Y KUŞAĞI ÇALIŞANLARININ PSİKOLOJİK SÖZLEŞME İHLALİNE İLİŞKİN İŞVEREN HAKKINDAKİ GÖRÜŞLERİ: NİTEL BİR ANALİZ

Bu çalışmada, Y Kuşağı çalışanlarının işverenden hangi beklentilerinin karşılanmadığı takdirde psikolojik sözleşmenin ihlal edildiğine dair görüşlerinin elde edilmesi amaçlanmaktadır. Araştırmada nitel araştırma yöntemi benimsenmiş olup, İzmir ilinde gıda sektöründe faaliyet gösteren iki işletmenin 17 (%48,6) beyaz yakalı ve 18 (51,4) mavi yakalı olmak üzere toplam 35 Y Kuşağı çalışanından veri elde edilmiştir. Elde edilen veriler doğrultusunda Y Kuşağı çalışanlarının psikolojik sözleşme ihlaline ilişkin işveren hakkındaki görüşleri 3 tema altında gruplandırılmıştır: 1) Yönetime ilişkin görüşler, 2) İlişkilere ilişkin görüşler, 3) Çalışma koşullarına ilişkin görüşler. İlk tema altında yer alan alt temalar “adil yönetim”, “tanınma ve takdir”, “lider nitelikte yönetici” ve “karşılıklı özveri”dir. İkinci tema olan ilişkilere ilişkin görüşlerde bulunan alt temalar ise “yatay ilişki”, “rahat bilgi akışı”dır. Son olarak “iş-özel yaşam dengesi”, “kişisel ve mesleki gelişim imkanları”, “kariyer yönetimi” ile “tatmin edici ücret ve yan haklar” alt temaları da çalışma koşullarına ilişkin görüşler teması altında yer almaktadır. Bu bulgu doğrultusunda Y Kuşağı çalışanlarının psikolojik sözleşmenin ihlaline dair tutum içine girmemeleri için bu temalardaki beklentilerin işveren tarafından mümkün olduğunca karşılanması önerilebilmektedir.

OPINIONS OF GENERATION Y EMPLOYEES ABOUT THE PSYCHOLOGICAL CONTRACT BREACH OF EMPLOYERS: A QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS

In this study, it is aimed to get the opinions of Generation Y employees about the psychological contract breach of employers. Qualitative research method was adopted in the study and 35 white and blue collar employees (%48,6 white-collar employees, %51,4 blue-collar employees) from two enterprises operating in the food sector in İzmir were interviewed. According to the results of the study, the opinions of Generation Y employees about the psychological contract breach of employers were determined under 3 main themes. These are: 1) Opinions about management, 2) Opinions about relationships, 3) Opinions about working conditions. The sub themes identified under the first main theme are “fair management”, “recognition and appreciation”, “leading manager” and “mutual dedication”. The sub themes identified under the second main theme are “horizontal relationship” and “boundaryless information flow”. Finally, “work-life balance”, “personal and professional development opportunuties”, “career management”and “satisfying wages and benefits”sub themes are identified under the third main theme. In line with these findings, it can be suggested that expectations of these themes should be met by the employer as much as possible so that employees of Generation Y do not take an attitude regarding the pyschological contract breach.

___

  • Argyris, C. (1960), Understanding Organizational Behavior, Oxford: Dorsey Press.
  • Budd, J. W. (2004), Employment With a Human Face: Balancing Efficiency, Equity and Voice, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Budd, J. W. (2016), Çalışma Düşüncesi, (Çev. F. Man). İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları.
  • Cennamo, L. ve Gardner, D. (2008), “Generational Differences in Work Values, Outcomes and Person- Organisation Values Fit”, Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23(8), 891-906.
  • De Hauw, S. ve De Vos, A. (2010), “Millennials’ Career Perspective and Psychological Contract Expectations: Does the Recession Lead to Lowered Expectations?”, Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(2), 293-302.
  • Forret, M. L. ve Sullivan, S. E. (2002), “A Balanced Scorecard Approach to Networking: A Guide to Successfully Navigating Career Changes”, Organizational Dynamics, 31(3), 245-258.
  • Gouldner, A. W. (1960), “The Norm of Reciprocity: A Preliminary Statement”, American Sociological Review, 25(2), 161-178.
  • Levinson, H., Price, C., Munden, K., Mandl, H. ve Solley, C. (1962), Men, Management, and Mental Health, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Lub, X., Bijvank, M. N., Matthijs Bal, P., Blomme, R. ve Schalk, R. (2012), “Different or Alike? Exploring the Psychological Contract and Commitment of Different Generations of Hospitality Workers”, International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 24(4), 553-573.
  • Lyons, S. T. (2003), An Exploration of Generational Values in Life and at Work. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://curve.carleton.ca/c3cc861c-e720-47a1-a33f-e8d570474474
  • Maia, L. G. ve Bastos, A. V. B. (2015), “Organizational Commitment, Psychological Contract Fulfillment and Job Performance: A Longitudinal Quanti-Qualitative Study”, BAR-Brazilian Administration Review, 12(3), 250-267.
  • Morrison, E. W. ve Robinson, S. L. (1997), “When Employees Feel Betrayed: A Model of How Psychological Contract Violation Develops”, Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 226- 256.
  • Nadin, S. J. ve Williams, C. C. (2012), “Psychological Contract Violation Beyond an Employees’ Perspective”, Employee Relations, 34(2), 110-125.
  • Omay, U. (2017). Post Homo Servus, İstanbul: Beta Basım Yayım Dağıtım A.Ş.
  • Pinzaru, F.,Vatamanescu, E. M., Mitan, A., Savulescu, R., Vițelar, A., Noaghea, C. ve Balan, M. (2016). “Millennials at Work: Investigating the Specificity of Generation Y Versus Other Generations”, Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, 4(2), 173-192.
  • Robinson, S. L., Kraatz, M. ve Rousseau, D. M. (1994), “Changing Obligations and the Psychological Contract: A Longitudinal Study”, Academy of Management Journal, 37: 137-152.
  • Robinson, S. L. ve Morrison, E. W. (1995), “Organizational Citizenship Behavior: A Psychological Contract Perspective”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 1, 289-298.
  • Rousseau, D. M. (1990), “New Hire Perceptions of Their Own and Their Employer’s Obligations: A Study of Psychological Contracts”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 11, 389-400.
  • Rousseau, D. M. (1995), Psychological Contract in Organisation: Understanding Written and Unwritten Agreement, USA: Sage Publication.
  • Schein, E. H. (1965), Organizational Psychology, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Sharabi, M. ve Harpaz, I. (2007), “Changes in Work Centrality and Other Life Areas in Israel: A Longitudinal Study”, Journal of Human Values, 13(2), 95-106.
  • Smola, K. W. ve Sutton, C. D. (2002), “Generational Differences: Revisiting Generational Work Values for the New Millennium”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 363-382.
  • Strauss, W. & Howe, N. (1991), Generations: The History of America’s Future, 1584 to 2069, New York: William Morrow.
  • Sturges, J., Conway, N., Guest, D. ve Liefooghe, A. (2005), “Managing the Career Deal: The Psychological Contract as a Framework for Understanding Career Management, Organizational Commitment and Work Behavior”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(7), 821-838.
  • Tulgan, B., (2009), Managing Generation X, New York: W.W. Norton Publishing.
  • Vasantha, S. (2016), “Assessing Psychological Contract in the Generational Workforce”, Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 9(32), 1-6.
  • Wu, J. B., Hom, P. W., Tetrick, L. E., Shore, L. M., Jia, L., Li, C. ve Song, L. J. (2006), “The Norm of Reciprocity: Scale Development a Validation in the Chinese Context”, Management and Organization Review, 2(3), 377-402.
Business and Management Studies: An International Journal-Cover
  • ISSN: 2148-2586
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2013
  • Yayıncı: ACC Publishing