ÖRGÜTSEL PAZAR YÖNELİMİNİN YÖNETİM İNOVASYONUNA ETKİSİNDE İŞ KARMAŞIKLIĞININ ROLÜ

Yönetim inovasyonu son yıllarda örgütsel performansa pozitif etki yaratması ve sürdürülebilir rekabet avantajı yaratması dolayısıyla araştırma ve uygulama alanında önemli bir kavram haline gelmiştir. Özellikle teknoloji devrimi karşısında rekabette üstünlük yaratan yönetim inovasyonu, firmaların pazar yönelimine sahip olmaları halinde daha yüksek çıktılar oluşturmaktadır. İş karmaşıklığı kavramı ise bir ekibin, iş görevlerinin gerektirdiği zihinsel kapasite ve iş becerisi düzeyini ifade etmektedir. Karmaşık işler daha yoğun odaklanma, daha yüksek beceri ve zihinsel kapasite gerektirmektedir. İş karmaşıklığının gerektirdiği bu temel özellikler ise pazar yönelimi etkisiyle yönetim inovasyonu çıktılarını artıracak etki yaratmaktadır. Bu çalışma, pazar yönelimine sahip firmaların yönetim inovasyonu üzerindeki etkisini incelemektedir. Ayrıca iş karmaşıklığının pazar yöneliminin yönetim inovasyonuna etkisindeki pozitif rolünü inceleyen çalışma bu varsayımı ile yönetim literatürüne farklı bir perspektif kazandırmayı hedeflemektedir.

___

  • Adams, M.E., Day, G.S. & Dougherty, D. (1998). Enhancing New Product Development Performance: An Organizational Learning Perspective. Journal of Product Innovation Management 15, 403–422.
  • Almeida, P., & Kogut, B. (1999). The localization of knowledge and the mobility of engineers in regional networks. Management Science, 45(7), 905–917.
  • Ansari, S.M., Fiss, P.C. & Zajac, E.J. (2010). Made to fit: how practices vary as they diffuse, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 35 No. 1, 67-92.
  • Audenaert, M., Vanderstraeten, A., & Buyens, D. (2017). When innovation requirements empower individual innovation: the role of job complexity. Personnel Review, 46(3), 608-623.
  • Becton, J. B., Carr, J. C., Mossholder, K. W., & Walker, H. J. (2017). Differential effects of task performance, organizational citizenship behavior, and job complexity on voluntary turnover. Journal of Business and Psychology, 32(4), 495-508.
  • Birkinshaw, J. & Mol, M.J. (2006). How management innovation happens, Sloan Management Review, 47 (4), 81-88.
  • Birkinshaw, J. M., Hamel, G., & Mol, M. J. (2008). Management innovation. Academy of Management Review, 33(4), 825–845.
  • Brown, G., Pierce, J. L., & Crossley, C. (2014). Toward an understanding of the development of ownership feelings. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35, 318–338.
  • Carboni, O. A., & Russu, P. (2018). Complementarity in product, process, and organizational innovation decisions: Evidence from European firms. R&D Management, 48(48(2/s)), 210–222.
  • Carroll, J. S. (1998). Organizational learning activities in high‐hazard industries: the logics underlying self‐analysis. Journal of Management studies, 35(6), 699-717.
  • Chae, H., & Choi, J. N. (2018). Contextualizing the effects of job complexity on creativity and task performance: Extending job design theory with social and contextual contingencies. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 91(2), 316-339.
  • Deegahawature, M. M. D. R. (2014). The Effect of Proclivity to Open Innovation, Job Complexity and Technology Turbulence on Creativity: Evidence from Technologically Less Advanced Countries. International Journal of Business and Social Research, 4(4), 125-136.
  • Djanko, S., & Hoekman, B. (2000). Foreign direct investment and productivity growth in Czech enter- prises. The World Bank Economic Review, 14(1), 49–64.
  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics.
  • Fosfuri, A., Motta, M., & Ronde, T. (2001). Foreign direct investment and spillovers through workers’ mobility. Journal of International Economics, 53, 205–222.
  • Geldes, C., Felzensztein, C., & Palacios-Fenech, J. (2017). Technological and non-technological innovations, performance and propensity to innovate across industries: The case of an emerging economy. Industrial Marketing Management, 61, 55-66.
  • Guler, I., Guillén, M. F., & Macpherson, J. M. (2002). Global competition, institutions, and the diffusion of organizational practices: The international spread of ISO 9000 quality certificates. Administrative science quarterly, 47(2), 207-232.
  • Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2012). Partial least squares: the better approach to structural equation modeling?. Long Range Planning, 45(5-6), 312-319.
  • Hamel, G. (2006), “The why, what, and how of management innovation”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 84 No. 2, 72-84.
  • Hamel, G. & B. Bren (2007), The Future of Management, Harvard Business School Press, 3–255.
  • Hammond, M.M., Neff, N., Farr, J.L., Schwall, A. & Zhao, X. (2011), “Predictors of individual-level innovation at work: a meta-analysis”, Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, & the Arts, 5(1), 90-105.
  • Hamdoun, M., Jabbour, C. J. C., & Othman, H. B. (2018). Knowledge transfer and organizational innovation: Impacts of quality and environmental management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 193, 759-770.
  • Hecker, A., & Ganter, A. (2013). The influence of product market competition on technological and management innovation: Firm‐level evidence from a large‐scale survey. European Management Review, 10(1), 17-33.
  • Hunter, J. E., & Hunter, R. F. (1984). Validity and utility of alternative predictors of job performance. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 72–98.
  • Janssen, O. (2001). Fairness perceptions as a moderator in the curvilinear relationships between job demands, and job performance and job satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 1039–1050.
  • Jaworski, B. J., & Kohli, A. K. (1993). Market orientation: antecedents and consequences. Journal of marketing, 57(3), 53-70.
  • Khosravi, P., Newton, C., & Rezvani, A. (2019). Management innovation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of past decades of research. European Management Journal.
  • Kim, N., & Atuahene‐Gima, K. (2010). Using exploratory and exploitative market learning for new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27(4), 519-536.
  • Kuada, J., & Buatsi, S. N. (2005). Market orientation and management practices in Ghanaian firms: revisiting the Jaworski and Kohli framework. Journal of International Marketing, 13(1), 58-88.
  • Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2006). Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, 27(2), 131–150.
  • Le Bas, C., Mothe, C., & Nguyen-Thi, T. U. (2015). The differentiated impacts of organizational innovation practices on technological innovation persistence. European Journal of Innovation Management, 18(1), 110e127.
  • Levinthal, D. A., & March, J. G. (1993). The myopia of learning. Strategic management journal, 14(S2), 95-112.
  • Li, J., Burch, T. C., & Lee, T. W. (2017). Intra‐individual variability in job complexity over time: Examining the effect of job complexity trajectory on employee job strain. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(5), 671-691.
  • Liao, Z. (2018). Social capital and firms' environmental innovations: The moderating role of environmental scanning. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(1), 117–127.
  • Lin, L. H., & Ho, Y. L. (2016). Institutional pressures and environmental performance in the global automotive industry: The mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Long Range Planning, 49(6), 764–775.
  • Liu, M. L., Lin, C. P., Joe, S. W., & Chen, K. J. (2019). Modeling knowledge sharing and team performance. Management Decision.
  • Lynch, L. M. (2007). Organizational innovation and US productivity. VOX, Research-based policy analisis and commentary from leading economists, 6.
  • March, J.G. (1991), “Exploration and exploitation in organisational learning”, Organisation Science, 2(1), 71–87.
  • McKee, D. (1992). An Organizational Learning Approach to Product Innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 9, 232–245.
  • Mol, M.J. & Birkinshaw, J. (2008). Giant Steps in Management: Innovations That Change the Way We Work, FT Prentice Hall, Dorchester.
  • Morgeson, F. P., & Humphrey, S. E. (2006). The work design questionnaire (WDQ): developing and validating a comprehensive measure for assessing job design and the nature of work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(6), 1321–1339.
  • Nurmi, N., & Hinds, P. J. (2016). Job complexity and learning opportunities: A silver lining in the design of global virtual work. Journal of International Business Studies, 47(6), 631-654.
  • Nunnaly, J.C. and Bernstein, I.H. (1994). Psychometric Theory, McGraw‐Hill, New York, NY.
  • Pauget, B., & Wald, A. (2018). Creating and implementing organizational innovation: The role of professional identity and network embeddedness in healthcare organizations. European Journal of Innovation Management, 21(3), 384-401.
  • Salgado, J. F. (2017). Moderator effects of job complexity on the validity of forced-choice personality inventories for predicting job performance. Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones, 33(3), 229-238.
  • Shalley, C.E. and Gilson, L.L. (2004). “What leaders need to know: a review of social and contextual factors that can foster or hinder creativity”, The Leadership Quarterly, 15 (1), 33-53.
  • Slater, S.F. and Narver, J.C. (1995). Market Orientation and the Learning Organization. Journal of Marketing 59, 63–74.
  • Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and micro- foundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319-1350.
  • Vaccaro, I.G., Jansen, J.J.P., Van Den Bosch, F.A.J. & Volberda, H.W. (2012). “Management innovation and leadership: the moderating role of organizational size”, Journal of Management Studies, 49(1), 28-51.
  • Wang, A. C., & Cheng, B. S. (2010). When does benevolent leadership lead to creativity? The moderating role of creative role identity and job autonomy. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(1), 106-121.
  • Wang, C. J., Tsai, H. T., & Tsai, M. T. (2014). Linking transformational leadership and employee creativity in the hospitality industry: The influences of creative role identity, creative self-efficacy, and job complexity. Tourism Management, 40, 79-89.
  • Weerawardena, J. (2003). Exploring the role of market learning capability in competitive strategy. European journal of marketing.
  • Wu, M., Peng, Z., & Estay, C. (2018). How role stress mediates the relationship between destructive leadership and employee silence: The moderating role of job complexity. Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology, 12.
  • Yang, D., Li, L., Jiang, X., & Zhao, J. (2019). The fit between market learning and organizational capabilities for management innovation. Industrial Marketing Management.
  • Zhou, K. Z., & Li, C. B. (2010). How strategic orientations influence the building of dynamic capability in emerging economies. Journal of Business Research, 63(3), 224-231.
Beykoz Akademi Dergisi-Cover
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 2 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2013
  • Yayıncı: Beykoz Üniversitesi
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

KREDİ TEMERRÜT TAKASLARI PRİMİ (CREDIT DEFAULT SWAPS PREMIUM-CDS) ile AVRUPA BORÇ KRİZİ İLİŞKİSİ: PIIGS ÜLKELERİ ÜZERİNE UYGULAMA

Lokman KANTAR

KÜMELEME ANALİZİ İLE TÜRKİYE’DEKİ NAKLİYAT VE TOPLAM SİGORTA PRİM GÖSTERGELERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

Hakan ÖZCAN, İbrahim UZPEDER

DENEYİMSEL PAZARLAMADA GASTRONOMİ TURİZMİ AÇISINDAN ARTIRILMIŞ GERÇEKLİK UYGULAMASI KULLANIMININ DENEYİM DEĞERİ ÜZERİNE ETKİSİ: ARTIRILMIŞ GERÇEKLİK MENÜ UYGULAMASI ÜZERİNE BİR ARAŞTIRMA

Nevin KARABIYIK YERDEN, Başak DEĞERLİ, Mert UYDACI, İlknur ERGÜN TUNCAY

TFRS-10 KONSOLİDE FİNANSAL TABLOLAR STANDARDINA GÖRE KONTROL GÜCÜNDEKİ DEĞİŞİMİN AMPİRİK ANALİZİ: BORSA İSTANBUL’DA İŞLEM GÖREN HOLDİNG ŞİRKETLERİ ÜZERİNE BİR UYGULAMA

Başak ERDEM, Gözde GÜRBÜZ

YAŞAYAN LABORATUVARLAR AĞ HARİTASI VE ODAK ALANLARININ GÖRSELLEŞTİRİLMESİ

Ceyda OVACI

ALTI SİGMA YAKLAŞIMI VE TEKSTİL SEKTÖRÜNDE BİR UYGULAMA

Murat KARABULUT, Pınar Yıldız KUMRU, Fatma Serab ONURSAL

ÜNİVERSİTELERİN SOSYAL MEDYA KULLANIMI: İZMİR’DEKİ DEVLET VE VAKIF ÜNİVERSİTELERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRMALI ANALİZİ

Selin BİTİRİM OKMEYDAN

MAĞAZA KİŞİLİĞİ VE ÖZ BENLİK UYUMUNUN MAĞAZA SADAKATİ ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİLERİ

Canan ERYİĞİT, Zeynep EREN

AVRUPA BİRLİĞİ’NE ÜYE VE ADAY ÜLKELERDE YÖNETİŞİM İLE EKONOMİK VERİLER ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ

Burak KILIÇ, Ahmet KESER

FİRMALARIN KURUMSAL YÖNETİM UYGULAMALARI İLE FİNANSAL PERFORMANSI ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİNİN YATAY KESİT BAĞIMLILIĞI ALTINDA PANEL VERİ YÖNTEMİ İLE ANALİZİ: BORSA İSTANBUL KURUMSAL YÖNETİM ENDEKSİNDE YER ALAN FİRMALAR ÜZERİNE BİR İNCELEME

Mustafa ÖZYEŞİL, Havane TEMBELO