OKUL YÖNETİCİLERİNİN EĞİTİM YÖNETİMİ BİLGİ SİSTEMLERİNE İLİŞKİN GÖRÜŞLERİ: MEMNUNİYET, ALGILANAN FAYDA VE GÖREVE UYGUNLUK ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ

Bu araştırmanın amacı, okul yöneticilerinin kullanmakta oldukları Eğitim Yönetimi Bilgi Sistemlerinden EYBS memnuniyet düzeylerini ve bunu etkileyen bazı faktörleri incelemektir. Bu amaçla 142 okul yöneticisine, araştırmacılar tarafından geliştirilen EYBS Değerlendirme Anketi uygulanmıştır. Toplanan verilerin analizinde betimsel istatistik ve regresyon analizi yöntemleri kullanılmıştır. Araştırma sonuçlarına göre, okul yöneticilerinin kullanmakta oldukları EYBS’lere yönelik memnuniyet düzeyleri yüksektir. Ayrıca okul müdürleri, EYBS’yi oldukça faydalı ve görevlerine uygun bulmaktadırlar. Araştırmanın ortaya koyduğu bir diğer sonuca göre ise, yöneticilerin EYBS’den duydukları memnuniyet ile algılanan fayda ve göreve uygunluk arasında pozitif ve anlamlı bir ilişki olduğudur. Bu iki değişken de memnuniyetle pozitif korelasyona sahiptir. Regresyon analizi sonucunda, okul yöneticilerinin EYBS’den duydukları memnuniyetin %26’sının faydalılık ve göreve uygunluk faktörlerinden kaynaklandığı tespit edilmiştir

School Administrators’ Opinions Regarding to Educational Management Information Systems: The Relationship Among Satisfaction, Perceived Usefullness and Task Fit

The aim of this study was to examine the level of school administrators’ satisfaction with Education Management Information Systems EMIS and some factors affecting it. For this aim, EMIS Evaluation Questionnaire, developed by the authors, was conducted to 142 school administrators. In the analysis of data, descriptive statistics and regression analysis methods were used. The results showed that school administrators are very satisfied with EMIS, and consider that it is very usefull and appropriate to their tasks. Another result of the study revealed that there is a positive and significant relationship among school administrators’ satisfaction with EMIS, usefullness and task fit. These two variables have a positive correlation with the satisfaction. According to the results of the regression analysis, 26 % of the level of school administrators’ satisfaction with the EMIS results from EMIS’ usefulness and task fit factors

___

  • Argyris, C. (1991). Management Information Systems: The Challenge to Ratio- nality and Emotionality. Management Science, 291.
  • Babu, A. R., Singh, Y. P., & Sachdeva, R. K. (1997). Establishing A Management Information System: iin: Swanson, B.E. etal (eds); Improving Agricultural Extension. A reference manual. Rome: FAO.
  • Bayrakçı, M. (2007). Türkiye'de Eğitim Yönetimi Bilgi Sistemleri ve Uygulama- da Karşılaşılan Sorunlar. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 395-420.
  • Billeh, V. (2001). Educational management and information systems and deci- sion making. In V. Billeh & E. Abd-El Mawgood (Eds.), Education Devel- opment Through Utilization of Technology. Beirut: Unesco Regional Office & United Arab Emirates: Ministry of Education and Youth.
  • Boone, L. E., & Kurtz, D. L. (1999). Contemporary Business. Orlando: The Dryden Press-Harcourt Brace College Publishers.
  • Breiter, A., & Light, D. (2006). Data for School Improvement: Factors for de- signing effective information systems to support decision-making in schools. Educational Technology & Society, 9(3), 206-217.
  • Burchfield, S. A., Easton, P. A & Holmes, D. R. (1994). The Development of an Educational Management Information System Model for Educational Efficiancy Analysis, and ıts Adaptation in Bostwana. In S. A. Burcfield (Ed.) Research for Educational Policy and Planning in Bostwana. Gabo- rone: Macmillan.
  • Carrizo, L., Sauvageot, C., & Bella, N. (2003). Information tools for the preparation and monitoring of education plans. Paris: Unesco.
  • Cassidy, T. (2005). Education Management Information System (EMIS) De- velopment in Latin America and the Caribbean: Lessons and Challeng- es. Retrieved from http://41.89.160.5/chisimba/usrfiles/context/lpe803/ EMIS_-_What_is_it_4.pdf
  • Coakes, S. J. (2005). SPSS: analysis without anguish : Version 12.0 for Windows. Australia : John Wiley & Sons Publishing.
  • Crouch, L., Enache, M., & Supanc, P. (2001). Education Management Informa-tion Systems (EMIS): Guidelines for Design and Implementation. Tech-KnowLogia, January/February,. Retrieved from http://www.techknowlo-gia.org/TKL_Articles/PDF/233.pdf
  • Calisir, F., &Calisir, F. (2004). The relation of interface usability characteristics, perceived usefulness, and perceived ease of use to end-user satisfaction with enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems. Computers in Human Behavior,20(4), 505-515.
  • Çınar, İ. (1997). Eğitim Yönetimi Bilgi Sistemleri. Eğitim Yönetimi, 3(3), 289-298.
  • Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G. ve Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2012). Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik: SPSS ve LISREL uygulamaları. Ankara: Pegem Yayıncılık.
  • Davis, F.D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user accep-tance of information technology. MIS Quarterly 13(3), 319-340.
  • Davis, F.D. (1993). User acceptance of information technology: System charac-teristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts. International Journal ofMan-Machine Studies 38, 475-487.
  • DeLone W.H, & McLean E.R. (1992). Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable. Information Systems Research, 3(1), 60-95.
  • DeLone W.H, & McLean E.R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean Model of In-formation Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4).
  • Ellison, R. (2004). A practical guide to working with Education Management Information Systems.
  • Goodhue, D. L. & Thompson, R. L. (1995).Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance MIS Quarterly,19(2), 213-236.
  • Goodhue D.L. (1998). Development and Measurement Validity of a Task-Te-chnology Fit Instrument for User Evaluations of Information Systems. Decision Sciences, 29(1), 105-138.
  • Gökçen, H. (2007).Yönetim Bilgi Sistemleri. Palme Yayıncılık. Ankara
  • Haddad, W. D. (2012). ICTs for Education A Reference Handbook, Part 1: De-cision Makers Essentials Available from http://www.ictinedtoolkit.org/usere/pdfs/ICTs_for_Education_Essentials.pdf
  • Hua, H., & Herstein, J. (2003). Education Management Information System (EMIS): Integrated Data and Information Systems and Their Implica-tions In Educational Management. Paper presented at the Annual Con-ference of Comparative and International Education Society, March 2003.
  • Infodev. (2012). Education Management Information Systems (EMIS) Case Studies and Lessons Learned. from http://www.infodev.org/en/Proj-ect.5.html
  • Karasar, N. (2003). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemi. Nobel Yayın Dağıtım. Ankara.
  • Koofi, A. A. (2007). A Study of How an Education Management Information System (EMIS) can be Effectively Implemented in the Ministry of Education in the Kingdom Of Bahrain The Braided Learning E-Journal. Retrieved from http://www.mirandanet.ac.uk/ejournal/uploads/590/EMIS.pdf
  • Leblebici, D. N. (1996). Çağdaş Kamu Yönetiminde Enformasyonun Yeri ve Enformasyon Sistemleri. Unpublished Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Ankara.
  • McGinn, N., & Welsh, T. (1999). Decentralization of Education: Why, When, What and How? Paris: IIEP/UNESCO.
  • MEB (2014). Milli Eğitim Istatistikleri. Örgün Eğitim 2013-2014. T.C. Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı Strateji Geliştirme Başkanlığı.
  • Moses, K. D. (2001). Education Management Information System: What Is It and Why Do We Not Have More of It. TechKnowLogia, January/February,. Retrieved from http://www.techknowlogia.org/TKL_Articles/PDF/221.pdf
  • OECD. (2004). e-Transformation Turkey Project: Turkish Case for e-Govern-ment. Paper presented at the Meeting of Senior Officials from Centres of Government On Using New Tools for Decision-Making: Impacts on Informa-tion, Communication and Organisation.
  • O'brien, J. A. (1990). Management Information Systems - A Managerial End User Perspective. U.S.A.: Richard D. Irwin, Inc.
  • Orbach, E. (2004). The Capacity of Nigerian Government to deliver Basic Education Services: African Human Development Working Paper Series.
  • Powell, M. (2006). Rethinking Education Management Information Systems: Les-sons from and Options for Less Developed Countries.
  • Sultana, R. G. (2002). An EMIS for Palestine - The Education Management In-formation System in The West Bank And Gaza Strip. Mediterranean Jour-nal of Educational Studies.
  • UNESCO. (2006). Data collection and education management information sys-tems (EMIS) Guide book for planning education in emergenciesand recon-struction. Paris: Unesco.
  • UNESCO. (2010). Management Capacity, Guidebook for planning education in emergencies and reconstruction (pp. 153-154). Paris: Unesco.
  • Visscher, A., Wild, P., Smith, D., & Newton, L. (2003). Evaluation of the imple-mentation, use and effects of a computerised management information system in English secondary schools. British Journal of Educational Tech-nology, 34(3), 357-366.
  • Wako, T. N. (2003). Education Management Information Systems (EMIS): An overview Available from http://www.educationcaribbean.com/eDocs/ICT4E/EMIS.pdf
  • Wokocha, C., & Adebayo, E. (2012). A Guide to Establishing Management In-formation System in Tertiary Institutions in Nigeria. European Scientific Journal, 8(14), 63-78.
  • Zrivan, M., Pliskin, N., & Levin, R. (2005). Measuring user satisfaction and perceived usefulness in the ERP context. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 45(3), 43-52.
Balıkesir Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1301-5265
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 2 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 1998
  • Yayıncı: Balıkesir Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü