Felsefi Teolojide Antroposentrik Dönüş: Teolojik An-tropolojiye Bir Giriş

Bu çalışma, modern dönemde entelektüel alanda gerçekleştiği iddia edilen antroposentrik dönüşün felsefi teoloji alanındaki yansımasının bir neticesi ola-rak ortaya çıkan teolojik antropoloji disiplinine giriş niteliğinde bir araştırmayı içermektedir. Böylece, henüz teolojik antropoloji alanına dair kapsamlı bir kay-nak içermeyen Türkçe literatüre katkı sağlanması amaçlanmaktadır. Bu amaç doğrultusunda ilk olarak teolojik çalışmalarda antropolojik yaklaşımın bir ihti-yaç ve zorunluluk olduğunu çalışmalarında vurgulayan Karl Barth, Karl Rahner ve Wolfhart Pannenberg'in görüşleri ışığında alanın felsefi arka planı ele alın-maktadır. Daha sonra, müstakil bir ilmi disiplin olarak teolojik antropolojinin belirlediği amaçlar doğrultusundaki güncel tartışma konuları ve metodolojik meseleleri incelenmektedir.

The Anthropocentric Turn in Philosophical Theology: An Introduction to Theological Anthropology

This article presents an introduction to theological anthropology, a discipline that resulted from the anthropocentric turn took place in the intel-lectual field in the modern era. By this means, it is aimed at contributing to the Turkish literature lacking in comprehensive studies dealing with theological an-thropology. First, the philosophical background of the discipline has been ex-amined in the light of the views of Karl Barth, Karl Rahner, and Wolfhart Pan-nenberg, who emphasise the need and significance of an anthropological ap-proach in modern theological studies. Then, the contemporary discussion top-ics and methodological issues of theological anthropology as an independent field have been analysed in the light of the current literature.

___

  • Barth, K. (1960). Church Dogmatics 3: The Doctrine of Creation, part 2. (Trans H. Knight, G. W. Bromiley, J. K. S. Reid & R. H. Fuller). Edinburgh: T&T Clark.
  • Barth, K. (1962). Church Dogmatics: A Selection. (Trans. G. W. Bromiley). New York: Harper Torch Books.
  • Barth, K. (2015). Theology and Church: Shorter Writings 1920-1928. (Trans. L. P. Smith). Eugene: Wimpf and Stock Publications.
  • Brugger, E. C. (2009). Psychology and Christian Anthropology. Edification Journal of the Society for Christian Psychology, 3 (1), 5-18.
  • Callaway, K. & Strawn, B. (2020). Experimental Theology: Theological Anthropology and the Psychological Sciences. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 48 (1), 3-17.
  • Carr, A. (1973). Theology and Experience in the Thought of Karl Rahner. The Journal of Religion, 53 (3), 359-376.
  • Clines, D. J. A. (1968). The Image of God in Man. Tyndale Bulletin, 19, 53-103.
  • Cooper, J. W. (2016). Scripture and Philosophy on the Unity of Body and Soul: An Integrative Method for Theological Anthropology. The Ashgate Research Companion to Theological Anthropology. (Eds. J. R. Farris & C. Taliaferro). London and New York: Routledge, 27-43.
  • Cortez, M. (2016). Christological Anthropology in Historical Perspective: Ancient and Contemporary Approaches to Theological Anthropology. Michigan: Zondervan.
  • Cortez, M. (2015). The Madness in Our Method: Christology as the Necessary Starting Point for Theological Anthropology. The Ashgate Research Companion to Theological Anthropology. (Eds. J. R. Farris & C. Taliaferro). London and New York: Routledge, 15-26.
  • Cortez, M. (2010). Theological Anthropology: A Guide for the Perplexed. Wilthshire: T&T Clark.
  • Cortez, M. (2007). What Does It Mean to Call Karl Barth a Christocentric Theo-logian. Scottish Journal of Theology, 60 (2), 1-17.
  • Dahlstrom, D. O. (2000). Translator’s Forward. A. Losinger, The Anthropological Turn: The Human Orientation of the Theology of Karl Rahner. (Trans. D. O. Dahlstrom). New York: Fordham University Press, vii-xiv.
  • Erickson, M. (2013). Christian Theology. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic.
  • Farris, J. R. & Taliaferro, C. (2016). Introduction. The Ashgate Research Companion to Theological Anthropology. (Eds. J. R. Farris & C. Taliaferro). London and New York: Routledge, 1-6.
  • Feuerbach, L. (2008). The Essence of Christianity. (Trans. G. Elliot). Walnut: MSAC Philosophy Group.
  • Glasse, J. (1964). Barth on Feuerbach. The Harvard Theological Review, 57 (2), 69-96.
  • Gonzales, M. A. (2007). Created in God's Image: An Introduction to Feminist Theologi-cal Anthropology. New York: Orbis Books.
  • Habermas, J. (2006). Secularization as a Twofold and Complementary Learning Process. Dialectics of Secularization: On Reason and Religion. (Trans. B. McNeill). San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 43-47.
  • Hanoğlu, İ. (2014). Fahreddin er-Razi’de Felsefî-Teolojik Antropoloji. İstanbul: Araş-tırma Yayınları.
  • Hanefi, H. (1978). Teoloji mi Antropoloji mi? (Çev. M. S. Yazıcıoğlu). Ankara Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 23 (1), 505-531.
  • Hodge, D. R. & Wolfer, T. A. (2008). Promoting Tolerance: The Imago Dei as an Imperative for Christian Social Workers. Journal of Religion and Spirituality in Social Work, 27 (3), 297-313.
  • Hollenbach, D. (2014). Human Dignity in Catholic Thought. The Cambridge Handbook of Human Dignity: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. (Ed. M. Düwell, J. Braarvig, & R. Brownsword). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 250-259.
  • Krötke, W. (2000). The Humanity of the Human Person in Karl Barth’s Anthro-pology. The Cambridge Companion to Karl Barth. (Ed. J. Webster). New York: Cambridge University Press, 159-176.
  • Langenfeld, A. & Lerch, M. (2018). Theologisch Anthropologie. Stuttgard: Verlag Ferdinard Schöningh.
  • Losinger, A. (2000). The Anthropological Turn: The Human Orientation of the Theo-logy of Karl Rahner. (Trans. D. O. Dahlstrom). New York: Fordham Univer-sity Press.
  • Mengüşoğlu, T. (2017). İnsan Felsefesi. İstanbul: Doğu Batı Yayınları.
  • Moncher, F. J. (2009). Implications of Catholic Anthropology for Psychological Assessment. Edification Journal of the Society for Christian Psychology, 3 (1), 69-75.
  • Moritz, J. M. (2015). Evolutionary Biology and Theological Anthropology. The Ashgate Research Companion to Theological Anthropology. (Eds. J. R. Farris & C. Taliaferro). London and New York: Routledge, 45-56.
  • Oberdorfer, B. (2010). Human Dignity and ‘Image of God’. Scriptura, 204, 231-239.
  • Pannenberg, W. (2004). Anthropology in Theological Perspective. (Trans. M. J. O’Connell). Edinburgh: T&T Clark.
  • Petrusek, M. R. (2017). The Image of God and Moral Action: Challenging the Practicality of the Imago Dei. Studies in Christian Ethics, 30 (1), 60-82.
  • Rahner, K. (1973). Theological Investigations, vol. 9. (Trans. G. Harrison). New York: The Seabury Press.
  • Robinson, D. N. (2015). Theological Anthropology and the Brain Sciences. The Ashgate Research Companion to Theological Anthropology. (Eds. J. R. Farris & C. Taliaferro). London and New York: Routledge, 73-79.
  • Ruether, R. R. (2002). The Emergence of Christian Feminist Theology. The Cambridge Companion to Feminist Theology. (Ed. S. F. Parsons). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 3-22.
  • Shults, F. L. (2003). Reforming Theological Anthropology after the Philosophical Turn to Relationality. Michigan: William B. Eerdmans Publishing.
  • Simango, D. (2016). The Imago Dei: A History of Interpretation from Philo to the Present. Studia Historiae Ecclesiasticae, 42 (1), 172-190.
  • Taylor, C. (2012). Benliğin Kaynakları. (Çev. S. G. Baş & B. Baş). İstanbul: Küre Yayınları.
  • Thweatt-Bates, J. (2016). Cyborg Selves: A Theological Anthropology of the Posthuman. Oxon: Routledge.
  • Weber, J. C. (1966). Feuerbach, Barth, and Theological Methodology. The Journal of Religion, 46 (1), 24-36.