Causes of disputes in the Turkish construction industry: Case of public sector projects

Disputes are inevitable in construction projects. They pose serious risks for the project participants and if not managed properly, disputes prevent the completion of construction projects within the desired cost, time and quality. Therefore, it is vital to determine the factors that contribute to construction disputes. The main purpose of this study is to identify the primary causes of disputes in the Turkish construction industry. In this context, the public construction disputes among the parties during the execution of the contract are examined. The findings show that the problem areas giving rise to disputes are mainly related to seven dispute categories as unit prices, delays and extension of time, contractual matters, variations, contract documents, payments, and other disputes. These dispute categories are analyzed comprehensively, and finally, main causes of disputes in each dispute category are identified and discussed in detail.

___

Abeynayake, M. D. T. E. (2008). Special features and experiences of the construction industry- arbitration in Sri Lanka. Paper presented at the meeting of International Conference on Building Education and Research, Salford, United Kingdom.

Acharya, N. K., Dai Lee, Y., Man Im, H. (2006). Conflicting factors in construction projects: Korean perspective.

Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 13(6), 543-566.

Bates Jr, A., Holt, L. T. (2011). Large, complex construction disputes: dynamics of multiparty mediation. Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 3(2), 58-62.

Bristow, D. J., Vasilopoulos, R. (1995). The new CCDC 2: facilitating dispute resolution of construction projects. Construction Law Journal, 11, 95-117.

Cakmak, P. I., Cakmak, E. (2013). An analysis of causes of disputes in the construction industry using analytical hierarchy process (AHP). Paper presented at the meeting of Architectural Engineering Institute, The Pennsylvania State University, Pennsylvania, USA.

Cakmak, E., Cakmak, P. I. (2014). An analysis of causes of disputes in the construction industry using analytical network process (ANP). Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 109, 183- 187.

Chan, E. H., Suen, H. C. (2005a). Disputes and dispute resolution systems in Sino-foreign joint venture construction projects in China. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 131(2), 141-148.

Chan, E. H., Suen, H. C. (2005b). Dispute resolution management for international construction projects in China. Management Decision, 43(4), 589-602.

Cheung, S. O., Ng, S. T., Lam, K. C., Sin, W. S. (2001). A fuzzy sets model for construction dispute evaluation. Construction Innovation, 1(2), 117-127.

Cheung, S. O., Suen, H. C. (2002). A multi-attribute utility model for dispute resolution strategy selection. Construction Management and Economics, 20(7), 557-568.

Cheung, S. O., Yiu, T. W., Yeung, S. F. (2006). A study of styles and outcomes in construction dispute negotiation. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 132(8), 805-814.

Cheung, S. O., Yiu, K. T. (2007). A study of construction mediator tactics - Part I: taxonomies of dispute sources, mediator tactics and mediation outcomes. Building and Environment, 42(2), 752-761.

Chong, H. Y., Mohamad Zin, R. (2012). Selection of dispute resolution methods: factor analysis approach. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 19(4), 428-443.

Diekmann, J. E., Girard, M. J. (1995). Are contract disputes predictable?. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 121(4), 355-363.

Fawzy, S. A., El-adaway, I. H. (2012). Contract administration guidelines for managing conflicts, claims, and disputes under world bank-funded projects. Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 4(4), 101-110.

Fenn, P., Lowe, D., Speck, C. (1997). Conflict and dispute in construction. Construction Management and Economics, 15(6), 513-518.

Gad, G. M., Kalidindi, S. N., Shane, J., Strong, K. (2011). Analytical framework for the choice of dispute resolution methods in international construction projects based on risk factors. Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 3(2), 79-85.

Heath, B.C., Hills, B., Berry, M. (1994). The nature and origin of conflict within the construction process; construction conflict: management and resolution. Paper presented at the meeting of CIB TG15 Conference, Kentucky, USA.

Ilter, D., Dikbas, A. (2009). An analysis of the key challenges to the widespread use of mediation in the Turkish construction industry. International Journal of Law in the Built Environment, 1(2), 143-155.

Ilter, D. (2012). Identification of the relations between dispute factors and dispute categories in construction projects. International Journal of Law in the Built Environment, 4(1), 45-59.

KIK (http://www.ihale.gov.tr). KIK Public Procurement Reports (http://www.ihale.gov.tr/ihale_istatistikleri-45-1.html).

KIK. (2016a). Public procurement law [doc]. Retrieved from http://www. ihale.gov.tr/.

KIK. (2016b). Standard contract for construction works [doc]. Retrieved from http://www.ihale.gov.tr/.

KIK. (2016c). General specifications for construction works [doc]. Retrieved from http://www.ihale.gov.tr/.

Kumaraswamy, M. M. (1997). Conflicts, claims and disputes in construction.

Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 4(2), 95-111.

Kumaraswamy, M., Yogeswaran, K. (1998). Significant sources of construction claims. International Construction Law Review, 15(1), 144-160.

Love, P., Davis, P., Ellis, J., Cheung, S.O. (2010). Dispute causation: identification of pathogenic influences in construction. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 17(4), 404-423.

Mitropoulos, P., Howell, G. (2001). Model for understanding, preventing and resolving project disputes. Journal of Construction Engineering Management, 127(3), 223-231.

Rhys Jones, S. (1994). How constructive is construction law?. Construction Law Journal, 10, 28-38.

Ogburn, M. L., El-adaway, I. H. (2013). Biddability, constructability, operability, and environmental checklist: potential role in reducing conflicts, claims, and disputes. Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 6(1), 05013001.

Tas, E., Firtina, O. (2015). The use of dispute review boards in construction projects: A comparison of Turkey, UK and US. A|Z ITU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture, 12(2), 187-204.

Thompson, R. M., Vorster, M. C., Groton, J. P. (2000). Innovations to manage disputes: DRB and NEC. Journal of Management in Engineering, 16(5), 51-59.

Watts, V.M., Scrivener, J.C. (1993). Review of Australian building disputes settled by litigation. Building Research & Information, 21(1), 59-63.

YFK (http://www.csb.gov.tr/gm/yfk/ index.php?sayfa=anasayfa).

YFK. (2015). Yuksek Fen Kurulu Kararlar Gorusler. Ankara: SAR.