MEKANA VE YEREL HALKA BAĞLILIK, KÜLTÜREL MİRASA YÖNELİK TUTUMU ETKİLER Mİ?

Yerel halk, kültürel mirasların korunması ve devamlılığı açısından önemli bir paydaştır. Bu nedenle yerel halkın kültürel mirasa yönelik tutum ve niyetlerinin irdelenmesi önem teşkil etmektedir. Araştırma, Birleşmiş Milletler Eğitim, Bilim ve Kültür Örgütü (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization-UNESCO) Dünya Mirası ünvanını taşıyan Bergama Çok Katmanlı Kültürel Peyzaj Alanı ve Efes’in yer aldığı İzmir’in Bergama ve Selçuk ilçelerinde, toplam 841 katılımcı yerel halk ile gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırmada, mekana bağlılık ve yerel halka bağlılık kavramlarını, kültürel mirasa yönelik algı ve korumaya yönelik tutum ile ilişkilerini ele alan teorik bir araştırma modeli sunulmakta ve bu model, test edilmektedir. Önerilen teorik model iyi uyum üretmiş, yerel halka ve mekana bağlılığın kültürel mirasa yönelik algıya, algının da kültürel mirasın korunmasına yönelik tutuma pozitif yönde etki ettiği saptanmıştır. 

Do Place and Community Attachment Influence the Attitude towards Cultural Heritage?

Local people are an important stakeholder in terms of preservation and continuity of cultural heritage. Therefore, it is important to examine the attitudes and intentions of local people towards cultural heritage. The research was carried out with a total of 841 residents in the Bergama and Selçuk districts of İzmir, where the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) World Heritage titled Pergamon Multilayer Cultural Landscape Area and Ephesus is located. In the study, a theoretical research model is presented and this model is being tested, which deals with the concepts of attachment  and community attachment, and attitudes towards perception and conservation of cultural heritage. The proposed theoretical model has been found to produce good fit indices and, the residents’ attachment to place and community influenced the positive perception of cultural heritage and the preservation of the cultural heritage.

___

  • Ady, J.C. (1994), “Minimizing threats to the validity of cross-cultural organization research”, in Wiseman, R.L. and Shuter, R. (Eds), Communicating in Multinational Organizations, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 30-42.
  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211.
  • Ajzen, I. ve Fishbein, M. (2005). The Influence of Attitudes on Behavior, The Handbook of Attitudes, 173 (221). 31, 173-221
  • Andereck, K. L., Valentine, K. M., Knopf, R. C. ve Vogt, C. A. (2005). Residents’ Perceptions of Community Tourism Impacts, Annals of Tourism Research, 32(4), 1056-1076.
  • Bergama Belediyesi, (2016). Bergama Çok Katmanlı Kültürel Peyzaj Alanı Alan Yönetim Planı, Bergama-İzmir.
  • Bergama Kaymakamlığı. http://www.bergama.gov.tr/ilcemiz-hakkinda-genelbilgiler (Erişim: 01.01.2018).
  • Brown, G., Raymond, C. M. ve Corcoran, J. (2015). Mapping and Measuring Place Attachment, Applied Geography, 57, 42-53.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2002). Sosyal Bilimleri için Veri Analizi El Kitabı İstatistik Araştırma Deseni-SPSS Uygulamaları ve Yorum, Ankara: Pegem Yayıncılık.
  • Cellini, R. (2011). Is UNESCO Recognition Effective in Fostering Tourism? A Comment on Yang, Lin and Han, Tourism Management, 32(2), 452-454.
  • Chui, C. T. B., Rahim, F. H. A., Khan, N. R. M., Cheng, C. S. ve Hassan, F. H. (2011). Assessing Tourists’ Attitude Towards Responsible Cultural Heritage tourism in Melaka: Development and Validation o Responible Heritage Tourism Scale, IEEE Colloqium on Humanitites, Science and Engineering Research (CHUSER 2011), Dec 5-6, Penang, 497-502.
  • Çelik, H.E. ve Yılmaz, V. (2013). Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesi Temel Kavramlar Uygulamalar Programlama, Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
  • Davis, A. (2016). Experiential Places or Places of Experience? Place Identity and Place Attachment as Mechanisms for Creating Festival Environment, Tourism Management, 55, 49-61.
  • Drost, A. (1996). Developing Sustainable Tourism for World Heritage Sites, Annals of Tourism Research, 23(2), 479-492.
  • Erdoğan, İ. (2003). Pozitivist Metodoloji Bilimsel Araştırma Tasarımı İstatistiksel Yöntemler Analiz ve Yorum, Ankara: Erk Yayınları.
  • Fazio, R. H. (1986). How Do Attitudes Guide Behavior? R. M. Sorrentino ve E. T. Higgins. (Ed.) Handbook of Motivation and Cognition: Foundations of Social Behavior (ss. 204-243). New York: Guilford Press.
  • Frey, B. S. ve L. Steiner. (2011). World Heritage List: Does It Make Sense?, International Journal of Cultural Policy, 17, 555–573.
  • Goussous, J. S. ve Al-Hammadi, N. A. (2018). Place Attachment Assessment of a Heritage Place: A Case Study of the Roman Ampitheater in Downtown Amman, Jordan, Frontiers of Architectural Research, 7(1), 1-10.
  • Gross, M. J. ve Brown, G. (2008). An Empirical Structural Model of Tourists and Places: Progressing Involvement and Place Attachment into Tourism, Tourism Management, 29(6), 1141-1151.
  • Gu, H. ve Ryan, C. (2008). Place Attachment, Identity and Community Impacts of Tourism-The Case of Beijing Hutong, Tourism Management, 29(4), 637-647.
  • Gürsoy, D., Jurowksi, C. ve Uysal, M. (2002). Residents’ Attitudes: A Structural Modelling Approach, Annals of Tourism Research, 29(1), 79-105.
  • Hidalgo, M. C. ve Hernandez, B. (2001). Place Attachment: Conceptual and Empirical Questions, Journal of Environmental Psychology. 21, 273-281.
  • Huang, C. H., Tsaur, J. R. ve Yang, C. H. (2012). Does World Heritage List Really Induce More Tourists? Evidence from Macau, Tourism Management, 33, 1450-1457.
  • Jorgensen, B. S. ve Stedman, R. C. (2001). Sense of Place as an Attitude: Lakeshore Owners Attitutdes Toward Their Properties, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21(3), 233-248.
  • Jurowski, C., Uysal, M. ve Williams, D. R. (1997). A Theoretical Analysis of Host Community Resident Reactions to Tourism, Journal of Travel Research, 36(2), 3-11.
  • Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (2010). Günümüzde İnsan ve İnsanlar, İstanbul: Evrim Yayınevi. Kaltenborn, B. P., Thomassen, J., Wold, L. C., Linnell, J. D. C. ve Skar, B. (2013). World Heritage Status as a Foundation or Building Local Futures? A Case Study from Vega in Central Norway, Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 21(1), 99-116.
  • Kasarda, J. D. ve Janowitz, M. (1974). Community Attachment in Mass Society, American Sociological Review, 39(3), 328-339.
  • Kyle, G., Graefe, A., Manning, R. ve Bacon, J. (2004). Effects of Place Attachmen on Users’ Perceptions of Social and Environmental Conditions in a Natural Setting, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24(2), 213-225.
  • Lewicka, M. (2011). Place Attachment: How Far Have We Come in the Last 40 Years?, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31, 207-230.
  • McCool, S. F. ve Martin, S. R. (19949. Community Attachment and Attitudes Toward Tourism Development, Journal of Travel Research, 32(3), 29-34.
  • Nicholas, L. N., Thapa, B. ve Ko, Y. J. (2009). Residents’ Perspectives of a World Heritage Site, Annals of Tourism Research, 36(3), 390-412.
  • Nyaupane, G.P. ve Timothy, D. (2010). Heritage Awareness and Appreciation Among Community Residents: Perspectives from Arizona USA, International Journal of Heritage Studies, 16(3), 225-239.
  • Proshansky, H. M., Fabian, A. K. ve Kaminoff, R. (1983). Place Identity: Pyhsical World Socialization of the Self, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 3, 57-83.
  • Ram, Y., Björk, P. ve Weidenfeld, A. (2016). Authenticity and Place Attachment of Major Visitor Attractions, Tourism Management, 52, 110-122.
  • Raymond, C. M., Brown, G. ve Weber, D. (2010). The Measurement of Place Attachment: Personal, Community, and Environmental Connections, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 422-434.
  • Ryan, C., Chaozhi, Z. ve Zeng, D. (2011). The Impacts of Tourism at a UNESCO Heritage Site in China- A Need for Meta-Narrative? The Case of the Kaiping Diaolou, Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 19(6), 747-765.
  • Sampson, R. J. (1988). Local Friendship Ties and Community Attachment in Mass Society: A Multilevel Systemic Model, American Sociological Review, 53(5), 766-779.
  • Schackley, M. (2006). Visitor Management: Case Studies from World Heritage Sites, Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
  • Selçuk Belediyesi. (2012). Efes Yönetim Planı 2014-2019, Selçuk-İzmir.
  • Selçuk Belediyesi. Rakamlarla Selçuk. http://www.selcuk.bel.tr/icerik/21/9/ rakamlarla-selcuk.aspx. (Erişim: 01.01.2018)
  • Stokols, D. ve Shumaker, S. A. (1981). People in Places: A Transactional View of Settings. J. H. Harvey (Ed.), Cognition, Social Behavior and the Environment (ss.441-488). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associate Publishers. 441- 488.
  • Stylos, N., Bellou, V., Andronikidis, A. ve Vassiliadis, C. A. (2017). Linking the Dots Among Destination Images, Place Attachment, and Revisit Intentions: A Study Among British and Russian Tourists, Tourism Management, 60, 15-29.
  • Su, M. M. ve Wall, G. (2014). Community Participation in Tourism at a World Heritage Tourism Site: Mutianyu Great Wall, Beijing, China, International Journal of Tourism Research, 16, 146-156.
  • T. C. Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı, Kültür Varlıkları ve Müzeler Genel Müdürlüğü.Dünya Miras Listesi. 01.10.2016 tarihinde http://www. kulturvarliklari.gov.tr/TR,44423/dunya-miras-listesi.html. adresinden erişildi.
  • Thapa, B. 2007. Issues and Challenges of World Heritage Sites in Nepal. R. White ve J. Carman. (Ed.). World Heritage: Global Challenges and Local Solutions. (ss. 23–27). Oxford, UK: Archaeopress.
  • Tunçer, M. (2011). Bergama’nın (Pergamon) UNESCO Dünya Kültür Miras Listesi’ne Alınması İçin Yapılması Gerekenler. Uluslararası Bergama Sempozyumu Bildiriler Kitabı. 2.Cilt. 07-09 Nisan, Bergama-İzmir, 576-591.
  • Um, S. ve Crompton, J. L. (1987). Measuring Resident’s Attachment Levels in a Host Community, Journal of Travel Reserch, 26(1), 27-29.
  • UNESCO Türkiye Milli Komisyonu. UNESCO Hakkında. 27 Şubat 2018 tarihinde http://www.unesco.org.tr/?page=15:62:1:turkce adresinden erişildi.
  • UNESCO. 2008. Dünya Mirası Konvansiyonunun Uygulanmasına Yönelik İşlevsel İlkeler. Dünya Kültürel ve Doğal Mirasının Korunması İçin Hükümetler Arası Komite. WHC. 08/01. Paris.
  • UNESCO. 2018. World Heritage in Danger. 03 Şubat 2018 tarihinde https://whc. unesco.org/en/158/ adresinden erişildi.
  • UNWTO.2017. Tourism Highlights 2017 Edition. 03 Şubat 2018 tarihinde https:// www.e-unwto.org/doi/pdf/10.18111/9789284419029 adresinden erişildi.
  • Uslu, A. ve Kiper, T. (2006). Turizmin Kültürel Miras Üzerine Etkileri: Beypazarı/ Anakara Örneğinde Yerel Halkın Farkındalığı, Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 3(3), 305-314.
  • Wager, J. (1995). Developing a Strategy for the Angkor World Heritage Site, Tourism Management, 16(7), 515-523.
  • Woosnam, K M., Aleshinloe, K. D., Ribeiro, M A. Stylidis, D., Jiang, J. and Erul, E. (2018). Social Determinants of Place Attachment at a World Heritage Site, Tourism Management, 67, 139-146.
  • Xu, Z. ve Zhang, J. (2016). Antecedents and Consequences of Place Attachment: A Comparison of Chinese and Western Urban Tourists in Hangzhou, China, Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 5, 86-96.