Forcing Democracy: Is Military Intervention for Regime Change Permissible?

Forcing Democracy: Is Military Intervention for Regime Change Permissible?

This article intends to go beyond the consequentialist utilitarian approaches to forcible regime change by addressing the question of forcing democracy-building from an angle of appropriateness. It aims to analyze the admissibility of pro-democratic military interventions in international society by focusing on the UN and state practice. Is military intervention to remove a tyrannical regime permissible in international law? To what extend does international society condone an outside force to impose a democratic regime? Does the practice of the UN Security Council in promotion of democracy by force point to an emerging norm with regards to expansive concept of humanitarian intervention? To analyze such questions, this article first provides for a discussion of the concept of intervention. Second, it overviews the normative framework of the use of force in international relations. It continues with the analysis of unilateral and multilateral pro-democratic military interventions, and the UN Security Council practice of condemning, authorizing or consequently endorsing democratic regime change in the target states. In the conclusion part, the article assesses the legality and legitimacy issue regarding the pro-democratic intervention and regime change in light of main norms enshrined in the UN Charter and in general international law.

___

  • Arend, Anthony Clark, and Robert J. Beck. International Law and the Use of Force, Beyond the UN Charter Paradigm. London: Routledge, 1993.
  • Beloff, Max. “Reflections on Intervention.” Journal of International Affairs 22 (1968): 198-207.
  • Brownlie, Ian. International Law and the Use of Force by States. London: Oxford Univer- sity Press, 1963.
  • Boutros-Ghali, Boutros. An Agenda for Democratization. New York: United Nations, 1996.
  • Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, and George W. Downs. “Intervention and Democracy.” In- ternational Organization 60 (2003): 627-649.
  • Bull, Hedley. “Introduction.” In Intervention in World Politics, edited by Hedley Bull, 1-6. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984.
  • Byers, Michael, and Simon Chesterman. “‘You the People’: Pro-Democratic Intervention in International Law.” In Democratic Governance and International Law, edited by Gregory H. Fox and Brad R. Roth, 259-92. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
  • Cassese, Antonio. International Law in a Divided World. New York: Oxford University Press, 1994.
  • Çelik, Edip. Milletlerarası Hukuk (International Law). İstanbul: Filiz Kitabevi, 1982.
  • D’Amato, Anthony. “The Invasion of Panama was a Lawful Response to Tyranny.” Ameri- can Journal of International Law 84 (1990): 516-24.
  • Davidson, Scott. Grenada: A Study in Politics and the Limits of International Law. Alder- shot, England: Avebury, 1987.
  • Farer, Tom J. “Panama: Beyond The Charter Paradigm.” American Journal of Internati- onal Law 84 (1990): 503-15.
  • Forstyhe, David P. “Democracy, War, and Covert Action.” Journal of Peace Research 29 (1992): 385-95.
  • Franck, Thomas. “The Emerging Right of Democratic Governance.” American Journal of International Law 86 (1992): 46-91.
  • Fukuyama, Francis. “The End of History?.” The National Interest (1989): 3-18.
  • Hermann, Margaret G. and Charles W. Kegley. “The US Use of Force to Promote Democracy: Evaluating the Record.” International Interactions 24 (1998): 91-114.
  • ICJ Reports, Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. United States of America), Merits, 1986.
  • Kegley, Charles W. Jr., and Margaret H. Hermann. “Putting Military Intervention into the Democratic Peace: A research Note.” Comparative Political Studies 30 (1997): 78-107.
  • Kelsen, Hans. The Law of the United Nations. London: Stevens & Sons Limited, 1951.
  • Lauterpacht, Hersch, ed. Lassa Francis Lawrence Hersch Oppenheim, International Law: A Treatise Vol. I. London: Longmans, Green & Co., 1955.
  • Lowenthal, Abraham F., ed. Exporting Democracy: The United States and Latin America-Themes and Issues. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 1991.
  • McDougal, Myres S., and Florentino P. Feliciano, Law and Minimum World Public Order: The Legal Regulation of International Coercion. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1961.
  • Meernik, James. “United States Military Intervention and the Promotion of Democracy.” Journal of Peace Research 33 (1996): 391-402.
  • Nanda, Ved P. “The Validity of US Intervention in Panama under International Law,” American Journal of International Law 84 (1990): 494-503.
  • Pazarcı, Hüseyin. Uluslararası Hukuk Dersleri. Ankara: Turhan Kitabevi, 2000.
  • Reisman, Michael W. “Coercion and Self-Determination: Construing Charter Article 2 (4).” American Journal of International Law 78 (1984): 642-45.
  • Reisman, Michael W. “Sovereignty and Human Rights in Contemporary International Law.” American Journal of International Law 84 (1990): 866-76.
  • Reisman, Michael W. “Humanitarian Intervention and Fledgling Democracies.” Fordham International Law Journal 18 (1994): 794-805.
  • Rosenau, James N. “The Concept of Intervention.” Journal of International Affairs 22 (1968): 165-76.
  • Rosenau, James N. “Intervention as a Scientific Concept.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 23 (1969): 149-71.
  • Roth, Brad R. Governmental Illegitimacy in International Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1999.
  • Schachter, Oscar. “The Legality of Pro-Democratic Invasion.” American Journal of In- ternational Law 78 (1984): 645-650.
  • Schachter, Oscar. International Law in Theory and Practice. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1991.
  • Scheffer, David J. “Use of Force After the Cold War: Panama, Iraq, and the New World Order.” In Right v. Might - International Law the Use of Force, edited by Louis Henkin, Stanley Hoffman, Jeane J. Kirkpatrick, Allan Gerson, William D. Rogers, and David J. Scheffer, 109-158. New York: Council on Foreign Rela- tions,1991.
  • Shaw, Malcolm N. International Law. Cambridge: Grotius Publications Limited, 1991.
  • Simma, Bruno. ed. The Charter of the United Nations, A Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994.
  • Slaughter Burley, Anne-Marie, and Carl Kaysen. “Introductory Note: Emerging Norms of Justified Intervention.” In Emerging Norms of Justified Intervention, edited by Laura W. Reed and Carl Kaysen, 7-14. Cambridge, MA: American Aca- demy of Arts and Sciences, 1993.
  • Sloan, Blaine. United Nations General Assembly Resolutions In Our Changing World. New York: Transnational Publishers, Inc., 1991.
  • Teson, Fernando R. “Eight Principles of Humanitarian Intervention.” Journal of Military Ethics 5 (2006): 93-113. UN Charter
  • UN General Assembly, Resolution 375 (IV), Draft Declaration on the Rights and Duties of States, 6 December 1949.
  • UN General Assembly Resolution 380 (V), Peace Through Deeds, 17 November 1950.
  • UN General Assembly, Resolution 1236 (XII), Peaceful and Neighbourly Relations Among States, 14 December 1957.
  • UN General Assembly, Resolution 2131 (XX), Declaration on the Inadmissibility of Inter- vention in the Domestic Affairs of States and the Protection of Their Indepen- dence and Sovereignty, 21 December 1965.
  • UN General Assembly, Resolution 2625 (XXV), Declaration on Principles of Interna- tional Law Concerning Friendly Relations and Cooperation among States in ac- cordance with Charter of the United Nations, 24 October 1970.
  • UN General Assembly, Resolution 2734 (XXV), Declaration on the Strengthening of International Security, 16 December 1970.
  • UN General Assembly, Resolution 36/103, Declaration on the Inadmissibility of Inter- vention and Interference in the Internal Affairs of the States, 9 December 1981.
  • UN General Assembly, Resolution 34/103, Inadmissibility of the Policy of Hegemonism in International Relations, 14 December 1979.
  • UN General Assembly, Resolution 37/10, Manila Declaration on the Peaceful Settlement of International Disputes, 15 November 1982.
  • UN Doc. S/PV.2489, 26 October 1983.
  • UN Doc. S/16077/Rev.1, 27 October 1983.
  • UN Doc. S/PV.2491, 28 October 1983.
  • UN Doc. A/RES/38/7, 2 November 1983
  • UN Doc. S/PV.2899, 20 December 1989.
  • UN Doc. S/21048, 22 December 1989.
  • UN Doc. A/RES/44/ 240, 29 December 1989.
  • UN Doc. S/RES/841, 16 June 1993.
  • UN Doc. S/RES/940, 31 July 1994.
  • UN Doc. S/RES/1132, 8 October 1997.
  • UN Doc. S/PRST/1998/5, 26 February 1998.
  • UN Doc. S/RES/1156, 16 March 1998.
  • UN Doc. S/RES/1181, 13 July 1998.
  • UN Doc. S/RES/1368, 12 September 2001.
  • UN Doc. S/RES/1378, 14 November 2001.
  • UN Doc. S/RES/1511, 16 October 2003.
  • UN Doc. S/RES/1546, 8 June 2004.
  • UN Doc. A/59/565. United Nations Report of the Secretary-General’s High-level Panel on Threats, Challenges and Change. A More Secure World: Our Shared Respon sibility, 4 December 2004.
  • UN Doc. S/RES/1973, 17 March 2011.
  • United Nations Yearbook, New York: United Nations, 1965.
  • United Nations Yearbook, New York: United Nations, 1983.
  • “Security Council Debates,” Keesing’s 11, July 1965. Accessed June 2011, http://www.kees ings.com.
  • “Removal of Mr.Bishop – Establishment of Revolutionary Military Council – Reactions from other Caribbean States,” Keesing’s 30, January 1984. Accessed June 2011, http://www.keesings.com.
  • “US Justification for Intervention,” Keesing’s 35, December 1989. Accessed June 2011, http://www.keesings.com.
  • “US Invasion and Installation of Endara Government,” Keesing’s 35, December 1989. Accessed July 2011, http://www.keesings.com.
  • “Inauguration of President Endara – Confirmation of Election Results,” Keesing’s 35, December 1989. Accessed July 2011, http://www.keesings.com.
  • “International Reactions to Invasion,” Keesing’s 35, December 1989. Accessed July 2011, http://www.keesings.com.
  • “Obama Says ‘Qaddafi Has A Choice’ or UN Force Will Take Military Action,” RFE/RL, 18 March 2011. Accessed September 30, 2011, http://www.rferl.org/content/ libya_no-fly_zone_united_nations_france_britain/2342541.html.