Paradoksal Liderlik Modeli

Bu çalışmanın amacı liderliğin aydınlık ve karanlık yüzlerini bütünsel bir anlayışla açıklayan yeni bir kuramsal model geliştirmek ve böylece liderlik kuramlarının ışığında liderlik fenomenine yeni bir bakış açısı kazandırarak bir tartışma alanı oluşturmaktır. Bu bağlamda mevcut liderlik kuramlarının varsayımları incelenmiş ve lider üye etkileşim kuramından istifade edilerek yeni bir kuramsal liderlik modeli geliştirilmiştir. Geliştirilen yeni model bir liderin karanlık ve aydınlık davranışlarını bütünsel bir yaklaşımla açıkladığı için paradoksal liderlik modeli olarak tanımlanmıştır. Paradoksal liderlik modeli ile sağlanan kuramsal ve uygulamaya dönük katkılar ile birlikte gelecekte yapılacak çalışmalara nasıl bir yön verilebileceği ve yeni pencereler açılabileceği değerlendirilmiştir.

Paradoxical Leadership Model

The aim of this research is to develop a new theoretical leadership model, which explains the dark and bright sides of leadership with a holistic view, and thereby, to trigger a new debate through bringing in a new perspective to leadership phenomenon in the light of extant theories. In this respect, following a review of historical development process of leadership theories, drawing on LMX theory a new theoretical leadership model was developed. Because it explains dark and bright behaviors of a leader with a holistic view, this new model was defined as paradoxical leadership model. Theoretical and practical implications of paradoxical leadership model, as well as how new avenues will be opened for researchers in the future were discussed.

Kaynakça

Ashforth, B. E. (1994), “Petty Tyranny In Organizations”, Human Relations, Vol. 47, No: 7, s. 755-778.

Aycan, Z., Kanungo, R. N., Mendonca, M., Yu, K., Deller, J., Stahl, G. ve Kurshid, A. (2000), “Impact of Culture on Human Resource Management Practices: A 10-Country Comparison”, Applied Psychology: An International Review, Vol. 49, No: 1, s. 192-221.

Bass, B. M. (1985), Leadership and Performance Beyond Expectations, Free Press, New York.

Başar, U., Sığrı, Ü. ve Basım, N. (2016), “İş yerinde Karanlık Liderlik”, İş ve İnsan Dergisi, Vol. 3, No: 2, 65-76.

Beam, H. H. (1975), Leadership Theory: Past, Present and Future Directions (Working Paper No. 103), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.

Bennis, W. G. (1959), “Leadership Theory and Administrative Behavior: The problems of Authority. Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 4, s. 259-301.

Blake, R. R. ve Mouton, J. S. (1982), “A Comparative Analysis of Situationalism and 9, 9 Management by Principle, Organizational Dynamics, Vol. 10, No: 4, s. 20-43.

Bowers, D. G. ve Seashore, S. E. (1966), “Predicting Organizational Effectiveness with A Four-Factor Theory of Leadership”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 11, No: 2, s. 238-263.

Carson, C. M. (2005), “A Historical View of Douglas McGregor’s Theory Y”, Manage-ment Decision, Vol. 43, No: 3, s. 450-460.

Channon, D. (1979), “Leadership and Corporate Performance in The Service Industries”, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 16, No: 2, s. 185-201.

Cook-Sather, A. (2006), “Change Based on What Students Say”: Preparing Teachers for a Paradoxical Model of Leadership”, International Journal of Leadership in Education, Vol. 9, No: 4, s. 345-358.

Dansereau, F., Graen, G. ve Haga, W. J. (1975), “A Vertical Dyad Linkage Approach to Leadership within Formal Organizations a Longitudinal Investigation of The Role Ma-king Process”, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, Vol. 13, No: 1, s. 46-78.

Dienesch, R. M. ve Liden, R. C. (1986), “Leader-Member Exchange Model of Leader-ship: A Critique and Further Development”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 11, No: 3, s. 618-634.

Epitropaki, O. ve Martin, R. (2004), “Implicit Leadership Theories in Applied Settings: Factor Structure, Generalizability, and Stability Over Time”, Journal of Applied Psycho-logy, Vol. 89, No: 2, s. 293-310.

Evans M. G. (1970), “The Effects of Supervisory Behavior on The Path-Goal Relations-hip”, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, Vol. 5, No: 3, s. 277-298.

Fisher, E. A. (2009), “Motivation and Leadership in Social Work Management: A Review of Theories and Related Studies”, Administration in Social Work, Vol. 33, No: 4, s. 347-367.

French, J. R. P. ve Rawen, B. (1959), “The Bases of Social Power”, Cartwright, D. (Ed.), Studies in Social Power, Institute for Social Research, Ann Arbor, MI, s. 150-157.

Gardner, W. L., Cogliser, C. C., Davis, K. M. ve Dickens, M. P. (2011), “Authentic Lea-dership: A Review of The Literature and Research Agenda”, The Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 22, No: 6, s. 1120-1145.

Gibb C. A. (1947), “The Principles and Traits of Leadership”, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, Vol. 42, No: 3, s. 267-284.

Glad, B. (2002), “Why Tyrants Go Too Far: Malignant Narcissism and Absolute Power”, Political Psychology, Vol. 23, No: 1, s. 1-37.

Graef, C. L. (1983), “The Situational Leadership Theory: A Critical View”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 8, No: 2, s. 285-291.

Graen, G., Alvares, K. ve Orris, J. B. (1970), “Contingency Model of Leadership Effec-tiveness: Antecedent and Evidential Results”, Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 74, No: 4, s. 285-296.

Graen G. B. ve Uhl-Bien, M. (1995), “Relationship-Based Approach to Leadership: De-velopment of Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) Theory of Leadership Over 25 years: Applying A Multi-Level Multi-Domain Perspective”, The Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 6, No: 2, s. 219-247.

Halpin, A. W. (1956), “The Behavior of Leaders”, Educational Leadership, Vol. 14, No: 3, s. 172-186.

Handerson, J. E. ve Hoy, W. K. (1982, Mart), Leader Authenticity: The Development and Test of An Operational Measure, 66. American Educational Research Association Kong-resi’nde sunulan bildiri, New York, NY.

Hater, J. J. ve Bass, B. M. (1988), “Superiors’ Evaluations and Subordinates’ Perceptions of Transformational and Transactional Leadership”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 73, No: 4, s. 695-702.

Hersey, P. ve Blanchard, K. H. (1969), Management of Organization Behavior: Utilizing Human Resources (4. Baskı). Prentice Hall Inc, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

Hill, W. (1969), “Validation and Extension of Fiedler’s Theory of Leadership Effective-ness”, The Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 12, No: 1, s. 33-47.

Hofstede, G. (1980), Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.

Hofstede, G. (1991), Culture and Organizations: Software of the Mind. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.

Horner, M. (1997), “Leadership Theory: Past, Present and Future”, Team Performance Management, Vol. 3, No: 4, s. 270-287.

House, R. J. (1971), “A Path Goal Theory of Leader Effectiveness”, Administrative Scien-ce Quarterly, Vol. 16, No: 3, s. 321-339.

House R. J. ve Mitchell, T. R. (1975), Path-goal theory of leadership (Technical Report No. 75-67), Office of Naval Research, Arlington, VA.

House, R. J. (1996), “Path-Goal Theory of Leadership: Lessons, Legacy, and A Reformu- lated Theory”, The Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 7, No: 3, s. 323-352.

House, R., Hanges, P., Ruiz-Quintanilla, A., Dorfman, P., Javidan, M., Dickson, M. ve Gupta, V. (1999), “Cultural Influences on Leadership and Organizations: Project GLO-BE”, W. Mobley (Ed.), Advances in Global Leadership, JAI Press, Stamford, CN, s. 171-233.

Jacobs, T. O. (1970), Leadership and exchange in formal organizations, Human Resour-ces Research Organization, Alexandria, VA.

Jago A. G. ve Vroom, V. H. (1980), “An Evaluation of Two Alternatives to The Vroom/ Yetton Normative Model”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 23, No: 2, s. 347-355.

Jago, A. G. (1982), “Leadership: Perspectives in Theory and Research”, Management Science, Vol. 28, No: 3, s. 315-336.

Jenkins W. O. (1947), “A Review of Leadership Studies with Particular Reference to Military Problems”, Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 44, No: 1, s. 54-79.

Keller, T. (1999), “Images of The Familiar: Individual Differences and Implicit Leaders- hip Theories”, The Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 10, No: 4, s. 589–607.

Kellerman, B. (2004), Bad Leadership: What It is, How It Happens, Why It Matters, Har-vard Business School Press, Boston, MA.

King, A. S. (1990), “Evolution of Leadership Theory”, Vikalpa, Vol. 15, No: 2, s. 43-54. Kopelman, R. E., Prottas, D. J. ve Davis, A. L. (2008), “Douglas McGregor’s Theory X and Y: Toward A Construct-Valid Measure”, Journal of Managerial Issues, Vol. 20, No: 2, s. 255-271.

Kuhnert, K. W. ve Lewis, P. (1987), “Transactional and Transformational Leadership: A Constructive/Developmental Analysis”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 12, No: 4, s. 648-657.

Lavine, M. (2014), “Paradoxical Leadership and the Competing Values Framework”, The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, Vol. 50, No: 2, s. 189-205.

Lewis, M. W., Andriopoulos, C. ve Smith, W. K. (2014), “Paradoxical Leadership to Enable Strategic Agility”, California Management Review, Vol. 56, No: 3, s. 58-77.

Lieberson, S. ve O’Connor, J. F. (1972), “Leadership and Organizational Performance: A study of Large Corporations”, American Sociological Review, Vol. 37, No: 2, s. 117-130.

Lipman-Blumen, J. (2005), “Toxic Leadership: When Grand Illusions Masquerade as Noble Visions”, Leader to Leader, Vol. 36, s. 29-36.

Lord. R. G., Foti. R. J. ve De Vader, C. L. (1984), “A Test of Leadership Categorization Theory: Internal Structure, Information Processing, and Leadership Perceptions”, Orga-nizational Behavior and Human Performance, Vol. 34, No: 3, s. 343-378.

McShane, S. L. ve Von Glinow, M. A. (2009), Organizational Behavior (2. Baskı), McG-raw-Hill, Boston, MA.

Mitchell, T. R., Biglan, A., Oncken, G. R. ve Fiedler, F. E. (1970), “The Contingency Model: Criticism and Suggestions”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 13, No: 3, s. 253-267.

Newman, K.L. ve Nollen, S.D. (1996), “Culture and Congruence: The Fit between Ma-nagement Practices and National Culture”, Journal of International Business, Vol. 27, s. 753-779.

Padilla, A., Hogan, R. ve Kaiser, R. B. (2007), “The Toxic Triangle: Destructive Leaders, Susceptible Followers, and Conducive Environments”, The Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 18, No: 3, s. 176-194.

Paşa, S. F., Kabasakal, H. ve Bodur, M. (2001), “Society, Organizations and Leadership in Turkey”, Applied Psychology, Vol. 50, No: 4, s. 559–589.

Pellegrini, E. K. ve Scandura, T. A. (2008), “Paternalistic Leadership: A Review and Agenda for Future Research”, Journal of Management, Vol. 34, No: 3, s. 566-593.

Rahim, M. A., Kim, N. H. ve Kim, J. S. (1994), “Bases of Leader Power, Subordinate Compliance and Satisfaction with Supervision: A Cross-Cultural Study of Managers in the U.S. and Korea”, The International Journal of Organizational Analysis, Vol. 2, No: 2, s. 136-154.

Reddin, W. J. (1967), “The 3-D Management Style Theory A Typology Based on Task and Relationships Orientation”, Training and Development Journal, Vol. 21, No: 4, s. 8-17.

Rosch, E. (1978), “Principles of Categorization”, Rosch, E. ve Lloyd, B. B. (Ed.), Cogni-tion and Categorization, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, s. 28-48.

Sanford, F. (1952), “Research in Military Leadership”, Sanford, F. (Ed.), Current Trends: Psychology in The World Emerging, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, PA, s. 45-59.

Schoenfeld B. N. (1948), “The Psychological Characteristics of Leadership”, Social For-ces, Vol. 26, No: 4, s. 391-396.

Seeman, M. (1966), “Status and Identity: The Problem of Inauthenticity”, The Pacific Sociological Review, Vol. 9, No: 2, s. 67–73.

Smith, W. K., Besharov, M. L., Wessels, A. K. ve Chertok, M. (2012), “A Paradoxical Leadership Model for Social Entrepreneurs: Challenges, Leadership Skills, and Peda-gogical Tools for Managing Social and Commercial Demands”, Academy of Management Learning & Education, Vol. 2, No: 3, s. 463-478.

Spector, B. A. (2016), “Carlyle, Freud, and The Great Man Theory More Fully Conside-red”, Leadership, Vol. 12, No: 2, s. 250-260.

Stogdill R. M. (1948), “Personal Factors Associated with Leadership: A Survey of The Literature”, Journal of Psychology, Vol. 25, No: 1, s. 35–71.

Stogdill, R. M. (1975, Ağustos). The evolution of leadership theory. Academy of Mana-gement Kongresi’nde sunulan bildiri, New Orleans, LA.

Sullivan, D., Mitchell, M. ve Uhl-Bien, M. (2003), “The New Conduct of Business: How LMX can Help Capitalize on Cultural Diversity”, G. Graen (Ed.), Dealing with Diversity, Information Age Publishing, Greenwich, CT, s. 183-218.

Şahin, F. (2012), “Büyük Adam Düşüncesinden Liderlikte Özellikler Kuramına Kavramsal Bir Bakış”, C.Ü. İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, Vol. 13, No: 1, s. 141-163.

Tabak, A., Polat, M., Coşar, S. ve Türköz, T. (2012), “Otantik Liderlik Ölçeği: Guvenirlik ve Geçerlik Çalışması”, İş Güç Endüstri İlişkileri ve İnsan Kaynakları Dergisi, Vol. 14, No: 4, s. 89-106.

Tabak, A. ve Sığrı, Ü. (2013), “Liderlik”, Sığrı, Ü. ve Gürbüz, S. (Ed.), Örgütsel Davranış, Beta, İstanbul, s. 374-429.

Tabak, A., Kızıloğlu, A. ve Türköz, T. (2013), “Örtulu Liderlik Ölçeği Geliştirme Çalış-ması”, ODTÜ Gelişme Dergisi, Vol. 40, No: 1, s. 97-138

Tannenbaum, R. ve Schmidt, W. (1973), “How to Choose A Leadership Pattern”, Harvard Business Review, May-June, s. 3-12.

Tead O. (1935), The Art of Leadership, McGraw-Hill, New York.

Tepper, B. J. (2000), “Consequences of Abusive Supervision”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 43, No: 2, s. 178-190.

Thomas, A. B. (1988), “Does Leadership Make A Difference to Organizational Perfor-mance?”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 33, No: 3, s. 388-400.

Tjosvold, D., Wedley, W. C. ve Field, R. H. G. (1986), “Constructive Controversy, The Vroom-Yetton Model, and Managerial Decision-Making”, Journal of Occupational Be-havior, Vol. 7, No: 2, s. 125–138.

Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu, (b.t.), 6 Aralık 2016, http://www.tuik.gov.tr/PreHaberBulten-leri.do?id=21570

Van Steers, D. A. ve Field, R. H. G. (1990), “The Evolution of Leadership Theory”, Jour-nal of Organizational Change Management, Vol. 3, No: 3, s. 29-45.

Vecciho, R. P. (1987), “Situational Leadership Theory: An Examination of A Prescriptive Theory”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 72, No: 3, s. 444-451.

Vroom, V. H. ve Yetton, P. W. (1973), Leadership and Decision-Making, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, PA.

Vroom, V. H. ve Jago, A. G. (1988), The New Leadership: Managing Participation in Organizations, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

Vroom, V. H. ve Jago, A. G. (1995), “Situation Effects and Levels of Analysis in The Study of Leader Participation”, The Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 6, No: 2, s. 169-181.

Walter, J. E., Caldwell, S. D. ve Marshall, J. M. (1980), “Evidence for The Validity of Situational Leadership Theory”, Educational Leadership, Vol. 37, No: 8, s. 618-621.

Walumbwa, F. O., Avolio, B. J., Gardner, W. L., Wernsing, T. S. ve Peterson, S. J. (2008), “Authentic Leadership: Development and Validation of A Theory-Based Measure”, Jour-nal of Management, Vol. 34, No: 1, s. 89-126.

Wasti, S. A. (2003), “The Influence of Cultural Values on Antacedents of Organizational Commitment: An Individual Level Analysis”, Applied Psychology: An International Re-view, Vol. 52, No: 4, s. 533-554.

Whicker, M. L. (1996), Toxic Leaders: When Organizations Go Bad, Quorum Books, Westport, VA.

Yammamarino, F. (2013), “Leadership: Past, Present, and Future”, Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, Vol. 20, No: 2, s. 149–155.

Yukl, G. (1989), “Managerial Leadership: A Review of Theory and Research”, Journal of Management, Vol. 15, No: 2, s. 251-289.

Kaynak Göster