KELİME ÖĞRENME STRATEJİLERİNİN ÖĞRETİMİ KONUSUNDA TÜRKİYE’DEKİ İNGİLİZCE ÖĞRETMENLERİNİN ALGILARI

Herhangi bir dilin temeli olduğu göz önüne alındığında, kelime bilgisi yabancı dil öğrenmenin temel bir bileşenidir. Bu çalışma, Türkiye’deki İngilizce öğretmenlerinin kelime öğrenme stratejilerine (VLS) nasıl değer verdiklerine ve bunları sınıf uygulamalarında ne ölçüde kullandıklarına ilişkin algılarını araştırmayı amaçlamaktadır. Diğer bir amaç, Türk devlet ortaokulları bağlamında İngilizce öğretmenleri tarafından en çok ve en az uygulanan kelime öğrenme stratejilerini ortaya çıkarmaktır. Bu açımlayıcı sıralı karma yöntemli çalışmaya 15 farklı okuldan 26 İngilizce öğretmeni katılmıştır. Nicel veriler, Schmitt'in Kelime Öğrenme Yöntemleri taksonomisine dayalı bir anket aracılığıyla toplanmış ve Sosyal Bilimler için İstatistiksel Paket (SPSS) aracılığıyla analiz edilmiştir. 9 öğretmen ile yarı yapılandırılmış görüşmeler yapılmış ve veriler tematik analiz yoluyla yorumlanmıştır. Bulgular, İngilizce öğretmenlerinin kelime öğrenimi ve öğretimine özel önem verdiğini ortaya koydu. Ayrıca, kelime öğrenme stratejilerinin önem düzeyi ile uygulama düzeyi arasında anlamlı bir ilişki bulunmuştur ve bu da İngilizce öğretmenlerinin en çok önemli gördükleri stratejileri kullandıklarını ortaya koymaktadır. Ancak en önemli strateji grubu hafıza stratejileri olarak algılansa da en sık uygulanan strateji belirleme strateji grubu olmuştur. Öğretmenlerin önemli gördükleri stratejileri öğretirken zorlandıkları görülmektedir. Yoğun müfredat, yetersiz ders kitapları, sınav odaklı öğretim, sınırlı ders saatleri, yetersiz donanım ve ilgisiz öğrenciler gibi faktörlerin öğretmenleri farklı VLS türlerini öğretmekten alıkoyduğu belirlenmiştir.

PERCEPTIONS OF TURKISH EFL TEACHERS ABOUT THE INSTRUCTION OF VOCABULARY LEARNING STRATEGIES

Given that it is the basis of any language, vocabulary is a fundamental component in learning a foreign language. This study aims at exploring the perceptions of Turkish EFL teachers regarding how they value vocabulary learning strategies (VLS) and the extent of using them in their classroom practices. Another purpose is to unveil the most and the least commonly applied VLS by EFL teachers in the Turkish state secondary schools context. 26 EFL teachers from 15 different schools participated in this mixed-methods sequential explanatory designed study. The quantitative data were gathered through a questionnaire based on Schmitt's taxonomy of VLS and analysed via Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS). Semi-structured interviews were conducted with nine teachers and the data were interpreted via thematic analysis. The findings revealed that EFL teachers place special emphasis on vocabulary learning and teaching. Besides, a significant relationship was found between the importance level and application level of VLS, revealing that EFL teachers mostly employed the strategies that they considered important. However, the most frequently applied strategy turned out to be the determination strategy group although the most important strategy group was perceived as memory strategies. Teachers seemed to have difficulty instructing the strategies they regard as significant. Such factors as intensive curriculum, insufficient course books, exam-oriented instruction, limited course hours, inadequate equipment, and indifferent learners were determined to restrain teachers from instructing different kinds of VLS.

___

  • Amiryousefi, M. (2015). İranian EFL learners’ and teachers’ beliefs about the usefulness of vocabulary learning strategies. SAGE Open. 5(2), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015581382
  • Anderson, N. J. (2005). L2 learning strategies. İn E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 757-771). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Asyiah, D. N. (2017). The vocabulary teaching and vocabulary learning: Perception, strategies, and influences on students' vocabulary mastery. Jurnal Bahasa Lingua Scientia, 9(2), 293-318.
  • Aytekin, N. Ç., & Güven, S. (2013). Examining the impact of vocabulary strategy training on adult EFL students. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 9(2), 339-352.
  • Berne, J. I. & Blachowicz, C. L. Z. (2008). What reading teachers say about vocabulary instruction: voices from the classroom. The Reading Teacher, 62 (4), pp. 314 – 323.
  • Borg, S. (2003). Teacher cognition in language teaching: A review of research on what language teachers think, know, believe, and do. Language Teaching, 36(2), 81-109.
  • Bouirane, A. (2016). Perceptions of vocabulary teaching methods among EFL teachers. İnternational Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning, 6, 22-39.
  • Catalán, R. M. J. (2003). Sex differences in L2 vocabulary learning strategies. İnternational Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13(1), 54-77.
  • Chamot, A. U., & Rubin, J. (1994). Comments on Janie-Miller’s “A critical appraisal of learner training: Theoretical bases and teaching implications.” TESOL Quarterly, 28, 771-776. Received from https://doi.org/10.2307/3587559.
  • Cohen, A. D. (1998). Strategies in learning and using a second language. NY: Addison Wesley Longman Limited.
  • Cohen, A. D. (2003). Strategy Training for Second Language Learners. Eric Digest. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.546.2507&rep=rep1&type=pdf
  • Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.
  • Demirtaş, N. (2014). EFL teachers' perceptions of teaching vocabulary learning strategies. (Unpublished Master’s Thesis). Çağ University, Mersin.
  • Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
  • Goundar, P. R. (2015). Vocabulary learning strategies of English as Foreign Language (EFL) learners: a literature review. İnternational Journal of Humanities and cultural studies, 2(2), 292-301.
  • Gu, Y., & Johnson, R. K. (1996). Vocabulary Learning Strategies and Language Learning Outcomes. Language Learning, 46(4), 643-679.
  • Güreş, G. (2019). Turkish EFL instructors’ use of vocabulary teaching techniques and their opinions about students’ vocabulary learning strategies [Master’s thesis, Pamukkale University]. DSpace Repository. http://acikerisim.pau.edu.tr/xmlui/handle/11499/3948?locale-attribute=en.
  • Intaraprasert, C. (2004). ETS Students and Vocabulary Learning Strategies: A Preliminary İnvestigation. Unpublished Research, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand.
  • Kebiel, Rachida. (2012). Teachers and students’ perceptions of vocabulary learning strategies. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Mohamed Khider University of Biskra.
  • Kılıç, A.Ö. (2018). EFL instructors' perspectives and implementations based on vocabulary teaching strategies. (Unpublished Master’s Thesis). Akdeniz University, Antalya.
  • Li, J. (2009). The evolution of vocabulary learning strategies in a computer-mediated reading environment. CALİCO Journal, 27(1), 118-146.
  • Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Nunan, D. (2011). Teaching English to Young Learners. USA: Anaheim University Press.
  • Ölmez, F. (2014). A Comparison of Students’ and Teachers’ Perceptions on the Use and İnstruction of Vocabulary Learning Strategies. (Unpublished Master’s Thesis). Akdeniz University, Turkey.
  • Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. New York: Newbury House/Harper & Row.
  • Oxford, R. L. (2003). Language learning styles and strategies: An overview. GALA. Retrieved from http://web.ntpu.edu.tw/~language/workshop/read2.pdf
  • Oxford, R. L., & Nyikos, M. (1989). Variables affecting the choice of language learning strategies by university students. The Modern Language Journal, 73(3), 291- 300.
  • Richard, J.C., & Renandya, W.A. (2002). Methodology in Language Teaching an Anthology of Current Practice. Cambridge University Press.
  • Rubin, J. (1975). What the ‘good language learner’ can teach us, TESOL Quarterly, 9, 41-51.
  • Rubin, J. (1987). Learner strategies: Theoretical assumptions, research history and typology. In A. L. Wenden & J. Rubin (Eds.), Learner strategies in language learning (pp. 15-30). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Sagarra, N., & Alba, M. (2006). The key is in the keyword: L2 vocabulary learning methods with beginning learners of Spanish. The Modern Language Journal, 90, 228-243.
  • Schmitt, N. (1997). Vocabulary learning strategies. İn N. Schmitt & M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy (pp. 199-227). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Schmitt, N. (2010). Researching vocabulary: A vocabulary research manual. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Seis, Z. (2020). Exploring the relationship between the perceptions of English lecturers towards vocabulary teaching and their strategies in vocabulary instruction. (Master’s Thesis). Maltepe University, Istanbul.
  • Tashakkori, A., Teddlie, C., & Teddlie, C. B. (2003). Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
  • Thornbury, Scout. (2002). How to teach vocabulary. London: Longman.
  • Wei, M. (2007). An examination of vocabulary learning of college-level learners of English in China. The Asian EFL Journal Quarterly, 9(2), 93–114.
  • Zheng, S. (2012). Studies and suggestions on English vocabulary teaching and learning. English Language Teaching, 5(5), 129-137. Doi:10.5539/elt.v5n5p129.