YENİLİKÇİLİK KALİTESİ PERSPEKTİFİNDEN BİLGİ PAYLAŞIMI, ENTELEKTÜEL SERMAYE VE PERFORMANS İLİŞKİSİ

Çalışmanın amacı; açık ve örtülü bilgi paylaşımı mekanizmalarının firmanın entelektüel sermayesine olan katkıları ile başlayıp, operasyonel ve finansal performansa olan etkisi ile biten ilişkiler ağını Türkiye özelinde ampirik olarak test etmektir. Ayrıca bu çalışma özellikle diğer çalışmalardaki doğrusal ilişkiler yerine, entelektüel sermaye değişkenlerinin firma performansına etkisinde pazara yönelik yenilikçilik kalitesinin etkileşim etkisine odaklanarak literatüre katkı sunmaktadır. Bu bağlamda, 161 firma çalışanından elde edilen nicel veriler ile AMOS 23 programı aracılığıyla ilk olarak yapısal eşitlik analizi gerçekleştirilmiş, daha sonra moderator analizi yapılmıştır. Elde edilen bulgular ışığında;1) firma içinde gerçekleştirilen açık ve örtük bilgi paylaşımlarının entelektüel sermaye boyutlarını pozitif olarak etkilediği, 2) entelektüel sermaye boyutlarının operasyonel performansı güçlendirdiği ve 3) operasyonel performansın firmanın finansal performansına anlamlı ve pozitif olarak etki ettiği bulunmuştur. Ayrıca pazardaki yenilikçilik kalitesinin entelektüel sermaye boyutları ile operasyonel performans arasında moderator role sahip olduğu ampirik olarak kanıtlanmıştır.

THE RELATIONSHIPS AMONG KNOWLEDGE SHARING, INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL AND PERFORMANCE FROM INNOVATION QUALITY PERSPECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to investigate how i) knowledge sharing (KS) contributes to firm’s intellectual capital, ii) intellectual capital influence on operational and financial performance. We also show the moderating role of innovation quality on the relationships among human, structural and relational capitals and operational performance rather than linear relationships. In this context, by studying 161 employees, we conducted structural equation modelling on the basis of using the AMOS 23 method. Next, we analyzed moderating role of innovation quality between intellectual capital variables and operational performance. In light of findings, we found that 1) explicit and tacit knowledge sharing affect intellectual capital variables, 2) intellectual capital variables contribute to firm’s operational performance, and 3) operational performance influence the financial performance. We also determined that the innovation quality moderates the relationships between intellectual capital variables and operational performance.

___

  • Aiken, L. S., West, S. G ve Reno, R. R. (1991). Multiple Regression: Testing And Interpreting Interactions. Sage.
  • Akgün, A.E., Keskin, H ve Byrne, J., C. (2009), “Organizational emotional capability, product and process innovation and firm performance: An empirical analysis”, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 26, 103-130.
  • Akgün, A.E., Keskin, H. ve Günsel, A. (2009). Bilgi Yönetimi ve Öğrenen Örgütler. Bilgi Yönetimi ve Öğrenen Örgütler. Eflatun Yayınevi.
  • Akgün, A. E., Keskin, H., Ayar, H. ve Okunakol, Z. (2017), “knowledge sharing barriers in software development teams: A multiple case study in Turkey”, Kybernetes, 46(4), 603-620.
  • Aramburu, N ve Saenz, J. (2011), “Structural capital, innovation capability, and size effect: An empirical study”, Journal of Management Organization, 17(3), 307–325.
  • Bock, G.W ve Kim, Y.G. (2002), “Breaking the myths of rewards”, Information Resources Management Journal, 15(2), 14– 21.
  • Bukh, P.N., Larsen, H. T ve Mouritsen, J. (2001), “Constructing intellectual capital statements”, Scandinavian Journal of Management, 17, 87-108.
  • Campbell, B. A., Coff, R ve Kryscynski, D. (2012), “Rethinking sustained competitive advantage from human capital”, The Academy of Management Review, 37(3), 376-395.
  • Chase, R. L. (1997), “Knowledge management benchmarks”, Journal of Knowledge Management, 1(1), 83-92.
  • Chen, Y.S. (2008), “The positive effect of green intellectual capital on competitive advantages of firms”, Journal of Business Ethics, 77(3), 271-286.
  • Choi, B ve Lee, H. (2003), “An emprical investigation of km styles and their effect on corporate performance”, Information & Management, 40(3), 403-417.
  • Cousins, P. D., Handfield, R. B., Lawson, B ve Petersen, K. J. (2006), “Creating supply chain relational capital: The impact of formal and informal socialization processes”, Journal of operations management, 24(6), 851-863.
  • Crook, T.R., Combs J.G, Ketchen D.J, Todd S ve Woehr, D. (2011), “Does human capital matter? A meta analysis of the relationship between human capital and firm performance”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(3), 443-456.
  • Curtis, B., Hefley, W.E ve Miller, S. (1995), People Capability Maturity Model. Pennsylvania: Pittsburgh Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University.
  • Cyert, R. M ve March, J. G. (1963). A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
  • Darroch, J. (2005), “Knowledge management, innovation and firm performance”, Journal of Knowledge Management, 9(3), 101-115.
  • Edvinsson, L ve Malone, M. (1997). Intellectual Capital: Realising Your Company's True Value By Finding İts Hidden Brainpower, New York, NY: Harper Collins.
  • Eisenhardt, K. M ve Martin, J. A. (2000), “Dynamic capabilities: What are they?”, Strategic Management Journal, 21(10‐11), 1105-1121.
  • Elberdin, M., Kianto, A ve Saenz, J. (2018), “Intellectual capital drivers of product and managerial innovation in high tech and low tech firms”, R&D Management, 48(3), 290-307.
  • Fornell C ve Larcker D.F. (1981), “Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error”, Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-51.
  • Grant, R. M. (1996), Toward a knowledge‐based theory of the firm”, Strategic Management Journal, 17(2), 109-122.
  • Granstrand, O. (1999). The Economics and the Management of Intellectual Property. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham.
  • Haner, U. E. (2002), “Innovation quality—a conceptual framework”, International Journal of Production Economics, 80(1), 31-37.
  • Heisig, P., Suraj, O. S., Kianto, A., Kemboi, C., Arrau, G. P., Easa, N. F. (2016) "Knowledge management and business performance: global experts’ views on future research needs", Journal of Knowledge Management, 20(6), 1169-1198.
  • Hsu, Y.H. ve Fang, W.C. (2009), “Intellectual capital and new product development performance: the mediating role of organizational learning capability”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(5), 664-677.
  • Hsu, C. L ve Lin, J. C. C. (2008), “Acceptance of blog usage: The roles of technology acceptance, social influence and knowledge sharing motivation”, Information & management, 45(1), 65-74.
  • Hsu, I. C ve Sabherwal, R. (2012), “Relationship between intellectual capital and knowledge management: An empirical investigation”, Decision Sciences, 43, 489-524.
  • Huber, G. P. (1991), “Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures”, Organization Science, 2, 88– 115.
  • Irwin, J. R ve McClelland, G. H. (2001), “Misleading heuristics and moderated multiple regression models”, Journal of Marketing Research, 38(1), 100-109.
  • Karlsen, T., Silseth, P., R., Benito, G. ve Welch, L. S. (2003), “Knowledge, internationalization of the firm, and inward– outward connections”, Industrial Marketing Management, 32(5), 385-396.
  • Kianto, A., Saenz, J ve Aramburu, N. (2017), “Knowldege based human resource management practices, intellectual capital and innovation”, Journal of Business Research, 81, 11-20.
  • Liebowitz, J ve Wright, K. (1999), “Does measuring knowledge make ‘cents’?”, Expert Systems with Applications, 17(5), 99-103.
  • Marr, B. (2006). Strategic Performance Management: Leveraging And Measuring Your İntangible Value Drivers. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann.
  • Melbye D. (2008), “Putting the pieces together”, Government Finance Review, 24(2), 20-25.
  • Murphy, T.E ve Zandvakili, S. (2000), “Data-and metrics-driven approach to human resource practices: Using customers, employees, and financial metrics”, Human Resource Management, 39, 93–105.
  • Nahapiet, J ve Ghoshal, S. (1998), “Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage”, Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242-66.
  • Namvar, M., Fathian, M., Akhavan, P. ve Gholamian, M.R. (2010), “Exploring the impacts of intellectual property on intellectual capital and company performance: the case of Iranian computer and electronic organizations”, Management Decision, 48(5-6), 676-697.
  • Neter, J., Kutner, M. H., Nachtsheim, C. J ve Wasserman, W. (1996), Applied Linear Statistical Models. Chicago: Irwin.
  • Nonaka, I ve Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge-Creating Company. Oxford University Press.
  • Podsakoff, P.M ve Organ, D. (1986), “Reports in organizational research: problems and prospects”, Journal of Management, 12, 531–545.
  • Radaelli, G., Mura, M., Spiller, N ve Lettieri, E. (2011), “Intellectual capital and knowledge sharing: the mediating role of organisational knowledge-sharing climate”, Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 9(4), 346-352,
  • Razzaq S., Muzaffarabad K ve Kashmir. A., S. (2017), “The ımpact of human resources management practices on employee commitment: Evidence from Pakistan telecom sector”, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(7).
  • Reychav, I ve Weisberg, J. (2009), “Going beyond technology: Knowledge sharing as a tool for enhancing customer-oriented attitudes”, International Journal of Information Management, 29(5), 353-361.
  • Robertson S. (2002), “A tale of two knowledge-sharing systems”, Journal of Knowledge Management, 6(3), 295-308.
  • Rumizen, M. C. (1998), “Report on the Second Comparative Study of Knowledge Creation Conference”, Journal of Knowledge Management, 2(1).
  • Sanchez, R ve Mahoney, J. T. (1996), “Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product and organization design”, Strategic Management Journal, 17(2), 63-76.
  • Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H ve Müller, H. (2003), Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures”, Methods Of Psychological Research Online, 8(2) 23-74.
  • Simon, H. (1965). Administrative Behavior. New York: Free Press.
  • Smith, E. A. (2001), “The role of tacit and explicit knowledge in the workplace”, Journal of Knowledge Management, 5(4), 311-321.
  • Snell, S. A ve Dean, J. W. (1992), “Integrated manufacturing and human resource. management: A human capitalperspective”, Academy of Management Journal, 35, 467–504.
  • Subramaniam, M. ve Youndt, M. A. (2005), “The influence of intellectual capital on the types of innovative capabilities”, Academy of Management Journal, 48(3), 450-463.
  • Sveiby K. E ve Simons R. (2002) “Colaborative Climate and Effectiveness of knowledge work”, Journal of Knowledge Management, 6(5), 420-428.
  • Tseng, C ve Goo, Y. (2005), “Intellectual capital and corporate value in an emerging economy: empirical study of Taiwanese manufacturers”, R&D Management, 35(2), 187–201.
  • Wang Z., Sharma, P.N ve Cao J. (2016), “From knowledge sharing to firm performance: A predictive model comparision”, Journal of Business Research, 69(10), 4650-4658.
  • Wang Z ve Wang N. (2012), “Knowledge sharing, innovation and firm performance”, Expert Systems with Applications, 39, 8899–8908.
  • Wang Z, Wang N ve Liang, H. (2014), “Knowledge sharing, intellectual capital and firm performance”, Management Decision, 52(2), 230-258.
  • Wu W.Y., Cahng, M ve Chen C.W. (2008), “Promoting innovation through the accumulation of intellectual capital, social capital, and entrepreneurial orientation”, R&D Management, 38(3), 265-277.
  • Yang, J. T. (2010), „Antecedents and consequences of knowledge sharing in international tourist hotels”, International Journal of Hospitality Management, 29(1), 42-52.
  • Zhou, L., Wu, W ve Luo, X. (2007), “Internationalization and the performance of born- global SMEs: The mediating role of social networks”, Journal of International Business Studies, 38(4), 673–690.
Business and Management Studies: An International Journal-Cover
  • ISSN: 2148-2586
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2013
  • Yayıncı: ACC Publishing
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

EGE DENİZİ’NDEKİ KARASULARI SORUNUNUN TÜRK VE ULUSLARARASI DENİZ TİCARETİ’NE ETKİLERİ

GÖKÇE ÇİÇEK CEYHUN

A RESEARCH ON DETERMINATION OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ORGANIZATIONAL SUPPORT AND ORGANIZATIONAL CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIOR

Bülent GÜVEN

SÜRECE DAYALI FAALİYET TABANLI MALİYETLEME YÖNTEMİ İLE GENEL ÜRETİM GİDERLERİNİN ÜRÜNLERE DAĞITIMI: GEMİ İNŞA PROJELERİNDE BİR UYGULAMA

GÜLAY İRAK, METİN SABAN

PAYDAŞLARIN MATERYALİSTİK DEĞER EĞİLİMİNE GÖRE İŞVEREN MARKA İMAJI: TÜRKİYE’DE HABERLEŞME SEKTÖRÜ

Çağla Pınar BOZOKLU

İNTERNET KANALININ SERVİS KANİBALİZASYON ALGISI ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİ VE İLİŞKİSEL SERMAYENİN ARACI ROLÜ

Cenk Murat KOÇOĞLU, Ayşegül ACAR, Samet GÖKKAYA

INFLUENCE OF PERSON-ORGANISATION-FIT ON WORK ENGAGEMENT THROUGH ENHANCED JOB SATISFACTION: TEST OF SOCIAL IDENTITY THEORY

SEVCAN KILIÇ AKINCI

REKLAMIN TÜKETİCİLER ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİNİN CAPI TEKNİĞİYLE ARAŞTIRILMASI

A. Selçuk KÖYLÜOĞLU, MAHMUT TEKİN, H. Serhat ÇERÇİ

IMPACT OF INTERNET CHANNEL ON THE SERVICE CANNIBALIZATION PERCEPTION AND THE ROLE OF RELATIVE

AYŞEGÜL ACAR, SAMET GÖKKAYA, CENK MURAT KOÇOĞLU

KALİTE BİLEŞENLERİNİN YÖNETSEL BAKIŞ AÇISIYLA TESPİTİ: LOKANTA/RESTORAN İŞLETMELERİNE YÖNELİK KEŞİFSEL BİR ARAŞTIRMA

ZEKİ UÇAR

ÖRGÜTSEL VATANDAŞLIK DAVRANIŞI İLE ALGILANAN ÖRGÜTSEL DESTEK ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİLERİN BELİRLENMESİNE YÖNELİK BİR ARAŞTIRMA

Bülent GÜVEN