Aziz YAŞAN, LUT TAMAM, Hilal BARDAKÇI SELÇUK

Bir grup evli kadında istem dışı cinsel birleşme: Yaygınlığı, nedenleri ve bazı sonuçları

Amaç: Bu çalışmada bir grup evli kadında istem dışı cinsel birleşmenin yaygınlığı, nedenleri bazı kısa dönem sonuçları ve cinsel işlev bozukluklar ile ilişkisinin araştırılması amaçlanmıştır. Yöntem: Bir üniversitede araştırma görevlisi olarak çalışan evli 63 kadın çalışmaya alınmıştır. Deneklere sosyodemografik ve istem dışı cinsel yaşantı- lara ait bilgi formu ve Arizona Cinsel Yaşantılar ölçeği verildi. Sonuçlar: Olguların yarısından fazlasında istem dışı cinsel birleşme olduğu saptandı. İstem dışı cinsel birleşmenin kabul edilmesinin en sık nedenlerinin sevgi göstermenin bir yolu olarak görülmesi ve duygusal gereksinmelerin karşılanması olduğu belirlendi. Arizona Cinsel Yaşantılar Ölçeğine göre, istem dışı cinsel birleşme yaşayan olguların istek, uyarılma, orgazm ve orgazm doyumu alt ölçek puanları yaşamayanlara göre anlamlı düzeyde daha düşüktü. Tartışma: Elde edilen bulgular istem dışı cinsel birleş- melerin tümünün travmatik olarak kabul edilemeyeceği ve bazı kadınların bunu olumlu cinsel deneyim olarak yaşayabileceğini göstermektedir. Ancak istem dışı cinsel birleşme yaşayan bazı kadınlarda bu yaşantıların cinsel işlev bozuklukları ve bazı olumsuz ruhsal sonuçlara yol açabileceğide görülmektedir. Bu nedenle istem dışı cinsel birleş- menin olumlu veya olumsuz bir yaşantı olarak yaşanmasına yol açan etkenlerin neler olabileceğine ilişkin ayrıntılı çalışmalara gerek duyulmaktadır. Aynı zamanda bu tür yaşantıların yol açabileceği cinsel işlev bozukluğu ve bazı psikiyatrik sorunlar nedeniyle psikiyatri uygulamasında sorgulanması gereken bir durum olduğu kanısındayız. (Anadolu Psikiyatri Derg 2015; 16(6):389-396)

Prevalence of unwanted sexual intercourse: reasons, short term consequences in a group married women

Objective: The aim of this study was to examine the prevalence of unwanted sexual intercourse, its reasons, some short term consequences and related sexual function disorder in a group of married women. Methods: Sixty three married women who have been working as research fellow in a university have participated in the study. A study form including sociodemographic features and information relevant to unwanted sexual experiences of cases were completed by participants. Arizona Sexual Experiences Scale were given to collect information about sexual life and experiences of subjects. Results: More than half of the cases revealed that they had unwanted sexual intercourse during their lifetime. The most common reasons for unwanted sexual intercourse were using sex as a way of showing their love and satisfying a need to be sensual. According to Arizona Sexual Experience Scale, women those have unwanted sexual intercourse had significantly lower sexual desire, arousal, orgasm and sexual satisfaction subscale as compared to women those did not have unwanted sexual intercourse. Discussion: This study has shown that all unwanted sexual intercourse may not be considered as traumatic and for some women it might be considered as positive sexual experience. However, in some cases it may lead to negative psychological consequences and sexual dysfunction. Thus, further studies are warranted to determine the factors leading an unwanted sexual course to be considered as a positive or negative experience. In psychiatric practice, evaluating unwanted sexual course might help psychiatrists to find out a precipitating factor for a sexual dysfunction and some psychiatric syndromes. (

PDF

___

1. Laina Y, Rebecca K. The making of unwanted sex: gendered and neoliberal norms in college women's unwanted sexual experiences. J Sex Res 2008; 45:386-397.
2. Parish WL, LUo Y, Laumann EO, Kew M, Yu Z. Unwanted Sexual Activity among Married Women in Urban China. J Sex Res 2007; 44:158-171.
3. Vannier SA, OSullivan LF. Sex without desire: characteristics of occasions of sexual compliance in young adults committed relationships. J Sex Res 2010; 47:429-439.
4. OSullivan LF, Allgeier ER. Feigning sexual desire: Consenting to unwanted sexual activity in heterosexual dating relationships. J Sex Res 1998; 35:234-243.
5. Basile KC. Rape by acquiescence: The ways in which women give in to unwanted sex with their husbands. Violence Against Women 1999; 5:1036-1058.
6. Impett EA, Peplau LA. Why some women consent to unwanted sex with a dating partner: Insights from attachment theory. Psychol Women Q 2002; 26:360-370.
7. Santhya KG, Rama F, Sİnha RK, Mohanty SK. Consent and Coercion: Examining Unwanted Sex Among Married Young Women in India. Int Fam Plan Perspect 2007; 33:124-132.
8. Sione´an C, DiClemente RJ, Wingood GM, Crosby R, Cobb BK, Harrington K, et al. Psychosocial and behavioral correlates of refusing unwanted sex among African American adolescent females. J Adolesc Health 2006; 30:55-63.
9. Peterson ZD, Muehlenhard CL. Conceptualizing the wantedness of womens consensual and nonconsensual sexual experiences: Implications for how women label their experiences with rape. J Sex Res 2007; 44:72-88.
10. Basile KC. Prevalence of wife rape and other intimate partner sexual coercion in a nationally representative sample of women. Violence Vict 2002; 17:511-524.
11. Capitaine M, Rodgers RF, Chabrol H. Unwanted sexual experiences, depressive symptoms and disordered eating among college students. Eat Behav 2011;12:86-89.
12. Lehrer JA, Lehrer EL, Koss MP. Unwanted sexual experiences in young men: evidence from a survey of university students in Chile. Arch Sex Behav 2013; 42:213-223.
13. Basson R. The female sex ual response: a different model. J Sex Marital Ther 2000; 26:51-65.
14. Basson R. Using a different model for female sexual response to address womens problematic low sexual desire. J Sex Marital Ther 2001; 27:359-403.
15. Cain VS, Johannes CB, Avis NE, Mohr B, Schocken M, Skurnick J, et al. Sexual functioning and practices in a multi-ethnic study of midlife women: Baseline results from SWAN. J Sex Res 2003; 40:266-276.
16. Sand M, Fisher WA. Womens endorsement of models of female sexual response: The nurses sexuality study. J Sex Med 2007; 4:708-719.
17. Avis NE, Zhao X, Johannes CB, Ory M, Brockwell S, Greendale GA. Correlates of sexual function among multi-ethnic middle-aged women: Results from the Study of Womens Health Across the Nation (SWAN). Menopause 2005; 12:385-398.
18. Hines DA. Predictors of sexual coercion against women and men: a multilevel, multinational study of university students. Arch Sex Behav 2007; 36:403-422.
19. McGahuey CA, Glenberg AJ, Laukes CA, Moreno FA, Delgado PL, McKnight KM, et al. Arizona Sexual Experiences Scale: Reliability and validity. J Sex Marital Ther 2000; 26:25-40.
20. Soykan A. The reliability and vaidity of Arizona sexual experiences scale in Turkish ESRD patients undergoing hemodialysis. Int J Impot Res 2004; 16:532-534.
21. Wolff B, Blanc AK, Gage AJ. Who decides? Womens status and negotiation of sex in Uganda. Cult Health Sex 2000; 2:303-322.
22. Kaplan HS. The New Sex Therapy: Active Treatment of Sexual Dysfunctions. New York: Brunner Mazel, 1974.
23. Stephenson KR, Ahrold TK, Meston CM. The association between sexual motives and sexual satisfaction: gender differences and categorical comparisons. Arch Sex Behav 2011; 40:607-618.
24. Çakır U, Gündüz N, Turan H, Güleş E, Aker T. Kadın majör depresif bozukluk hastalarında cinsel travmaya bağlı travma sonrası stres bozukluğu ve ilişkili bilişler. Anadolu Psikiyatri Derg 2014; 15:200-206.
25. Puri M, Tamang J, Shah I. Suffering in silence: consequences of sexual violence within marriage among young women in Nepal. BMC Public Health 2011; 11:29-34.
26. Oswald DL, Russell BL. Perceptions of sexual coercion in heterosexual dating relationships. J Sex Res 2006; 43:87-95.
27. Impett, EA, Peplau LA, Gable SL. Approach and avoidance sexual motives: Implications for personal and interpersonal well-being. Pers Relat 2005; 12:465-482.