___

• ASTM., 2001. Standard Test Method for Determination of Rock Hardness by Rebound Hammer Method. 04.09, D 5873-00.
• Aydın, A., 2009. ISRM Suggested Method for Determination of the Schmidt Hammer Rebound Hardness: Revised Version. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 46:627–634.
• Aydın, A., Basu, A., 2005. The Schmidt Hammer in Rock Material Characterization. Engineering Geology, 81:1–14.
• Barton, N., Choubey, V., 1977. The Shear Strength of Rock Joints in Theory and Practice, Rock Mechanics, 10, 1-2, 1-54.
• Bilgin, N., Seyrek, T., Shahriar, K., 1990. Roadheaders Glean Valuable Tips for Istanbul Metro Tunnels. Tunnelling, Oct. 29–32.
• Büyüksağış, I.S., Göktan, R.M., 2007. The Effect of Schmidt Hammer Type on Uniaxial Compressive Strength Prediction of Rock. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 44:299–307.
• Cerna, B., Engel, Z., 2011. Surface and Sub-Surface Schmidt Hammer Rebound Value Variation for A Granite Outcrop, Earth Surf. Process. Landforms 36, 170–179.
• Dabski, M., 2009. Early Stages of Weathering of Glacially-Abraded Limestone Surfaces as Determined by Various Schmidt Hammer Tests: Biferten glacier forefield, Glarner Alps (Switzerland), Landform Analysis, 11, 11–15.
• Dabski, M., 2014. Rock Surface Micro−Roughness, Schmidt Hammer Rebound and Weathering Rind Thickness Within LIA Skálafellsjökull Foreland, SE Iceland, Pol. Polar Res. 35, 1, 99–114.
• Deere, D.U., Miller, R.P., 1966. Engineering Classifications and İndex Properties of İntact rock. Technical report no. AFWL-TR 65-116, University of Illinois: p 300.
• Demirdağ, S., Yavuz, H., Altındağ, R., 2009. the Effect of Sample Size on Schmidt Rebound Hardness Value of Rocks. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 46:725–730.
• Goudie, A.S., 2006. The Schmidt Hammer in Geomorphological Research. Progr. Phys. Geogr. 30, 6, 703–718 .
• Göktan, R.M., Ayday, C.A., 1993. Suggested İmprovement to the Schmidt Rebound Hardness Isrm Suggested Method With Particular Reference to Rock Machineability. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 30:321–322.
• Gökçeoğlu, C., Aksoy, H., 2000. New Approaches to the Characterization of Clay-Bearing, Densely Jointed and weak rock masses. Engineering Geology, 58, 1–23.
• Haramy, K.Y., De Marco, M.J., 1985. Use of Schmidt Hammer for Rock and Coal Testing. In: Proceedings 26Th Us Symposium Rock Mechanics, 26–28 June, Rapid City, SD. Rotterdam: Balkema p 549–555.
• Hsiung, S.M., Ghosh, A., Chowdhury, A.H., 1995. On Natural Rock Joint Profile Characterization Using Self- Affine Fractal Approach, the 35th U.S. Symposium on Rock Mechanics (USRMS), 5-7 June, Reno, Nevada, 681-687.
• Hucka, V., 1965. A Rapid Method for Determining the Strength of Rocks in Situ. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2:127–134.
• ISRM., 1981. ISRM Suggested Methods Rock Characterization, Testing and Monitoring. E. T. Brown (ed.), Pergamon Press, London, 211 s.
• ISRM., 2007. The Complete ISRM Suggested Methods for rock Characterization, Testing and Monitoring: 1974– 2006. In: Ulusay, Hudson (Eds.), Suggested Methods Prepared by the Commission on Testing Methods, International Society for Rock Mechanics. ISRM Turkish National Group, Ankara, Turkey p 628.
• Kahraman, S., 2001. Evaluation of Simple Methods for Assessing the Uniaxial Compressive Strength of rock. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 38, 981–94.
• Kahraman, S., Fener, M., Gunaydın, O., 2002. Predicting the Schmidt Hammer Values of in–Situ Intact Rock From Core Sample Values. International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences, 39, 395–399.
• Karaman, K., Kesimal, A., 2015a. A Comparative Study of Schmidt Hammer Test Methods for Estimating the Uniaxial Compressive Strength of Rocks. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 74, 507-520.
• Karaman K., Kesimal A., 2015b. Correlation of Schmidt Rebound Hardness With Uniaxial Compressive Strength and P-Wave Velocity of Rock Materials. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 40, 1897-1906.
• Karpuz, C., 1990. A classification System for Excavation of Surface Coal Measures. Mining Science and Technology, 11:157–163.
• Karpuz, C., Paşamehmetoğlu, A.G., 1977. Field Characterization of Weathered Ankara Andezites. Engineering Geology, 46:1–17.
• Katz, O., Reches, Z., Roegiers, J.C., 2000. Evaluation of Mechanical Rock Properties Using a Schmidt Hammer. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 37:723–728.
• Li, Y., Huang, R., 2015. Relationship Between Joint Roughness Coefficient and Fractal Dimension of Rock Fracture Surfaces. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 75, 15–22.
• McCarroll, D., 1989. Potential and Limitations of the Schmidt Hammer for Relative-Age Dating: Field Tests on Neoglacial Moraines, Jotunheimen, Southern Norway, Arctic and Alpine Research, 21,3, 268-275.
• Poole, R.W., Farmer, I.W., 1978. Geotechnical Factors Affecting Tunneling Machine Performance in Coal Measures Rock. Tunnels tunnelling Dec. 27–30.
• Poole, R.W., Farmer, I.W., 1980. Consistency and Repeatability of Schmidt Hammer Rebound Data During Field Testing. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, Geomech Abstr. 17:167–171.
• Schmidt, E., 1951. a Non-Destructive Concrete Tester. Concrete, 59(8):34–35.
• Soiltest, Inc., 1976. Operating İnstructions—Concrete Test Hammer. Soiltest Inc, Evanston
• Sumner, P., Nel, W., 2002. The Effect of Rock Moisture on Schmidt Hammer Rebound: Tests on Rock Samples From Marion Island and South Africa. Earth Surf Process Landf 27:1137–1142.
• USBR., 1998. Engineering Geology Field Manual. Field I˙ndex Tests, 1:111–112.
• Williams, R.B.G., Robinson, D.A., 1983. The Effect of Surface Texture on the Determination of the Surface Hardness of Rock Using Schmidt Hammer. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 8, 289-292.
• Yağız, S., 2009. Predicting Uniaxial Compressive Strength, Modulus of Elasticity and Index Properties of Rocks Using the Schmidt hammer. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 68:55–63.