INNOVATION IN EASTERN EUROPE & CENTRAL ASIA: A MULTI- CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING APPROACH

In today’s intense competition environment, innovation levels of countries determine their competitive advantages. This study compares the innovation levels of Eastern European and Central Asian (EECA) countries using multi-criteria decision-making methods. The firm-level data set of the World Bank on innovation (BEEPS data) is used to evaluate innovation levels and capabilities of the countries in the region. In our proposed TOPSIS based methodology, countries are compared in terms of four different innovation types (New Product, New Organization, New Marketing, and New Process Innovations). Also, we provide an extensive sensitivity analysis to show the changes in the innovation rankings of the countries wıth different criteria weights.

DOĞU AVRUPA VE MERKEZ ASYA’DA YENİLİK: BİR ÇOK KRİTERLİ KARAR VERME YAKLAŞIMI

Günümüzün yüksek rekabet ortamında, ülkelerin inovasyon düzeyleri rekabetçi avantajlarını da belirlemektedir. Bu çalışma Doğu Avrupa ve Orta Asya ülkelerinin inovayon düzeylerini çok kriterli karar verme yöntemleri ile karşılaştırmaktadır. Dünya Bankası’nın firma düzeyindeki inovasyon veri seti (BEEPS) kullanılarak ülkelerin inovasyon düzeyleri ve yetenekleri değerlendirilmiştir. Bu çalışmada geliştirilen TOPSIS tabanlı yöntemle dört inovasyon türü (Ürün, Organizasyonel , Pazarlama ve Süreç Yeniliği) kullanılarak ülkeler karşılaştırılmıştır. Ayrıca, ülkelerin inovasyon sıralamasının farklı kriter ağırlıklarında nasıl değiştiğini gösterecek şekilde bir duyarlılık analizi yapılmıştır.

___

Chen, G. (2017). “An Entropy-TOPSIS Method for Evaluation Innovation Performance of the High-tech Industry”, Boletín Técnico, 55(3), 155-163.

World Intellectual Property Organization. (2018). Global Innovation Index 2018, available at: https://www.globalinnovationindex.org/gii-2018-report.

Grela, M., Majchrowska, A., Michałek, T., Mućk, J., Stążka-Gawrysiak, A., Tchorek, G. and Wagner, M. (2017). “Is Central and Eastern Europe Converging Towards the EU-15?”, Narodowy Bank Polski, Education & Publishing Department.

Grossman, G. M. and Helpman, E. (1991). Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.

Gupta, H. and Barua, M. K. (2018). “A Framework to Overcome Barriers to Green Innovation in SMEs using BWM and Fuzzy TOPSIS”, Science of the Total Environment, 633, 122-139.

Hagemejer, J. and Muck, J. (2019). “Export‐Led Growth and its Determinants: Evidence from CEEC Countries”, The World Economy, 00, 1-32.

Hwang, C. L. and Yoon, K. (1981). “Methods for Multiple Attribute Decision Making”, In Multiple Attribute Decision Making (pp. 58-191). Berlin: Springer.

Kattel, R., Reinert, E.S. and Suurna, M. (2011). “Industrial Restructuring and Innovation Policy in Central and Eastern Europe since 1990”, The Other Canon Foundation and Tallinn University of Technology Working Papers in Technology Governance and Economic Dynamics 23, TUT Ragnar Nurkse Department of Innovation and Governance.

Kaynak, S., Altuntas, S. and Dereli, T. (2017). “Comparing the Innovation Performance of EU Candidate Countries: An Entropy-Based TOPSIS Approach”, Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 30(1), 31-54.

Kravtsova, V. and Radosevic, S. (2012). “Are Systems of Innovation in Eastern Europe Efficient?”, Economic Systems, 36(1), 109-126.

Labaye, E., Sjtil, P.E., Bogdan, W., Novak, J., Mischke, J., Fruk, M. and O., Ionuiu (2013). “A New Dawn: Reigniting Growth in Central and Eastern Europe”, McKinsey Global Institute (MGI) Report.

Lema, R., Rabellotti, R. and Sampath, P. G. (2018). “Innovation Trajectories in Developing Countries: Co-evolution of Global Value Chains and Innovation Systems”, The European Journal of Development Research, 30(3), 345-363.

Levenko, N., Oja, K. and Staehr, K. (2019). “Total Factor Productivity Growth in Central and Eastern Europe Before, During and After the Global Financial Crisis”, Post-Communist Economies, 31(2), 137-160.

Li, X. and Gao, Z. (2015). “Application of Improved Entropy TOPSIS to Competitive Performance Evaluation of Power Companies”, In 2015 International Conference on Computational Science and Engineering (pp. 183-188).

Mangır, F. and Erdogan, S. (2011). “Comparison of Economic Performance Among Six Countries in Global Financial Crisis: The Application of Fuzzy TOPSIS Method”, Economics, Management and Financial Markets, 6(2), 122-136.

Nan, Y. and Tian, Y. (2011). “Performance Evaluation on Regional Innovation System Based on AHP-TOPSIS Methodology”, In Proceedings of 2011 IEEE International Conference on Computer Science and Network Technology (Vol. 2, pp. 1140-1143).

Nuruzzaman, N., Sing, D. and Pattnaik, C. (2018). “Competing to be Innovative: Foreign Competition and Imitative Innovation of Emerging Economy Firms”, International Business Review, in press.

Papava, V. (2018). “Catching Up and Catch-Up Effect: Economic Growth in Post-Communist Europe (Lessons from the European Union and the Eastern Partnership States)”, European Journal of Economic Studies, 7(2), 109-125.

Popescu, G. (2014). “FDI and Economic Growth in Central and Eastern Europe”, Sustainability, 6(11), 8149-8163.

Radosevic, S. (2005). “Central and Eastern Europe in the EU Innovation System: Asset or Liability?”, In Proceedings of 65th Anniversary Conference of the Institute of Economics, Zagreb, (pp. 369-378).

Silva, M. D. C., Gavião, L. O., Gomes, C. F. S. and Lima, G. B. A. (2017). “A Proposal for the Application of Multicriteria Analysis to Rank Countries According to Innovation using the Indicators Provided by the World Intellectual Property Organization”, RAI Revista de Administração e Inovação, 14(3), 188-198.

Smętkowski, M. (2018). “The Role of Exogenous and Endogenous Factors in the Growth of Regions in Central and Eastern Europe: The Metropolitan/Non-metropolitan Divide in the Pre-and Post-Crisis Era”, European Planning Studies, 26(2), 256-278.

Suder, A. and Kahraman, C. (2016). “Multicriteria Analysis of Technological Innovation Investments using Fuzzy Sets”, Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 22(2), 235-253.

Tiits, M., Kattel, R., Kalvet, T. and Tamm, D. (2008). “Catching Up, Forging Ahead or Falling Behind? Central and Eastern European Development in 1990-2005”, Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 21(1), 65-85.

Urfalıoğlu, F. and Tolga, G. (2013). “Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Teknikleri ile Türkiye’nin Ekonomik Performansının Avrupa Birliği Üye Ülkeleri ile Karşılaştırılması”, Marmara University Journal of Economic & Administrative Sciences, 35(2), 329-360.

Veugelers, R. and Schweiger, H. (2016). “Innovation Policies in Transition Countries: One Size Fits All?”, Economic Change and Restructuring, 49(2-3), 241-267.

Wadho, W. and Chaudhry, A. (2018). “Innovation and Firm Performance in Developing Countries: The Case of Pakistani Textile and Apparel Manufacturers”, Research Policy, 47(7), 1283-1294.

Zavadskas, E. K. and Turskis, Z. (2011). “Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) Methods in Economics: An Overview”, Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 17(2), 397-427.
Business and Management Studies: An International Journal-Cover
  • ISSN: 2148-2586
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2013
  • Yayıncı: ACC Publishing
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

THE IMPACT INVESTIGATION OF R&D EXPENDITURE IN AUTOMOTIVE SECTOR

İpek DOĞAN ÖZER, Elif NAZLI, BÜLENT YANIKTEPE

BAĞIMSIZ DENETİM KALİTESİ AÇISINDAN BAĞIMSIZ DENETİM KURULUŞLARININ ÖZELLİKLERİ VE DENETİM GELİRLERİ: BAĞIMSIZ DENETİM KURULUŞLARI ÜZERİNE BİR ARAŞTIRMA

İBRAHİM SAKİN, ZEYNEP TÜRK

HİBRİT AKIŞ TİPİ ÇİZELGELEME PROBLEMİNİN SEZGİSEL ALGORITMALAR KULLANILARAK ÇÖZÜMÜ

Fatma Selen MADENOĞLU

ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE AND COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: BUSINESS SIZE MATTERS

ALİ ŞÜKRÜ ÇETİNKAYA, Aboobakr NIAVAND, Muhammad RASHİD

DOĞU AVRUPA VE MERKEZ ASYA’DA YENİLİK: BİR ÇOK KRİTERLİ KARAR VERME YAKLAŞIMI

Özgür KABADURMUŞ, Fatma Nur Karaman KABADURMUŞ

SOSYAL SERMAYENİN KURUMSAL İMAJ ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİ: SİVİL TOPLUM KURULUŞLARINDA BİR UYGULAMA

FATMA KORKMAZ, FATİH FERHAT ÇETİNKAYA

E-PERAKENDE SİTELERİNDE YAŞANAN AKIŞ DENEYİMİNİN TÜKETİCİ SATIN ALMA NİYETİNE ETKİSİ: GİYİM VE AYAKKABI SEKTÖRÜNDE FAALİYET GÖSTEREN MARKALAR ÜZERİNDE BİR İNCELEME

SERAP ÇABUK, Ahmet Salim KUŞ

KİŞİ-ÖRGÜT UYUMUNUN İŞTEN AYRILMA NİYETİ ÜZERİNE ETKİSİNDE İŞ TATMİNİ NASIL BİR ARACILIK ROLÜ ÜSTLENİR? GÖRGÜL BİR ÇALIŞMA

Almula Umay KARAMANLIOĞLU, Gamze GÜNER, Burak Efe BAHADIR, Hakkı Okan YELOĞLU

BÜTÇE KAVRAMI VE BÜTÇE UYGULAMALARI ÜZERİNE ÜRETİM İŞLETMELERİNDE BİR ARAŞTIRMA

YASİN ŞEKER

DEPOZİTO VE PLASTİK POŞET ÜCRETİ UYGULAMALARI: MUHASEBE SÜRECİ

HARUN KISACIK