İNGİLİZ OKULU KURAMI PERSPEKTİFİNDEN ULUSLARARASI ÇEVRE SORUNLARI

Bu çalışma ana akım Uluslararası İlişkiler teorilerinden İngiliz Okulu kuramının uluslararası ilişkilerde yeni sorunlar olarak adlandırılan meseleler arasında yer alan uluslararası çevre sorunlarının yönetimi ve çözümüne dair ne gibi yeni perspektif ve çıkarımlar getirebileceğini tartışmaktadır. Çalışma İngiliz Okulu kuramının devlet merkezli uluslararası ilişkiler anlayışı ile uluslararası çevre sorunları gibi doğası gereği ulusüstü/sınır aşan özellikteki sorunların arasındaki gerilimin doğruluğunu kabul etmekle birlikte, İngiliz Okulu ve benzeri devlet merkezli kuramların da bu gibi sorunların anlaşılmasına ve açıklanmasında faydalı birer araç olarak kullanılabileceklerini iddia etmektedir. Çalışma, özellikle uluslararası çevre sorunlarının uluslararası toplumun bir parçası olarak kabul edildiğini vurgulamaktadır. Dolayısıyla bu sorunların ele alınış biçimi İngiliz Okulu’nun kavramsallaştırdığı kurumların işleyişi vasıtasıyla açıklanabilir. Çalışmanın öne sürdüğü bir diğer iddia ise İngiliz Okulu’nda devam eden güncel tartışmaların uluslararası çevre sorunlarının incelenmesinde sıklıkla kullanılan sürdürülebilir kalkınma, insani güvenlik ve işbirliği gibi kavramlarla yakından ilişkili olduğudur.

INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES FROM THE ENGLISH SCHOOL PERSPECTIVE

This study discusses possible new perspectives and conclusions that can be drawn from the English School theory, which is among the mainstream International Relations theories, about the management and resolution of international environmental problems, which are often regarded as emerging problems in contemporary international relations. While the study acknowledges the tension between the state-centric approach of the English School theory, and the inherently supranational character of international environmental issues; it also argues that the English School and other state-centric theories can be useful analytical tools in understanding and explaining such problems, as well. The study, specifically, underlines the fact that environmental issues are significant parts of the international society. Particularly for this reason, the management of environmental issues could be explained through the work of international institutions that the English School conceptualizes. Another argument suggested by the study is that current debates within the English School are closely related to the frequently used concepts in relation to international environmental issues - such as sustainable development, human security and co-operation.

PDF

___

Acharya, Amitav (2013), “Human Security”, Baylis et. al. (ed.), The Globalization in World (Oxford: Oxford University Press). Barnett, Jon (2003), “Security and climate change”, Global environmental change, 13 (1): 7-17.

Barnett, Jon and W. Neil Adger (2007), “Climate Change, Human Security and Violent Conflict”, Political Geography, 26: 639-655.

Barry Buzan (2014), An Introduction to the English School of International Relations: The Societal Approach (Cambridge, Polity)

Baylis, John, Steve Smith and Patricia Owens (2014), The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations, sixth ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press)

Bendini, Roberto (2016), “In Depth Analysis United States - China relations: a complex balance between cooperation and confrontation”, (European Parliament – Directorate General for External Policies Policy Department), http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/IDAN/2016/570464/EXPO _IDA(2016)570464_EN.pdf (21.11.2016)

Bernstein, Steven (2013), “Global Environmental Norms”, Robert Falkner (ed.), The Handbook of Global Climate and Environmental Policy (UK: WileyBlackwell): 127-145.

Buhaug, Halvard, Nils Petter Gleditsch, and Ole Magnus Theisen (2010) , “Implications of Climate Change for Armed Conflict”, Mearns R, Norton A (Ed.), Social Dimensions of Climate Change: Equity and Vulnerability. New Frontiers of Social Policy (Washington: World Bank): 75-101.

Bull, Hedley (1971), “Order vs. Justice in International Society.” Political Studies, 19 (3): 269-283.

Bull, Hedley (1980), “The Great Irresponsibles? The United States, the Soviet Union, and World OrderAuthor”, International Journal, 35 (3): 437-447.

Bull, Hedley (1985), The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics (Hong Kong: Macmillan).

Bull, Hedley (1995, and 2012 ed.), The Anarchical Society A Study of Order in World Politics (London: Macmillan).

Bull, Hedley ve Adam Watson (1984) “Introduction”, Hedley Bull ve Adam Watson (ed.), The Expansion of International Society (Oxford: Oxford University Press): 1-9.

Buzan, Barry (2001), “The English School: An Underexploited Resource in IR”, Review of International Studies 27(3): 471-488.

Buzan, Barry (2004a), From International to World Society? English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalisation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

Buzan, Barry (2004b) "A reductionist, idealistic notion that adds little analytical value" Security Dialogue, 35 (3): 369-370.

Buzan, Barry (2010), “Culture and International Society”, International Affairs 86 (1): 1-25.

Buzan, Barry (2014), An Introduction to the English School of International Relations: The Societal Approach (Cambridge: Polity).

Demirel, Murat (2017), “Hedley Bull Perspektifinden “Uluslararası Toplum” Kavramsallaştırması ve Kurumları”, Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 3: 46-85.

Ejdus, Filip (2014), “The expansion of international society after 30 years: Views from the European periphery”, International Relations, 28 (4): 445-445.

Gledtisch, Nil Petter (2012), “Whither the weather? Climate Change and Conflict”, Journal of Peace Research, 49 (1): 3–9.

Gong, Gerrit (1984), The Standard of Civilization in International Society (Oxford: Clarendon Press).

Griffiths, Martin ve Terry O'Callaghan (2002), International Relations: The Key Concepts (London: Routledge).

Halliday, Fred (2009), “The Middle East and Conceptions of ‘International Society”, Barry Buzan ve Ana Gonzalez Palaez (ed.), International Society and the Middle East (UK: Palgrave Macmillan): 1-23.

Harrison, Kathryn and Lisa McIntosh Sundstrom (Ed.) (2010), Global Commons, Domestic Decisions: The Comparative Politics of Climate Change, American and Comparative Environmental Policy (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press)

Hoffman, Stanley (1986), “Hedley Bull and His Contribution to International Relations”, International Affairs, 62 (2): 179-195.

Hubert, Don (2004), “An Idea that Works in Practice”, Security Dialogue, 35 (3): 351-352.

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change – IPCC, “IPCC Fourth Assessment Report: Climate Change 2007”, https://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/wg1/en/spmsspmprojections-of.html (21.11.2016)

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change - IPCC, “Reports-Assesment Reports: Working Group Two: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability”, http://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/tar/wg2/index.php?idp=446 (21.11.2016)

İlhan Sağsen (2015), The European Union as a Distinctive Actor in Global Climate Change Policy, (Ankara: Middle East Technical University - Unpublished Ph. D. Thesis)

James, Alan (1993), “System or Society?”, Review of International Studies 19 (3): 269-288.

Jones, Roy E. (1981), “The English School of International Relations: A Case for Closure”, Review of International Studies, 7 (1): 1-13. Keene, Edward (2002), Beyond the Anarchical Society (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

Lewis, Joanna (2010/2011), “The State of U.S.-China Relations on Climate Change: Examining the Bilateral and Multilateral Relationship”, (Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, China Environment Series 2010/2011): 7-39, https://www.wilsoncenter.org/sites/default/files/Feature%20Article%20The% 20State%20of%20U.S.-China%20Relations%20on%20Climate%20Change.pdf (21.11.2016)

Lieberthal, Kenneth ve David Sandalow (2009), “Overcoming Obstacles to U.S. – China Cooperation on Climate Change”, (The John L. Thornton China Center at Brookings), https://www.brookings.edu/wpcontent/uploads/2016/06/01_climate_change_lieberthal_sandalow.pdf (21.11.2016)

Little, Richard (2000), “The English School’s Contribution to the Study of International Relations”, European Journal of International Relations, 6 (3): 395-422.

Navari, Cornelia ve Daniel M. Green (Ed.), (2014), Guide to the English School in International Studies (West Sussex: Wiley Blackwell)

Parikh, Jvoti (1994), “North-South Issues for Climate Change”, Economic and Political Weekly, 29 (45/46): 2940-2943.

Paterson, Matthew (1996), “IR Theory”, John Vogler ve Mark Imber (ed.), The environment and international relations, (London: Routledge): 59-76.

Paterson, Matthew (2005), “Global Environmental Governance”, Alex Bellamy (ed.), International Society and its Critics (Oxford: Oxford University Press): 163-177.

Pella, John Anthony Jr. (2015), Africa and the Expansion of International Society Surrendering the Savannah (London: Routledge).

Ralph, Jason (2007), Defending the Society of States Why America Opposes the International Criminal Court and its Vision of World Society (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

Resmi Gazete (17 Mayıs 2014), Yönetmelik - Sayı 29003, www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2014/05/20140517-3.htm (21.11.2016)

Resmi Gazete (22 Temmuz 2014), Sera Gazı Raporlarının İzlenmesi ve Raporlanması Hakkında Tebliğ - Sayı 29068, www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2014/07/20140722-5.htm (21.11.2016)

Reuveny, Rafuel (2007), “Climate Change-induced Migration and Violent Conflict”, Political Geography, 26 (6): 656–673.

Salehyan, Idean (2008), “From Climate Change to Conflict? No Consensus Yet”, Journal of Peace Research, 45: 315-326.

Tepeciklioğlu, Ali Onur (2016), “An Analysis of the World Society Conceptualization in the English School”, Ege Akademik Bakış, 16 (4): 733-743.

Tepeciklioğlu, Ali Onur ve Elem Eyrice Tepeciklioğlu (2015), “Teoriden Pratiğe: Suriye Krizi ve Uluslararası Toplum”, SBF Dergisi, 70 (1): 162-192.

The Guardian (21.12.2012), China and US Hold the Key to a New Global Climate Deal, https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2012/dec/12/china-us-globalclimate-deal (21.11.2016)

The UN Refugee Agency – UNHCR, Syria Regional Refugee Response, http://data.unhcr.org/syrianrefugees/regional.php (21.11.2016)

The Washington Post (Nov.12, 2014), “China, U.S. Agree to Limit Greenhouse Gases”, https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/china-us-agreeto-limit-greenhouse-gases/2014/11/11/9c768504-69e6-11e4-9fb4- a622dae742a2_story.html (21.11.2016)

The White House Office of the Press Secretary (Nov. 11, 2014), “Fact Sheet: U.S.-China Joint Announcement on Climate Change and Clean Energy Cooperation”, https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2014/11/11/factsheet-us-china-joint-announcement-climate-change-and-clean-energy-c (21.11.2016)

The White House Office of the Press Secretary (Sep. 25, 2015) , “U.S.-China Joint Presidential Statement on Climate Change”, https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2015/09/25/us-china-jointpresidential-statement-climate-change (21.11.2016)

U.S. Department of State (June 7, 2016), “Media Note: U.S. China Strategic and Economic Dialogue Outcomes of the Strategic Track”, http://m.state.gov/md258146.htm (21.11.2016)

UNFCCC (2016a), Who’s who: Groupings and actors, http://unfccc.int/essential_background/convention/items/6343.php (21.11.2016)

UNFCCC (2016b), Paris Agreement – Status of Ratification, http://unfccc.int/paris_agreement/items/9444.php (20.11.2016)

UNFCCC (2016c), The Secreteriat, http://unfccc.int/secretariat/items/1629.php (21.11.2016)

United Nations (1998), Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/convkp/kpeng.pdf (21.11.2016)

United Nations Sustainable Development Knowledge Platform, https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/milestones/wced (21.11.2016)

US Environmental Protection Agency (2016), Global Greenhouse Gas Emissions Data, https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/global-greenhouse-gasemissions-data, (20.11.2016)

Victor, David G. (2001), The Collapse of the Kyoto Protocol and the Struggle to Slow Global Warming, A Council On Foreign Relations Book (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press)

Vincent, R. J. (1995), Human Rights and International Relations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

Vogler, John (2014a), “Mainstream Theories: Realism, Rationalism and Revolutionism”, Paul Harris (ed.), Routledge Handbook of Global Environment Politics (New York: Rotuledge): 30-39.

Vogler, John (2014b), “Environmental Issues”, Baylis, John et. al. (ed.), The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations, sixth ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press): 341-355.

Wheeler, Nicholas. J. (1992), “Pluralist or solidarist conceptions of international society: Bull and Vincent on humanitarian intervention”, Millennium-Journal of International Studies, 21 (3): 463-487.

Wight, Martin (1991), International Theory The Three Traditions (Leicester: Leicester University Press).

Wight, Martin ve Herbert Butterfield (1966), “Preface”, Herbert Butterfield ve Martin Wight (ed.), Diplomatic Investigations (London: Allen & Unwin): 2-3.

Williams, John (2005), “Pluralism, Solidarism and the Emergence of World Society in the English School Theory”, International Relations 19 (1): 19-38.

World Resources Institute (2014), 6 Graphs Explain the World’s Top 10 Emitters, http://www.wri.org/blog/2014/11/6-graphs-explainworld%E2%80%99s-top-10-emitters (20.11.2016)

Yurdusev, A. Nuri (1996), “‘Uluslararası İlişkiler’ Öncesi”, Atila Eralp (ed.), Devlet Sistem ve Kimlik: Uluslararası İlişkilerde Temel Yaklaşımlar (İstanbul: İletişim): 47-51.