Hegel’s Master-Slave Dialectic and The Relationship between God and Believer

Öz In his Phenomenology, Hegel characterizes self-conscious- ness as desire and gives an account of master-slave relationship as an example of how consciousness is brought to the level of self-cons ciousness as a result of the interaction of two consciousnesses. In this paper, I will firstly try to explain masterslave dialectic, and then to analyze whether it can be useful to understand the relations between God and believer / man. Second, if this dialectic turns out to be useless in such an endeavour, I will try to explain why this is so. It should be said that Hegelian master-slave dialectic is very influential for an understanding of the nature of self-consciousness. It is also very help ful in engaging with the difficult questions both of religion and of philosophy: how is one related to many or how does divine interact with the world and human beings? However, Hegel’s master-slave dialectic proposes an answer which has certain deficiencies, especially, in ex plicating the nature of the relation between God and believer. I will to demonstrate why this dialectic can mislead us in understanding how God and believr interact.

___

  • Altizer, T. J. J. and W. Hamilton (1966), Rational Theology and the Death of God, Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
  • Caputo, J. D. (1992), “Meister Eckhart and the Later Heidegger: the Mys- tical Element in Heidegger’s Thought” in (eds) Christopher Macann (1992), Martin Heidegger: Critical Assessments, London: Routledge, pp.130-178
  • Findlay, J. N. (1976), Hegel: A Re-examination, New York: Oxford Press.
  • Gadamer, H. G. (1976), Hegel’s Dialectic: Five Hermeneutical Studies, New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • Hegel, G. W. F. (1968), Lectures on Philosophy of Religion: Together with a Work on the Proofs of the Existence of God, London: Routledge and K. Paul.
  • Hegel, G. W. F. (1977), Phenomenology of Spirit, New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Luther, O. K. and J. L. Hoover (1981), “Hegel’s Phenomenology of Relig- ion”, The Journal of Religion, 61 (3): 229-241.
  • Redding, P. (2007), “Hegel’s Philosophy of Religion”, in (eds.) Graham Oppy and Nick Trakakis (2007), History of Western Philosophy of Re- ligion, Volume IV, pp.49-60
  • Stepelevich, L. S. (1992), “Hegel and Roman Catholicism”, Journal of American Academy of Religion, 60, pp.673-691.
  • The Holy Bible, translated from the Latin vulgate, diligently compared with the Hebrew, Greek, and other editions from divers languages, Douay, Rhimes Version, 1582/1609.
  • Martin Wendte, ‘Review of Hegel and Christian Theology. A Reading of The Lectures on the Philosophy of Religion’ Ars Disputandi (http://www.ArsDisputandi.org) 5 (2005). pp. 2-10.