Modern Politika Felsefesinde Yönetimin Etkili Hale Getirilmesi Meselesi: Devlet, Güç ve Özgürlük

Bu makale, modern politika felsefesinde yönetimin nasıl daha etkili hale getirilebileceği meselesinin kökenlerini inceler. Modern politika, modernleşme süreçleriyle başlayan toplumsal değişim süreçlerinin yol açtığı problemlere çözümler üretme çabalarının bir sonucu olarak biçimlenir. Sürekli değişimin kaçınılmaz olduğunun kabulü yönetimin nasıl etkili kılınabileceğine dair problemlerin ortaya çıkmasına neden olur. Locke, tüm insanlar arasında doğal bir eşitliğin varlığını savunarak mülkiyet hakkını ve özgürlüğü güvence altına alan koşulları egemen kılmayı amaçlar. Bu da yönetimin, özgür bireyler arasındaki etkileşimler vasıtasıyla daha etkili hale gelen bir olgu olarak kavranmasına yol açar. Bu çerçevede, bu makale modern politikanın başlıca üç filozofunun (Machiavelli, Hobbes ve Locke) kavrayışlarından hareketle ‘yönetimin etkili hale getirilmesi meselesi’ni analiz eder.

The Issue of Making Administration Effective in Modern Political Philosophy: State, Power, and Freedom

This paper examines the origins of the issue of how the administration can be made more effective, which is dealt with in modern political philosophy. Modern politics is shaped as a result of efforts to produce solutions to the problems caused by the processes of social change that begin with the modernization. The recognition of the fact that continuous change is inevitable leads to the emergence of problems about how administration can be made effective. Locke aims to establish the conditions guaranteeing the right to property and freedom by advocating the existence of a natural equality among all human beings. This leads to the understanding of administration as a phenomenon that becomes more effective through interactions between free individuals. In this context, this paper analyzes the issue of making the administration effective by taking into account the perspectives of the three leading philosophers of modern politics (Machiavelli, Hobbes and Locke).

___

  • Acemoglu, D. ve J. A. Robinson. (2006). Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Acemoglu, D. ve J. A. Robinson. (2012). Why Nations Fail : The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty. New York: Crown Publishing.
  • Albritton, R. R. (1976). Hobbes on Political Science and Political Order. Canadian Journal of Political Science / Revue Canadienne de Science Politique, 9(3), 464-472.
  • Anderson, S. L. (2006). Mill’s Life. The Blackwell guide to Mill’s Utilitarianism. (Ed. H. R. West). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
  • Aquinas, T. ([1271-72] 2007). Commentary on Aristotle’s Politics. (Çev. R. J. Regan). Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.
  • Aristoteles. ([M.Ö. 335–323] 2009). Politics. (Çev. E. Barker). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Arneil, B. (1996). John Locke and America: The Defence of English Colonialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Berlin, I. (1958). Two Concepts of Liberty. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Bobbio, N. (1993). Thomas Hobbes and the Natural Law Tradition. (Çev. Daniela Gobetti). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Case, W. (2011). Electoral Authoritarianism and Backlash: Hardening Malaysia, oscillating Thailand. International Political Science Review/Revue Internationale de Science Politique, 32 (4), 438-457.
  • Congleton, R. D. (2011). Perfecting Parliament: Constitutional Reform, Liberalism, and the Rise of Western Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Donaldson, P. S. (1942). Machiavelli and Mystery Of State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Donno, D. (2013). “Elections and Democratization in Authoritarian Regimes”. American Journal of Political Science, 57 (3), 703-716.
  • Edwards, A. (2002). Hobbes. Interpreting Modern Political Philosophy: From Machiavelli to Marx. (Ed. A. Edwards ve J. Townshend). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Eray, Ş. (2009). Küreselleşme ve Bölgeselleşme İlişkisi: Merkeziyetçilikten Adem-i Merkeziyetçiliğe, Ulus Devletten Ulusüstü Birliklere ve Bölgeselleşmeye. Toplum ve Hekim, 24 (4-5), 264-274.
  • Finn, S. J. (2006). Thomas Hobbes and The Politics Of Natural Philosophy. London: Continuum.
  • Fontana, B. (1993). Hegemony and Power: On the Relation between Gramsci and Machiavelli. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Fukuyama, F. (1989). The End of History? The National Interest, 16, 3-18.
  • Fukuyama, F. (2001). Natural Rights and Human History. The National Interest, 64, 19- 30.
  • Fukuyama, F. (2001). Social Capital, Civil Society and Development. Third World Quarterly, 22 (1), 7-20.
  • Fukuyama, F. (2004). State-Building: Governance and World Order in The 21st Century. New York: Cornell University Press.
  • Fukuyama, F. (2012). The Future of History: Can Liberal Democracy Survive the Decline of the Middle Class? Foreign Affairs, 91(1), 53-61.
  • Giddens, A. (1991). The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Golosov, G. V. (2011). The Regional Roots of Electoral Authoritarianism in Russia. Europe-Asia Studies, 63(4), 623-639.
  • Harrison, R. (2003). Hobbes, Locke, and Confusion’s Masterpiece: An Examination of Seventeenth-Century Political Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Herbert, G. B. (1989). Thomas Hobbes: The Unity of Scientific and Moral Wisdom. Vancouver: The University of British Columbia Press.
  • Hobbes, T. ([1642; 47; 51] 1998). De Cive/On the Citizen. (Ed. M. Silverthorne). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hobbes, T. ([1651] 1998). Leviathan. (Ed. J. C. A. Gaskin). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Huntington, S. P. (1996). The Clash of Civilizations and The Remaking of World Order. New York: Simon & Schuster.
  • Kahn, V. (1990). Habermas, Machiavelli, and the Humanist Critique of Ideology. PMLA, 105(3), 464-476.
  • Kenyon, T. (2002). Locke. Interpreting Modern Political Philosophy: From Machiavelli to Marx. (Ed. A. Edwards ve J. Townshend). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Locke, J. ([1689] 2003). Two Treatises of Government and A Letter Concerning Toleration. (Ed. I. Shapiro). New Haven ve London: Yale University Press.
  • Machiavelli, N. ([1532] 2008). The Prince. (Ed. Q. Skinner& R. Price). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Marini, F. (1969). John Locke and the Revision of Classical Democratic Theory. The Western Political Quarterly, 22(1), 5-18.
  • Mearsheimer, J. J. (1994). The False Promise of International Institutions. International Security, 19(3), 5-49.
  • Montesquieu, B. ([1748] 2017). Kanunların Ruhu Üzerine. (Çev. B. Günen). İstanbul: Türkiye İş Bankası Yayınları.
  • Morgenbesser, L. (2015). In Search of Stability: Electoral Legitimation under Authoritarianism in Myanmar. European Journal of East Asian Studies, 14(2), 163-188.
  • Nietzsche, F. ([1901] 1967). The Will to Power. (Çev. W. Kaufmann). Vintage Books: New York.
  • Ramsay, M. (2002). Machiavelli. Interpreting Modern Political Philosophy: From Machiavelli to Marx. (Ed. A. Edwards ve J. Townshend). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Rasmussen, P. J. (2009). Excellence Unleashed Machiavelli’s Critique of Xenophon and the Moral Foundation of Politics. Lanham: Lexington Books.
  • Rawls, J. ([1971] 1999). A Theory of Justice: Revised Edition. Cambridge & Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. Rousseau, J. ([1762] 2015). Toplum Sözleşmesi. (Çev. V. Günyol). İstanbul: İş Bankası Yayınları.
  • Sarıtaş, İ. (2018). Nazi Döneminde Sinemanın Propaganda Aracı Olarak İşlevi. İletişim Kuram ve Araştırma Dergisi, (47), 329-350.
  • Schedler, A. (2013). The Politics of Uncertainty: Sustaining and Subverting Authoritarianism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Scheppele, K. L. (2018). Autocratic Legalism. The University of Chicago Law Review, 85(2), 545-584.
  • Schmitt, C. ([1938] 1996). The Leviathan in the State Theory of Thomas Hobbes: Meaning and Failure of a Political Symbol. (Çev. G. Schwab ve E. Hilfstein). Westport: Greenwood Press.
  • Seglow, J. (2002). Mill. Interpreting Modern Political Philosophy: From Machiavelli to Marx. (Ed. A. Edwards ve J. Townshend). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Skinner, Q. (1978). The Foundations of Modern Political Thought, Vol. 1: The Renaissance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Skinner, Q. (1998). Liberty before Liberalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Smith, A. ([1776] 2009). An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Tully, J. (1980). A Discourse On Property: John Locke And His Adversaries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Viroli, M. (1998). Machiavelli. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Waldron, J. (1989). John Locke: Social Contract versus Political Anthropology. The Review of Politics, 51(1), 3-28.
  • Ward, L. (2010). John Locke and Modern Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Weber, M. ([1917-19] 2004). The Vocation Lectures. (Çev. R. Livingstone). Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.