Türkiye’de Yenidoğan ve Çocuklarda Intraoperatif Mekanik Ventilasyon Stratejileri: Anket Çalışması
Amaç: Genel anestezi altındaki çocukların çoğunun mekanik ventilasyona gereksinimi vardır. Ancak literatürde, bu uygulama için birçok parametrenin yetişkin hastalar örnek alınarak uygu- landığı bildirilmiştir. Çocuklar için intraoperatif mekanik ventilasyon hakkında literatür eksikliği bulunmaktadır. Bu anketin amacı, Türk anesteziyologlar arasında, “Yenidoğan ve çocuklarda mekanik ventilasyona dayalı intraoperatif solunum parametreleri nasıl yönetilmektedir?” sorusu- na yanıt aramaktır. Yöntem: Anestezistlere yönelik 30 soru içeren anket uygulandı. Bu ankette mekanik ventilasyon modları, tidal volüm, pozitif son ekspiratuar basınç (PEEP), inspire edilen oksijen fraksiyonu (FiO 2 ), solunum sayısı, periferal oksijen saturasyonu (SpO 2 ), end-tidal karbondioksit (EtCO 2 ) ve recruit- ment manevraları ile ilgili klinik uygulamalar hakkında bilgi toplandı. Bulgular: Bu ankete toplam 148 anestezi uzmanı ve anestezi asistanı yanıt verdi. Ankete katılanla- rın %77’si üniversite hastanesinde çalışıyordu. Katılımcıların %60’ından fazlası yenidoğanlarda ve çocuklarda volüm kontrollü modu tercih etmekteydi. En sık kullanılan tidal volüm ve PEEP değerle- ri sırasıyla 6-8 mL kg -1 ve 3-4 cmH 2 O idi. SpO 2 ve EtCO 2 içeren monitörizasyon %85’in üzerinde bir oranda uygulanmakta idi. Recruitment manevrasının kullanımı %75.7 idi. Bu teknik, sıklıkla (%55.4) hipoksi sırasında manuel inspiratuar basınç (%71.6) kullanılarak uygulanmakta idi. Sonuç: Bu çalışmanın sonuçları mevcut literatürle farklılıklar göstermektedir. Bununla birlikte, pediyatrik hastalarda intraoperatif mekanik ventilasyon uygulamaları ile ilgili bilgiler sınırlıdır ve daha fazla çalışmaya gereksinim vardır.
Intraoperative Mechanical Ventilation Strategies in Newborns and Children in Turkey: A Survey Investigation
Objective: Most children under general anesthesia need mechanical ventilation (MV), but it hasbeen reported in the literature that many parameters for this application are derived from adultpatients. There is lack of literature about intraoperative MV for children. We conducted this sur-vey to seek an answer for the question “How intraoperative respiratory parameters based on MVare managed for newborns and children among Turkish anesthesiologists?”.Method: A questionnaire containing 30 questions was sent to anesthesiologists. This survey col-lected information on clinical practice related to MV modes, tidal volume, positive end-expiratorypressure (PEEP), fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO 2 ), respiratory rate, monitoring of peripheraloxygen saturation (SpO 2 ) and end-tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO 2 ) and recruitment maneuvers(RMs).Results: A total of 148 anesthesiologists and anesthesia residents responded to this survey. Ofthese respondents, 77% were working at a university hospital. More than 60% of respondentswere using volume-controlled modes for newborns and children. The most commonly used tidalvolume and PEEP values were 6-8 mL kg -1 and 3-4 cmH 2 O, respectively. Monitorization, includingSpO 2 and EtCO 2 was used by over 85% of respondents, while 75.7% of them were using recruit-ment maneuvers (RMs), which were often (55.4%) used during hypoxia with application ofmanual inspiratory pressure (71.6%).Conclusion: The results of the present study indicate differences with the existing literature data.However, information about intraoperative application of mechanical ventilation in pediatricpatients is limited, and there is a need for further study on this field.
___
- Kneyber MC. Intraoperative mechanical ventilation for
the pediatric patient. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol.
2015;29:371-9.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpa.2015.10.001
- Fesseau R, Alacoque X, Larcher C, Morel L, Lepage B,
Kern D. An ADARPEF survey on respiratory manage-
ment in pediatric anesthesia. Paediatr Anaesth.
2014;24:1099-105.
https://doi.org/10.1111/pan.12499
- Futier E, Constantin JM, Paugam-Burtz C, et al. A trial
of intraoperative low-tidal-volume ventilation in abdo-
minal surgery. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:428-37.
https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1301082
- Feldman JM. Optimal ventilation of the anesthetized
pediatric patient. Anesth Analg. 2015;120:165-75.
https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000000472
- Bang SR. Neonatal anesthesia: how we manage our
most vulnerable patients. Korean J Anesthesiol.
2015;68:434-41.
https://doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2015.68.5.434
- Dargaville PA, Tingay DG. Lung protective ventilation in
extremely preterm infants. J Paediatr Child Health.
2012;48:740-6.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1754.2012.02532.x
- Abouzeid T, Perkins EJ, Pereira-Fantini PM, Rajapaksa
A, Suka A, Tingay DG. Tidal volume delivery during the
anesthetic management of neonates is variable. J
Pediatr. 2017;184:51-6.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.01.074
- Trachsel D, Svendsen J, Erb TO, von Ungern-Sternberg
BS. Effects of anaesthesia on paediatric lung function.
Br J Anaesth. 2016;117:151-63.
https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aew173
- von Ungern-Sternberg BS, Regli A, Schibler A, Hammer
J, Frei FJ, Erb TO. The impact of positive end-expiratory
pressure on functional residual capacity and ventilati-
on homogeneity impairment in anesthetized children
exposed to high levels of inspired oxygen. Anesth Analg. 2007;104:1364-8.
https://doi.org/10.1213/01.ane.0000261503.29619.9c
- von Ungern-Sternberg BS, Hammer J, Schibler A, Frei
FJ, Erb TO. Decrease of functional residual capacity and
ventilation homogeneity after neuromuscular blocka-
de in anesthetized young infants and preschool child-
ren. Anesthesiology. 2006;105:670-5.
https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-200610000-00010
- Neumann RP, von Ungern-Sternberg BS. The neonatal
lung--physiology and ventilation. Paediatr Anaesth.
2014;24:10-21.
https://doi.org/10.1111/pan.12280
- Habre W, Petak F. Perioperative use of oxygen: variabi-
lities across age. Br J Anaesth. 2014;113:26-36.
https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aeu380
- Goncalves LO, Cicarelli DD. Alveolar recruitment mane-
uver in anesthetic practice: how, when and why it may
be useful. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2005;55:631-8.
https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-70942005000600006
- Garcia-Fernandez J, Romero A, Blanco A, Gonzalez P,
Abad-Gurumeta A, Bergese SD. Recruitment manoeuv-
res in anaesthesia: How many more excuses are there
not to use them? Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim.
2018;65:209-17.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redar.2017.12.006
- Hartland BL, Newell TJ, Damico N. Alveolar recruitment
maneuvers under general anesthesia: a systematic review of the literature. Respir Care. 2015;60:609-20.
https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.03488
- Wamsley C, Missel D. Effect of peak inspiratory pressu-
re on the development of postoperative pulmonary
complications in mechanically ventilated adult surgical
patients: a systematic review protocol. JBI Database
System Rev Implement Rep. 2016;14:74-82.
https://doi.org/10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-003223
- Almarakbi WA, Fawzi HM, Alhashemi JA. Effects of four
intraoperative ventilatory strategies on respiratory
compliance and gas exchange during laparoscopic
gastric banding in obese patients. Br J Anaesth.
2009;102:862-8.
https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aep084
- Celebi S, Koner O, Menda F, Korkut K, Suzer K, Cakar N.
The pulmonary and hemodynamic effects of two diffe-
rent recruitment maneuvers after cardiac surgery.
Anesth Analg. 2007;104:384-90.
https://doi.org/10.1213/01.ane.0000252967.33414.44
- Badet M, Bayle F, Richard JC, Guerin C. Comparison of
optimal positive end-expiratory pressure and recruit-
ment maneuvers during lung-protective mechanical
ventilation in patients with acute lung injury/acute
respiratory distress syndrome. Respir Care.
2009;54:847-54.
https://doi.org/10.4187/002013209793800448