Chinese Concepts and Relational International Politics

The rise of China troubles the taken-for-granted epistemological and ontological

___

  • Acharya, Amitav. “Ethnocentrism and Emanipatory IR Theory.” In (Dis)Placing Security: Critical Re-evaluations of the Boundaries of Security Studies, edited by S. Arnold and J.M. Beier, 1-18. Toronto, ON: Centre for International and Security Studies, 2000.
  • Alston, Jon P. “Wa, Guanxi, and Inhwa: Managerial Principles in Japan, China, and Korea.” Business Horizons 32, no. 2 (1989): 26-31.
  • Avelino, Flor, and Jan Rotmans. “Power in Transition: An Interdisciplinary Frameowrk to Study Power in Relation to Structural Change.” European Journal of Social Theory 12, no. 4 (2009): 543-69.
  • Barbalet, Jack. “Guanxi, Tie Strength, and Network Attributes.” American Behavioural Scientist 59, no. 8 (2015): 1038-50.
  • ———. “Market Relations as wuwei: Traditional Concepts in the Analysis of China’s Post-1978 Economy.” Asian Studies Review 35, no. 3 (2011): 335-54.
  • Barkin, J. Samuel. Realist Constructivism: Rethinking International Relations Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010).
  • Bell, Duran. “Guanxi: A Nesting of Groups.” Current Anthropology 41, no. 1 (2000): 132-8.
  • Bilgin, Pinar. “Thinking Past Western IR.” Third World Quarterly 29, no. 1 (2008): 5-23.
  • Bin, Yu. “China and Russia: Normalizing Their Relationship.” In Power Shift: China and Asia’s New Dynamics, edited by David Shambaugh, 228-47. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2005.
  • Carlson, Allen. “Moving Beyond Sovereignty? A Brief Consideration of Recent Changes in China’s Approach to International Order and the Emergence of the Tianxia Concept.” Journal of Contemporary China 20, no. 68 (2010): 89-102.
  • Chang, Hui-Ching, and G. Richard Holt. “The Concept of Yuan and Chinese Interpersonal Relationships.” In Cross-Cultural Interpersonal Communication, edited by Stella Ting-Toomey and Felipe Corzenny, 28-57. London:Sage, 1991.
  • Chen, Ching-Chang. “The Absence of Non-Western IR Theory in Asia Reconsidered.” International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 11, no. 1 (2011): 1-23.
  • Chong, Melody P.M., Ping Ping Fu, and Yu Fan Shang. “Relational Power and Influence Strategies: A Step Further in Understanding Power Dynamics.” Chinese Management Studies 7, no. 1 (2013): 53-73.
  • Chow, Rey. “Violence in the Other Country: China as Crisis, Spectacle, and Woman.” In Third World Women and the Politics of Feminism, edited by Ann Russo, Lourdes Torres, and Chandra Talpade Monaty, 80-100. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1991.
  • Chowdhry, C. and S.M. Rai. “The Geographies of Exclusion and the Politics of Exclusion: Race-based Exclusions in the Teaching of International Relations.” International Studies Perspectives 10, no. 1 (2009): 84-91.
  • Coles, Romand. Visionary Pragmatism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2016.
  • Contessi, Nicola P. “Foreign and Security Policy Diversification in Eurasia: Issue Splitting, Co-alignment, and Relational Power.” Problems of Post-Communism 62, no. 5 (2015): 299-315.
  • DeGlopper, Donald R. Lukang: Commerce and Community in a Chinese City. Albany, NY: SUNY Press, 1995.
  • Farh, Jiing-Lih, Anne S. Tsui, Katherine Xin, and Bor-Shiuan Cheng. “The Influence of Relational Demography and Guanxi: The Chinese Case.” Organization Science 9, no. 4 (1998): 471-88.
  • Foucault, Michel. The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. London: Routledge, 2002.
  • Gao, Yanli. “China’s World View and World Historical Studies.” Dimensioni e problemi della ricerca storica 20, no. 1(2008): 255-68.
  • Gilpin, Robert. War and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.
  • Gold, Thomas, Dong Ghine, and David L. Wank. Social Connections in China: Institutions, Culture, and the Nature of Guanxi. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
  • Hammond, Scott C., and Lowell M. Glenn. “The Ancient Practice of Chinese Social Networking: Guanxi and Social Network Theory.” E:CO 6, no. 1/2 (2004): 24-31.
  • Heffner, Lanette. Inside the Dragon’s Briefcase: China’s Emergent Economy. San Antonio, TX: University of Texas,2008.
  • Heng, Yee-Kuang. “Ghosts in the Machine: Is IR Eternally Haunted by the Spectre of Old Concepts.” International Relations 47, no. 5 (2010): 535-56.
  • Ho, David Y.F. “On the Concept of Face.” American Journal of Sociology 81, no. 4 (1976): 867-84.
  • ———. “Selfhood and Identity in Confucianism, Taoism, Buddhism, and Hinduism: Contrasts with the West.”Journal of the Theory of Social Behaviour 25, no. 2 (1995): 115-39.
  • Hückel, Bettina. “Theory of International Relations with Chinese Characteristics: The Tianxia System from a Metatheoretical Perspective.” Diskurs 8, no. 2 (2012): 34-64.
  • Hwang, Kwang-kuo. “Face and Favour: The Chinese Power Game.” American Journal of Sociology 92, no. 4 (1987): 944-74.
  • Jia, Wenshan. “An Intercultural Communication Model of International Relations: The Case of China.” In Challenges to Chinese Foreign Policy: Diplomacy, Globalization, and the Next World Power, edited by Yufan Hao, C.X. George Wei, and Lowell Dittmer, 319-34. Lexington, KY: University Press of Kentucky, 2009.
  • ———. “The Wei (Positioning)–Ming (Naming)–Lianmian (Face)–Guanxi (Relationship)–Renqing (Humanized Feelings)–Complex in Contemporary Chinese Culture.” In Confucian Cultures of Authority, edited by Peter H.Hershock and Roger T. Ames, 49-64. Albany, NY: SUNY Press, 2006.
  • Kavalski, Emilian. Central Asia and the Rise of Normative Powers: Contextualzing the Security Governance of the European Union, China, and India. New York: Bloomsbury, 2012.
  • ———. The Guanxi of Relational International Theory. London: Routledge, 2017.
  • ———. “More of the Same: An Unpredictable Trump Foreign Policy in an Unpredictable Central Asia.” Monde Chinois 4, no. 48 (2016): 112-17.
  • Qin, Yaqing. “Relationality and Processual Construction: Bringing Chinese Ideas into International Relations Theory.” Social Sciences in China 30, no. 3 (2009): 5-20.
  • ———. “Why Is There No Chinese International Theory.” International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 7, no. 3 (2007): 313-40.
  • Risse, Thomas. “‘Let’s Argue’: Communicative Action in World Politics.” International Organization 54, no. 1 (2000): 1-39.
  • Rosemont, Henry. “Two Loci of Authority: Autonomous Individuals and Related Persons.” In Confucian Cultures of Authority, edited by P.H. Hershock and R.T. Ames, 1-20. Albany, NY: SUNY Press, 2006.
  • Russell, Roberto, and Juan Gabriel Tokatlian. “From Antagonistic Autonomy to Relational Autonomy: A Theoretical Reflection from the Southern Cone.” Latin American Politics and Society 45, no. 1 (2003): 1-24.
  • Schwartz, Benjamin I. “The Maoist Image of World Order.” Journal of International Affairs 21, no. 1 (1967): 92- 102.
  • Shih, Chih-yu. “Transcending Hegemonic International Relations Theorization: Nothingness, Re-Worlding, and Balance of Relationship.” All Azimuth 6, no. 2 (2017): 19-42.
  • Shimizu, Kosuke. “Materializing the Non-Western.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 28, no. 1 (2015): 3-20.
  • Swain, Margaret Byrne. Chinese Cosmopolitanism [Tianxia He Shijiie Zhuyi]. In Cultural Heritage Politics in China, edited by Tami Blumenfield and Helaine Silverman, 33-50. New York: Springer, 2013.
  • Tong, Shijun. “Chinese Thought and Dialogical Universalism.” In Europe and Asia beyond East and West, edited by Gerard Delanty, 305-15. London: Routledge, 2006.
  • Tsui, Anne S., and Jiing-Lih Larry Farh. “Where Guanxi Matters: Relational Demography and Guanxi in the Chinese Context.” Work and Occupations 24, no. 1 (1997): 56-79.
  • Tu, Wei-ming. Confucian Thought: Selfhood as Creative Transformation. Albany, NY: SUNY Press, 1985.
  • Uemura, Takeshi. “Understanding Chinese Foreign Relations: A Cultural Constructivist Approach.” International Studies Perspectives 16, no. 3 (2015): 345-65.
  • Vucetic, Srdjan. The Anglosphere: A Genealogy of Racialized Identity in International Relations. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2011.
  • Wen, Haiming, and Wang Hang. “Confucian Cultural Psychology and Its Contextually Creative Intentionality.” Culture & Psychology 19, no. 2 (2013): 184-202.
  • Wolfers, Arnold. Discord and Collaboration. Baltimore, NJ: The John Hopkins University Press, 1962.
  • Womack, Brantly. “China as a Normative Foreign Policy Actor.” In Who is a Normative Foreign Policy Actor?, edited by Nathalie Tocci, 265-98. Brussels: Center for European Policy Studies, 2008.
  • Yang, K.S., and David Y.F. Ho. “The Role of Yuan in Chinese Social Life: A Conceptual and Empirical Analysis.” In Asian Contributions to Psychology, edited by Anand C. Paranjpe, David Y.F. Ho, and Robert W. Rieber, 263-81. New York: Praeger, 1988.
  • Yang, Mayfair Mei-hui. Gifts, Favors, and Banquets: The Art of Social Relationships in China. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1994.
  • ———. “The Resilience of Guanxi and New Deployments: A Critique of Sone New Guanxi Scholarship.” The China Quarterly 42, no. 170 (2002): 459-76.
  • Yeung, Irene Y.M., and Rosalie L. Tung. “Achieving Success in Confucian Societies: The Importance of Guanxi (Connections).” Organizational Dynamics 25, no. 2 (1996): 54-65.
  • Yue, Ricky Wai-kay. “Beyond Dependency: The Promise of Confucianism in Post-Westphalia International Relations.” Bandung: Journal of the Global South 2, no. 4 (2015): 1-17.
  • Zhang, Feng. “Confucian Foreign Policy Traditions in Chinese History.” The Chinese Journal of International Politics 8, no. 2 (2015): 197-218.