BORROWED SOUNDS: SAMPLING AFTER PELHAM

This essay examines the CJEU judgment of Pelham and its possi-ble effects on the practice of sampling. It reviews the musical sampling within the wider context of the history of musical borrowing and argues that its current position within the copyright discourse has been counter-productively marginalized. It proposes an interpretation of the CJEU’s judgment for the future national courts of the European Union member states that would prevent the unreasonable strictness towards sampling.

ÖDÜNÇ ALINMIŞ SESLER: PELHAM KARARI’NDAN SONRA SAMPLING

Bu makale, Avrupa Birliği Adalet Divanı’nın Pelham kararını ve bu kararın sampling uygulamalarına olası etkilerini incelemektedir. Bir eserden alınan ses kaydı veya enstrüman sesinin başka bir eserde kulla-nılmasını ifade eden “sampling”, müzik tarihindeki öncülleriyle beraber incelenmiş olup, bu uygulamanın güncel telif hakkı doktrini tarafından haksız yere marjinalleştirildiği savunulmaktadır. Bu kapsamda, makele, Adalet Divanı’nın Pelham kararının, gelecekte sampling uygulamalarına olanak sağlayacak bir şekilde yorumlanması gerektiğini savunmaktadır.

Kaynakça

Adeney, E., Antons, C. (2013) The Germania 3 Decision Transla-ted: The Quotation Exception before the German Constitutional Court. European Intellectual Property Review 35(11), 646

Africa, M. (2000) The Misuse of Licensing Evidence in Fair Use Analysis: New Technologies, New Markets, and the Courts. Cal. L.J. 88(4), 1145

Anyanwu, E.C. (2004) Let’s Keep It on the Download: Why the Educational Use Factor of the Fair Use Exception Should Shield Rap Music from Infringement Claims. Rutgers Com & Tech L.J. 30, 179

Ashtar, R. (2009) Theft, Transformation, and the Need of the Im-material: A Proposal for a Fair Use Digital Sampling Regime. Alb. L.J. Sci. & Tech. 19, 261

Awera, O.B. (2006) From J.C. Bach to Hip Hop: Musical Bor-rowing, Copyright and Cultural Context. N.C. L. Rev. 84, 547

Balkin, J.M. (2004) Digital Speech and Democratic Culture: A Theory of Freedom of Expression for the Information Society. N.Y.U. L. Rev. 79, 1

Baroni, M.L. (1993) A Pirate’s Palette: The Dilemmas of Digital Sound Sampling and a Proposed Compulsory License Solution. U. Mi-ami Ent. & Sports L. Rev. 11, 65

Battersby, C. (1990) Gender and Genius: Towards a Feminist Aesthetics. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons

Berger, J. (2008) Ways of Seeing. London: Penguin Books

Blackburn, M. (2019) Editorial: Borrowing, quotation, sampling and plundering. Organized Sound 24(2), 115.

Bourriaud, N. (2005) Postproduction: Culture as Screenplay: How Art Reprograms the World. Berlin: Lukas & Sternberg, 2nd edn

Boyle, J., Jenkins, J., Aoki, K. (2017) Theft! A History of Music. Durham: Duke Center for the Study of the Public Domain

Böttger, F., Clark, B. (2016) German Constitutional Court Decides that Artistic Freedom May Prevail Over Copyright Exploitation Rights (‘Metall auf Metall’). J. of I.P. L. & Practice 11(11), 812

Buelow, G.J. (1987) The Case of Handel’s Borrowings: The Judgment of Three Centuries. in Sadie, S., Hicks, A. (ed), (1987) Han-del: Tercentary Collection New York: Macmillian Press

Burkholder, J.P. (1994) The Uses of Existing Music: Musical Bor-rowing as a Field. NOTES 50(3), 851

Carroll, M.W. (2005) The Struggle for Music Copyright. Fia. L. Rev. 57, 907

Chang, V. (2009) Records That Play: The Present Past in Samp-ling Practice. Popular Music 28(2), 143

Cohen, J.E. (2012) Configuring the Networked Self: Law, Code, and the Play of Everyday Practice. London: Yale University Press

Cortazar, J. (1986) Around the Day in Eighty Worlds. San Fran-cisco: North Point Press

Ekiz, O. (2019) My Film in Your Pocket: An Analysis of User In-teractions with Films and Copyright Law. QMJIP 9(2), 196

Evans, T.M. (2011) Sampling, Looping, and Mashing... Oh My!: How Hip Hop Music is Scratching More Than the Surface of Copyright Law. Fordham Intell. Prop. Media & Ent. L. J. 21, 843

Griffiths, J. (2019) European Union Copyright Law and the Char-ter of Fundamental Rights – Advocate General Szpunar’s Opinions in (C-469/17) Funke Medien, (C-476/17) Pelham GmbH and (C-516/17) Spiegel Online. ERA Forum (20), 35

Hampel, S.C. (1992) Are Samplers Getting a Bum Rap: Copyright Infringement and Technological Creativity. U. III. L. Rev., 559

Harrison, A. (2017) Music The Business. London: Penguin, 7th ed

Hudson, E. (2017) The Pastiche Exception in Copyright Law: A Case of Mashed-up Drafting. I.P.Q. 4, 346

Iljadica, M. (2017) ‘Copyright and the Right to the City’ NILQ 68(1), 59

Jütte, B.J., Maier, H. (2017) A Human Right to Sample – Will the CJEU Dance to the BGH-beat? Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 12(9), 784

Kallberg, J. (1983) Chopin in the Marketplace: Aspects of Interna-tional Music Publishing Industry in the First Half of the Nineteenth Cen-tury: Part I: France and England. Notes, Second Series, 39(3), 535

Keller, D. (2008) The Musician as Thief: Digital Culture and Copyright Law in Miller, P.D. (ed), Sound Unbound: Sampling Digital Music and Culture Massachusetts: The MIT Press

Lange, D. (1992) At Play in the Fields of the Word: Copyright and the Construction of Authorship in the Post-Literate Millennium. Law and Contemporary Problems 55(2), 139

Latham, S.J. (2003) Newton v. Diamond: Measuring the Legiti-macy of Unauthorized Compositional Sampling – A Clue Illuminated and Obscured. Hastings Comm. & Ent.L.J. 26, 119

Lavik, E. (2014) Romantic Authorship in Copyright Law and the Uses of Aesthetics in van Eechoud, M. (ed), The Work of Authorship Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press B.V.

Marcus, J.H. (1990) Don’t Stop That Funky Beat: The Essentiality of Digital Sampling to Rap Music. Hastings Comm. & Ent. L. J. 13, 767.

Matulionyte, R. (2017) A Boom in Self-Publishing and Its Legal Challenges. European Intellectual Property Review 39, 754

McLeish, C.E. (2013) “The Future is Medieval”: Orality and Mu-sical Borrowing in the Middle Ages and Online Remix Culture. Ontario: Thesis, Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository

McLeod, K., DiCola, P. (2011) Creative License: The Law and Culture of Digital Sampling. London: Duke University Press

Meconi, H. (2004) Early Musical Borrowing. New York: Routledge

Morey, J. (2012) Copyright Management and its Effect on the Sampling Practice of UK Dance Music Producers. IASPM Journal 3(1), 48.

Niemann, F. (2013) Limits of Sampling Sound Recordings: the German Federal Court of Justice’s Metall auf Metall I & II Holdings in Light of the US Jurisprudence on Digital Sampling. European I.P. Rev. 35(6), 356

Roberts, J.H. (1987) Handel and Vinci’s ‘Didone Abbandonata’: Revisions and Borrowings. Music & Letters 68(2), 141

Roman, Z. (1973) Connotative Irony in Mahler’s Todtenmarsch in”Callots Manier”. The Musical Quarterly 59, 207

Samuelson, P. (2018) The EU’s Controversial Digital Single Mar-ket Directive. Communications of the ACM 61(11), 20

Schur, R.L. (2012) Parodies of Ownership. Michigan: University of Michigan Press

Shore, R. (2017) Beg, Steal & Borrow: Artists Against Originality. London: Laurence King Publishing

Siôn, P., Redhead, L. (2014) Musical Borrowing and Quotation in the Twentieth and Twenty-First Centuries. Contemporary Music Review 33(2), 125

Skinner, Q. (1966) The Limits of Historical Explanations. Philo-sophy 41(157), 199

Snijders, T., van Deursen, S. (2019) The Road Not Taken – The CJEU Sheds Light on the Role of Fundamental Rights in the European Copyright Framework – a Case Note on the Pelham, Spiegel Online and Funke Medien Decisions. IIC (50), 1176.

Winemiller, J.T. (1997) Recontextualizing Handel’s Borrowing. The Journal of Musicology 15(4), 444

Woodmansee, M. (1984) The Genius and the Copyright: Econo-mic and Legal Conditions of the Emergence of the ‘Author’. Eighteenth-Century Studies 17(4), 425

Woodmansee, M., Jaszi, P. (1994) The Construction of Authors-hip: Textual Appropriation in Law and Literature. Durham: Duke Uni-versity Press

World Intellectual Property Organization, (1971) Guide to the Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works. Ge-neva: WIPO Publication

Creative Commons, State of the Commons, availeble at (last visited December 16, 2019)

Creative Commons, About the Licenses, available at (last visited December 16, 2019)

European Policy for Intellectual Property, (2018) ‘Vote for a Ba-lanced European Copyright Law’ (10 September 2018), available at < https://www.create.ac.uk/wp-con-tent/uploads/2018/06/Academic_Statement_Copyright_Directive_29_06_2018.pdf> (Last visited, December 16, 2019)

Franklin, B., McLeod, K. (2009) Copyright Criminals. Arlington: PBS, available at < https://www.pbs.org/independentlens/copyright-criminals/film.html> (Last visited December 16, 2019)

Newton, M. (2008) Is Sampling Dying? How Greenbacks and Red Tape are Tearing the Heart out of Hip-Hop. (SPIN, November 21, 2008), available at (last visi-ted December 16, 2019)

1 BvR 1585/13, 31 May 2016; An English translation of the judg-ment is available at (last visited December 16, 2019) (Germany)

Bridgeport v. Dimension, 383 F.3d 390 (6th Cir. 2004) (US)

C-70/10, Scarlet Extended SA v Société belge des auteurs, compo-siteurs et éditeurs SCRL (SABAM) EU:C:2011:771 (CJEU)

C-314/12, UPC Telekabel Wien GmbH v Constantin Film Verleih GmbH and Wega Filmproduktionsgesellschaft mbH, EU:C:2014:192 (CJEU)

C-360/10, Belgische Vereniging van Auteurs, Componisten en Uitgevers CVBA (SABAM) v Netlog NV, EU:C:2012:85 (CJEU)

C-469/17, Funke Medien NRW GmbH v Bundesrepublik Deutsch-land, EU:C:2019:623 (CJEU)

C-476/17 Pelham GmbH, Moses Pelham, Martin Haas v Ralf Hüt-ter, Florian Schneider-Esleben EU:C:2019:624 (CJEU)

C-476/17 Pelham GmbH, Moses Pelham, Martin Haas v Ralf Hüt-ter, Florian Schneider-Esleben EU:C:2018:1002, Opinion of AG Szpu-nar (CJEU)

C-516/17, Spiegel Online GmbH v Volker Beck, EU:C:2019:625 (CJEU)

Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Co-uncil of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copy-right and related rights in the information society

Directive 2006/115 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on Rental Right and Lending Right and on Certain Rights Related to Copyright in the Field of Intellectual Property (codi-fied version).

Directive 2019/790 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 April 2019 on copyright and related rights in the Digital Single Market and amending Directives 96/9/EC and 2001/29/EC

German Copyright Act of 9 September 1965

Grand Upright, Ltd. v. Warner Bros. Records Inc. 780 F. Supp. 182 (S.D.N.Y. 1991) (US)

Kaynak Göster