Perception of Homeland among Crimean Tatars:Cases from Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan and Crimea

Kırım Tatarları, başta Osmanlı İmparatorluğu'na doğru olmak üzere çok büyük göçlere neden olan 1783 Rus işgalinden beri anavatan kaybını yaşamaktadırlar. Anavatan kaybı Stalin'in stratejik sürgünleri ile doruk noktasına ulaşmıştır. 1944 yılında, Kırım Tatarları Kırım'dan Orta Asya'ya sürülmüşler ve anavatanlarına dönüş hakkını 1989 yılında elde edebilmişlerdir. O tarihten beri, vatana geri dönüş devam etmektedir. Anavatan mitinin milli duyguyu harekete geçiren etkin bir araç olduğu göz önünde bulundurarak, bu makalede, Kırım Tatarları'nda anavatan algısı çeşitli katmanları ile incelenmektedir. Bu katmanlar, kimliğin temel bir unsuru olarak anavatan; idealize edilmiş nihai bir hedef olarak anavatan, Kırım Tatar toplumunun yaşadığı yer olarak anavatan ve daha iyi bir yaşam için akılcı olarak seçilen bir mekan olarak anavatan şeklinde sıralanabilir. Ayrıca bu makale, bu farklı katmanların her bir Kırım Tatarı'nda farklı derecelerde olmakla birlikte, aynı anda var olabildiğini iddia etmektedir.

Kırım, Özbekistan ve Kazakistan'daki Kırım Tatarları'nda Anavatan Algısı

Crimean Tatars have been experiencing the loss of homeland since the Russian invasion of Crimea in 1783, which caused massive waves of migration especially to the Ottoman Empire. The loss of homeland culminated in Stalin's strategic deportations. Crimean Tatars were deported from Crimea to Central Asia in 1944 and obtained the right to return to their homeland in 1989. Since then, the return process has continued. Considering that the construction of the myth of homeland is an effective instrument to mobilize national sentiment, this article studies the perception of homeland among Crimean Tatars with its different layers - as an essential marker of identity, as an idealized mythical final destination, as a land where the community lives, and finally as a rationally desired place in search for a better life. The article also argues that these layers may coexist in individual cases although their relative significance may vary

___

  • Abbasova, Gulnara (2004). Unpublished Intervention to the UN Working Group on Minorities. Geneva: Switzerland.
  • Allworth, Edward A. (Ed.) (1998). The Tatars of Crimea: Return to the Homeland. Durham&London: Duke University Press.
  • Anderson, Benedict (1991). Imagined Communities. London- NY: Verso.
  • Asanin, İdris Çelebioğlu (2002). Adalet Güreşi Saflarında. Simferopol: Kırım Devlet Okur Pedagojika Neşriyatı.
  • Azade-Rorlich, Ayşe (2000). Volga Tatarları. İstanbul: Iletişim Yay.
  • Cemileva, Safinar, Lentara Halilova and Lila Cemilova (2004). Qırımnın Sadıq Qızları. Akmescit: Ocaq
  • Connor, Walker (1978). "A Nation is a Nation, is a State, is an Ethnic Group, is a..." Ethnic and Racial Studies 1(4): 379-388.
  • --- (1992). "The nation and its myth". International Journal of Comparative Sociol- ogy 33(1-2): 48-57.
  • --- (1986). "The Impact of Homelands upon Diasporas". in Gabriel Sheffer (Ed.). Diasporas in International Politics. London: Croom Helm. 16- 45.
  • Conquest, Robert (1970). Nation Killers- The Soviet Deportation of Nationalities. London: Macmillan
  • Fazıl, İskender (1998). Secde. Akmescit: Tavria
  • Fisher, Alan (1977). "Crimean Separatism in the Ottoman Empire". in William W. Haddad and William Ochenwald (Eds.). Nationalism in a Non-National State. Co- lumbus: University of Ohio Press. 57-76.
  • --- (1978). The Crimean Tatars. Stanford, California: Stanford University, Hoover Institution Press.
  • Giraybai, Amdi (1997). Şiirler. Akmescit: Tavria
  • Hayruddinov, M.A. and C.M. Useyinov (2001). Etiket Krımski Tatar. Simferopol: Sonat.
  • http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/DATASTATISTICS/0,,contentMDK:2 0535285~menuPK:1192694~pagePK:64133150~piPK:64133175~theSitePK:2 39419,00.html, last accessed 25.02.2006, 3:10
  • Horowitz, D.L. (1985). Ethnic Groups in Conflict. Berkeley CA: University of Cali- fornia Press.
  • Huttchinson, D.L and Anthony D. Smith (Eds.) (1996). Ethnicity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • İnalcık, Halil (1944). "Yeni Vesikalara Göre Kırım Hanlığının Osmanlı Tabiliğine Girmesi ve Ahıtname Meselesi". Belleten 8(31): 185-229.
  • Kaiser, Robert (1994). The Geography of Nationalism in Russia and the USSR. Princeton- New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
  • --- (2002). "Homeland Making and the Territorialization of National Identity". in Danielle Conversi (ed.). Ethnonationalism in the Contemporary World. London: Routledge. 230-245.
  • Kırımlı, Hakan (1996). Kırım Tatarlarında Milli Kimlik ve Milli Hareketler (1905- 1916). Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu Yay.
  • Kreindler, Isabelle (1986). "The Soviet deported nationalities: a summary and up- date". Soviet Studies 38(3): 387-405.
  • Lévi-Strauss, Claude (1963). "the structural study of the myth". Structural Anthropo- logy. NY: Basic Books, Inc. 206-231.
  • Marie, Jean-Jacques (1995). Les Peuples Déportés D'Union Sovietique. Paris : Edi- tions Complexe.
  • Mueddin, Rüstem (1995). Ana Kaygısı. Akmescit: Tavria
  • Nalçaoğlu, Halil (2002). "Vatan: toprakların altı, üstü ve ötesi". Modern Türkiye'de Siyasi Düşünce. Vol.4. İstanbul: İletişim Yay. 293-308.
  • Nekrich, Alexander M. (1978). The Punished Peoples: The Deportation and the Fate of Soviet Minorities at the End of the Second World War. Toronto: W.W.Norton &Company
  • Özcan, Kemal (2002). Vatana Dönüş- Kırım Türklerinin Sürgünü ve Milli Mücadele Hareketi (1944-1991). İstanbul: Tarih ve Tabiat Vakfı Yay.
  • Sheehy, Ann and Bohdan Nahaylo (1980). The Crimean Tatars, Volga Germans and Meskhetians: Soviet Treatment of Some National Minorities. London: Minority Rights Group Report.
  • Skrbıs, Zlatko (1999). Long Distance Nationalism - Diasporas, Homelands and Identi- ties. Aldershot: Ashgate publishing Limited.
  • Smith, Anthony D. (1981). "States and homelands: the social and geopolitical impli- cations of national territory". Millenium: Journal of International Studies 10 (3): 187-202.
  • --- (1986). Ethnic Origins of Nations. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • --- (1992). "Chosen peoples: why ethnic groups survive?". Ethnic and Racial Stud- ies 15(3): 436-456.
  • --- (1999a). Myths and Memories of the Nation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • --- (1999b). "Ethnic election and national destiny: some religious origins of national- ist ideals". Nations and Nationalism 5 (3): 331-55.
  • Trier, Tom and Andrei Khanzin (Eds.) (2007). The Meskhetian Turks at a Cross- roads: Integration, Repatriation or Resettlement. Münster: LIT Verlag.
  • Uehling, Greta Lynn (2004). The Crimean Tatars - Deportation and Return-Beyond Memory. NY: Palgrave, Mac Millan.
  • Vozgrin, V.E. (1992). Istoriçeskiye Sudbi Krimskih Tatar. Moscow: Misl.
  • Williams, Brian Glynn (1998). "The Crimean Tatar exile in Central Asia: a case study in group destruction and survival". Central Asian Survey 17 (2): 288-317.
  • --- (2001a). "The ethnogenesis of the Crimean Tatars: an historical reinterpreta- tion". JRAS Series 3: 329-348.
  • --- (2001b). The Crimean Tatars: The Diaspora Experience and the Forging of a Nation. Leiden: Brill.
  • http://www.qurultay.org
  • Yiftachel, Oren (2001). "The Homeland and Nationalism". The Encyclopaedia of Nationalism 1: 359.
  • Zeti, Pivot (2004). Kırım'dan Seda. Akmescit: Ocaq.