Gelecek Odaklı Tasarım Projelerine Öğrenci Yaklaşımlarının Değerlendirilmesi

Öz Sürekli değişen bir dünyada gelir geçer değil kalıcı ürünler tasarlayabilmek, değişimin hızına ayak uydurabilmek ve onu yönlendirebilmek adına tasarımcılar “Gelecek Vizyonuna” sahip olmalıdırlar. Gelecek vizyonu edinebilmek adına psikoloji, sosyoloji, politika gibi birçok alan gelecekler çalışmalarından faydalanmaktadırlar. Endüstri Ürünleri Tasarımı lisans programlarında da gelecek odaklı tasarım proje konuları verilmektedir. Bu noktadan yola çıkarak bu makalenin ana konusu endüstri ürünleri tasarımı lisans eğitiminde, öğrencilerin gelecek vizyonu edinebilecekleri, gelecek odaklı tasarım projelerinde öğrenci yaklaşımlarının değerlendirilmesi ve gelecekler çalışmaları alanından metot kullanımının sürece yaptığı katkının incelenmesidir.

___

  • Amara, R. (1981). The futures field, Searching for definitions and boundaries. The Futurist, 15(1), s. 25-29.
  • Bell, W. (1997). Foundations of Futures Studies: Human Science for a New Era (Cilt 1). London: Transaction Publishers.
  • Bevolo, M., & Brand, R. (2003). Brand design for the long term. Design Management Journal, 1, 33-39.
  • Brier, D. J. (2005). Marking the future: a review of time horizons. Futures, 35(8), 833-848.
  • Broadbent, J. A. (2004). A Future for Design Science? . International Symposium on te Development and Prospects of a PhD Programme in Design Science Education (s. 31-51). Taiwan: Kaoyang University.
  • Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked Problems in Design Thinking. Design Issues, 8(2), s. 5-21.
  • Cross, N. (1981, January). The Coming of Post-Industrial Design. Design Studies, 2(1), 3-7.
  • Cross, N. (1989). Engineering Design Methods: Strategies for Product Design. Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Sons Ltd.
  • Cross, N. (2006). Designerly Ways of Knowing. London: Springer.
  • Cross, N., Elliott, D., & Roy, R. (1975). "Designing the Futures - Man Made Futures: Design and Technology" The Open University Course Material T2621. Milton Keynes: The Open University Press.
  • David, H. (1970). Challenges for the Future. Proceedings of the International Futures Research Conference. 4. Kyoto: Kodansha.
  • Design for Dreaming. (1956). 2 26, 2015 tarihinde http://publicdomainreview.org/collections/design-for-dreaming-1956/ adresinden alındı
  • DFFN. (2003). Design for Future Needs. EC Report .
  • Edwards, C. (1999). Many products have gone the way of Edsel. Johnson City Press.
  • Evans, M., & Sommerville, S. (2005). Designing Tomorrow: A Methodology for Future Orientated Product Design. Global Chinese Industrial Design Conference 2005. Taiwan: Chang Gung University.
  • Evans, M., & Sommerville, S. (2007). Design Led Futures: Futures Thinking in the Design Curriculum. International Conference On Design Education (s. 1-5). Sydney: University Of New South Wales.
  • Glenn, J. (1994). Introduction to the Futures Research Methodology Series. In Futures Research Methodology. New York: The American Council of the United Nations University.
  • Groff, L., & Smoker, P. (2015, 6 1). http://www.csudh.edu/. INTRODUCTION TO FUTURE STUDIES: http://www.csudh.edu/global_options/IntroFS.HTML adresinden alınmıştır
  • Hugentobler, H. K., Jonas, W., & Rahe, D. (2004). Designing a Methods Platform for Design and Design Research. Futureground, DRS. Melbourne.
  • Inayatullah, S. (2003). Causal Layered Analysis: Unveiling and transforming the future. Futures Research Methodology. (J. Glenn, Derleyici) Washington D.C.
  • Inayatullah, S. (2008). Six Pillars: Futures Thinking for Transforming. Foresight, 10(1), s. 4-21.
  • Inayatullah, S. (2013). Futures Studies: Theories and. N. Al-Fodhan içinde, There’s a Future: Visions for a Better World (s. 36-66). T.F. Editores.
  • Jensen, C. (2005). Future Forecasts in Product Design - Guidelines to predicting the future. 4 8, 2015 tarihinde NTNU: http://www.ivt.ntnu.no/ipd/fag/PD9/2005/artikler/PD9artikkel_Camilla_Jensen.pdf adresinden alındı
  • Jonas, W. (2010). A Scenario for Design. R. Buchanan, D. Doordan, & V. Margolin içinde, The designed world : images, objects, environments (s. 37-52). Oxford: Berg Publishers.
  • Jonas, W., & Chow, R. (2010). MAPS. Theoretical Underpinnings. 2 26, 2015 tarihinde http://www.design-research-lab.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/MAPS_Theoretical_Underpinnings1.pdf adresinden alındı
  • Krippendorf, K. (2006). The semantic turn; a new foundation for design. London: Boca Raton.
  • Kurzweil, R. (1999). The age of spiritual machines : when computers exceed human intelligence. New York: Penguin Group.
  • Lukas, P. (1998). The Ghastliest Product Launches. Fortune(16), 44-51.
  • McMath, R. (1998). What were they thinking? Marketing lessons I’ve learned from over 80,000 new product innovations and idiocies. New York: Times Business.
  • Radcliffe, D. F., & Lee, T. Y. (1989). Design methods used by undergraduate engineering students. Design Studies, 10(4), 199-207.
  • Raskin, P., Banuri, T., Gallopin, G., Gutman, P., Hammond , A., Kates, R., & Swart, R. (2002). Great Transition. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute.
  • Ratner, E. (2007). Teaching visionary thinking to product designers using lessons from utopian science fiction. 10th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education, E and PDE 2008. Newcastle: Northumbria University.
  • Saurin, R. (2012). Workplace Futures: A Case Study of an Adaptive Scenarios Approach to Establish Strategies for Tomorrow’s Workplace. Doctoral Thesis. Dublin Institute of Technology.
  • Seymour, R. (2008). COVER STORY: Optimistic Futurism. Interactions, 15(3), 52-54.
  • Toffler, A. (1981). Gelecek Korkusu. İstanbul: Altın Kitaplar Yayınevi.