think of ideas quickly. I can write paragraphs that flow well. When writing a composition on a given topic, I find it easy to decide which style I should use. E.g. If I am asked to write a report, I can use the appropriate conventions to write a report. When given a topic to write about, I can think of ideas easily. Although I occasionally make mistakes when writing, I generally write good compositions. I can use nouns, verbs, adverbs, and adjectives in the right position in a sentence. I can use punctuation correctly. I find it easy to include all the information that should be dealt within on any given topic. I can locate and use suitable sources of information for any writing topic. I can write error-free sentences in my compositions. I can write coherent compositions. I can edit my compositions and correct mistakes in punctuation, capitalization, paragraph structure When given a topic to write about, I can think of ideas quickly.