Intervertebral disc heights and concavity index of the lumbar spine in young healthy adults

Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate lumbar intervertebral disc heights and concavity index of the lumbarspine, and the influence of age, gender, weight, height and body mass index (BMI) on these parameters.Methods: The study was conducted on 150 health young subjects (age 18 to 27) without any disorder which affects the lumbarspine and the discs. Subjects underwent standard standing lateral lumbar radiography. Mann-Whitney U test and Spearman’scorrelation test were used for statistical analysis.Results: Of the 150 subjects (age range, 18–27 years), 80 (53.3%) were women and 70 (46.7%) were men. Men presentedhigher lumbar disc values than women. In both genders, disc height increased from T12–L1 to L4–L5, and then decreased atL5–S1. The heights of all lumbar discs increased with age, weight, height and BMI in both genders. Women demonstrated a higherconcavity index at L2, L3 and L4 vertebrae compared to men, whereas men showed a higher concavity index value at L5 vertebra.The concavity index of T12, L1, L2, L3 and L4 vertebrae decreased with age.Conclusion: Our results will serve as guidelines and references for further studies, radiologists and spinal surgeons.

___

  • 1. Junghanns H. Die gesunde und die kranke wirbelsäule in röntgenbild und klinik. Stuttgart: Georg Thieme Verlag; 1968.
  • 2. DePalma MJ, Ketchum JM, Saullo T. What is the source of chronic low back pain and does age play a role? Pain Med 2011;12:224–33.
  • 3. Ghannam M, Jumah F, Mansour S, Samara A, Alkhdour S, Alzuabi MA, Aker L, Adeeb N, Massengale J, Oskouian RJ, Tubbs RS. Surgical anatomy, radiological features, and molecular biology of the lumbar intervertebral discs. Clin Anat 2017;30:251–66.
  • 4. Choi YS. Pathophysiology of degenerative disc disease. Asian Spine J 2009;3:39–44.
  • 5. Budak EÇ, Bozkurt MR. Vertebra lomber disklerde meydana gelen bozulmalar›n manyetik rezonans görüntüleme (MRG) ile analizi. Online Academic Journal of Information Technology 2013;4:125–44.
  • 6. Berlemann U, Gries NC, Moore RJ. The relationship between height, shape and histological changes in early degeneration of the lower lumbar discs. Eur Spine J 1998;7:212–7.
  • 7. Kutsal YG, ‹nan›c› F, O¤uz KK, Alanay A, Palao¤lu S. Bel a¤r›lar›. Hacettepe T›p Dergisi 2008;39:180–93.
  • 8. fienköylü A. Bel a¤r›s›nda k›rm›z› bayraklar. Türkiye Fiziksel T›p ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi 2011;57 (Özel Say› 2).
  • 9. Leivseth G, Salvesen R, Hemminghytt S, Brinckmann P, Frobin W. Do human lumbar discs reconstitute after chemonucleolysis? A 7- year follow-up study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1999;24:342–7.
  • 10. Shao Z, Rompe G, Schiltenwolf M. Radiographic changes in the lumbar intervertebral discs and lumbar vertebrae with age. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2002;27:263–8.
  • 11. Humzah MD, Soames RW. Human intervertebral disc: structure and function. Anat Rec 1988;220:337–56.
  • 12. Lawrence JS. Disc degeneration, its frequency and relationship to symptoms. Ann Rheum Dis 1969;28:121–38.
  • 13. Schmorl G, Junghanns H. The human spine in health and disease. 2nd ed. New York: Grune & Stratton; 1971. p. 18.
  • 14. Vernon-Roberts B, Pirie CJ. Degenerative changes in the intervertebral discs of the lumbar spine and their sequelae. Rheumatol Rehabil 1977;16:13–21.
  • 15. Amonoo-Kuofi HS. Morphometric changes in the heights and anteroposterior diameters of the lumbar intervertebral discs with age. J Anat 1991;175;159–68.
  • 16. Al-Hadidi MT, Badran DH, Al-Hadidi AM, Abu-Ghaida JH. Magnetic resonance imaging of normal lumbar intervertebral discs. Saudi Med J 2001;22:1013–8.
  • 17. Sevinc O, Barut C, Eryoruk N, Safak AA. Influence of age and sex on lumbar vertebral morphometry determined using sagittal magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Anat 2008;190:277–83.
  • 18. Twomey L, Taylor J. Age changes in lumbar intervertebral discs. Acta Orthop Scand 1985;56:496–9.
  • 19. Pfirrmann CW, Metzdorf A, Elfering A, Hodler J, Boos N. Effect of aging and degeneration on disc volume and shape: a quantitative study in asymptomatic volunteers. J Orthop Res 2006;24:1086–94.
  • 20. Gocmen-Mas N, Karabekir H, Ertekin T, Edizer M, Canan Y, Duyar I. Evaluation of lumbar vertebral body and disc: a stereological morphometric study. Int J Morphol 2010; 28:841–7.
  • 21. Malkoç I, Aydinlioglu SA, Alper F, Kaciroglu F, Yuksel Y, Yuksel R, Dane S, Toktas M. Age related changes in height and shape of the lumbar intervertebral discus. Europoean Journal of Basic Medical Sciences 2012;2:68–73.
  • 22. Bogduk N. Klinische Anatomie von Lendenwirbelsäule und Sakrum. Berlin: Springer Verlag; 2000.
  • 23. Kapakin S, Akflit D. Manyetik rezonans görüntüleme yöntemi ile lumbal intervertebral disklerin morfometrik de¤erlendirilmesi. Atatürk Üniversitesi Veteriner Bilimleri Dergisi 2009;4:2:77–85.
  • 24. Urquhart DM, Kurniadi I, Triangto K, Wang Y, Wluka AE, O’Sullivan R, Jones G, Cicuttini FM. Obesity is associated with reduced disc height in the lumbar spine but not at the lumbosacral junction. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2014;39:E962–6.
  • 25. Öztürk A, Özkan Y, Özdemir RM, Yalçin N, Akgöz S, Saraç V, Aykut S. Radiographic changes in the lumbar spine in former professional football players: a comparative and matched controlled study. Eur Spine J 2008;17:136–41.
  • 26. Schmitt H, Dubljanin E, Schneider S, Schiltenwolf M. Degenerative changes in the lumbar spine in former elite athletes. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2004;29:2554–9.
  • 27. Bogduk N. Functional anatomy of the disc and the lumbar spine. Janz KB, Hochschuler SH, McAfee PC, editors. The artificial disc. Heidelberg: Springer Verlag; 2003. pp. 19–32.
  • 28. Souza FR, Ferreira F, Narciso FV, Makhoul CMB, Canto RST, Barauna MA. Evaluation of lumbar concavity using a radiographic method and kypholordometry. Revista Brasileara Fisioterapia 2009;13:103–9.
  • 29. Ismail AA, Cooper C, Felsenberg D, Varlow J, Kanis JA, Silman AJ, O’Neill TW. Number and type of vertebral deformities: epidemiological characteristics and relation to back pain and height loss. The European Vertebral Osteoporosis Study. Osteoporos Int 1999;9: 206–13.