Sergen koşullarda aşılı crimson tide çeşidi karpuzlarda kalite parametrelerindeki değişimler

Bu çalışmada; Ferro, RS841, Agentario ve Macis anaçları üzerinde aşılı yetiştirilen Crimson Tide karpuz çeşidinin sergen koşullarda 2009 -2010 yıllarında derim sonrası kalitesini belirlemek amaçlanmıştır. Aşılanmamış Crimson Tide çeşid i meyveleri kontrol olarak kullanılmıştır. Ülkemizde yaygın olarak kullanılan sergen koşullarında derimden sonra meyveler 27 ° C’de %50±5 oransal nem koşullarında 7 gün depolanmıştır. Meyve örneklerinde; meyve kabuk kalınlığı (mm), ağırlık kayıpları oranı (% ), suda çözünebilir toplam kuru madde içeriği ( SÇKM, %), meyve eti sertliği (MES, kg- k), titre edilebilir asitlik (TEA, %), meyve suyu pH’sı, meyve et rengi (L* a* b*) , mantarsal bozulmalar (%), fruktoz, g likoz, s akkaroz ve toplam şeker içerikleri (%) ile β -karoten, toplam likopen ve toplam karotenoid içerikleri (µg/g ) ile meyvelerin tat durumunu belirlemek için duyusal analizler (1 -9) gibi fiziksel ve kimyasal parametrelerde meydana gelen değişimler incelenmiştir. Bulgularımıza göre, sergen koşullarda Crimson Tide karpuz çeşidinde mantarsal bozulma görülmemiştir. S ergen koşulunda aşılı ve aşısız Crimson Tide karpuz çeşidi meyvelerinde hakim şekerin sakkaroz (ortalama %3 .76 -5 .58) olduğu saptanmıştır. Ağırlık kayıpları, SÇKM, meyve et rengi a* ve b* değerleri ve sakkaroz içeriği artarken, meyve kabuk kalınlığı, MES, TEA, fruktoz, g likoz ve toplam şeker, toplam likopen ve toplam karotenoid içerikleri, meyve et rengi L* değeri ve duyusal tat azalmıştır.

Changes in the quality parameters of grafted crimson tide watermelon cultivar in common marketing condition

The objective of this study is to determine the postharvest quality of Crimson Tide watermelon cultivar grafted on Ferro, RS841, Age ntario and Macis rootstocks in c ommon marketing condition in 2009 -2010 years. Ungrafted Crimson Tide cultivar was used as control. Fruits were also kept at 27 ° C and 50±5% relative humidity for 7 days which is a common marketing condition for watermelons in Turkey after harvest. Changes in physical and chemical parameters such as fruit rind thickness (mm), percent weight loss (%), total soluble solid content (TSS, %), fruit flesh firmness (FFF, kg- k), titratable acidity ( TA, %), pH, fruit flesh color (L* a* b*), incidence of fungal decay, fructose, g lucose, sucrose and total sugar contents (%) and β -carotene, total lycopene and total carotenoid contents (µg/g ) and s ensory evaluation for taste were determined immediately after harvest, after 7 days during the c ommon marketing condition . According to data, fungal disorders were not seen during the c ommon marketing condition. Sucrose (3.76 to 5.58% on average) of dominant sugar was determined in g rafted and ungrafted Crimson Tide watermelon cultivar during the c ommon marketing condition. Weight loss, TSS, a* and b* value of fruit flesh color and sucrose contents increased while rind thickness, FFF, TA, fructose, g lucose and total sugar, total lycopene and total carotenoid contents , L* value of fruit flesh color and sensory taste decreased during the c ommon marketing condition.

___

  • Bruton, B.D., Fish, W.W., Roberts, W., Popham, T.W., 2009. The influence of rootstock selection on fruit quality attributes of watermelon. The Open Food Science Journal, 3: 15- 34.
  • Chisholm, D.N., Picha, D.H., 1986. Effect of storage on sugar and organic acid contents of watermelons, HortScience, 21, 1031 – 1033.
  • Colla, G., Roupahel, Y., Cardarelli, M., Rea, E., 2006. Effect of Salinity on Yield, Fruit Quality, Leaf Gas Exchange, and Mineral Composition of Grafted W atermelon Plants, HortScience, 41, 622 -627.
  • Corey, K. A., Schlimme, D.V. , 1988. Relationship of Rind Gloss and Groundspot Color to Flesh Quality of Watermelon Fruits during Maturation, Sci. Hortic., 3 4, 211 - 21 8.
  • Cushman, K.E., Huan, J., 2008. Performance of Four Triploid W atermelon Cultivars Grafted onto Five Rootstock Genotypes: Yield and Fruit Quality under Commercial Growing Conditions, Acta Horticulturae, 782, 335 -3 41.
  • Çandır, E., Yetişir, H., 2010. Farklı Su Kabağı Anaçlarının Karpuzun Şeker, Organik Asit ve Karotenoid İçeriğine Etkileri, (BAPKB Projesi Sonuç Raporu), Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi , 12s.
  • Davis, A.R., Perkins - Veazie, P., 2005. Rootstock Effects on Plant Vigor and Watermelon Fruit Quality, Cucurbit Genetics Cooperative, 28/29, 39- 42.
  • Davis, A., Perkins - Veazie, P., Levi, A., King, S., Zhang, X., 2008. Grafting effects on vegetable quality. HortScience, 43:1670 -1672.
  • Elkashif, M., Huber, D.J., Brecht, J.K., 1989. Respiration and Ethylene Pr oduction in Harvested Watermelon Fruit: Evidence for Nonclimacteric Respiratory Behavior, J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci., 114, 81 -8 5.
  • E mam, M.S. , İbrahim, M.A. , 2005. Impact of Irrigation Levels on Watermelon Fruits Yield and Postharvest Quality under Polyethylene Low Tunnels Cultivation, Journal of Productivity and Development, 10, 1, 97 -112.
  • FAO, 2014. FAO Statistical Database, www.fao.org. com
  • F ish, W.W., Perkins -Veazie, P., Collins, J.K., 2002. A Quantitative Assay for Lycopene That Utilizes Reduced Volumes of Organic Solvents, J. Food Composition and Analysis, 15, 309 -3 17.
  • Karakurt, Y., Huber, D.J., 2004. Ethylene- induced gene expression, enzyme ectivities, and water soaking in immature and ripe watermelon ( Citrullus lanatus ) Fruit, J Plant Physiol., 161, 381 - 38 8.
  • Koren, A., Edelstein, M., 2004. Advantages. and limitations of grafted vegetable transplants in Israel. (Abstr.) HortScience 39: 873 .
  • Lee, J. M., 1994. Cultivation of grafted vegetables I. Current status, grafting methods and benefits. HortScience, 29(4): 235 -239.
  • McGuire, R.G., 1992. Reporting of objective colour measurement. HortScience, 27: 1254- 1255. Motsenbocker, C.E., Picha, D.H. , 1996. Quality parameters of triploid watermelons. Journal of Vegetable Production 2:3 -14.
  • Oda, M.,1995. New grafting methods for fruit–bearing vegetables in Japan. JARQ, 29: 187 - 198.
  • Özdemir, A.E., Yetişir, H., Çandır, E., Aras, V., Arslan, Ö., 2011. Kar puzlarda Aşılı Üretimin Derim Sonrası Kaliteye ve Raf Ömrüne Etkileri. TÜBİTAK 108 O 391 nolu Proje Sonuç Raporu, Antakya/Hatay, 126 s.
  • Özdemir, A.E., H., Yetişir, E., Çandır, V., Aras, Ö., Aslan, D., Üstün, M., Ünlü, 2014. Sergen Koşullarda Aşılı Crisby Ç eşidi Karpuzlarda Kalite Parametrelerindeki Değişimler. VI. Bahçe Ürünlerinde Muhafaza ve Pazarlama Sempozyumu, 22 - 25 Eylül 2014, Bursa, (Basımda).
  • Perkins -Veazie, P., Collins, J. K., Pair, S.D., Roberts, W., 2001. Lycopene content differs among red- fleshed watermelon cultivars. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 81:983- 987.
  • Perkins -Veazie, P., Collins, J.K., 2003. Watermelon Lycopene Degrades After Low Temperature Storage [Abstract], HortScience, 38, 817.
  • Perkins -Veazie, P., Collins, J.K., 2006. Carotenoid Changes of Intact Watermelons After Storage, J. Agric. Food. Chem., 54, 5868- 5874.
  • Perkins -Veazie, P. 2007. Carotenoids in watermelon and mango. Acta Horticulturae, 746: 259 - 264 . Proietti, S., Rouphael, Y., Colla, G., Cardarelli, M., De Agazio, M., Zacchini, M., Rea, E., Moscatello, S., Battistelli, A., 2008. Fruit quality of mini - watermelon as affected by grafting and irrigation regimes. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 88:1107 –1114. Radulović, M., Ban, D., Sladonja, B., Lus etić-Bursić, V., 2007. Changes of Quality Parameters in Watermelon during Storage, Acta Hort. (ISHS), 731, 451 -456.
  • Roberts, W., Bruton, B.D., Popham, T.W. , Fish, W.W., 2005. Improving the quality of fresh- cut watermelon through grafting and rootstock selection. (Abstr.) HortScience, 40: 871.
  • Sadler, G.O., 1994. Titratable Acidity, Chapter 6 (Ed: Nielsen SS. Introduction to the Chemical Analysis of Foods),. Jones and Bartlett Publishers, Borton, USA, 81 – 91.
  • Suslow, T.V., 2014. Watermelon, Recommendations for Maintaining Postharvest Quality . http://rics. ucdavis.edu/postharvest2/Produce/ProduceFacts/Fruit/watermelon.shtml . TÜİK, 2014. Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu, http://www.tuik.gov.tr.
  • Yetisir, H. , Sarı, N., 2003. Effect of different rootstock on plant growth, yield and quality of watermelon. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 43:1269 – 1274.
  • Yetişir, H., Sarı, N., Yücel, S., 2003. Rootstock Resistance to Fusarium Wilt and Effect on Watermelon Fruit Yield and Quality, Phytoparsitica, 31, 2, 163 -169.
  • Vural, H., Eşiyok, D., Duman, İ., 2000. Kültür Sebzeleri (Sebze Yetiştirme), Ege Ünv. Basımevi, Bornova, İzmir, 440 s.