Türkiye'nin yeni sanayi politikası yönelimi: entegre sanayi politikası yaklaşımı önerisi

Türkiye 'nin yeni sanayi politikası yönelimini değerlendiren bu çalışmada, Türkiye 'de sanayide hedeflenen yapısal dönüşümü gerçekleştirmek için yalnızca yatay sanayi politikalarının a priori "yeterli" ve "uygun " görülemeyeceği öne sürülmektedir. Teknolojik ve endüstriyel gelişmenin rotasını etkilemek için, yatay politikaların yanı sıra, zaman ve ülke spesifik çeşitli dikey (seçici/sektörel) politikaların niçin gerekli olduğu, iktisat teorisindeki argümanlar ve ülkelerin sanayi politikaları deneyimleri ışığında ortaya konmakta; yatay ve dikey politikalara birlikte, birbirleriyle ilişkilendirerek yer veren "entegre " sanayi politikası yaklaşımının daha esnek ve sistemik sanayi politikası olanakları içerdiği açıklanmaktadır.

The new industrial policy orientation of turkey: a suggestion for an integrated industrial policy approach

This study, which assesses the new industrial policy orientation of Turkey, argues that horizontal industrial policies alone cannot be considered a priori "sufficient" and "adequate" to achieve the targeted industrial restructuring of Turkey. The study discusses, in the light of theoretical arguments as well as industrial policy implementations in different countries, why "time" and country specific" vertical (selective/sectoral) policies along with horizontal ones are necessary to influence the direction of technological and industrial development. It explains that the "integrated" approach to industrial policy, which combines horizontal and vertical measures in an interrelated manner, represents a more flexible and systemic approach to industrial poli-cy.

___

  • Aiginger, Karl - Sieber, Susanna (2006), "The Matrix Approach to Industrial Policy",International Review of Applied Economics, Vol. 20, No: 5, p. 573-601.
  • Amsden, Alice (1989), Asia's Next Giant, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Amsden, Alice (2000), "Industrialization under New WTO Law", High Level Round Table on Trade and Development: Directions for the Twenty-first Century, Bangkok. Erişim: http//www.unctad.org
  • Asheim, Bjorn T.- Coenen, Lars (2005), "Knowledge Bases and Regional Innovation Systems: Comparing Nordic Clusters", Research Policy, Vol. 34, No: 8, p. 1173-1190.
  • Avrupa Komisyonu (2002), "Industrial Policy in an enlarged Europe", Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the Economic and Social Committe and the Committe of the Regions, (COM) 2002) 714 final, Brussels.
  • Avrupa Komisyonu (2005a), "Implementing the Community Lisbon Programme: A policy Framework to Strengthen EU Manufacturing- Towards a more Integrated Approach for Industrial Policy", Communication from the Commission, (COM) 2005) 474 final, Brussels.
  • Avrupa Komisyonu (2005b), Annex to the: Communication from the Commission, "Implementing the Community Lisbon Programme: A Policy Framework to Strengthen EU Manufacturing- Towards a more Integrated Approach for Industrial Policy", Commission staff working document, (COM)2005) 474 final, SEC(2005) 1215/2, Brussels.
  • Avrupa Komisyonu (2005c), Annex to the: Communication from the Commission, "Implementing the Community Lisbon Programme: A Policy Framework to Strengthen EU Manufacturing- Towards a More integrated Approach for Industrial Policy", Commission Staff Working Document, (COM)2005) 474 final, SEC(2005) 1217, Brussels.
  • Avrupa Komisyonu (2007a), "Mid-term Review of Industrial Policy. A Contribution to the EU's Growth and Jobs Stategy", Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committe and the Committe of the Regions, COM(2007) 374 final, Brussels.
  • Avrupa Komisyonu (2007b), Accompanying document to the "Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committe and the Committe of the Regions,"Mid-term Review of Industrial Policy.A Contribution to the EU's Growth and Jobs Stategy", Commission Staff Working Document, SEC (2007) 917, Brussels.
  • Birleşmiş Milletler (2006), World Economic and Social Survey 2006, Diverging Growth and Development,Nqvi York: United Nations.
  • Chang, Ha - Joon (1994), The Political Economy of Industrial Policy, London: Macmil-lan.
  • Chang, Ha - Joon (2009), "Industrial Policy: Can We Go Beyond an Unproductive Confrontation?", A Plenary Paper for ABCDE (Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics), Seoul, South Korea, 22-24 June, http: //siteresources. worldbank.org/INT ABCDESK200^/Resources/Ha-Joon-Chang.pdf
  • Cimoli, Mario - Dosi, Giovanni - Stiglitz, Joseph (Ed) (2009), Industrial Policy and Development, The Political Economy of Capabilities Accumulation, Oxford University Press.
  • DPT (2003), Türkiye Sanayi Politikası (AB Üyeliğine doğru), Ağustos 2003, DPT, Ankara. http: //ekutup.dpt.gov.tr/sanayi/tr2003ab.pdf
  • DPT (2007), Sanayi Politikaları Özel İhtisas Komisyonu Raporu, Yayın No: DPT: 2731 - ÖİK: 683, Ankara.
  • Dünya Bankası (1993), The East Asian Miracle: Economic Growth and Public Policy, New York, Oxford University Press.
  • Edquist, C. (1997), Systems of Innovation Approaches- Their Emergence and Characteristics, Edquist, C. (Ed.), Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organizations, Pinter Publishers, London, p. 1-35.
  • Edquist, C. - Chaminade, C. (2006), 'Industrial Policy from a Systems-of-Innovation Perspective', European Investments Bank (EIB), Papers, Vol. 11, No: l,p. 109-132.
  • Ham, Rose Marie - Mowery, David C. (1995), "Enduring Dilemmas in U.S. Technology Policy, California Management Review, Vol. 37, No: 4, s. 89-107.
  • Hayek, Friedrich A. (1937), Economics and Knowledge, Economica, Vol. 4, No: 13, p. 33-54.
  • Hayek, Friedrich A. (1945), The Use of Knowledge in Society, American Economic Re-view, No: 35, p. 519-30.
  • İzmen, Ümit ( 2009), "Türkiye İçin Sanayi Politikası Arayışları", İktisat İşletme ve Finans, Cilt 24, Sayı 279, s. 9-35.
  • Justman, M. - Teubal, M. (1991), 'A Structuralist Perspective on the Role of Technology in Economic Growth and Development', World Development, Vol. 19, No: 9, p. 1167-1983.
  • Ketels, C. (2007), Industrial Policy in the United States, Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Vol. 7, No: 3-4, p. 147-167.
  • Konukman, Aziz - Sönmez, Mustafa - Daldal, Ş. Necef (2009), Alternatif Sanayileşme Önerileri, Kalkadon Yayınları, İstanbul.
  • Lall, Sanjaya (1996), Learning from the Asian Tigers, London: Macmillan.
  • Lall, Sanjaya - Teubal, Morris (1998), " 'Market-Stimulating' Technology Policies in Developing Countries: A Framework with Examples from East Asia", World Development, Vol. 26, No: 8, p. 1369-1385.
  • Lall, Sanjaya (2000), Selective Industrial and Trade Policies in Developing Countries: Theoretical and Empirical issues, QEH Working Paper Series, QEHWPS48.
  • Lall, Sanjaya (2003), Reinventing Industrial Strategy: The Role of Government Policy in Building Industrial Competitiveness, QEH Working Paper Series, QEHWPS111.
  • Lauridsen, Laurids S. (2008), State, Institutions and Industrial Development: Industrial Deepening and Upgrading Policies in Taiwan and Thailand Compared, Vols. 1-2, Aachen: Shaker Verlag.
  • Lauridsen, Laurids S. (2010), "Strategic Industrial Policy and Latecomer Development: The What, the Why and the How", Forum for Development Studies, Vol. 37, No: 1, p. 7- 32.
  • Lin, Justin - Chang, Ha - Joon (2009), "DPR Debate: Should Industrial Policy in Developing Countries Conform to Comparative Advantage of Defy it? A Debate Between
  • Justin Lin and Ha Joon Chang", Development Policy Review, Vol. 27, No: 5, p. 483-502.
  • Lipsey, Richard - Carlaw, Kenneth (1996), Assessing Innovation Policies; Taking Schumpeter Seriously on Technoloy Policy, Industry Canada Working Paper, No: 25, Ottawa: Industry Canada.
  • Lipsey, Richard - Carlaw, Kenneth (1998), "Technology Policies in Neo-Classical and Structuralist-Evolutionary Models", STI Review, No: 22 (Paris: OECD).
  • Lundvall, Bengt - Ake (1992), National Systemes of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning, Pinter, London.
  • Malerba, Franco (2002), "Sectoral Systems of Innovation and Production, Research Policy, No: 31, p. 247-264.
  • Metcalfe, J.Stanley (1994), "Evolutionary Economics and Technology Policy", Economic Journal, No: 194, p. 931-944.
  • Nelson, Richard R. (1993), National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis, Oxford University Press, New York.
  • Nelson, Richard R. (1994), The Coevolution of Technology, industry Structure, and Supporting Institutions", Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 3, No: 1, p. 47-63.
  • Noland, Marcus - Pack, Howard (2003), Industrial Policy in an Era of Globalization: Lessons from Asia, Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.
  • Ocampo, J. A - Jomo, K. S. - Vos, R. (2007), 'Explaining Growth Divergences', Ocam-po, J. A. - Jomo, K. S. - Vos, R. (Ed.), Growth Divergences: Explaining Differences inEconomic Performance, London: Zed Books (with United Nations, New York), p. 3-43.
  • Öniş, Ziya - Şenses, Fikret (2009), "Küresel Dinamikler, Ülke îçi Koalisyonlar ve Re-aktif Devlet, Türkiye'nin Savaş Sonrası Kalkınmasında Önemli Politika Dönüşümleri", Şenses, Fikret (Ed.), Neoliberal Küreselleşme ve Kalkınma, İletişim Yayınları, İstanbul, s. 705-743.
  • Peres, Wilson - Primi, Annalisa (2009), "Theory and Practice of industrial Policy. Evidence from the Latin American Experience", Birleşmiş Milletler, CEP AL, Series Desarallo Productivo No: 187, Santiago de Chile.
  • Perez, Carlotta (2001), "Technological Change and Opportunities for Development as a Moving Target", CEPAL Review, No: 75, December, p. 109-130.
  • Resmi Gazete (2008), Araştırma ve Geliştirme Faaliyetlerinin Desteklenmesi Hakkında Kanun, Resmi Gazete, No: 26814, Tarih: 12 /03 /2008.
  • Rodrik, Dani (1999), 'The New Global Economy and Developing Countries: Making Openness Work', Overseas Development Council, Policy Essay,No. 24, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press and ODC.
  • Rodrik, Dani (2007), One Economics Many Recipes: Globalization, Institutions and Economic Growth, Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
  • Rodrik, Dani (2008), Normalizing Industrial Policy," World Bank, Commission on Growth and Development Working Paper No: 3, Washington IBRD/World Bank.
  • Sanayi ve Ticaret Bakanlığı (2010), Türkiye Sanayi Stratejisi Belgesi, 2011-2014 (AB Üyeliğine Doğru), Ankara.
  • Shapiro, H. (2007), 'Industrial Policy and Growth', J. A. Ocampo, K. S. Jomo and R. Vos, (Ed.), Growth Divergences: Explaining Differences in Economic Performance, London and New York: Zed Books (With United Nations: New York), p. 148-171.
  • Smith, Keith (2000), "Innovation as a Systemic Phenomenon: Rethinking the Role of Policy", Entreprise and Innovation Management Studies, Vol. 1, No: 1, p. 73-102.
  • Şenses, Fikret (1996), The Pattern of Industrial Growth in Turkey Under Alternative Industrial Trade Strategies, The Study on Japanese Cooperation in Industrial Policy for Developing Countries, Institute of Developing Economies, Tokyo, S. 229.
  • TEPAV (2007), Türkiye'nin Rekabet Gücü için Sanayi Politikası, Ankara.
  • Türel, Oktar (2008), "Türkiye'de Sanayi Politikalarının Dünü ve Bugünü". Erişim: http: //www.bagimsizsosyalbilimciler.org/Yazilar_Uye/TurelJan08.pdf
  • TÜSİAD (2003), Ulusal İnovasyon Sistemi. Kavramsal Çerçeve, Türkiye İncelemesi ve Ülke Örnekleri, Yayın No: TÜSİAD-T/2003 /10 /362.
  • TÜSİAD (2008), Bölgesel İnovasyon Merkezleri: Türkiye İçin Bir Model Önerisi, Yayın No. TÜSİAD-T/2008-12/477.
  • TÜSİAD (2009), Mevcut Ar-Ge Düzenlemelerinde Karşılaşılan Sorunlar, Çözüm Önerileri ve Başarılı Ülke Uygulamalarına İlişkin Görüş Belgesi, İstanbul.
  • U1 - Haque, I. (2007), 'Rethinking Industrial Policy', UNCTAD Discussion Papers, No: 183, April, Geneva: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
  • Wade, Robert (1990), Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of Government in East Asian industrialization, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press.
  • Weiss, John (2005), "Export Growth and Industrial Policy: Lessons from the East Asian Miracle Experience", LAEBA (Latin America/Caribean and Asia/Pasific Economics and Business Association) Toplantısında Sunulan Bildiri, 28-29 Kasım, Buenos Aires.
  • Westphal, Larry E. (2002), Technology Strategies for Economic Development in a Fast Changing Global Economy", Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Vol. 11, No: 4, p. 275-320.
  • Woolthuis, Rosalinde Klein - Lankhuizen, Maureen - Gilsing, Victor (2005), "A System Failure Framework for innovation Policy Design", Technovation, No: 25, p. 609-619.