Torakolomber Vertebra KırıklarındaPosterior Stabilizasyon Uygulanan Hastalarımızda Geç Dönem Sonuçlarımız

Giriş ve Amaç: Bu çalışmada 2007- 2015 tarihleri arasında Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Kliniğinde cerrahi yolla tedavi edilen Torakolomber vertebra kırığı bulunan 17 olgunun retrospektif değerlendirilmesi yapıldı. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Çalışmaya dahil edilen hastaların en genci 20, en yaşlısı 63 yaşındaydı ve hastaların yaş ortalaması 43.05 ±13,25 olarak belirlendi. Bu çalışmadaki 17 hastanın 9 ‘u (%52.9) kadın, 8‘si (%47.1) ise erkekti. Etyolojik faktör 7 olguda (%41,2) yüksekten düşme ,7 olguda (%41,2) trafik kazası, 2 olguda (%11,8) araç dışı trafik kazası ve 1 olguda (%5,9) darp idi. Olguların beşinde (%29,4) L3, üçünde (%17,6) L1, üçünde (%17,6) T12 ,ikisinde (%11,8) T8 ve bir hastada (%5,9) T10 ,bir hastada (%5,9) L2 ve bir hastada (%5,9) L4 ve bir hastada da (%5,9) L5 kırık idi. Hastaların %82,4 ini patlama tarzı kırıklar oluşturmaktadır. Ek yaralanmalara bakıldığında ise en sık fıbula şaft kırığı yaralanması görülmektedir. Bulgular: Hastaların hepsine posterior spinal segmental enstrumantasyon uygulandı. Tüm olgularda füzyon amacı ile hastanın kendi kemikleri karıştırılarak kullanıldı. Operasyonlarda ortalama 2 ,05 ünite kan kullanılmıştır.1 hastada implant kırılması ve yetmezliği görüldü. Hastaların ameliyat öncesinde , ameliyat sonrasında ve son kontrollerde klinik ve radyolojik sonuçları değerlendirildi. Ölçülen radyolojik parametreler ayakta yan grafilerde ; anterior korpus yükseklik kaybı , sagittal indeks , lokal kifoz açısı ,anterior kompresyon açısı yer almakta idi. Ayrıca 17 hastanın, ameliyat öncesi ve son kontrollerdeki bilgisayarlı tomografide transvers ve ön-arka spinal kanal çapları değerlendirildi. Son kontrollerde hastaların klinik gözlemleri vizüel analog skala (VAS), Roland –Morris skalası ve Oswestry skorlama sistemi kullanıldı ve değerlendirildi. Sonuç: Klinik memnuniyette radyolojik parametrelerdeki düzelmeden ziyade kanal remodelasyonun daha etkın olduğu sonucuna vardık.

Late Results of Posterior Stabilization in Patients with Thoracolumbar Vertebral Fractures

Objective: In this study, we retrospectively evaluated 17 cases with thoracolumbar vertebra fractures who were surgically treated in Orthopaedics and Traumatology Clinics between the years January 2007 and June 2012. Materials and Metods: In our cases mean age of the patient were 43.05 ±13,25 and the youngest patient was 20 years old whereas the oldest was 63 years old. In our study, 8 (47.1%) of the 17 patients were male and 9 (52.9%) of them were female. Etiological factor was falling from a height in 7 (41,2%) cases, traffic accident in 7 (41,2%) cases, out side traffic accident in 2 (11,8%) cases and pounding in 1 (5,9%) cases. In 5 cases (29,4%) L3, in 3 cases (17,6%) L1, in 3 cases (17,6%) T12 ,in 2 cases (11,8%) T8 ,in 1 cases (5,9%) T10 ,in 1 cases (5,9%) L2 ,in 1 case (5,9%) L4 and in one case (5,9%) L5 vertebrae was fractured. 82,4% of the patients have burst fractures. The most observed additional injury is fibula shaft fracture injury. Results: Posterior spinal segmental instrumentation was performed in all casesThe radiological parameters were evaluated as loss of height in anterior corpus, sagittal index, local angle of kyphosis and anterior compresion angle in standing lateral radiographies. Moreover in 17 cases transverse and anteriorposterior spinal canal diameters were evaluated in CT assesment pre-operatively and during last controls. The clinical observation was made using visual analogue scala (VAS),Roland –Morris scala and Oswestry scoring system during last controls and the results were evaluated. Conclusion: We conclude that canal remodelling is more effective than improvement in radiological parameters in clinical satisfaction.

___

  • 1. Yılmaz G, Acaroğlu E, Torakolomber bölge omurga yaralanmaları, Türkiye Klinikleri Journal of Surgical Medical Sciences, 2006, 2(30), 5-10.
  • 2. White, A.A, Panjabi, M.M, Clinical biomechanics of the spine, 2nd Edition Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, 1990, pp: 115- 117.
  • 3. Benli, İ.T, Tandoğan, N.R, Kış, M, Tüzüner, M, Mumcu, E.F, Akalın S, Çıtak M, Cotrel –Dubousset instrumentation in the treatment of unstable thoracic and lumbar spine fractures, Archives Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery, 1994, 113, 88 – 92.
  • 4. Eastlack, R.K, Bono, C.M, Fractures anddislocations of the thoracolumbar spine, In: RW, Heckman, J.D, Court-Brown, C.M, (Eds.), Rockwood and Green’s Fractures in Adults, Vol. 2, 5th Edition., Lippincott Williams Wilkins,Philadelphia, 2001, 1543- 1580.
  • 5. Knop, C, Fabian, H, Bastian, L, Blauth, M, Late results of thoracolumbar fractures after posterior instrumentation and transpedicular bone grafting, Spine, 2001, 26 (1), 88-89.
  • 6. Marco, R.A, Kushwaha, V.P, Thoracolumbar burstfractures treated with posterior decompression and pedicle screw instrumentationsupplemented with balloon – assisted vertebroplasty and calcium phosphate reconstruction, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 2009, 91 – A(1), 20 – 28.
  • 7. McLain, R.F, Burkus, J.K, Benson, D.R, Segmental instrumentation for thoracic and thoracolumbar fractures: prospective analysis constructs survival and five – year follow, Spine, 2001, 1 (5), 310 – 323.
  • 8. Scholl, B.M, Theiss, S.M, Kirkpatrick, J.S, Short segment fixation of thoracolumbar burst fractures, Orthopaedics, 2006, 29 (8), 703 –708.
  • 9. Vaccaro, A.R, Kim, D.H, Brodke, D.S, Harris, M, Chapman, J, Schildhauer, T, Routt, M.L.C, Sasso, R.C, Diagnosis and Management of Thoracolumbar Spine Fractures. An Instructional Course Lecture, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery American, volume 2003, 85-A, 2455-70.
  • 10. Zdeblick, T.A, Sasso, R.C, Vaccaro, A.R, Chapman, J.R, Harris, M.B, Surgical treatment of thoracolumbar fractures, Instructional Course Lectures, 2009, 58, 639 – 644.
  • 11. Roy-Camille, R, Saillant, G, Mazel, C, Plating of Thoracic, Thoracolumbar and Lumbar Injuries with Pedicle Screw Plates, Orthopedic Clinics of North America, 17, 147–159, 1986
  • 12. Gertzbein SD, Court-Brown CM, Marks P, et al, (1988) The neurologic outcome following surgery for spinal fractures, Spine 13, 641–4.
  • 13. Cotler, J.M, Vernace, J.V, Michalski, J.A, The use of Harrington rods in thoracolumbar fractures, Orthopedic Clinics of North America, 1986, 17, 87-103.
  • 14. Dickson, J.H, Harrington, P.R, Erwin, W.D, Results of reduction and stabilization of the severely fractured thoracic and lumbar spine, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery,1978, 60-A, 799-805.
  • 15. Ebelke, D.K, Asher, M.A, Neft, J.R, Kraker, D.P, Survivorship Analysis of VSP Spine Instrumentation in the Treatment of Thoracolumbar and Lumbar Burst Fractures, Spine, 16, 428–432, 1991.
  • 16. Graziano, G.P, Cotrel-Dubousset hook and rod combinations for spine fractures, Journal of Spinal Disorders, 6, 380-385, 1993.
  • 17. Alvine, G.F, Swain, J.M, Asher, M.A et al, (2004) Treatment of thoracolumbarburst fractures with variable screw placement or Isola instrumentation and arthrodesis: case series and literature review, Journal of Spinal Disorder Techniques,17(4), 251 –64.
  • 18. McLain, R.F, Sparling, E, Benson, D.R, 1993, Early failure of short segment pedicle instrumentation of thoracolumbar fractures, A preliminary report, The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 75(2):162–7.
  • 19. Weinstein, J.N, Collalto, P, Lehmann, T.R, Thoracolumbar “burst” fractures treated conservatively: a long-term follow-up, Spine, 1988, 13, 33-38.
  • 20. Denis, F, Armstrong, G.W, Searls, K, Matta, L, Acute thoracolumbar burst fractures in the absence of neuralgic defisit, A comparison between operative and non-operative treatment, Clinical Orthopedics and Related Research, 1984, 189; 1-9.
  • 21. Shen, W.J, Liv T.J, Shen, Y.S, Non operative treatment versus posterior fixation for thoracolumbar junction burst fractures without neurologic defisit, Spine, 2001, 26 (9), 1038 –1045.
  • 22. Saifuddin, A, MRI of acute spinal trauma, Skeletal Radiology, 2001, 30, 237-246.
  • 23. Yazar, T, Acar, B, Yatay konumlu konvansiyonel MRG’de aksiyel kompresyon ve traksiyon uygulaması omurga değerlendirimesi için anlamlı mıdır? The Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery, 2009, 20 (4), 11-18.
  • 24. Knop, C, Fabian, H, Bastian, L, Blauth, M, Late results of thoracolumbar fractures after posterior instrumentation and transpedicular bone grafting, Spine, 2001, 26(1), 88-89.
  • 25. McNamara, M.J, Stephens, G.C, Spengler, D.M, Transpedicular short-segment fusions for treatment of lumbar burst fractures, Journal of Spinal Disorders, 1992, 5(2), 183-187.
Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 2147-9607
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2014
  • Yayıncı: Manisa Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü