___

• Acharya, Amitav, and Barry Buzan. “Why is there no non-Western IR theory? An Introduction.” International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 7, no. 3 (2007): 287-312.
• Aron, Raymond. "What Is a Theory of International Relations?" Journal of International Affairs 21, no. 2 (1967): 185-206.
• Aydinli, Ersel, and Julie Matthews. “Are the Core and Periphery Irreconcilable? The Curious World of Publishing in Contemporary International Relations.” International Studies Perspectives 1 (2000): 289-303.
• Ayoob, Mohamed. “Subaltern Realism: International Relations Theory Meets the Third World.” In International Relations Theory and the Third World, edited by Stephanie G. Neuman, 31-54. Houndsmills: Macmillan, 1998.
• Bajpai, Kanti. “Obstacles to Good Work in Indian International Relations.” International Studies 46, no. 1-2 (2009): 109-28.
• Bilgin, Pinar. “Thinking Past ‘Western’ IR?” Third World Quarterly 29, no. 1 (2008): 5-23. doi:10.1080/01436590701726392.
• Bleiker, Roland. “Searching for Difference in a Homogeneous Discipline.” International Studies Review 8 (2006):
• Brown, William. “Africa in International Relations: A Comment on IR Theory, Anarchy and Statehood.” Review of International Studies 32 (2006):
• Clapham, Christopher. Africa and the International System: The Politics of State Survival. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
• Cooper, Andrew, ed. Niche Diplomacy: Middle Powers after the Cold War. Houndsmills: Macmillan, 1997.
• Cunningham-Cross, Linsay. “The Innovation Imperative: Chinese International Relations Research and the Search for a ‘Chinese School’.” Unpublished paper, n.d.
• Dunn, Kevin, C. and Timothy M. Shaw, eds. Africa’s Challenge to International Relations Theory. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2001.
• Gaylard, Rob. “Welcome to the World of Our Humanity”: (African) Humanism, ubuntu and Black South African Writing.” Journal of Literary Studies 20, no. 3-4 (2004): 268-82.
• Geldenhuys, Deon. Deviant Conduct in World Politics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004.
• ——— . The Diplomacy of Isolation: South African Foreign Policy Making. Johannesburg: Macmillan South Africa, 1984.
• ——— . Isolated States: A Comparative Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
• Gill, Stephen. “Transformation and Innovation in the Study of World Order.” In Innovation and Transformation in International Studies, edited by Stephen Gill and James H. Mittelman, 5-24. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
• Jordaan, Eduard. “The Concept of a Middle Power in International Relations: Distinguishing Between Emerging and Traditional Middle Powers.” Politikon 30, no. 1 (2003): 165-81.
• Kimmerle, Heinz. “Ubuntu and Communalism in African Philosophy and Art.” Rozenberg Quarterly, September 2011. Accessed August 10, 2016. http://rozenbergquarterly.com/ubuntu-and-communalism-in-african-philosophy-and-art/ .
• Le Pere, Garth. “South Africa – an ‘Emerging Power’?” Global Dialogue 3, no.1 (1998): 1-2.
• Mazrui, Ali. “On the Concept of “We are all Africans.” American Political Science Review 57, no. 1 (1963): 88-97.
• ———. Towards a Pax Africana: A Study of Ideology and Ambition. London: Wakefield & Nicolson, 1967.
• Mallavarapu, Siddharth. “Theories of International Relations.” In International Relations: Perspectives for the Global South, edited by Bhupinder Chimni and Siddharth Mallavarapu. New Delhi: Dorling Kindersley, 2012.
• Mittelman, James H. “Rethinking Innovation in International Studies: Global Transformation at the Turn of the Millennium.” In Innovation and Transformation in International Studies, edited by S. Gill and J. H. Mittelman, 248-63. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
• Murithi, Tim. “A Local Response to the Global Human Rights Standard: The ‘Ubuntu’ Perspective on Human Dignity.” Globalization, Societies and Education 5, no. 3 (2007): 277-86.
• ——— . “Practical Peacemaking Wisdom from Africa: Reflections on Ubuntu.” The Journal of Pan African Studies 1, no. 4 (2006): 25-34.
• Nel, P., I. Taylor, and J. van der Westhuizen. “Multilateralism in South Africa’s Foreign Policy: The Search for a Critical Rationale.” Global Governance 6, no. 1 (2000): 43-60.
• Neuman, Stephanie, ed. International Relations Theory and the Third World. Houndsmills: Macmillan, 1998.
• Nkiwane, Tandeka. “Africa and International Relations: Regional Lessons for a Global Discourse.” International Political Science Review 22, no. 3 (2001): 279-90.
• Schoeman, Maxi. “South Africa as an Emerging Middle Power.” African Security Review 9, no. 3 (2000): 47-58.
• ——— . “South Africa: Between History and a Hard Place.” In International Relations Scholarship around the World, edited by Arlene Tickner and Ole Waever, London: Routledge, 53-70. 2009.
• Smith, Karen. “Contrived Boundaries, Kinship and Ubuntu: A (South) African View of the ‘International’.” In Thinking International Relations Differently, edited by A. Tickner and D. Blaney, 301-21. London: Routledge, 2012.
• ——— . “Has Africa Got Anything to Say? African Contributions to the Theoretical Development of International Relations.” The Round Table 98, no. 402 (2009): 269-84.
• ———. “Obstacles to the Development of IR Theory in the Developing World: The Case of South Africa.” Africa Review 2, no. 1 (2010): 65-80.
• Solomon, Hussein. “South African Foreign Policy and Middle Power Leadership.” In Fairy Godmother, Hegemon or Partner? In Search of a South African Foreign Policy, edited by Hussein Solomon. Halfway House: Institute for Security Studies Monograph Series, 1997.
• South African Government. “White Paper on South African Foreign Policy- Building a Better World: The Diplomacy of Ubuntu.” Accessed September 1, 2016. http://www.gov.za/documents/white-paper-south-african-foreign-policy-building-better-world-diplomacy-ubuntu.
• Swanson, D.M. “Ubuntu: An African Contribution to (Re)search for/with a ‘Humble Togetherness’.” Journal of Contemporary Issues in Education 2, no. 2 (2007): 53-67.
• Tickner, Arlene, and David Blaney, eds. Thinking International Relations Differently. London: Routledge, 2012.
• Tickner, Arlene, and Ole Wæver, eds. International Relations Scholarship around the World. London and New York: Routledge, 2009.
• Tieku, Thomas Kwasi. “Collectivist Worldview: Its Challenge to International Relations.” In Africa and International Relations in the Twenty-First Century, edited by Fantu Cheru, Timothy Shaw, and Scarlett Cornelissen, 36-50. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.
• ———. “Solidarity Intervention: Emerging Trends in AU’s Interventions in African Crisis.” Speaking notes for the workshop on Africa International: Agency and Interdependency in a Changing World, Chatham House, London, UK, October 9, 2009.
• Vale, Peter. “International Relations in Post‐apartheid South Africa: Some Anniversary Questions.” Politikon 31, no. 2 (November 1, 2004): 239-49. doi:10.1080/0258934042000280751.
• van der Westhuizen, Janis. "South Africa's Emergence as a Middle Power." Third World Quarterly 19, no. 3 (1998): 435-55.