EFFECTIVENESS OF POPLITEAL NEVRE BLOCK AND ANKLE NEVRE BLOCK IN HALLUX VALGUS SURGERY

Objective: Regional anesthesia methods have been widely used in hallux valgus (HV) surgery in recent years. General anesthesia, spinal anesthesia and peripheral nerve blocks are frequently applied. The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of ultrasound- guided popliteal sciatic nerve block (UPSNB) and ultrasound-guided ankle nerve block (UANB) in HV surgery. Method: This study was conducted with 40 patients with ASA I-II physical conditioning after having obtained the ethics committee approval from Gaziantep University ethics committee (No:2016/186). Patients were divided into two equal groups; UPSNB was applied with 20 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine in Group S (n=20). In Group P (n=20), UANB (5 mL to the posterior tibial nerve, 5 mL to the superficial peroneal nerve, 4 mL to the deep peroneal nerve, 3 mL to the saphenous nerve, 3 mL to the sural nerve) was applied with 20 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine. The tourniquet time, time of onset of motor block and duration of motor block, time of onset of sensory block and duration of sensory block were recorded for each patient. The time when the visual analogue scale (VAS) was 4 was recorded for each group. Results: The sensory block onset time was shorter in Group P (21.85± 1.53; 9.4± 1.31 min) (p

HALLUKS VALGUS AMELİYATINDA POPLİTEAL SİYATİK SİNİR BLOĞU İLE AYAK BİLEĞİ SİNİR BLOĞUNUN ETKİNLİĞİ

Amaç: Son y›llarda halluks valgus (HV) operasyonlar›nda rejyonel anestezi yöntemleri s›kça kullan›lmaktad›r. Genel anestezi, spinal anestezi ve periferik sinir bloklar› s›kça kullan›lmaktad›r. Bu çal›flman›n amac› HV cerrahinde ultrasound eflli¤inde popliteal siyatik sinir blo¤u (UPSNB) ile ultrasound eflli¤inde ayak bilek sinir blo¤unun (UABSB) etkinli¤ini gözlemlemektir. Yöntem: Çal›flmam›z yerel etik kurul onay› (Gaziantep Üniversitesi Etik kurulu No: 2016/ 186) ile ASA I-II fiziksel durumda olan toplam 40 hasta ile yap›ld›. Çal›flmam›zda iki eflit gruba ayr›lan hastalar›m›zda grup S de (n=20) 20 mL %0.5 lik bupivakain ile UPSNB uyguland›. grup P de (n=20) toplam 20 mL %0.5 lik bupivakain ile UABSB (5 mL posterior tibial sinir, 5 mL yüzeyel peroneal sinir, 4 mL derin peroneal sinir, 3 mL safen sinir, 3 mL sural sinir bloklar›) uyguland›. Hastalar›m›z›n turnike süresi, motor blok bafllama zaman› ve süresi ile sensoryal blok bafllama zaman› ve süresi kayda al›nd›. Ayr›ca her iki grup için vizüel analog skalan›n (VAS) 4 oldu¤u zaman kayda al›nd›. Bulgular: Sensoryal blok bafllama zaman› grup P'de daha k›sa idi (21.85± 1.53; 9,4± 1.31 dk) (p

PDF

___

Mortka K, Lisinski P. Halluxs valgus-a case for a physiotherapist or only for a surgeon? Literature review. J Phys Ther Sci 2015; 27: 3303-3307.

Nix S, Smith M, Vicenzino B. Prevalence of hallux valgus in the general population: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Foot Ankle Res 2010; 3: 21.

Lee KT, Park YU, Jegal H, Young KW, Kim JS, Lim SY. Osteoarthritis of the second metatarsophlangeal joint associated with hallux valgus deformity. Foot Ankle Int 2014; 35: 1329-1333.

Jeon HJ, Park YC, Lee JN, Bae JS. Popliteal sciatic nerve block versus spinal anesthesia in hallux valgus surgery. Korean J Anest-hesiol 2013; 64: 321-326.

Liszka H, Gadek A, Wordliczek J. The impact of type of anesthesia on postoperative pain after surgical correction of hallux valgus deformity. Przegl Lek 2016; 73: 11-14.

Amdrosoli AL, Guzzetti L, Chiaranda M, Cuffari M, Gemma M, Cappelleri G. A randomised controlled trial comparing two popliteal nerve catheter tip positions for postoperative analgesia after day-case hallux valgus repair. Anesthesia 2016; 71: 1317-1323.

Karaarslan S, Tekgül ZT, fiimflek E et.al. Comparison between ultrasonography-guided popliteal sciatic nerve block and spinal anesthesia for hallux valgus repair. Foot Ankle Int 2016; 37: 85-89.

Palmisani S, Arcioni R, Di Benedetto P, De Blasi RA, Mercieri M, Ronconi P. Ropivacaine and levobupivacaine for bilateral selective ankle block in patients undergoing hallux valgus repair. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2008; 52: 841-844.

Schipper ON, Hunt KJ, Anderson RB, Davis WH, Jones CP, Cohen BE. Ankle Block vs Single-Shot Popliteal Fossa Block as Primary Anesthesia for Forefoot Operative Procedures: Prospective, Randomized Comparison. Foot Ankle Int 2017; 38: 1188-1191.

Cataldo R, Carassiti M, Costa F et.al. Starting with ultrasonography decreases popliteal block performance time in inexperienced hands: a prospective randomized study. BMC Anesthesiol 2012; 12: 33.

S›iardi D, Marino A, Chillemi S, Sil›otti R, Mondello E. Sciatic nerve block with lateral popliteal approach for hallux valgus correction. Comparison between 0.5% bupivacaine and 0.75% ropivacaine. Minerva Anestesiol 2004; 70: 625-629.

Jeong JS, Shim JC, Jeong MA, Lee BC, Sung IH. Minimum effective anaesthetic volume of 0.5% ropivacaine for ultrasound-guided popliteal sciatic nerve block in patients undergoing foot and ankle surgery: determination of ED50 and ED95. Anaesth Intensive Care 2015; 43: 92-97.

Russell DF, Pillai A, Kumar CS. Safety and efficacy of forefoot surgery under ankle block anaesthesia. Scott Med J 2014, 59: 103-107.

Urfalioglu A, Gokdemir O, Hanbeyoglu O et.al. A comparison of ankle block and spinal anesthesia for foot surgery. Int J Clin Exp Med 2015; 8: 19388-19393.

Mouton A, Le Strat V, Medevielle D, Kerroumi Y, Graff W. French association of foot surgery (AFCP). Patient's satisfaction after outpatient forefoot surgery: Study of 619 cases. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2015; 101 (6 Suppl): S217-220.