Süt Endüstrisi Atıksularının Yukarı Akışlı Anaerobik/Aktif Çamur Reaktörleri ile Arıtılabilirlik Çalışması

Bu çalışmada süt endüstrisi atıksularını yukarı akışlı çamur yataklı anaerobik reaktör (UASB) ve aktif çamur reaktör sistemleri kullanılarak altı aylık süre boyunca arıtım verimleri incelenmiştir. Arıtılabilirlik çalışmalarında atıksular önce UASB reaktöre sonra aktif çamur reaktör sistemlerine verilmiştir. Her bir reaktör ve sistemden çıkan sular için 5 günlük biyokimyasal oksijen ihtiyacı (BOİ 5 ), toplam organik karbon (TOK) ve askıda katı madde (AKM) parametreleri incelenmiştir. Çıkış atıksuyunda BOİ 5 , TOK ve AKM parametrelerinde elde edilen arıtma verimleri sırasıyla %99,33, %94,55 ve %89,23 olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Elde edilen sonuçlar değerlendirildiğinde süt endüstrisi atıksularının UASB ve aktif çamur reaktörleri ile etkin bir şekilde arıtılabileceği belirlenmiştir.

Treatment of Dairy Industry Wastewater Using Up-Flow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket/Activated Sludge Reactors

In this study, the treatment efficiencies of the dairy wastewater were investigated by using up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor (UASB) and activated sludge reactor systems for six months. In treatability studies, wastewaters were first given to the UASB reactor and then to activated sludge reactor systems. 5- day biochemical oxygen demand (BOD 5 ), total organic carbon (TOC) and suspended solids (SS) removal efficiencies were investigated for each reactor and system effluent. The effluent yields obtained from BOD 5 , TOC and SS parameters were 99.33%, 94.55% and 89.23%, respectively. When the results were evaluated, it was determined that the wastewater from the dairy industry could be effectively treated with UASB and activated sludge reactors.

___

  • Adulkar, T.V., Rathod, V.K., 2014. Ultrasound Assisted Enzymatic Pre-treatment of High Fat Content Dairy Wastewater, Ultrasonics Sonochemistry 21, 1083-1089.
  • Sarkar, B., Chakrabarti, P.P., Vijaykumar, A., Kale, V., 2006. Wastewater Treatment in Dairy Industries-possibility of Reuse. Desalination 195(1-3), 1-306.
  • Farizoglu, B., Uzuner, S., 2011. The Investigation of Dairy Industry Wastewater Treatment in a Biological High Performance Membrane System. Biochemical Engineering Journal 57, 46-54.
  • Kumar, S., Gupta, N., Pakshirajan K., 2015. Simultaneous Lipid Production and Dairy Wastewater Treatment Using Rhodococcus Opacus in a Batch Bioreactor for Potential Biodiesel Application. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 3, 1630-1636.
  • Perle, M., Kimchie, S., Shelef, G., 1995. Some Biochemical Aspects of the Anaerobic Degradation of Dairy Wastewater. Water Resources 29, 1549-1554.
  • Chen, Z., Luo, J., Chen, X., Hang X., Shen, F., Wan, Y., 2016. Fully Recycling Dairy Wastewater by an Integrated Isoelectric Precipitation- nanofiltration-anaerobic Fermentation Process. Chemical Engineering Journal 283, 476-485.
  • Tocchi, C., Federici, E., Fidaati, L., Manzi, R., Vincigurerra, V., Petruccioli, M., 2012. Aerobic Treatment of Dairy Wastewater in an Industrial Three-reactor plant: Effect of Aeration Regime on Performances and on Protozoan and Bacterial Communities. Water Research 46, 3334-3344.
  • Vidal, G., Carvalho, A., Méndez, R., Lema, J.M., 2000. Influence of the Content in Fats and Proteins on the Anaerobic Biodegradability of Dairy Wastewaters. Bioresource Technology 74, 231-239.
  • Passeggi, M., López, I., Borzacconi, L., 2012. Modified UASB Reactor for Dairy İndustry Wastewater: Performance Indicators and Comparison with the Traditional Approach. Journal of Cleaner Production 26, 90-94.
  • Demirel, B., Yenigun, O., Onay, T. 2005. Anaerobic Treatment of Dairy Wastewaters: a Review. Process Biochemistry 40, 2583-259.
  • Perle, M., Kimchie, S., Shelef, G., 1995. Some Biochemical Aspects of the Anaerobic Degradation of Dairy Wastewater. Water Research 29(6), 1549-1554.
  • Andrade, L.H., Mendes, F.D.S., Espindola, J.C., Amaral, M.C.S., 2014. Nanofiltration as Tertiary Treatment for the Reuse of Dairy Wastewater Treated by Membrane Bioreactor. Separation and Purification Technology 126, 21-29.
  • Wolicka, D., 2008. Biotransformation of Phosphogypsum in Wastewaters from the Dairy Industry. Bioresource Technology 99, 5666-5672.
  • Bhatia, M., Goyal, D., 2014. Analyzing Remediation Potential of Wastewater Through Wetland Plants: A Review. Environmental Progress &Sustainable Energy 33, 9-27.
  • Rilo, M.S., Coimbra, N.R., Villacorta, M.J., Otero, M., 2015. Treatment of Dairy Industry Wastewater by Oxygen Injection: Performance and Outlay Parameters from the Full Scale Implementation. Journal of Cleaner Production 86, 15-23.
  • Turan, M., 2004. Influence of Filtration Conditions on the Performance of Nanofiltration and Reverse Osmosis Membranes in Dairy Wastewater Treatment. Desalination 170, 83-90.
  • Sarkar, B., Chakrabarti, P.P., Vijaykumar, A., Kale, V., 2006. Wastewater Treatment in Dairyindustries-possibility of Reuse. Desalination 195, 141-152.
  • Rivas, J., Prazeres, A.R., Carvalho, F., Beltran, F., 2010. Treatment of Cheese Whey Waste- water: Combined Coagulation–flocculation and Aerobic Biodegradation. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 58, 7871–7877.
  • Guven, G., Perendeci, A., Tanyolac, A., 2008. Electrochemical Treatment of Deproteinated Whey Wastewater and Optimization of Treatment Conditions with Responsesurface Methodology. Journal of Hazardous Materials 157, 69–78.
  • Karadag, D., Köroğlu, E.O., Ozkaya, B., Cakmakci, M., 2015. A Review on Anaerobic Biofilm Reactors for the Treatment of Dairy Industry Wastewater. Process Biochemistry 50, 262-271.
  • Kushwaha, P.J., Srivastava, C.V., Mall, D.I., 2011. An Overview of Various Technologies for the Treatment of Dairy Wastewaters. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 51(5), 442-452.
  • Arvanitoyannis, S.I., Giakoundis, A., 2006. Current Strategies for Dairy Waste Management: A Review. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 46, 379-390.
  • Benaissa, F., Said, K.H., Mostefa, M.N., 2014. Optimization and Kinetic Modeling of Electrocoagulation Treatment of Dairy Wastewater. Desalination and Water Treatment, 5988-5994.
  • Hoseyni, M.S., Moradi, O., Tahmacebi, S., 2013. Removal of COD from Dairy Wastewater by MWCNTs: Kinetics and Thermodynamics. Fullerenes, Nanotubes, and Carbon Nanostructures 21, 794–803.
  • Akinbile, O.C., Yusoff, S.M., Zuki, A.A.Z., 2012. Landfill Leachate Treatment Using Sub- surface Flow Constructed Wetland by Cyperus haspan. Waste Management 32, 1387-1393.
  • Yang, L., Tsai, Y.K., 2007. Treatment of Aged Landfill Leachate by Cascade Constructed Wetland Systems. Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology 7(3-4), 353-359.
  • Healy, M.G., Rodgers M., Mulqueen, J., 2007. Treatment of Dairy Wastewater Using Constructed Wetlands and Intermittent Sand Filters. Bioresource Technology 98, 2268-2281.
  • Demirel, B., Yenigun, O., Onay, T.T., 2005. Anaerobic Treatment of Dairy Wastewaters: A Review. Process Biochemistry 40, 2583-2595.
  • Tawfik, A., Sobhey, M., Badawy, M., 2008. Treatment of a Combined Dairy and Domestic Wastewater in an Up-flow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket (UASB) Reactor Followed by Activated Sludge (AS System). Desalination 227, 167-177.
  • Heaven, W.M., Wild, K., Souza, D.D., Nahid, A., Tull, D., Watkins, M., Hannah, M., Nash, D., 2012. Physicochemical Properties and Trace Organic Compounds in a Dairy Processor’s Aerobic Bioreactor. Bioresource Technology 124, 119-128.
  • APHA (American Public Health Association) (2012). American Water Works Association (AWWA) & Water Environment Federation (WEF). Standard methods for the examination of water & wastewater, 22 nd ed.
Çukurova Üniversitesi Mühendislik-Mimarlik Fakültesi Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1019-1011
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 1986
  • Yayıncı: ÇUKUROVA ÜNİVERSİTESİ MÜHENDİSLİK FAKÜLTESİ