___

• Alford, R. P. (2006). Four mistakes in the debate on ‘outsourcing authority’. Albany Law Review 69, s. 653-681.
• Arcioni, E. ve A. McLeod (2015). Cautious but engaged -- an Empirical study of the Australian High Court's use of foreign and international materials in constitutional cases. International Journal of Legal Information, 42(3): s. 437- 470.
• Başlar, Kemal (2008). Türk Mahkemelerinde Avrupa İnsan Hakları Sözleşmesi. Avrupa Konseyi yayını. Ankara.
• Baudenbacher, C. (2003). Judicial globalization: new development or old wine in new bottles? Texas International Law Journal, vol. 38, s. 505-526.
• Belov, Sergey (2013). Russia: Foreign Transplants in the Russian Constitution and Invisible Foreign Precedents in Decisions of the Russian Constitutional Court. T. Groppi and M. Ponthoreau (der.) The Use of Foreign Precedents by Constitutional Judges, Oxford, Hart Publishing, s. 347-371.
• Bentele, U. (2009). Mining for gold: the Constitutional Court of South Africa's experience with comparative constitutional law. Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law 37, s. 219-40.
• Benvenisti, E. (2008). Reclaiming democracy: the strategic uses of foreign and international law by national courts. American Journal of International Law, 102(2), s. 241-274.
• Benvenuto, O. J. (2006). Reevaluating the Debate Surrounding the Supreme Court’s Use of Foreign Precedent. Fordham Law Review, 38, s. 2596-2759.
• Bertea S. ve Claudio S. (2014). Foreign precedents in judicial argument: a theoretical account. European Journal Legal Studies, 7, 2, s. 140-179.
• Bettina-Kaiser, A. (2017). It isn’t true that England is the moon: comparative constitutional law as a means of constitutional interpretation by the courts? German Law Journal, 18, 02, s. 291-308.
• Black, R., C. Owens, Ryan J. Walters, Daniel E., Brookhart, Jennifer L. (2014). Upending a global debate: an empirical analysis of the U.S. Supreme Court's use of transnational law to interpret domestic doctrine. Georgetown Law Journal, 103(1), s. 1-46.
• Bobek, M. (2013). Comparative Reasoning in European Supreme Courts, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Black, Ryan C. , Ryan J. Owens and Jennifer L. Brookhart (2016), We Are the World: The U.S. Supreme Court’s Use of Foreign Sources of Law, British Journal of Political Science 46(4 ), ss: . 891-913, s. 892.
• Buyse, A. (2015). Tacit citing: the scarcity of judicial dialogue between the global and the regional human rights mechanisms in freedom of expression cases. Tarlach McGonagle and Yvonne Donders (der.) The United Nations and Freedom of Expression and Information: Critical Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, s. 443-465
• Canivet, G. (2006). The practice of comparative law by the supreme courts: brief reflections on the dialogue between the judges in French and European experience. Tulane Law Review, 80, s. 1377-1400.
• Choudhry, S. (2006). Migration as a new Metaphor in Comparative Constitutional Law. in Choudhry Sujit (der.) The Migration of Constitutional Ideas, Cambridge: Cambridge Univeristy Press, s. 1-35.
• Cross, F. B., Spriggs James.F., Johnson Timothy R., Wahlbeck Paul J. (2010). Citations in the U.S. Supreme Court: an empirical study of their use and significance. University of Illinois Law Review, 2, s. 489-575.
• Çalı, B. (2014). Third time lucky? the dynamics of the internationalisation of domestic courts, the Turkish constitutional court and women’s right to identity in international law. https://www.ejiltalk.org/third-time-lucky-the-dynamics-ofthe- internationalisation-of- domestic-courts-the-turkish-constitutional-courtand- womens-right-to-identity-in-international-law/, erişim tarihi: 24 Haziran 2017.
• Daniel J. F. (2007). Constitutional Interpretation Revisited: The Effects of a Delicate Supreme Court Balance on the Inclusion of Foreign Law in American Jurisprudence. Iowa Law Review 92, s. 1037-1071.
• De Bellis, M. (2014). The Italian Constitutional Court and comparative caw: a tale of two courts. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2428226, erişim tarihi: 30 Temmuz 2017.
• Delahunty, Robert and John Yoo, (2005), “Against Foreign Law”, Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 1, s. 291-330.
• Dietrich, F., Nielsen, Ingrid and Smyth Russell (2008). One hundred years of citation of authority on the Supreme Court of New South Wales. In University of New South Wales Law Journal 31(1), s. 189-214.
• Ejima, Akiko (2013). A Gap between the Apparent and Hidden Attitudes of the Supreme Court of Japan towards Foreign Precedents. T. Groppi and M. Ponthoreau (der.) The Use of Foreign Precedents by Constitutional Judges, Oxford, Hart Publishing, s. 273-299.
• Farber, D. A. (2007). Supreme Court, the law of nations, and citations of foreign law: the lessons of history. California Law Review, Vol. 95, 1335-1365.
• Fasone, Cristina (2013). The Supreme Court of Ireland and the Use of Foreign Precedents: The Value of Constitutional History. T. Groppi and M. Ponthoreau (der.) The Use of Foreign Precedents by Constitutional Judges, Oxford, Hart Publishing, s. 97-127.
• Flanagan, B. ve Sinead Ahern (2011). Judicial decision-making and transnational law: a survey of common-law supreme court judges, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 60, s. 1-28.
• Frank, Daniel J. (2007). Interpretation Revisited: The Effects of a Delicate Supreme Court Balance on the Inclusion of Foreign law in American Jurisprudence, Iowa Law Review 92, 1037-1069
• Frishman, O. (2016). Should courts fear transnational engagement? Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 49, 1, s. 59-105.
• Gamper, Anna (2013). Austria: Non-cosmopolitan, but Europe-friendly-The Constitutional Court's Comparative Approach. T. Groppi and M. Ponthoreau (der.) The Use of Foreign Precedents by Constitutional Judges, Oxford, Hart Publishing, s. 213-227.
• Gelter, M. ve Mathias M. Siems (2013). Language, Legal Origins, and Culture before the Courts: Cross-Citations between Supreme Courts in Europe, Supreme Court Economic Review, 21, s. 215-269.
• Gelter, M. ve Mathias Siems (2012). Networks, dialogue or one-way traffic? an empirical analysis of cross-citations between ten of Europe’s highest courts. Utrecht Law Review, 8, 88-99.
• Gelter, M. ve Siems, Mathias M. (2014). Citations to foreign courts - illegitimate and superfluous, or unavoidable - evidence from Europe, American Journal of Comparative Law, 62(1), s. 35-86.
• Gerek, Ş. ve Ali Rıza Aydın (2004). Türk anayasa yargısında İnsan Hakları Avrupa Mahkemesinin Yeri. Amme İdaresi Dergisi, 37, 3, s. 83-110.
• Groppi Tania. ve Marie-Claire Ponthoreau (2013). Conclusion, the use of foreign precedents by constitutional judges: a limited practice, an uncertain future, T. Groppi and M.-C. Ponthoreau (der.), The Use of Foreign Precedents By Constitutional Judges, Hart Publishing, Oxford and Portland.
• Groppi, Tania. ve Marie-Claire Ponthoreau (2013). The Use of Foreign Precedents by Constitutional Judges, Hart Publishing, Oxford, Oregon, Portland.
• Hailbronner, M. ve Stefan Martini (2017). Constitutional reasoning in the German Federal Constitutional Court. András Jakab, Arthur Dyevre and Giulio Itzcovich (der.), Comparative Constitutional Reasoning, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 323-355.
• Harding, S. K. (2003). Comparative reasoning and judicial review. Yale Journal of International Law 28, s. 409-464.
• Hirschl, R. (2017), “Judicial Review and the Politics of Comparative Citations: theory, Evidence & methodological Challenges”, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2975986, erişim tarihi: 12 Ağustos 2017, s. 3.
• Hirschl, R. (2014a). In search of an identity: voluntary foreign citations in discordant constitutional settings. American Journal of Comparative Law, 62 (3): 547-584.
• Hirschl, R. (2014b). Comparative Matters: The Renaissance of Comparative Constitutional Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Jaegere, J. D. (2016), Addressing an external audience: an empirical analysis of citation practices of the Belgian Constitutional Court. ECPR Genel Konferansına sunulan bildiri, Prag, https://ecpr.eu/Filestore/PaperProposal/29f697d0-8404-4960-a65e- 1e3039294adf.pdf, erişim tarihi 6 Ekim 2017.
• Kalb, J. (2013). The judicial role in new democracies: a strategic account of comparative citation. Yale Journal of International Law 38, s. 423-465.
• Kaufman, Z. D (2015). From the Aztecs to the Kalahari bushmen -- conservative justices' citation of foreign sources: consistency, inconsistency, or evolution? Yale Journal of International Law Online, 41, s. 1-8.
• Lambrecht, S. (2013). The attitude of four supreme courts towards the european court of human rights: Strasbourg has spoken…, The Judge in European and International Law, Samantha Besson, Andreas R. Ziegler, Fatimata Niang (der.) Schulthess Verlag, Zurich, s. 301-325.
• Law, D. S. (2015). Judicial comparativism and judicial diplomacy. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 163(4), s. 927-1036.
• Law, D. S. ve When Chen-Chang (2011). The limits of global judicial dialogue. Washington Law Review 6, s. 523-578.
• Lollini, A. (2012). The South African Constitutional Court experience: reasoning patterns based on foreign law, Utrecht Law Review, 8, 2, s. 55-87.
• Lupu, Y. ve Erik Voeten (2012). Precedent in international courts: a network analysis of case citations by the European Court of Human Rights, British Journal of Political Science 42 (2), s. 413-439.
• Lyke, S. B. (2012). Brown abroad: an empirical analysis of foreign judicial citation and the metaphor of cosmopolitan conversation, Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 49, 1, 83-144.
• Mak, Elaine (2011). Why do Dutch and UK judges cite foreign law? Cambridge Law Journal, 70, s. 420-450.
• Mak, Elaine (2013). “Globalisation of the National Judiciary and the Dutch Constitution”, Utrecht Law Review 9(2): s. 36-51.
• Markesinis, Sir B. (2006). Judicial mentality: mental disposition or outlook as a factor. Impeding recourse to foreign law. Tulane Law Review, 80, 1325-1375.
• Markesinis, Sir B. ve Jörg Fedtke (2005). The judge as comparatist. Tulane Law Review, 80, 11-167.
• Marshfield J. L. (2015). Foreign precedent in state constitutional interpretation. Duquesne Law Review, 53, s. 413-435.
• Martini, Stefan (2013). Lifting the Constitutional Curtain? The Use of Foreign Precedent by the German Federal Constitutional Court. T. Groppi and M. Ponthoreau (der.) The Use of Foreign Precedents by Constitutional Judges, Oxford, Hart Publishing, s. 229-252.
• McCormick, P. (2010). Waiting for globalization: an empirical study of the Mclachlin court's foreign judicial citations. Ottawa Law Review, 41, 2 (2009-2010), s. 209- 244.
• McCrudden, C. (2007). Judicial Comparativism and Human Rights, Örücü, Esin and David Nelken (der)i Comparative Law: A Handbook, Oxford: Hart Publishing s. 371-398.
• McGinnis, John O. (2006). “Foreign to Our Constitution”, Northwestern University Law Review, vol. 100, s. 303-329.
• Navot, Suzie (2013). Israel: Creating a Constitution-The Use of Foreign Precedents by the Supreme Court (1994–2010). T. Groppi and M. Ponthoreau (der.) The Use of Foreign Precedents by Constitutional Judges, Oxford, Hart Publishing, s.129-153.
• Oliphant, B. (2014). Interpreting the Charter with international law: pitfalls & principles. Appeal 19, s. 105–129.
• Ostberg, C. L. Matthew Wetstein & Craig Ducat, Attitudes, (2001). Precedents and cultural change: explaining the citation of foreign precedents by the Supreme Court of Canada. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 34(2), s. 377-379.
• Örücü, E. (1999), The use of foreign law in British courts. Ulrich Drobnig and Sjef Van Erp (eds.), The Use of Comparative Law by Courts, London: Kluwer, 1999, s. 253-295.
• Parrish, A. L. (2007). Storm in a teacup: the U.S. Supreme Court’s use of foreign law. University of Illinois Law Review, 13, s. 637-680.
• Posner Richard A. (2004). No thanks: we already have our own laws, Legal Affairs, http://www.legalaffairs.org/issues/JulyAugust- 2004/feature_posner_julaug04.msp, erişim tarihi 16 Ekim 2017.
• Posner, R. A. (2005). Foreword: a political court, Harvard Law Review 199, s. 32-102.
• Rautenbach, Christa (2013). South Africa: Teaching an 'Old Dog' New Tricks? An Empirical Study of the Use of Foreign Precedents by the South African Constitutional Court (1995–2010). T. Groppi and M. Ponthoreau (der.) The Use of Foreign Precedents by Constitutional Judges, Oxford, Hart Publishing, s. 185-209.
• Rautenbach, C. ve Lourens du Plessis (2013). In the name of comparative constitutional jurisprudence: the consideration of German precedents by South African Constitutional Court judges. German Law Journal, 14: s. 1539-1577.
• Roy, B. (2004). An empirical survey of foreign jurisprudence and international instruments in Charter litigation, University of Toronto Faculty of Law Review 62(2), 99- 143.
• Sanchez, Ernesto J. (2005). A case against judicial internationalism”, Connecticut Law Review, 38, s. 185-238.
• Saunders, C. (2011). Judicial Engaggement with comparative law in Rosalind Dixon and Tom Ginsburg (eds), Comparative Constitutional Law, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, s. 577-598.
• Siems, M. M. (2010). Citation patterns of the German Federal Supreme Court and of the Court of Appeal of England and Wales, King’s Law Journal, 21, s. 152-171.
• Simon, S. A. (2013). The Supreme Court’s use of foreign law in constitutional rights cases: an empirical study. Journal of Law and Courts, 1(2), s. 279-301.
• Slaughter, A. M. (2000). Judicial globalization. Virginia Journal of International Law 40, s. 1103–1124.
• Slaughter, A. M. (2003). A Global Community of Courts. Harvard International Law Journal, 44, s. 191-219.
• Smith, A. M. (2006). Making itself a home - understanding foreign law in domestic jurisprudence: the Indian case”, Berkeley Journal of International Law, 24, 1, s. 218-272.
• Smyth, R. (1999). “What do Intermediate Appellate Courts Cite? A Quantitative Study of the Citation Practice of Australian State Supreme Courts.”, Adelaide Law Review, 51, s. 51-79.
• Smyth, R. (2000). Judicial citations – an empirical study of citation practice in the New Zealand Court of Appeal. Victoria University of Wellington Law Review, 31(4), s. 847-895.
• Smyth, R. (2008). Citations of Foreign Decisions in Australian State Supreme Courts over the Course of the Twentieth Century: An Empirical Analysis, Temple International & Comparative Law Journal, 22, s. 409-436.
• Saunders, Cheryl and Stone, Adrienne, (2013)Reference to Foreign Precedents by the Australian High Court: A Matter of Method, T. Groppi and M. Ponthoreau (der.), The Use of Foreign Precedents by Constitutional Judges, Hart Publishing.
• Scotti, Valentina Rita (2013). India: A 'Critical' Use of Foreign Precedents in Constitutional Adjudication. T. Groppi and M. Ponthoreau (der.) The Use of Foreign Precedents by Constitutional Judges, Oxford, Hart Publishing, s. 69-96; T. Groppi and M. Ponthoreau (der.) The Use of Foreign Precedents by Constitutional Judges, Oxford, Hart Publishing.
• Sofio, L. (2006). Recent developments in the debate concerning the use of foreign law in constitutional interpretation, Hasting International & Comparative Law Review, 30, s. 131-150.
• Stephen A. S. (2013). The supreme court’s use of foreign law in constitutional rights cases: an empirical study, Journal of Law and Courts, 1, 2, s. 279-301.
• Szente, Z. (2013a). The Interpretive practice of the Hungarian Constitutional Court: a critical view, German Law Journal, 14(8): 1591-1614.
• Szente, Zoltan (2013b). Hungary: Unsystematic and Incoherent Borrowing of Law. The Use of Foreign Judicial Precedents in the Jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court, 1999–2010. T. Groppi and M. Ponthoreau (der.) The Use of Foreign Precedents by Constitutional Judges, Oxford, Hart Publishing, s. 253-272.
• Tushnet, M. (2006). When is knowing less better than knowing more? unpacking the controversy over supreme court reference to non-U.S. law, Minnesota Law Review, 90, 1275-1302.
• Tushnet, M. (2009). The inevitable globalization of constitutional law. Virginia Journal of International Law, 49, s. 985-1006.
• Zaring, D. (2006). The use of foreign decisions by federal courts: an empirical analysis, Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 3, s. 297-331.