Çocuklarda vazoaktif tedavide kullanılan ilaçların karşılaştırılması ve mortalite belirteçlerinin saptanması

Amaç: Yoğun bakım ünitemizde vazoaktif ilaç uygulanan hastaların tedavi etkinliği açısından değerlendirilmesi ve etkinlik yönünden ilaçların karşılaştırılmasıdır. İkinci amacı ise vazoaktif ilaç kullanılan hastalarda prognostik faktörleri belirlemektir. Yöntem: İstanbul Tıp Fakültesi Çocuk Yoğun Bakım Ünitesi’nde Ocak 2004- Ocak 2005 tarihleri arasında yatırılan hastaların kayıtları geriye dönük olarak değerlendirildi. Sonuçlar: Çalışmanın yapıldığı dönemde toplam 63 hastada vazoaktif ilaç (dobutamin ve/veya dopamin, epinefrin) kullanıldı. Hastaların yaş ortancası 96.5 (1–192) aydı; %52.4’ü (n=33) erkekti. Hastaların %28.6’sı (n=18) öldü. Epinefrin tedavisi uygulanan gruptaki hastalar daha ağırdı; gruplar arasında mortalite açısından fark bulunmadı. Epinefrin tedavisi uygulanan grupta pH ve baz açığı dopamin ve/veya dobutamin tedavisi alanlardan daha hızlı düzeldi. Laktat düzeyi, epinefrin tedavisi uygulanan grupta arttı, sekizinci saatte başlangıç değerine indi. Ölen hastalarda başlangıçta ve izlemde kalp tepe atımı yaşayanlardan yüksekti, istatistiksel anlamlı bulunmadı. Laktat düzeyi artışı mortalite açısından yol gösterici tek değişken olarak bulundu (p

Comparison of vasoactive medications and investigation determinants of mortality in children

Objective: To review the current use of vasoactive medications in our intensive care unit and compare vasoactive medications with respect to therapeutic end points and the choice of agent. The second objective is to determine prognostic factors that effect survival in vasoactive medications. Methods: The data of the patients who admitted to Istanbul Faculty of Medicine Pediatric Intensive Care Unit between dates January 2004 to January 2005 were investigated retrospectively. Results: During the study period vasoactive medications (dobutamine or/and dopamine, epinephrine) were used in 63 patients. Median age of the patients was 96.5 months (1-192) and 52.4% (n=33) of the patients were male. Twenty eight point six percent of the patients (n=18) died. The patients in the epinephrine treatment group were sicker than the dobutamine or/and dopamine groups. The pH and base deficit levels improved earlier in the epinephrine therapy than in the dobutamine or/and dopamine therapies. In the patients treated with epinephrine, the lactate concentration initially increased, but decreased to the basal level in the 8±1.6 observation period. The heart rate was higher at admission and during the follow up in nonsurvivors than survivors but was not found statistically significant. The relationship between increasing lactate concentration and mortality was found statistically significant (p<0.01). Conclusions: Early initiation of epinephrine may offer survival benefit to critically ill pediatric shock patients. The lactate concentration may increase transiently in patients treated with epinephrine. The decrease in the heart rate and lactate concentration are important determinants of outcome.

___

  • 1. Müllner M, Urbanek B, Havel C, Losert H, Waechter F, Gamper G. Vasopressors for shock. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2006 Issue 1.
  • 2. Meier-Hellmann A. The choice of catecholamines in septic shock: more and more good arguments to strengthen the known position, but don't lose the faith! Crit Care 2006; 16:127.
  • 3. Carcillo JA, Davis AL, Zaritsky A. Role of early fluid resuscitation in pediatric septic-shock. JAMA 1991; 4:124-5.
  • 4. Parker MM, Hazelzet JA, Carcillo JA. Pediatric considerations. Crit Care Med 2004; 32:591-4.
  • 5. Baines PB, Hart CA. Severe meningococcal disease in childhood. Br J Anaesth 2003; 90:72-83.
  • 6. Sakr Y, Reinhart K, Vincent JL, et al. Does dopamine administration in shock influence outcome? Results of the Sepsis Occurence in Acutely 111 Patients Study. Crit Care Med 2006; 34:589-97.
  • 7. Asfar P, Hauser B, Radermacher P, Matejovic M. Catecholamines and vasopressin during critical illness. Crit Care Clin 2006; 22:121-49.
  • 8. Levy B, Bollaert PE, Charpentier C, et al. Comparison of norepinephrine and dobutamine to epinephrine for hemodynamics, lactate metabolism, and gastric tonometric variables in septic shock: a prospective, randomized study. Intensive Care Med 1997; 23:282-7.
  • 9. Hollenberg SM, Ahrens TS, Anane D, et al. Practice parameters for hemodynamic support of sepsis in adult patients: 2004 update. Crit Care Med 2004; 32:1928-48.
  • 10. Beale RJ, Hollenberg SM, Vincent JL, Parrillo JE. Vasopressors and inotropic support in septic shock: an evidence-based review. Crit Care Med 2004; 32:455-65.
  • 11. Moran JL, O'Fathartaigh MS, Peisach AR, Chapman MJ, Leppard P. Epinephrine as an inotropic agent in septic shock: a dose-profile analysis. Crit Care Med 1993; 21:70-7.
  • 12. Salak N, Pajk W, Knotzer H, et al. Effects of epinephrine on intestinal oxygen supply and mucosal tissue oxygen tension in pigs. Crit Care Med 2001; 29:367-73.
  • 13. Levy B, Mansart A, Bollaert PE, Franck P, Mallie JP. Effects of epinephrine and norepinephrine on hemodynamics, oxidative metabolism, and organ energetics in endotoxemic rats. Intensive Care Med 2003; 29:292-300.
  • 14. Levy B. Bench-to-bedside review: is there a place for epinephrine in septic shock? Crit Care 2005; 9:561-5.
  • 15. Levy B, Gibot S, Franck P, Cravoisy A, Bollaert PE. Relation between muscle Na-t-K+ ATPase activity and raised lactate concentartions in septic shock: a prospective study: Lancet 2005; 365:871-5.
  • 16. Scalea TM, Maltz S, Yelon J, et al. Resuscitation of multiple trauma and head injury: role of crystalloid fluids and inotropes. Crit Care Med 1994; 22:610-5.
  • 17. Dellinger RP. Cardiovascular management of septic shock. Crit Care Med 2003; 31:946-55.
  • 18. Husain FA, Martin MJ, Mullenix PS, Steele SR, Elliott DC. Serum lactate and base deficit as predictors of mortality and morbidity. Am J Surg 2003; 185:485-91.
Çocuk Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1302-9940
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2000
  • Yayıncı: İstanbul Üniversitesi