Objective: Central venous catheterization is a technically difficult procedure in pediatric patients. Ultrasound guidance is becoming popular during the procedure. This study is designed to examine the success rate of ultrasound guidance during internal jugular vein catheterization and factors influencing the success rate in pediatric patients. Methods: Pediatric patients who underwent central venous catheterization within a period of 12 months were included in the study. After routine anesthesia induction and treatment, patients were positioned for catheterization. Ultrasound-guided catheterization was performed. The performer specified the time to switch cutdown method for catheterization. The patients’ demographic characteristics, the performers’ experience, cannulation side, number of attempts and complications were recorded. Success was defined as accomplishment of ultrasound-guided catheterization. Results: In 144 out of 180 patients, cannulation was achieved at the first attempt. Only in 8 catheterization procedures, more than one performer tried to realize the intervention. Nine patients had cutdowns for cannulation, which meant that ultrasound guidance was successful in cannulation of 171 (95%) patients. Seven cutdowns were performed by the attending physicians, and the other two by residents. Complications as arterial puncture, hemothorax, and pneumothorax were not seen during catheterization. Conclusion: Ultrasonografi is a very useful tool for catheterization in pediatric patients even in inexperienced hands. Experience is an important factor for improving the success.
Amaç: Santral venöz kateterizasyon pediyatrik hastalarda teknik olarak zor bir işlemdir. İşlem sırasında ultrason rehberliği popüler hale gelmektedir. Bu çalışma, pediyatrik hastalarda internal juguler ven kateterizasyonu sırasında ultrason rehberliğinin başarı oranını ve başarı oranını etkileyen faktörleri incelemek için tasarlanmıştır. Yöntem: 12 ay boyunca santral kateter yerleştirilen pediyatrik hastalar dahil edildi. Rutin anestezi indüksiyonu ve tedavisinden sonra hastalara kateterizasyon için pozisyon verildi. Kateterizasyon ultrason rehberliğinde yapıldı. Ne zaman cut-down’a dönüleceğine kateteri takan kişi karar verdi. Hastaların demografik özellikleri, uygulayıcı deneyimi, kanülasyon tarafı, deneme sayısı ve komplikasyonlar kaydedildi. Başarı, ultrason rehberliği ile kateterizasyon olarak tanımlandı. Bulgular: İlk girişimde 180 hastanın 144’ünde kanülasyon yapıldı. Yalnızca 8 kateterizasyon işleminde, birden fazla kişi deneme yaptı. Dokuz hastada kanülasyon için cut-down kullanıldı, bu da ultrason rehberliğinin 171 (%95) hastanın kanülasyonunda başarılı olduğu anlamına geliyor. Dokuz cut-downın 7’si asistanlar, 2’si uzmanlar tarafından gerçekleştirildi. Kateterizasyon sırasında arteriyel ponksiyon, hemotoraks ve pnömotoraks gibi komplikasyon görülmedi. Sonuç: Ultrasonografi, deneyimsiz ellerde bile pediyatrik hastalarda kateterizasyon için çok yararlı bir araçtır. Deneyim, başarının iyileştirilmesinde önemli bir faktördür.
___
1. Casado-Flores J, Barja J, Martino R, Valdivielso A. Complications of central venous catheterization in critically ill children. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2001;2:57- 62. https://doi.org/10.1097/00130478-200101000-00012
2. Venkataraman ST, Thompson AE, Orr RA. Femoral vascular catheterization in critically ill infants and children. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 1997;36:311-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/000992289703600601
3. Schummer W, Schummer C, Rose N, Niesen WD, Sakka. Mechanical complications and malpositions of central venous cannulations by experienced operators. Int Care Med. 2007;33:1055-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-007-0560-z
4. Verghese ST, McGill WA, Patel RI, Sell J, Midgley F, Ruttimann U. Ultrasound-guided internal jugular venous cannulation in infants: a prospective comparison with the traditional palpation method. Anesthesiology. 1999;91:71-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-199907000-00013
5. Verghese ST, McGill WA, Patel RI, Sell J, Midgley F, Ruttimann U. Comparison of three techniques for internal jugular vein cannulation in infants. Ped Anesth. 2000;10:505-11. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1460-9592.2000.00554.x
6. Leyvi G, Taylor DG, Reith E, Wasnick JD. Utility of ultrasound-guided central venous cannulation in pediatric surgical patients: a clinical series. Ped Anesth. 2005;15:953-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9592.2005.01609.x
7. Alderson PJ, Burrows FA, Stemp LI, Holtby HM. Use of ultrasound to evaluate internal jugular vein anatomy and to facilitate central venous cannulation in paediatric patients. Br J Anaesth. 1993;70:145-8. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/70.2.145
8. Mallinson C, Bennett J, Hodgson P, Petros AJ. Position of the internal jugular vein in children. A study of the anatomy using ultrasonography. Ped Anesth. 1999;9:111-4. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1460-9592.1999.9220329.x
9. Hind D, Calvert N, McWilliams R, et al. Ultrasonic locating devices for central venous cannulation: metaanalysis. BMJ. 2003;327:361-4. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7411.361
10. Morita M, Sasano H, Azami T, et al. A novel skintraction method is effective for realtime ultrasoundguided internal jugular vein catheterization in infants and neonates weighing less than 5 kilograms. Anesth Analg. 2009;109:754-9. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0b013e3181b01ae3
11. Shojania KG, Duncan BW, McDonald KM, Wachter RM, Markowitz AJ. Making health care safer: A critical analysis of patient safety practices. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ). 2001:i-x, 1-668.
12. Bailey PL, Glance LG, Eaton MP, Parshall B, McIntosh S. A survey of the use of ultrasound during central venous catheterization. Anesth Analg. 2007;104:491-7. https://doi.org/10.1213/01.ane.0000255289.78333.c2
13. Denys BG, Uretsky BF, Reddy PS, Ruffner RJ, Sandhu JS, Breishlatt WM. An ultrasound method for safe and rapid central venous access. N Engl J Med. 1991;324:566. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199102213240816
14. Hayashi Y, Uchida O, Takaki O, et al. Internal jugular vein catheterization in infants undergoing cardiovascular surgery: An analysis of the factors influencing successful catheterization. Anesth Analg. 1992;74:688-93. https://doi.org/10.1213/00000539-199205000-00012
15. Asheim P, Mostad U, Aadahl P. Ultrasound-guided central venous cannulation in infants and children. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2002;46:390-2. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-6576.2002.460410.x
16. Chuan WX, Wei W, Yu L. A randomized-controlled study of ultrasound prelocation vs anatomical landmark-guided cannulation of the internal jugular vein in infants and children. Pediatr Anesth. 2005;15:733-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9592.2004.01547.x
17. Johnson EM, Saltzman DA, Suh G, Dahms RA, Leonard AS. Complications and risks of central venous catheter placement in children. Surgery. 1998;124:911-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-6060(98)70016-9
18. Bruzoni M, Slater BJ, Wall J, St Peter SD, Dutta S. A Prospective Randomized Trial of Ultrasound- vs Landmark-Guided Central Venous Access in the Pediatric Population J Am Coll Surg. 2013;216:939-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.01.054
19. Froehlich CD, Rigby MR, Rosenberg ES, et al. Ultrasoundguided central venous catheter placement decreases complications and decreases placement attempts compared with the landmark technique in patients in a pediatric intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2009;37:1090-6. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0b013e31819b570e
20. Basford TJ, Poenaru D, Silva M. Comparison of delayed complications of central venous catheters placed surgically or radiologically in pediatric oncology patients. J Pediatr Surg. 2003;38:788-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/jpsu.2003.50168
21. Arul GS, Lewis N, Bromley P, Bennett J. Ultrasoundguided percutaneous insertion of Hickman lines in children. Prospective study of 500 consecutive procedures. J Ped Surg. 2009;44:1371-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2008.12.004
22. Al Sofyani K, Julia G, Abdulaziz B, Yves CJ, Sylvain R. Ultrasound guidance for central vascular access in the neonatal and pediatric intensive care unit. Saudi J Anaesth. 2012;6:120-4. https://doi.org/10.4103/1658-354X.97023