Bu çalışma 12 Haziran 2011 genel seçim sonuçlarını değerlendirmektedir. Ekonomik eğilimlerin Haziran genel seçim sonuçları üzerine etkisini il düzeyinde veri kullanarak analiz edilmektedir. Ekonometrik model tahmininde Görünürde Bağlantısız Regresyonlar kullanılmıştır. Sonuçlara göre siyasi partiler kendi tabanlarını korumuşlardır. İl düzey- inde ekonomik büyüme beklendiği gibi AKPni (Adalet ve Kalkınma Partisi) pozitif yönde etkilerken MHPni (Milliyetçi Hareket Partisi) olumsuz yönde etkilemiştir. Fakat CHP (Cumhuriyet Halk Partisi) üzerinde herhangi bir etkisi bulunmamıştır. Muhalefet partileri işsizlik oranından etkilenmezken, işsizlik oranının yüksek olduğu illerde AKP oy alamamıştır. Çalışmada ayrıca AKPnin daha yüksek kamu harcamaları yaptığı
This study examines the outcomes of the general election which took place on 12 June 2011. We analyze the effects of economic indicators on the results of June general election by using the provincial data. The Seemingly Unrelated Regression (SUR) technique is used in the estimations. We find that the political parties preserved their core voters or sympathizers. Provincial economic growth positively affects the AKP (Justice and Development Party) but the MHP (Nationalist Movement Party) negatively as expected. However, it does not have any influence on the CHP (Republican Peoples Party). Provinces suffering from higher unemployment rates do not vote for the AKP while opposition parties are not affected by unemployment rates. It is also found that vote share of the incumbent party does not increase in the provinces in which higher public spending has been made by the AKP. In terms of regions, our results indicate that the ruling party increased its vote share more in the provinces where the voters are of average or higher level of income and education.
Akarca, A.T. (2011). "A Prediction for AKP's Nationwide Vote Share in the 12 June 2011 Turkish Parliamentary Election." Iktisat Işletme ve Finans, 26(302): 53-74.
------, (2009a). "A Prediction for AKP's Nationwide Vote Share in the 29 March 2009 Turkish Local Elections." İktisat İşletme ve Finans, 24(276): 7-22.
------, (2009b) "Putting the Outcome of the 29 March 2009 Turkish Local Administrations Election in Perspective." Paper presented at EconAnadolu 2009: Anadolu International Conference in Economics. June 17-19, 2009, Eskişehir, Turkey.
Akarca, A.T. and Baslevent, C. (2009) "A Cluster Analysis of Regional Voting Patterns in Turkey from 1999 to 2009." Unpublished manuscript.
Akarca, A.T. and Tansel, A. (2007). "Social and Economic Determinants of Turkish Voter Choice in the 1995 Parliamentary Election." Electoral Studies, 26: 633-647.
------, (2006). "Economic Performance and Political Outcomes: An Analysis of the Turkish Parliamentary and Local Election Results between 1950 and 2004." Public Choice, 129(1-2): 77-105.
------, (2002). "Economic Performance and Political Outcomes: An Analysis of the 1995 Turkish Parliamentary Election Results." Paper presented at the Ninth Annual Conference of the Economic Research Forum held in Sharjah, UAE, October.
Başlevent, C., Kirmanoğlu, H., and Şenatalar, B. (2005). "Empirical Investigation of Party Preferences and Economic Voting in Turkey." European Journal of Political Research, 44: 547-562.
Çarkoğlu, A. (1997)."Macro-economic Determinants of Electoral Support for Incumbents in Turkey, 1950-1995." New Perspectives on Turkey, 17: 75-96.
Ercins, G. (2007). "Türkiye'de Sosyo-Ekonomik Faktörlere Bağlı Olarak Değişen Seçmen Davranışı (The Voter Behevior in Turkey Changing According to the Socio-Economic Variables)" C.Ü. İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 8(2): 25-40.
Evans, T.A. (2006). "The Different Effects of Discretionary Federal Spending on Parliamentary Elections." Economic Inquiry, 42: 234-48.
Evans, G., Robert A. (2006). "The Political Conditioning of Economic Perceptions". Journal of Politics, 68:194-207.
Fraile, M. and. Lewis-Beck, M.S. (2010). "Economic Voting in Spain: A 2000 Panel Test." Electoral Studies 29 (2): 210-220.
Gerber, A.S. and Gregory A.H. (2009). "Partisanship and Economic Behavior: Do Partisan Differences in Economic Forecasts Predict Real Economic Behavior?" American Political Science Review, 103(3): 407-426.
Göksel, T. and Çınar, Y. (2011). Mevcut Seçim Sisteminin İyileştirilmesine Yönelik Sayısal Analizler ve Politika Önerileri (Quantitative Analysis and Policy Recommendations for the Improvement of the Existing Electoral System)", TEPAV Yayınları, No: 58.
Köksal B., Civan, A., and Genç, S. (2010) "An Analysis of the Shifts in the Voter Preferences in 2009 Turkish Local Elections." İktisat İşletme ve Finans, 25 (289): 9-28.
Lewis-Beck, M.S. and Stegmaier, M. (2000). Economic Determinants of Electoral Outcomes. Annual Review of Political Science, 3: 183-219.
Nannestad, P. and Paldam, M. (1994) "The VP Function: A Survey of the Literature on Vote and Popularity Functions after 25 Years. " Public Choice 79 (3-4): 213-245.
Paldam, M. (1991). "How Robust Is the Vote Function? A Study of Seventeen Nations over Four Decades," in H. Norpoth, S. Michael, M.S. Lewis-Beck, L.D. Lafay (eds.) Economics and Politics: The Calculus of Support: 9-33. University of Michigan Press.
"West, W.J. (2005). "Regional Cleavages in Turkish Politics: An Electoral Geography of the 1999 and 2002 National Elections."Political Geography, 24(4): 499-523.
Whitten, G. (2004). "Could There Have Possibly Been Economic Voting?" in M.S. Lewis-Beck (ed.) The French Voter Before and After the 2002 Elections: 126-135. Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Yüksel, H., Civan, A., and Gündoğan, E. (2011). "The Impact of Economic and Political Factors on the 2010 Turkish Referendum." Eurasian Journal of Business and Economics, 4 (7): 69-80.